C0306 S02 Ecb RP 30037 Ac PDF

Responsible Division Responsible Discipline Document Type Document Status
C0306 Structures-Bridges Report General Issued for Approval
ETIHAD RAIL STAGE 2 PROJECT

C0306 - PACKAGE 2C
Design & Build Contract (Dubai)
DCP3 Design Report – Superstructure – DMB/JBL – DMB
72 to 73 and JBL 0 to 3 – Underbridge at 1+971
Rakesh Chowdhury
Prepared Associate Director -Structures Team 10-NOV-2020
Leader/ WSP
Xu Yue
Verified 10-NOV-2020
Technical Director / CRGT
Ubaidullah Khan
Quality Process Approval 10-NOV-2020
Project QA/QC Manager / CRGT
Sun Shangxing
Approved 10-NOV-2020
Project Director / CRGT
Name Signature Date
Document Number Issued Date 10-NOV-2020
Location/
Contract No. - - Discipline - Type - Sequence Number - Revision
Subdivision
C 0 3 0 6 - S 0 2 - E C B - R P - 3 0 0 3 7 - A C
This document including its attachments is the property of Etihad Rail. It contains confidential proprietary information and may be legally privilege. The
reproduction, distribution, utilization or communication of this document, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited unless expressly permitted by Etihad Rail.
UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE, THIS PRINTED COPY OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNCONTROLLED AND FOR REFERENCE PURPOSE ONLY
C0306-S02-ECB-RP-30037-AC PAGE 1 OF 22
Version Log - Internal
Version Date Name Description of Review Changes

AA1 01-JUN-2020 Rakesh Chowdhury Preparer
AA2 01-JUN-2020 Xu Yue Verifier
AB1 29-AUG-2020 Rakesh Chowdhury Preparer
AB2 29-AUG-2020 Xu Yue Verifier
AC1 10-NOV-2020 Rakesh Chowdhury Preparer
AC2 10-NOV-2020 Xu Yue Verifier
Revision Log – To Client
Revision Date Description of Changes

AA 01-JUN-2020 First Release
AB 29-AUG-2020 Second Release
AC 10-NOV-2020 Third Release
This document including its attachments is the property of Etihad Rail. It contains confidential proprietary information and may be legally privilege. The
reproduction, distribution, utilization or communication of this document, or any part thereof, is strictly prohibited unless expressly permitted by Etihad Rail.
DCP3 DESIGN REPORT –
SUPERSTRUCTURE – DMB/JBL – DMB
72 TO 73 AND JBL 0 TO 3 –
UNDERBRIDGE AT 1+971
Table of Contents
Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 4
1 Reference Documents ................................................................................................................ 5
2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6
2.1 Intent of this Design Report ............................................................................................ 7
2.2 Existing Condition........................................................................................................... 7
2.3 Description of Rail Network ............................................................................................ 8
2.4 Outline Scope ................................................................................................................. 9
2.5 Engineering Disciplines ................................................................................................... 9
3 Review of Existing Data ............................................................................................................ 10
4 Topographic and Geotechnical Surveys .................................................................................... 11
4.1 Topographic Surveys .................................................................................................... 11
4.2 Geotechnical Investigations .......................................................................................... 11
5 Stakeholder Engagement ......................................................................................................... 12
6 Design Development for the DCP Stage ................................................................................... 13
6.1 Design Basis Report ...................................................................................................... 13
6.2 Design Update from DCP2 ............................................................................................ 13
7 Structure Details ...................................................................................................................... 14
7.1 Underbridge JBL CH: 1+971 .......................................................................................... 14
8 Interface Management............................................................................................................. 15
9 Risk and Opportunity ............................................................................................................... 16
10 Next Steps ................................................................................................................................ 17
11 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 18
Appendices
Appendix A Design Calculations
Appendix B Risk Register
Appendix C List of Drawings
Tables
Table 1: Reference Documents
Table 2: Package 2C Design Packaging
Table 3: Risk and Opportunities
Figures
Figure 1: Project Layout
Figure 2: Package 2C Layout
Figure 3: Midas Model Snap
Figure 4: Plan
Figure 5: Elevation
Acronyms and Abbreviations

Please find below the list of acronyms or abbreviations used in this document, and their definitions:
AASHTO American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials
BS British Standards
BS EN British European Standards Specifications
CAD Computer Aided Design
DBR Design Basis Report
DC Document Control
DCP Design Control Point
DSR Document Submittal Register
DM Dubai Municipality
EPFM Electronic Plant and Facilities Management
ER Etihad Rail Company PJSC
ERS Etihad Rail Standard
GCC Gulf Cooperation Council
ICE Independent Checking Engineer
ISA Independent Safety Assessor
JV Joint Venture of China Railway Construction Corporation and Ghantoot Contracting
MSE Mechanically Stabilised Earth
NADD New Abu Dhabi Datum
NOC No Objection Certificate
PMC Project Management Consultant
PEP Project Execution Plan
QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Compliance
RAMS Reliability Availability Maintainability Safe
RTA Road & Transport Authority, Dubai
ROW Right of Way
TDM Technical Design Manual
TMP Transport Master Plan
TTM Temporary Traffic Management
UTM Universal Transverse Mercator
UAE United Arab Emirates
WGS World Grid System
1 Reference Documents
The following inputs from the Contract have been considered in the development of this Design Report as
below but not limited to:
Table 1: Reference Documents
Ref. Document Title Document Number Date

No
[1] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 3 C0306-S02-GDM-FS-00001-01 09 December 2018
[2] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 4 Annex B C0306-S02-GEI-FS-00003-04 01 April 2019
[3] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 5 C0306-S02-GER-PQ-00001-03 13 March 2019
[4] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 5 Annex 1 C0306-S02-GER-PQ-00002-03 13 March 2019
[5] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 5 Annex 2 C0306-S02-GER-PQ-00003-03 13 March 2019
[6] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 6 C0306-S02-GCM-PQ-00001-01 09 December 2018
[7] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 8 C0306-S02-EGE-FS-00003-04 13 May 2019
[8] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 11 C0306-S02-GPC-FS-00001-04 07 May 2019
[9] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 13 C0306-S02-GQA-FS-00001-01 09 December 2018
[10] Exhibit D2-1 Technical Specification X0231-UAE-GDM-PO-00002-00 29 May 2019

CAD Standards Manual
[11] Interface Management Plan C0306-S02-GEI-PL-00001-00 20 October 2019
[12] Quality Plan C0306-S02-GQA-PL-00001-00 31 October 2019
[13] Document Management Plan C0306-S02-GDM-PL-0000-00 31 October 2019
[14] Stakeholder Management Plan C0306-S02-GEI-PL-00002-AC 30 October 2019
[15] Configuration Management Plan C0306-S02-GCM-PL-00001-00 03 November 2019
[16] Requirements Management Plan C0306-S02-GCM-PL-00002-00 28 October 2019
[17] System RAM Plan C0306-S02-GER-PL-00001-AC 28 October 2019
[18] System Safety Management Plan C0306-S02-GER-PL-00002-AB 28 October 2019
[19] Design Basis Report – Road & Highways C0306-S02-ECH-RP-00001-00 31 October 2019
[20] Design Basis Report – Bridges & Railway Structure C0306-S02-ECB-RP-00001-AB 20 October 2019
[21] Design Basis Report – Geotechnical & Earthwork C0306-S02-EBB-RP-00001-AB 13 November 2019
[22] Design Basis Report – Rail C0306-S02-ERA-RP-00001-AB 11 November 2019
[23] Design Basis Report – Utilities C0306-S02-EUT-RP-00001-00 28 October 2019
[24] Design Basis Report – Hydrology & Drainage C0306-S02-EBH-RP-00001-AC 30 October 2019
[25] Design Basis Report – Sand Mitigation C0306-S02-ELS-RP-00001-AB 14 November 2019
[26] Design Management Plan C0306-S02-GEM-PL-00002-00 31 October 2019
2 Introduction
The Overall Etihad Rail Network comprises a proposed railway network, which will link freight facilities and
passenger stations, and form a part of the planned Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) railway network. It will
run from the Saudi Arabian border at Ghweifat in the west, via or close to the cities of the Gulf coast, to the
Northern Emirates and the East coast. There will also be a line running from Abu Dhabi to Al Ain, with and
intended connection into the Sultanate of Oman, as well as an existing branch line to the gas facilities at
Shah and Habshan.
The Etihad Rail network is planned to be developed in four main stages as shown in Figure 1 below:
Stage 1: The Shah Habshan Ruwais rail line is currently under operation and is used for the transport of
sulphur from the gas fields at Shah and Habshan to an export facility at Ruwais;
Stage 2: (Sections A, B1, B2 and C) Extends the Stage 1 railway network to the border with Saudi Arabia as
well as to Khalifah Port, Jebel Ali Port and Oman Border.
Stage 3: (Sections A, B and C) Extends the railway to Port Saqr, Al Hamriyah, Al Hamra, Fujeirah as well as
connecting the quarries of the northern emirates
There is also Stage 4 proposed which is to add dedicated lines as well as passenger stations to the network.
The passenger network definition is at feasibility stage
This project and design report focuses on Stage 2C which extends through Dubai and connects to Stage 2B
and 2D. The network comprises of mainly at grade rail network with numerous highway crossings. The scope
of works includes all the rail network along with associated earthworks, bridges, roads, utility diversions,
environmental and geotechnical aspects.
Figure 1: Project Layout
2.1 Intent of this Design Report

This report is produced for the specific design package detailed in the title of this report. The intent of the
report is to give an overview of the DCP3 stage and the work carried out since DCP2.
For reference the packaging of the works is as shown below as a separate design report will be issued for
each area for consistency with the design drawings.
Table 2: Package 2C Design Packaging
Package Chainage/ Location
Package 1 DMB 1 - 47+140.319 to 59+000
Package 2 DMB 2 - 59+000 to 69+000
Package 3 DMB 3 - 69+000 to 72+000
Package 4 Delta Area - DMB 72+000 To End of DMB and JBL 0+000 To
3+000
Package 5 JBL 1 - 3+000 to 8+000
Package 6 JBL 2 - 8+000 to 11+150
Package 7A JBL 3 (A) - 11+150 to 14+000
Package 7B JBL 3 (B) - 14+000 to 17+600
Package 8 JBL 4 - 17+600 to End of JBL
Package 9 JBL 5 - JART
Package 10A DMC 1 (A) - 0+000 to 7+000
Package 10B DMC 1 (B) – 7+000 to 10+000
Package 11 DMC 2 - 10+000 to 20+000
Package 12 DMC 3 - 20+000 to 32+000
Package 13A DMC 4 (A) - 32+000 to 38+000
Package 13B DMC 4 (B) - 38+000 to End of DMC
2.2 Existing Condition

The Stage 2C network comprises three main alignments which are DMB, DMC and JBL. The alignments DMC
and DMB are mainly in open desert that has future developments planned. The JBL line connects the
DMB/DMC alignments with Jebel Ali port. This alignment has numerous interfaces with existing road
networks, interchanges and developments. The key interfaces are as follows:
• Jebel Ali Port
• E11, E311 and E611 Crossing RTA Corridors
• DEWA Overhead High Voltage Lines
• DIP Road Corridor which is currently under construction
• Desert Mainlines parallel to the E611
• Existing Utilities and Structure Interfaces
• The rail corridor proposed has a varying ROW width due to all these constraints
• Utility interfaces with roads are listed in Appendix D: Utility Interface Schedule
2.3 Description of Rail Network

As mentioned above the network within Package 2C consists the alignments below and the summary of
each section. Figure 2 below illustrate the Package 2C network.
Figure 2: Package 2C Layout

DMB consists of +/-26km of double track, with 14 turnouts and further alignment provisions for another 19
turnouts. The key interfaces within this part of the alignment are:
• the connection to Package 2B
• passive provision for Dubai South passenger station
• Various underpasses and bridge constructions (refer to appendices for overview)
DMC consists of +/-49km of double track, with 12 turnouts and further alignment provisions for another 23
turnouts. The key interfaces within this part of the alignment are:
• the connection to Package 2D
• 2 set off tracks with bufferstops
• Various underpasses and bridge constructions (refer to appendices for overview)
JBL consists of +/-19km of predominantly single track with 2 passing loops, with 5 turnouts and further
alignment provisions for another 6 turnouts. The key interfaces within this part of the alignment are:
• the connection to package Jebel Ali Rail Terminal
• Various underpasses and complex bridge constructions crossing major highways (refer to appendices
for overview)
2.4 Outline Scope

The scope of the services on the project are below and are covered in more detailed in the approved design
management plan:
• DCP 1 – Preliminary Design: 30% Design
• DCP 2 – In Process Design: 66% Design
• DCP 3 – Pre-Final Design: 95% Design (This Design Report)
• DCP 3F – Final Design: 100% Design with full approvals
• Stage Gate Reviews
• Gaining approvals of for the design.
• Geotechnical design and review of the Geotechnical Factual Report.
• Design Services During Construction, Shop Drawings and As Builts
2.5 Engineering Disciplines

The DCP3 submission of the C306 Project requires but not limited to, the following key engineering
disciplines:
• Rail Alignment and Track
• Geotechnical, Earthworks and Ground Improvement
• Sand Mitigation
• Utilities Diversions and Protection
• Structural Design - Bridges and Viaducts
• Drainage and Hydrology
• Roads and Highways
• Line Side Works
• Security
• Environmental
• Interfaces
• Systems Assurance
3 Review of Existing Data

Throughout the course of the project, WSP have carried out technical reviews of existing data. It is key to
note that the WSP design team were also the same team that developed the tender design for the JV and
there is a full history of the existing data. The key areas of focus have been:
• SLR Records to Identify the Authority Requirements – This has been supplemented by the issue of NOI
applications to all authorities at DCP1 stage. The received information is included in the DCP2 packages.
• Review of Existing Topographic Surveys – WSP have reviewed the existing topo surveys and
subsequently updated the design with the additional topo surveys
• Review of Existing Geotechnical Investigation – WSP have produced a gap analysis of the existing GI data
and subsequently produced an additional GI spec and drawings for the JV. The JV are in the process of
applying for borehole NOC
• NOC Conditions – WSP have reviewed the NOC conditions from the preliminary design to identify areas
of concern for future design development
• EIA Review – WSP have carried out an EIA review to facilitate production of the CEMP. This EIA review
has identified areas of the alignment that have impacts on design and construction. The CEMP has been
issued and preconstruction surveys are ongoing
• Interdisciplinary Reviews – WSP have carried out inter discipline reviews to ensure design clashes have
been adjusted and updated in the DCP2 submission. Priority being the structures interface with the rail
alignment to try to get confident with the vertical alignment
• ROW Assessment – Review of the horizontal alignment and current ROW and identify if clashes are
present with the existing ROW
• Meetings with authorities have occurred based on the NOI and the preliminary NOC
4 Topographic and Geotechnical Surveys

4.1 Topographic Surveys
The contractor carried out additional topographic surveys during September and October 2019. All of these
surveys are complete and survey reports and drawings have been issued by the JV for the development of
detailed design.
The updated topographic surveys are included within the DCP3 designs.
4.2 Geotechnical Investigations

The JV has engaged a contractor to carry out the additional GI and DCP3 design is based on the
interpretation of existing and new factual data. For details, respective geotechnical notes and reports to be
referred.
5 Stakeholder Engagement
The JV have appointed a dedicated stakeholder team for the project and with the designer WSP have already
applied for Information NOC from the relevant authorities
6 Design Development for the DCP Stage

This section of the report describes the specific design development through the DCP2 stage
6.1 Design Basis Report

Design Basis Report for Structures and Bridges has been prepared and issued to the Engineer in accordance
with the relevant authority standards and project requirements. This report is reviewed and approved by
the Engineer. This report includes the key technical standards and specifications that have been used for
the design
6.2 Design Update from DCP2

The design issued at DCP3 was the basis of the preliminary design with updated GA drawings.
Through the DCP1 to DCP3 stages, the following activities have been carried out:
• Structural GA Drawings updated with the refined rail alignment which includes the additional
topographic surveys and interpretation of additional GI Factual data.
• Workshops with the contractor to confirm constructability requirements and methods of construction
• Structural Modelling of the superstructure and substructure designs. The models are included in the
package for review with the detailed design calculations
• Coordination with the Geotech, utilities and roads team to ensure clashes with existing or future
authority assets are resolved
• Coordination with the Geotech team regarding existing ground condition parameters.
• For architectural elements like parapet and MSE wall patterns, latest version of Bridge Aesthetic Report
shall be referred.
• The proposed drainage system for the rail is covered in the crossing road package. Please refer Section
3.8 Drainage design Report (C0306-S02-ECH-RP-30006-AA-DCP3-Roads-JBL0).
7 Structure Details
7.1 Underbridge JBL CH: 1+971
Cross sections of UB at JBL CH: 1+971 contains single cell continuous box-girder. Sub-structure is formed on
pier supported on piles. Connection between super and sub structure is formed by bearings and monolithic
pier between span-2 and span-3. Abutment is formed on piled foundation with MSE wall provided to
support soil fill pressure behind the abutment.
Figure 3: Midas Model Snap
Figure 4: Plan
Figure 5: Elevation
8 Interface Management
As identified in Section 6 the main interfaces that have arose between DCP2 and DCP3 are the following:
• Existing Utilities Interface with the Structure – Existing Data all received and trial trenches data for the
majority of site have been obtained.
• Additional GI carried out at site – Final Factual Report and has been issued by JV and geotechnical
assessment is based on existing and additional data.
• Systems Contractor – Space provisions on the structures decks is confirmed
9 Risk and Opportunity

Table 3 below presents risks and opportunities identified during DCP3 stage.
Table 3: Risk and Opportunities
Risk / Opportunity Impact Action and Mitigation
- - -
10 Next Steps
The design for DCP3 will reflect the detailed design stage and will be the basis for the ultimate final design
for the construction drawings submission DCPF. The next stage of design submission (DCP3F) will include a
100% detailed design after obtained NOC from all concerned authorities.
The next steps of the design are as follows:
• Review the DCP3 package with the engineer and go through any comments on the models, calculation
report and drawings.
• Submission of the package to concerned authorities and independent checker to get the CAT-III check
certificate.
• Final detailed drawings for authority approvals with final structural sizes
11 Conclusion
The report is a summary of the works carried out between DCP2 and DCP3. This report also describes the
specific design standards and parameters that are used for structures in the development of the DCP3. For
the proposed designs, considerations have been given to the appropriate design criteria for different
categories of processes including constructability, environmental and sustainability issues.
All the elements of the proposed design elements in the DCP3 design are developed for the project’s
requirements in accordance with the relevant authority standards. All key interfaces have been identified
and have been reviewed in detail considering the discipline design requirements and these have also been
updated with the latest Information NOCs, existing conditions, latest topographical survey and any other
updated information.
The next steps through to DCP3F will be the full final designs and engagement for detailed design approvals
with the authorities.
Appendix A Design Calculations
C0306-S02-ECB-RP-30037-AB PAGE 19 OF 22
Project Job Ref.
Etihad Rail - Package 2C 37463520
Part of Structure Status
Under Bridge Rail Structure - Super-Str. Design JBL CH:1+971 DCP-3
Calculated by Date Checked by Date Sheet no Rev. no
YH May-20 FH May-20 D00
Ref. Calculations Output
UNDERBRIDGE AT JBL (CH:1+971)
SUPERSTRUCTURE DESIGN REPORT
Page 1 of 48
Project Job Ref.
Table of Contents
1 - Introduction
1.1 - Introduction
1.2 - Geometry
1.3 - Longitudinal Design
2 - Material
3 - Loads / Load Combinations

3.1 - Loads Calculation
3.2 - Load Combinations
4 - Analysis Model
4.1 - Idealization of Model
4.2 - Section Properties
4.3 - Prestressing Tendon Profile
4.4 - Elastic Shortening Losses
4.5 - Loads Application
5 - Analysis Result
5.1 - Bending Moment Diagrams
5.2 - Shear Force Diagrams
6 - Longitudinal Design of Deck

6.1 - Allowable Stress Limits
6.2 - Serviceability Limit State - Stress Check
6.3 - Deck Slab longitudinal Design-Ultimate Limit State
6.3.1 - Flexural Design
6.3.2 - Shear Design
7 - Diaphragm Design
8 - End Zone Design
9 - Bearing Schedule
10 - Deflection / Camber Details
11 - Miscellaneous Design Check

11.1 - Deflection Check
11.2 - Dynamic Analysis Requirement Check
11.3 - Deflection check under passenger train as per BS EN-1990-Cl-A2.4.4.3
11.4 - Deck Twist Check
11.5 - Vertical Deflection Check
11.6 - Expansion Joint Calculation
Page 2 of 48
Project Job Ref.


Analysis Model
Page 3 of 48
Project Job Ref.
4.3 Prestressing Tendon Profile
Prestressing Details - Mid Span
Prestressing Details - Support Locaion
Page 4 of 48
Project Job Ref.
Tendon Profile
Tendon Details
Page 5 of 48
Project Job Ref.


Longitudinal Design of Deck
Page 6 of 48
Project Job Ref.
6.1 ALLOWABLE STRESS CHECK
Stressing shall not commence before the concrete reached the minimum compressive strength of 49.5 MPa.
For f'c = 55.0 Mpa For f'ci = 49.5 Mpa
Compression Limit = -27.23 Mpa (Maximum allowable Compression)
Tension Limit = 1.76 Mpa (Maximum allowable Tension)
Stress Limits at Transfer Stage
For f'c = 55.0 Mpa

Tension Limit = 0.00 Mpa (Maximum allowable Tension)
Compression Limit = -22.00 Mpa (Maximum allowable Compression, For Group-I)
Compression Limit = -27.50 Mpa (Maximum allowable Compression, For Group-II to Group-IV)
Compression Limit = -30.80 Mpa (Maximum allowable Compression, For Group-V to Group-VII)
Compression Limit = -33.00 Mpa (Maximum allowable Compression, For Group-VIII)
Stress Limits at Service Stage
Page 7 of 48
Project Job Ref.
6.2 Serviceability Limit State - Stress Check
Stressing shall not commence before the concrete reaches minimum compressive strength of 49.5MPa.
SUPERSTRUCTURE SLS COMBINATION (STRESSES AT TRANSFER)

-VE = COMPRESSION
+VE = TENSION
TOP FIBER
Compression Limit = -27.23 Mpa

Tension Limit = 1.76 Mpa
BOTTOM FIBER

Tension Limit = 1.76 Mpa
Page 8 of 48
Project Job Ref.
SUPERSTRUCTURE SLS COMBINATION (STRESSES AT SERVICE GROUP-1)

-VE = COMPRESSION
+VE = TENSION
TOP FIBER

Tension Limit = 0 Mpa
BOTTOM FIBER

Page 9 of 48
Project Job Ref.
SUPERSTRUCTURE SLS COMBINATION (STRESSES AT SERVICE GROUP-2 TO 4)

-VE = COMPRESSION
+VE = TENSION
TOP FIBER

BOTTOM FIBER

Page 10 of 48
Project Job Ref.
SUPERSTRUCTURE SLS COMBINATION (STRESSES AT SERVICE GROUP-5 & 6)

-VE = COMPRESSION
+VE = TENSION
TOP FIBER

BOTTOM FIBER

Page 11 of 48
Project Job Ref.
6.3 Deck Slab longitudinal Design-Ultimate Limit State
6.3.1 Flexure Design
Bending Moment diagram for ULS combination:
Location Location Max.(+ve) Mom. Max.(-ve) Mom.

Span1/4 L/4 324000
Span1/4 0.4L 395000
Span1/4 3L/4 272000
Span1/4 @ Face of Dia. 248000
Span2/3 L/4 329000
Span2/3 L/2 514000
Span2/3 3L/4 369000
Span2/3 @ Face of Dia. 351000
Page 12 of 48
Flexural Design (With Prestressed & Non-Prestressed Reinforcement) Span 1/4 (L/4)
Input Parameters
f'c = 55 Mpa Compressive strength of concrete at 28 days

fsy = 420 Mpa Yiels strength of non-prestressed conventional reinforcement
2
A = 1.13E+07 mm Area of cross-section (From CAD / MIDAS File)
4
I = 2.47E+13 mm Moment of Inertia about the centroid of the cross-section
h = 4150 mm Overall depth of member (From CAD / MIDAS File)
yc = 1459 mm Distance from centroidal axis of gross-section to extreme fiber in compression, neglecting r/f
yt = 2691 mm Distance from centroidal axis of gross-section to extreme fiber in tension, neglecting r/f
b = 13350 mm Width of flanged member or width of rectangular member
bt = 5400 mm Width of Tension Flange
b' = 1180 mm Width of a web of a flanged member
d = 2571 mm Distance from extreme compression fiber to centroid of prestressing r/f (web tendons)
dt = 4025 mm Distance from extreme compression fiber to centroid of non-prestressing r/f
t = 300 mm Thickness of the flange of a flanged member
Tendons (T) = 24.0 No. Total Tendons in a Cross-Section (only web tendons considered conservatively)
No. of Strand = 42.0 No. Number of strands in a Tendon (only web tendons considered conservatively)
Strand Dia. = 15.2 mm Diameter of Strand
2
Strand Area = 140 mm Area of Strand
f's = 1860 Mpa Ultimate strength of Pre-stressing Steel
f*y = 1674 Mpa Yield point stress of pre-stressing steel
Losses = - %
Peff = 147000 kN Prestressing force at section
e = 1111.75 mm Eccentricity
γ* = 0.28 Factor for type of pre-stressing steel (0.28 for low-relaxation steel, refer AREMA 17.18.4.1)
β1 = 0.657 Factor for concrete strength (β1=0.7285 for 45MPa_Refer AREMA 2.31.1-f)
A*s = 141120 mm2 Area of pre-stressing steel
ρ* = 0.004 As*/bd ratio of pre-stressing steel
Asf = 101962 mm2 The steel area required to develop the ultimate compressive strength of the overhanging portions of the flange
Asr = 39158 mm2 Steel area required to develop compressive strength of the web of a flanged section
Bar Dia. = 16 mm Dia. of Non-Prestressed Reinforcement
Bar Spacing = 150 mm Spacing of Non-Prestressed Reinforcement
No. of Layers = 0 Number of non-prestressed reinforcement
2
Ast = 0 mm Area of non-prestressed reinforcement
Φ = 0.95 Strength reduction factor (AREMA 17.15.1-b-1)
Mu = 324000 kN-m Design Ultimate Moment (From MIDAS Model)
ρ = 0.000 As/bdt ratio of pre-stressing steel
Page 13 of 48
For Bonded Members; EQ 17-19
f*su = f's [ 1- (γ * / β1 ) ( p* x f's / f'c ) ]
f*su = 1750 Mpa < f*y = 1674 (AREMA 17.18.4)
Therefore,
f*su = 1674 Mpa
Check for Section Type; Rectangular OR Flanged Section
For Rectangular Section (AREMA 17.18.2)

( A*s x f*su + As x fsy) / ( 0.85 x f'c x b ) < t
379 > 300 Not Governs
For Flanged Section (AREMA 17.18.3)

( A*sr x f*su ) / ( 0.85 x f'c x b' ) > t
1189 > 300 Flanged Section
Section Capacity
ΦMn = Φ { Asr x f*su x d [ 1 - 0.6 * ( Asr x f*su / b' x d x f'c) ] + As x fsy x ( dt - d )+ 0.85 x f'c ( b - b') ( t) (d - 0.5 t) }
Φ Mn = 514875 kN-m
Mu = 324000 kN-m
Φ Mn / Mu = 1.59 Design is OK
Check for Minimum Reinforcement
ΦMn > 1.2 M*cr

Where,
Mcr = ( fr + fpe ) * Sc - Md/nc * ( Sc / Sb - 1)
fr = 4.62 Mpa Modulus of rupture of concrete

fpe = 30.76 Mpa Compressive stress in concrete due to effective prestress forces only, after all losses
3
Sc = 9193979933 mm Composite section modulus for the extreme fiber of section where the tensile stress is caused by externally applied load
Sb = 9193979933 mm3 Non-composite section modulus for the extreme fiber of section where the tensile stress is caused by externally applied
Md/nc = 5.00E+04 kN-m Non-composite dead load moment at the section
Mcr = 325295 kN-m
Φ Mn = 514875 kN-m > 1.2 * M*cr = 390354 kN-m OK
Page 14 of 48
Flexural Design (With Prestressed & Non-Prestressed Reinforcement) Span 1/4 (0.4L)
Input Parameters

2
4
2
Losses = - %
2
Page 15 of 48
f*su = f's [ 1- (γ * / β1 ) ( p* x f's / f'c ) ]
f*su = 1754 Mpa < f*y = 1674 (AREMA 17.18.4)
Therefore,
f*su = 1674 Mpa


( A*sr x f*su ) / ( 0.85 x f'c x b' ) > t
Section Capacity
Φ Mn = 535465 kN-m
Mu = 395000 kN-m
ΦMn > 1.2 M*cr

Where,

3
Mcr = 338782 kN-m
Φ Mn = 535465 kN-m > 1.2 * M*cr = 406538 kN-m OK
Page 16 of 48
Flexural Design (With Prestressed & Non-Prestressed Reinforcement) Span 1/4 (3L/4)
Input Parameters

2
4
2
Losses = - %
e = 797 mm Eccentricity
2
Page 17 of 48
f*su = f's [ 1- (γ * / β1 ) ( p* x f's / f'c ) ]
f*su = 1734 Mpa < f*y = 1674 (AREMA 17.18.4)
Therefore,
f*su = 1674 Mpa


( A*sr x f*su ) / ( 0.85 x f'c x b' ) > t
Section Capacity
Φ Mn = 444238 kN-m
Mu = 272000 kN-m
ΦMn > 1.2 M*cr

Where,

3
Mcr = 279027 kN-m
Φ Mn = 444238 kN-m > 1.2 * M*cr = 334832 kN-m OK
Page 18 of 48
Flexural Design (With Prestressed & Non-Prestressed Reinforcement) Span 1/4 (-ve / Hogg)
Input Parameters

2
4
2
Losses = - %
e = -83.5 mm Eccentricity
2
Page 19 of 48
f*su = f's [ 1- (γ * / β1 ) ( p* x f's / f'c ) ]
f*su = 1566 Mpa < f*y = 1674 (AREMA 17.18.4)
Therefore,
f*su = 1566 Mpa


( A*sr x f*su ) / ( 0.85 x f'c x b' ) > t
Section Capacity
Φ Mn = 372178 kN-m
Mu = 248000 kN-m
ΦMn > 1.2 M*cr

Where,

Sc = 18710979228 mm3 Composite section modulus for the extreme fiber of section where the tensile stress is caused by externally applied load
Mcr = 266528 kN-m
Φ Mn = 372178 kN-m > 1.2 * M*cr = 319834 kN-m OK
Page 20 of 48
Input Parameters

2
4
2
Losses = - %
2
Page 21 of 48
f*su = f's [ 1- (γ * / β1 ) ( p* x f's / f'c ) ]
f*su = 1759 Mpa < f*y = 1674 (AREMA 17.18.4)
Therefore,
f*su = 1674 Mpa


( A*sr x f*su ) / ( 0.85 x f'c x b' ) > t
Section Capacity
Φ Mn = 570363 kN-m
Mu = 329000 kN-m
ΦMn > 1.2 M*cr

Where,

3
Mcr = 346443 kN-m
Φ Mn = 570363 kN-m > 1.2 * M*cr = 415732 kN-m OK
Page 22 of 48
Input Parameters

2
4
2
Losses = - %
2
Page 23 of 48
f*su = f's [ 1- (γ * / β1 ) ( p* x f's / f'c ) ]
f*su = 1778 Mpa < f*y = 1674 (AREMA 17.18.4)
Therefore,
f*su = 1674 Mpa


( A*sr x f*su ) / ( 0.85 x f'c x b' ) > t
Section Capacity
Φ Mn = 715004 kN-m
Mu = 514000 kN-m
ΦMn > 1.2 M*cr

Where,

3
Mcr = 422594 kN-m
Φ Mn = 715004 kN-m > 1.2 * M*cr = 507113 kN-m OK
Page 24 of 48
Flexural Design (With Prestressed & Non-Prestressed Reinforcement) Span 2/3 (3L/4)
Input Parameters

2
4
2
Losses = - %
2
Page 25 of 48
f*su = f's [ 1- (γ * / β1 ) ( p* x f's / f'c ) ]
f*su = 1752 Mpa < f*y = 1674 (AREMA 17.18.4)
Therefore,
f*su = 1674 Mpa


( A*sr x f*su ) / ( 0.85 x f'c x b' ) > t
Section Capacity
Φ Mn = 524805 kN-m
Mu = 369000 kN-m
ΦMn > 1.2 M*cr

Where,

3
Mcr = 306214 kN-m
Φ Mn = 524805 kN-m > 1.2 * M*cr = 367457 kN-m OK
Page 26 of 48
Flexural Design (With Prestressed & Non-Prestressed Reinforcement) Span 2/3 (-ve / Hogg)
Input Parameters

2
4
2
Losses = - %
2
Page 27 of 48
f*su = f's [ 1- (γ * / β1 ) ( p* x f's / f'c ) ]
f*su = 1615 Mpa < f*y = 1674 (AREMA 17.18.4)
Therefore,
f*su = 1615 Mpa


( A*sr x f*su ) / ( 0.85 x f'c x b' ) > t
Section Capacity
Φ Mn = 479712 kN-m
Mu = 351000 kN-m
ΦMn > 1.2 M*cr

Where,

Sc = 18710979228 mm3 Composite section modulus for the extreme fiber of section where the tensile stress is caused by externally applied load
Mcr = 313277 kN-m
Φ Mn = 479712 kN-m > 1.2 * M*cr = 375932 kN-m OK
Page 28 of 48
Project Job Ref.
6.3 Deck Slab longitudinal Design-Ultimate Limit State
6.3.2 Shear Design
Shear Force diagram for ULS combination
Location Location Max.Shear

Span 1 to 4 900 Web Sec 32700
Span 1 to 4 590 Web Sec 49600
Page 29 of 48
Shear Design (Prestressed Sections at Face of Web thk.=590mm)
Vu < Φ (Vc + Vs) EQ 17-30
Where,
Vu = Factored Shear Force at the section considered
Vc = Nominal Shear Srength provided by Concrete
Vs = Nominal Shear Strength provided by Web reinforcement
Design Parameters
f'c = 55.0 Mpa Compressive strength of concrete at 28 days

√f'c = 7.42 Mpa
fsy = 420 Mpa Yield strength of non-prestressed conventional reinforcement
2
A = 1.13E+07 mm Area of cross-section
I = 2.47E+13 mm4 Moment of Inertia about the centroid of the cross-section
h = 4150 mm Overall depth of member
d = 2328 mm Distance from extreme compression fiber to centroid of prestressing force
Check for 'd' = 3320 mm 'd' shall not be lessthan 0.8*h
Jacking Coeff. = 0.75 -
Losses = - %
Tendons (T) = 24.0 No. Total Tendons in a Cross-Section (web tendons only conservatively)
Tendons (W) = 4.0 No. Tendons in a Web in Single Row
No. of Strand = 42.0 No. Number of strands in cross-section (web tendons only conservatively)
Strand Dia. = 15.2 mm -
2
Strand = 140 mm Area of Strand
Duct Dia. = 160 mm Duct Diameter
Fpu = 1860 Mpa Ultimate Tensile Strength
Ep = 197000 Mpa Strand Modulus of Elasticity
Vd = 5900 kN Shear force at section due to unfactored Dead Load
Vi = 32700 kN Factored Shear force at section due to externally applied loads
Mdead = 9500 kN-m Maximum unfactored dead load moments at section
Mmax = 264000 kN-m Maximum factored moment at section due to externally applied loads
Shear Strength Provided by Concrete
Vc shall be taken as lesser of the values Vci or Vcw;

For Vci
Vci = ( 5x10-2 * √f'c * b' * d ) + Vd + ( Vi * Mcr / Mmax ) EQ 17-32
where,
Mcr = ( I / yt ) * ( 0.5 * √f'c + fpe - fd ) EQ 17-33
Page 30 of 48
fpc = 11.66 Mpa Compressive stress in concrete at centroid of section resisting externally applied loads
fd = 1.03 Mpa Stress due to unfactored dead load at extreme fiber of section
Mcr = 246491 kN-m Moment causing flexural cracking at section due to externally applied loads
Vci = 37885 kN > 0.14*√f'c*(b'*d) = 4070 kN OK
For Vcw
Vcw = ( 0.29 * √f'c + 0.3 * fpc ) * b' * d + ( Vp ) EQ 17-34
Vp = 11400 kN Vertical component of prestressed force at section-From MIDAS
Vcw = 33534 kN
Therefore,
Vc = 33534 kN
Shear Strength Provided by Web Reinforcement (AREMA 17.21.3)
Vs = ( Av * fsy * d ) / s EQ 17-35
Vs,reqd = 2799 kN
Av = 628 mm2 Area of web reinforcement 2 Legs of T 20.0
s = 125 mm longitudinal spacing of web reinforcement
Vs = 4911 kN < 0.66√f'c*b'*d = 19185 kN OK
The spacing of web reinforcing shall not exceed 600 mm
If, Vs > 0.332*√f'c*b'*d, Maximum spacing shall be reduced by one-half 400 mm

4911 < 9651 Max. spacing is 600 mm
Minimum Shear Reinforcement
Av = ( 0.345 * b' * s ) / fsy EQ 17-36
Av = 61 mm2 per web
Therefore,
Vu = 32700 kN
Vc + Vs = 38445 kN
Φ = 0.90 (AREMA 17.15.1-b-2)
Vu < Φ (Vc + Vs)

32700 < 34601 SAFE
Torsion Design
Tn = 37000 kN-m (Corresponding Torsion at Maximum Shear)

Ao = 22.72 m2 (Area enclosed by shear path)
At = 201 mm2 (Assuming T16 Dia. bar)
Fy = 420 MPa
Cot = 1 s = 125 mm2
At/s = 1.939 mm2/mm (per web)
Reinforcement required from Shear Design = 2512 mm2/m/web

Reinforcement required from Transverse Design = 2512 mm2/m/web
Reinforcement required for Torsion = 1939 mm2/m/web
Total Rebar Area required for Shear+Torsion+Transverse = 6963 mm2/m/web
Provided Rebar Area for Shear+Torsion+Transverse = 7856 mm2/m/web
(4 legged - T25 @ 125 c/c) SAFE
Reinforcement provided per web is 4 legs of T25 at 125 c/c (including reinforcement due to Shear +Transverse
Design+Torsion Design) .
Page 31 of 48
Although provided reinforcement satisfy the total shear links required on web, but as per engineer's comment
we have made additional check for shear links as per face per web as follows:
Reinforcement required from Shear Design = 1256 mm2/m/web/face

Reinforcement required from Transverse Design = 2512 mm2/m/web/face
Reinforcement required for Torsion = 970 mm2/m/web/face
As per Podoliny book; rule for web rebar for combined shear, torsion and transverse bending:
1.) (Shear & Torsion) + 1/2*(Transverse Bending) 3482 mm2/m/web/face

2.) 1/2*(Shear & Torsion) + (Transverse Bending) 3625 mm2/m/web/face
3.) 0.7*(Shear & Torsion) + 0.7*(Transverse Bending) 3316 mm2/m/web/face
Total Rebar Area required for Shear+Torsion+Transverse = 3625 mm2/m/web/face
Provided Rebar Area for Shear+Torsion+Transverse = 3928 mm2/m/web/face

(1 leg - T25 @ 125 c/c) SAFE
Additional Longitudinal Reinforcement required for torsion:
Tn = 37000 kN-m
Ao = 22.72 m2
Ph = 19.7 m
At = 38193 mm2
TS Rft. = 18760 mm2 T16-150 2 layers for slab width of 7000

BS Rft. = 14740 mm2 T16-150 2 layers for slab width of 5500
Web Rft. = 16616 mm2 T16-150 4 layers for Web height of (4150-550-500=3100)
Total Rft. = 50116 mm2 SAFE
Page 32 of 48
Shear Design (Prestressed Sections at Face of Diaphragm)
Vu < Φ (Vc + Vs) EQ 17-30
Where,
Vu = Factored Shear Force at the section considered
Vc = Nominal Shear Srength provided by Concrete
Vs = Nominal Shear Strength provided by Web reinforcement
Design Parameters
f'c = 55.0 Mpa Compressive strength of concrete at 28 days

√f'c = 7.42 Mpa
fsy = 420 Mpa Yield strength of non-prestressed conventional reinforcement
2
A = 1.44E+07 mm Area of cross-section
I = 3.15E+13 mm4 Moment of Inertia about the centroid of the cross-section
h = 4150 mm Overall depth of member
d = 2858 mm Distance from extreme compression fiber to centroid of prestressing force
Check for 'd' = 3320 mm 'd' shall not be lessthan 0.8*h
Jacking Coeff. = 0.75 -
Losses = - %
Tendons (T) = 24.0 No. Total Tendons in a Cross-Section (web tendons only conservatively)
Tendons (W) = 4.0 No. Tendons in a Web in Single Row
No. of Strand = 42.0 No. Number of strands in cross-section (web tendons only conservatively)
Strand Dia. = 15.2 mm -
2
Strand = 140 mm Area of Strand
Duct Dia. = 160 mm Duct Diameter
Fpu = 1860 Mpa Ultimate Tensile Strength
Ep = 197000 Mpa Strand Modulus of Elasticity
Vd = 9800 kN Shear force at section due to unfactored Dead Load
Vi = 49600 kN Factored Shear force at section due to externally applied loads
Mdead = 98000 kN-m Maximum unfactored dead load moments at section
Mmax = 351000 kN-m Maximum factored moment at section due to externally applied loads
Shear Strength Provided by Concrete
Vc shall be taken as lesser of the values Vci or Vcw;

For Vci
Vci = ( 5x10-2 * √f'c * b' * d ) + Vd + ( Vi * Mcr / Mmax ) EQ 17-32
where,
Mcr = ( I / yt ) * ( 0.5 * √f'c + fpe - fd ) EQ 17-33
Page 33 of 48
fpc = 9.31 Mpa Compressive stress in concrete at centroid of section resisting externally applied loads
fd = 5.24 Mpa Stress due to unfactored dead load at extreme fiber of section
Mcr = 198204 kN-m Moment causing flexural cracking at section due to externally applied loads
Vci = 40025 kN > 0.14*√f'c*(b'*d) = 6208 kN OK
For Vcw
Vcw = ( 0.29 * √f'c + 0.3 * fpc ) * b' * d + ( Vp ) EQ 17-34
Vp = 4200 kN Vertical component of prestressed force at section-From MIDAS
Vcw = 33750 kN
Therefore,
Vc = 33750 kN
Shear Strength Provided by Web Reinforcement (AREMA 17.21.3)
Vs = ( Av * fsy * d ) / s EQ 17-35
Vs,reqd = 21361 kN
Av = 2454 mm2 Area of web reinforcement 5 Legs of T 25.0
s = 125 mm longitudinal spacing of web reinforcement
Vs = 23561 kN < 0.66√f'c*b'*d = 29266 kN OK
The spacing of web reinforcing shall not exceed 600 mm
If, Vs > 0.332*√f'c*b'*d, Maximum spacing shall be reduced by one-half 400 mm

23561 > 14722 Max. spacing is 400 mm
Minimum Shear Reinforcement
Av = ( 0.345 * b' * s ) / fsy EQ 17-36
Av = 92 mm2 per web
Therefore,
Vu = 49600 kN
Vc + Vs = 57311 kN
Φ = 0.90 (AREMA 17.15.1-b-2)
Vu < Φ (Vc + Vs)

49600 < 51580 SAFE
Torsion Design
Tn = 42800 kN-m (Corresponding Torsion at Maximum Shear)

Ao = 22.72 m2 (Area enclosed by shear path)
At = 201 mm2 (Assuming T16 Dia. bar)
Fy = 420 MPa
Cot = 1 s = 125 mm2
At/s = 2.243 mm2/mm (per web)
Reinforcement required from Shear Design = 9820 mm2/m/web

Reinforcement required from Transverse Design = 2512 mm2/m/web
Reinforcement required for Torsion = 2243 mm2/m/web
Total Rebar Area required for Shear+Torsion+Transverse = 14575 mm2/m/web
Provided Rebar Area for Shear+Torsion+Transverse = 15712 mm2/m/web
(4 legged - T25 @ 125 c/c) SAFE
Reinforcement provided per web is 4 legs of T25 at 125 c/c (including reinforcement due to Shear +Transverse
Design+Torsion Design) .
Page 34 of 48
Although provided reinforcement satisfy the total shear links required on web, but as per engineer's comment
we have made additional check for shear links as per face per web as follows:
Reinforcement required from Shear Design = 4910 mm2/m/web/face

Reinforcement required from Transverse Design = 2512 mm2/m/web/face
Reinforcement required for Torsion = 1122 mm2/m/web/face
As per Podoliny book; rule for web rebar for combined shear, torsion and transverse bending:
1.) (Shear & Torsion) + 1/2*(Transverse Bending) 7288 mm2/m/web/face

2.) 1/2*(Shear & Torsion) + (Transverse Bending) 5528 mm2/m/web/face
3.) 0.7*(Shear & Torsion) + 0.7*(Transverse Bending) 5980 mm2/m/web/face
Total Rebar Area required for Shear+Torsion+Transverse = 7288 mm2/m/web/face
Provided Rebar Area for Shear+Torsion+Transverse = 7856 mm2/m/web/face

(2 legs - T25 @ 125 c/c) SAFE
Additional Longitudinal Reinforcement required for torsion:
Tn = 42800 kN-m
Ao = 22.72 m2
Ph = 19.71 m
At = 44202 mm2
TS Rft. = 18760 mm2 T16-150 2 layers for slab width of 7000

BS Rft. = 14740 mm2 T16-150 2 layers for slab width of 5500
Web Rft. = 16616 mm2 T16-150 4 layers for Web height of (4150-550-500=3100)
Total Rft. = 50116 mm2 SAFE
Page 35 of 48
Project Job Ref.


End Zone Design
Page 36 of 48
Project Job Ref.
Etihad Rail - Stage 2C 37463520
Design of End Anchorage Zone JBL (1+971) DCP3
YH Nov-20 FH Nov-20 D00

Design of End Anchorage Zones (Web) Total: 4(Columns) x 6 (Rows) x 42-Strand in deck Section
Tendon Properties MATERIALS

# of Strands = 42 f'ci (at stressing) = 49.5 MPa
Ultimate Tensile strength,fpu = 1860 MPa fy = 420 MPa
Nominal Strand Area = 140 mm2 ɸ = 0.7 (AREMA 2.30.2 b)
Duct external diameter = 160 mm Cover = 60 mm
Initial Post tensioning = 75%
Total No of Cables (Gen Zone) = 12
Initial fact. PT force / Tendon = 9,843 kN
Anchorage
Bearing plate width, a = 470 mm Angle of inclination α 3.8 degrees
Bearing plate length, b = 470 mm ecc. of anchor 389 mm
Spacing between tendons, S = 600 mm lc 17.22.6.2.(b) 541 mm
Gross Area Ag = 220900 mm2 t 4150 mm
Gross Area Ab = 200794 mm2
Maximum Supporting Area = 360000 mm2
1) Design of the local Zone
Step 1- Check of bearing strength
The effective bearing strength fb shall not exceed
Pr = f x fb x Ab
a- fb < 0.7 x f'ci ( A / Ag) ^ 0.5 = 44.2 MPa EQ 17-45
b- fb < 2.25 x f'ci = 111.4 MPa EQ 17-46
Thus the allowable bearing strength is = 44.2 MPa
17.22.7.2 Pr = 6217 kN < Pu = 9843 kN
The above bearing strength check is based on plate sizes and anchor spacing guidelines as per VSL catalouge.
Since the bearing strength is less than required (as per AREMA 17.22.7.2), special anchorage devices shall be used conforming to
the requirements of AREMA 17.22.7.3. The prestressing system supplier technical sheets shall also confirm the same
requirements.
Step 2- Check of Bursting Reinforcement

EQ 17-44 dburst = 0.5 (h-2e) +5e x sinα = 40 mm
EQ 17-43 Tburst = 0.25 x Pu (1- a/h) + 0.5xPu x sin α = 859 kN
17.22.3.4 (d) As = Tburst / ɸ x fy = 2,923 mm2
As used 1 Dia Bar 16 125 mm = 3,217 mm2 Safe
2) Compressive Stresses check

The concrete compressive stresses ahead of special anchorage devices at the interface
between local zone and general zone shall be approximated by:
fall = 0.7 x ɸ x f'c = 24.3 Mpa
Prestressing force for all tendons / web = Pu = 118117 kN
Effective bearing area / Web (Ab)

Ab is greater of Aplate or Aconf Aplate = 2650800 mm2
Assuming area between c/c anchorages as Aconf = 600 x 600 mm2
Aconf for all tendons in a web Aconf = 4320000 mm2
Page 37 of 48
Project Job Ref.
Check if Aplate controls Check if Aconf controls

Aplate = 2650800 mm2 Aplate = 2650800 mm2
Aconf = 4320000 mm2 Aconf = 4320000 mm2
Aplate shall be < 5500395 mm2 Aconf < 2xAplate 5301600 mm2
Aconf < 3xMin(a2,b2) 7952400 mm2
Ab = Aplate does not govern mm2 Ab= 4320000 mm2
Governing Ab = 4320000 mm2
Long extent of confined concrete lc= 540.5 mm

Overall depth of section t= 4150 mm
factor k
Vertical direction
Anchorage spacing S= 600 mm Note: if a group of
Bearing Plate Size aeff = 470 mm anchorages is closely spaced
Number of Anchorages in a Row n= 6 Nos in two directions, the
product of the correction
Check if S < 2eff True factors, k, for each direction
kv= 1.51
is used in EQ 17-42.
Horizontal direction
Anchorage spacing S= 600 mm
Bearing Plate Size beff = 470 mm
Number of Anchorages in a Row n= 2 Nos
Check if S < 2eff True

kh= 1.31
Resultant k per web kv x kh = 2.0
fca = 16.4 x 0.98 16.1 MPa
Allowable Stress fa = 24.3 Mpa

fa > fca, Safe
Page 38 of 48
Project Job Ref.
Etihad Rail - Stage 2B & 2C 37463520
YH Nov-20 FH Nov-20
3) Design of General Zone

Step 1- Bursting Reinforcement
a) Vertical Direction
(No. of Anchors in one Column) = 6
(No. of Tendon Columns per Web) = 2
a, lateral dimension of the anch. device considered (n-1)x S +beff 3,470 mm

dburst = 0.5 (h-2e) +5e x sinα = 1,815 mm EQ 17-44
Tburst = 0.25 x Pu (1- a/h) + 0.5 x Pu x sin α (Each Web) = 8,753 kN EQ 17-43
As = Tburst / ɸ x fy = 29,771 mm2 17.22.3.4 (d)

As used 3 Links T25 @ 125 mm = 42,763 mm2 Safe
To be distributed over 2 x dburst
b) Horizontal Direction
Tburst = 0.25 x Pu (1- a/h) + 0.5xPu x sin α (Per Tendon) = 533 kN EQ 17-43
dburst = 0.5 (h-2e) +5e x sinα (e and a = 0 for Hor. Dir.) = 535 mm EQ 17-44
As = Tburst / ɸ x fy = 1,814 mm2
As used 8 Nos T20 = 2,513 mm2 Safe
c) Spalling reinforcement (Horizontal Direction)
Tspall = 0.02 x Pu (Per Tendon) = 197 kN 17.22.3. (h)

As = Tspall / ɸ x fy (Req. / web) = 8,035 mm2
As used 19 Dia Bar 25 = 9,327 mm2 Safe
d) Spalling reinforcement (Vertical Direction)

Tspall = 0.02 x Pu (Each Tendon) = 197 kN
As = Tspall / ɸ x fy (Req. / Web) = 8,035 mm2
Page 39 of 48
Project Job Ref.

Design of End Anchorage Zones (Bottom Slab) Total: 6(Columns) x 1 (Rows) x 19-Strand in deck Section

Anchorage
Bearing plate width, a = 290 mm Angle of inclination α 5 degrees
Pr = f x fb x Ab
b- fb < 2.25 x f'ci = 111.4 MPa EQ 17-46
17.22.7.2 Pr = 2551 kN < Pu = 4453 kN
requirements.

EQ 17-44 dburst = 0.5 (h-2e) +5e x sinα = -711 mm

fall = 0.7 x ɸ x f'c = 24.3 Mpa

Page 40 of 48
Project Job Ref.

Aconf = 960000 mm2 Aconf = 960000 mm2
2 2
Aconf < 3xMin(a ,b ) 1513800 mm2

factor k
Vertical direction
kv= 1.23

kh= 1.43
fca = 16.7 x 0.85 14.2 MPa

fa > fca, Safe
Page 41 of 48
Project Job Ref.
Design of End Anchorage Zone JBL (1+971) Detail Design
YH Nov-20 FH Nov-20

(No. of Tendon Columns) = 6
a, lateral dimension of the anch. device considered (n-1)x S +beff 290 mm


dburst = 0.5 (h-2e) +5e x sinα (e and a = 0 for Hor. Dir.) = 1,145 mm EQ 17-44

As = Tspall / ɸ x fy (Req. / 6Tendon) = 1,817 mm2

As = Tspall / ɸ x fy (Req. / Tendon) = 303 mm2
As used 2 Dia Bar 16 = 402 mm2 Safe
Page 42 of 48
Project Job Ref.

Design of End Anchorage Zones (Top/Bottom Slab) Individual Tendons

Anchorage
Bearing plate width, a = 290 mm Angle of inclination α 5 degrees
Pr = f x fb x Ab
b- fb < 2.25 x f'ci = 111.4 MPa EQ 17-46
17.22.7.2 Pr = 2551 kN < Pu = 4453 kN
requirements.

EQ 17-44 dburst = 0.5 (h-2e) +5e x sinα = -711 mm

fall = 0.7 x ɸ x f'c = 24.3 Mpa

Page 43 of 48
Project Job Ref.

Aconf = 160000 mm2 Aconf = 160000 mm2
Aconf < 3xMin(a2,b2) 252300 mm2

factor k
Vertical direction
kv= 1.23

kh= 1.23
fca = 16.7 x 0.73 12.2 MPa

fa > fca, Safe
Page 44 of 48
Project Job Ref.
Design of End Anchorage Zone JBL (1+971) Detail Design
YH Nov-20 FH Nov-20

(No. of Tendon Columns) = 1
a, lateral dimension of the anch. device considered (n-1)x S +beff 290 mm


dburst = 0.5 (h-2e) +5e x sinα (e and a = 0 for Hor. Dir.) = 145 mm EQ 17-44

As = Tspall / ɸ x fy (Req. / 6Tendon) = 303 mm2

As = Tspall / ɸ x fy (Req. / Tendon) = 303 mm2
Page 45 of 48
Project Job Ref.


Deflection / Camber Details
Page 46 of 48
Project Job Ref.


Short Term deflection (DL + PT)
Short-Term Deflection
X-Span Length Y-Deflection
(m) (mm)
0.0 0.0
5.0 5.0
10.0 11.0
15.0 18.0
20.0 20.0
25.0 19.0
30.0 16.0
35.0 10.0
40.0 4.0
45.0 2.0
50.0 0.0
56.5 5.0
63.0 10.0
69.5 19.0
76.0 25.0
82.5 28.0
89.0 25.0
95.5 19.0
102.0 10.0
108.5 5.0
115.0 0.0
121.5 4.0
128.0 10.0
134.5 20.0
141.0 25.0
147.5 26.0
154.0 24.0
160.5 17.0
167.0 9.0
173.5 4.0
180.0 0.0
184.8 3.0
189.6 7.0
194.4 13.0
199.2 18.0
204.0 20.0
208.8 18.0
213.6 15.0
218.4 11.0
223.2 5.0
228.0 0.0
Page 47 of 48
Project Job Ref.


Long Term deflection (DL + PT + SIDL)
Long-Term Deflection
X-Span Length Y-Deflection
(m) (mm)
0.0 0.0
5.0 5.0
10.0 9.0
15.0 13.0
20.0 15.0
25.0 13.0
30.0 10.0
35.0 8.0
40.0 5.0
45.0 2.0
50.0 0.0
56.5 4.0
63.0 11.0
69.5 16.0
76.0 18.0
82.5 16.0
89.0 12.0
95.5 9.0
102.0 6.0
108.5 2.0
115.0 0.0
121.5 1.0
128.0 4.0
134.5 11.0
141.0 14.0
147.5 15.0
154.0 13.0
160.5 8.0
167.0 5.0
173.5 3.0
180.0 0.0
184.8 1.0
189.6 5.0
194.4 10.0
199.2 15.0
204.0 18.0
208.8 17.0
213.6 14.0
218.4 10.0
223.2 3.0
228.0 0.0
Page 48 of 48
Appendix B Risk Register
C0306-S02-ECB-RP-30037-AB PAGE 20 OF 22
BMS: Project Delivery
T446: Design Risk Management Schedule Project No 37463520 Project Name Etihad Rail 2C
Guidance Notes (see guidance notes page for more details)
Design risk management should be an integral part of the overall design development and designers should think of it in terms of considering constructability, maintainability, etc. Designers only need to document their consideration of risks in this simple risk management schedule format. There is no requirement for quantitative design risk assessments to be carried out/documented and these should be avoided
* Risks should be considered in a logical sequence relating to the location/operational environment, constructability/installability, operability (normal/emergency), maintainability (inc routine cleaning, replacement, etc.), and alteration/decommissioning/dismantling/demolition, and should be categorised against those headings,
CIRIA guidance documents C755, C756, C686, C607, etc. provide a useful checklist and detailed guidance on the identification of risks to be considered during design and how those risks might be addressed - see detailed guidance notes for more details
§ Significant residual risks are those which are unusual, not obvious, difficult to manage, or where critical design assumptions apply. The documentation by designers of residual risks that cover well-known and understood hazards should be avoided.
Ref Risk Category* Work Element/Location Hazard or Risk Issue Identified Risk Management Design ERIc Action Required Significant Temporary Works Design Action Status/Final Resolution Notes Significant Date Logged/ Raised By
& Phase where appropriate, (where appropriate) Owner (e.g. hazard elimination/risk mitigation action, information to Requirements/Management Arrangements and/or (e.g. traceability of ERIc action, communication of § Reviewed
Residual Risk
e.g. location/environment, be provided to others) any Special Erection/Installation Sequences or significant residual risk, critical design criteria, etc. )
construction, operation, maintenance, Requirements
alteration/demolition
1 Construction Buried structure Rising ground water may impact the design of buried Designer Carryout assessment of the design ground water table as per None No 02/10/2019 Bridges
structure such as box culverts. the available information.
2 Design and Construction Structures Uplift of buried structures (esp. box culverts) due to Structurers designed such that self-weight is sufficient to Dewatering procedures/temporary works to be in No 02/10/2019 Bridges
buoyancy if structures remain buried for a sustained counter-act uplift. place and construction staging to take into
period of time. consideration buoyancy by keeping structures
ballasted.
3 Design Structures Bridge hit by over height vehicle will result in Designer Design bridge/ underpass with required vertical clearance No 02/10/2019 Bridges
structural damage, road closures, financial loss and as per local authority guidelines. Also provide signage for
disruption to normal operation of road network. the maximum headroom clearance in accordance with
local authority manual.
4 Design and Construction All Using As built & utilities information. As Built Not possible to eliminate hazard by design. Trial holes should be excavated by hand to locate Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
information is not sufficient or not provided and A site survey, liaison with other discipline for design and establish the type of existing services and their
cannot be guaranteed to be accurate. information and web available aerial photographs are depths.
Utilities information is not guaranteed to be required to reduce the risk.
accurate/up to date. Re-use of existing locations for columns and tie-in into
This could potentially cause errors in the design. existing electrical network have been based on
assumptions.
As built information to be verified by topo survey
information.
Design developed utilizing, correlating and reviewing the
information obtained.
5 Design and Construction Buried structure Unavailability of ground water table Designer/ Carryout assessment of the design ground water table as Deep Excavations may require extensive No 02/10/2019 Bridges
Contractor per the available information. dewatering
6 Design and Construction Structures Exact routing of buried services unknown therefore Designer/ Add warning note to relevant drawings. Contractor to confirm location of existing Services i. Proposed diversion of existing services has been Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
risk of damage to existing services during excavation Contractor Identify the existing services and carryout diversion prior before commencement of construction and carry shown on the design drawings
work. to deep excavation. out necessary utilities diversion before start of ii. Warning notes has been provided on relevant
main construction activities. drawings.
Iii. Carryout necessary utilities diversion before start
of main construction activities
7 Construction Structures Noise and generation of excessive dust as a result of Add minimum performance specifications on noise/dust etc. Contractor to prepare own Construction Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
construction works on General Notes drawing. Add requirements for Environmental Management Plan to identify
Construction Environmental Management Plan in design appropriate mitigation measures.
documents.
8 Operation and maintenance All Train derailment Provide containment for possible derailment Rail operator to follow the Standard Operating No 02/10/2019 Bridges
Procedure (SOP) in case of any derailment.
9 Design and operation Structures Vehicle Collision Design bridge supports for vehicle collision load. Provide No 02/10/2019 Bridges
appropriate offsets including sway allowance and barrier
protection. Provide the adequate headroom under the
bridges.
10 Design and operation Structures Expansion joints can reduce the durability. Where possible, small spans shall be design as integral No 02/10/2019 Bridges
bridges to avoid the maintenance requirement.
11 Design and operation Structures Unsuitable access causing inspection and maintenance Safe and adequate access to be provided at abutment gallery, No 02/10/2019 Bridges
hazards. inside the box girders, bearing plinths etc. for inspection and
maintenance.
12 Design and operation Structures Inspection and maintenance personnel struck by Provisions for areas with adequate space (e.g. verges and No 02/10/2019 Bridges
passing vehicles or falling from height (e.g. access shoulders) to accommodate mobile elevated access platforms
platforms/scaffolding) - injury or single death and/or scaffolding along with required traffic management.
Consider space provisions for maintenance vehicles and
junction level. Consult with ADM/RTA and requirements for
lane closures to be identified on drawings.
13 Construction Buried structure Rising ground water may impact the design of buried Designer Carryout assessment of the design ground water table as per None No 02/10/2019 Bridges
structure such as box culverts. the available information.
14 Construction and Structures Route and condition of buried services unknown Designer/ Add warning note to relevant drawings. Carryout necessary utilities diversion before start of i. Proposed diversion of existing services has been Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
Alteration/Dismantling/Demolition therefore risk of damage to existing service during Contractor Identify the existing services and carryout diversion prior to main construction activities shown on the design drawings
excavation work. deep excavation. ii. Warning notes has been provided on relevant
drawings.
Iii. Carryout necessary utilities diversion before start of
main construction activities
15 Construction Structures Penetration of Chlorides and sulphates in structural Designer i. Provide sufficient concrete cover to the reinforcement. None No 02/10/2019 Bridges
concrete will affect the service life of structures. ii. Use concrete containing blast furnace slag and low water
cement ratio. Micro silica can be also used.
Iii. Waterproofing system shall be installed.
16 Construction Buried structure Leakage of water through expansion/ movement joints Designer Provide robust waterproofing system at expansion joint to None No 02/10/2019 Bridges
will affect the service life of structures. avoid any leakages.
17 Construction Structures Uncertain ground condition causing structural Contractor Carryout geotechnical investigation at foundation locations Remove soft spots prior to construction No 02/10/2019 Bridges
failure and consider geotechnical parameters accordingly.
18 Construction Structures Deep excavation in sand induce risk of collapse. Contractor Side of excavation pit to be protected by temporary Temporary trench/ excavation pit sheeting Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
supports. designed by Contractor
19 Construction Structures High ground water level increase risk of collapse of Contractor Side of excavation pit to be protected by temporary Temporary trench/ excavation pit sheeting Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
excavation pit/ trench supports. designed by Contractor
T446- Design Risk Management Schedule Page 1 of 2
BMS: Project Delivery
T446: Design Risk Management Schedule Project No 37463520 Project Name Etihad Rail 2C
Guidance Notes (see guidance notes page for more details)
Design risk management should be an integral part of the overall design development and designers should think of it in terms of considering constructability, maintainability, etc. Designers only need to document their consideration of risks in this simple risk management schedule format. There is no requirement for quantitative design risk assessments to be carried out/documented and these should be avoided
* Risks should be considered in a logical sequence relating to the location/operational environment, constructability/installability, operability (normal/emergency), maintainability (inc routine cleaning, replacement, etc.), and alteration/decommissioning/dismantling/demolition, and should be categorised against those headings,
CIRIA guidance documents C755, C756, C686, C607, etc. provide a useful checklist and detailed guidance on the identification of risks to be considered during design and how those risks might be addressed - see detailed guidance notes for more details
§ Significant residual risks are those which are unusual, not obvious, difficult to manage, or where critical design assumptions apply. The documentation by designers of residual risks that cover well-known and understood hazards should be avoided.
Ref Risk Category* Work Element/Location Hazard or Risk Issue Identified Risk Management Design ERIc Action Required Significant Temporary Works Design Action Status/Final Resolution Notes Significant Date Logged/ Raised By
& Phase where appropriate, (where appropriate) Owner (e.g. hazard elimination/risk mitigation action, information to Requirements/Management Arrangements and/or (e.g. traceability of ERIc action, communication of § Reviewed
Residual Risk
e.g. location/environment, be provided to others) any Special Erection/Installation Sequences or significant residual risk, critical design criteria, etc. )
construction, operation, maintenance, Requirements
alteration/demolition
20 Construction Structures Excavation may damage unidentified underground Contractor Provide H&S information on drawings. Incorporate latest Contractor to use ground radar or similar to Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
utilities survey and avoid unnecessary services crossings check the excavation areas prior to digging. If
new services are identified, use hand digging to
avoid damages.
21 Construction Structures Inadequate formworks Contractor Minimum depth acquired for specific to be carried out. Contractor to ensure temporary formworks is No 02/10/2019 Bridges
properly designed and reviewed
22 Construction, demolition Structures Fall onto starter bars/exposed RB Contractor Cut the upright bars immediately or put Yes 02/10/2019 Bridges
mushroom head or bend the exposed bars
23 Construction, demolition All Work over or close to existing oil and gas line Existing services should clearly shown on drawings. Contactor to liaise with stakeholders to find best No 02/10/2019 Bridges
Contractor to carryout utilities identification survey at solution for suggested closeness of works.
structure foundation location before execution of work at
site.
24 Construction All Transport, storage, use and disposal of hazardous Contractor Minimize and avoid specifying hazardous materials in Use of hazardous materials to be minimised as far No 02/10/2019 Bridges
materials (silica, asbestos, concrete impregnates, design as reasonably practicable. Appropriate assessment
fresh concrete etc.) will result in skin damage, to be carried out for each individual case.
burns, inhalation, eye damage, illness/ injury. Application or removal of potentially hazardous
materials to be carried out by fully qualified
personnel. Ensure correct use of personal protective
equipment including those near the works. Where
necessary, exclusion zones to be erected to protect
the general public. Safe working practice and health
and safety guidelines to be employed by contractor.
25 Operation and maintenance Structures Access to the bearing inspection gallery and interior Operating Authority Provide access openings of appropriate size and at Always implement a safe system of work when No 02/10/2019 Bridges
of the box for inspection and maintenance; fall from appropriate locations in accordance with the standards. entering the interior of the structure through access
height and risk associated with confined space Access to inside the box girder to be in the soffit to allow doors located at height and confined spaces. Submit
entry, could result in injury or fatality. mobile elevator work platform baskets to approach closely. relevant method statements and health and safety
risk assessments for review and approval prior to
the work. only suitably trained and experience
personnel to undertake confined space entry.
26 Construction Structures Stressing operations - breakage of pre-stressing Contractor Specify the appropriate number and type of tendons along Close quality control of stressing operations by the No 02/10/2019 Bridges
tendons, failure to recover damage tendons, with design prestressing force to ensure maximum supervision engineer. Submit post tensioning
insufficient prestressing or remaining tendons over- breaking load is not reached. method statements for review and approval prior to
stressed, leading to reduction in structural capacity. execution at site.
27 Operation and maintenance Structures Super-structure jacking for bearing replacement can Operating Authority Provide sufficient space for the placement of hydraulic Refer to structural drawings and authority No 02/10/2019 Bridges
result in failing jacking system or heavy bearing jacks at pier top and show locations for jacking points on specifications for the requirements of jacking
parts not adequately supported and falling onto drawings. Consider the provision of adequate space operations and bearing replacement. Only place
platforms and ground below can result in injuries or around piers to allow for the placement of lifting towers or hydraulic jacks or other form of lifting equipment at
loss of life. trestles, if required. designated locations.
28 Operation and maintenance Structures Concrete barrier/ fence removal or replacement on Contractor / Use pre-cast barriers and fence so that they can be Lifting hooks shall be provided. Closure of at- No 02/10/2019 Bridges
the bridges may result in falling of debris onto Operating Authority removed in the same section as they were installed. grade roads where necessary to minimize the risk
public or workforce below leading to injury or Provision of lifting holes to be provided in precast units. of injury to travelling public.
fatality.
29 Operation and maintenance Structures Fire incident on the bridge or in underpass can Designer Structure shall be design for fire resistance as per local No 02/10/2019 Bridges
result in damage to the structure, injury to bridge/ authority requirements. Provision of footpath for safe
underpass users and fatalities egress of commuters to be consider in design.
30 Operation and maintenance Structures Demolition of post-tensioned super-structure at the Operating Authority Consider adequate space provision to temporarily support No 02/10/2019 Bridges
end of its design working life. Destressing main the bridge deck during destressing. Specify that vehicles
bridge elements. Risk of sudden stress relief by should not pass under bridge during construction.
severing prestressing tendons, instability and
structural collapse.
Copy rows then insert above this line to ensure formula are copied Issue 3.0
T446- Design Risk Management Schedule Page 2 of 2

Appendix C List of Drawings
1st
Contract Location / Type of Sequence
Drawing/Document Number Package Sub Package Submission Discipline Revision Title Remarks
Number Subdivision Document Number
Activity
Drawing List - Structures - JBL 0 - Under Bridge 1+971 Super structure
C0306-S02-ECB-DG-30007 General Structure C0306 S02 ECB DG 30007 AC Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31261 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31261 AB Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Deck Concrete Sheet 1 No Change
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31262 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31262 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Deck Concrete Sheet 2 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31263 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31263 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Deck Concrete Sheet 3 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31264 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31264 AB Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Deck Concrete Sheet 4 No Change
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31266 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31266 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Post Tensioning Details Sheet 1 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31272 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31272 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Bearing Details Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31280 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31280 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Deck Details - Reinforcement Sheet 1 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31286 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31286 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Diaphragm - Reinforcement Sheet 1 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31287 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31287 AB Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Diaphragm - Reinforcement Sheet 2 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31288 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31288 AB Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Diaphragm - Reinforcement Sheet 3 Revised
C0306-JBL-ECB-DG-31290 General Structure C0306 JBL ECB DG 31290 AC Jebel Ali Branch Underbridge At 1+971 - Deflection Diagram Revised
END OF DOCUMENT

C0306 S02 Ecb RP 30037 Ac PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

C0306 S02 Ecb RP 30037 Ac PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Responsible Division Responsible Discipline Document Type Document Status

C0306 Structures-Bridges Report General Issued for Approval

ETIHAD RAIL STAGE 2 PROJECT

Document Number Issued Date 10-NOV-2020

Version Date Name Description of Review Changes

Revision Log – To Client

Revision Date Description of Changes

Acronyms and Abbreviations

Ref. Document Title Document Number Date

[1] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 3 C0306-S02-GDM-FS-00001-01 09 December 2018

[2] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 4 Annex B C0306-S02-GEI-FS-00003-04 01 April 2019

[3] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 5 C0306-S02-GER-PQ-00001-03 13 March 2019

[4] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 5 Annex 1 C0306-S02-GER-PQ-00002-03 13 March 2019

[5] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 5 Annex 2 C0306-S02-GER-PQ-00003-03 13 March 2019

[6] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 6 C0306-S02-GCM-PQ-00001-01 09 December 2018

[7] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 8 C0306-S02-EGE-FS-00003-04 13 May 2019

[8] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 11 C0306-S02-GPC-FS-00001-04 07 May 2019

[9] Exhibit D Part 1 Appendix 13 C0306-S02-GQA-FS-00001-01 09 December 2018

[10] Exhibit D2-1 Technical Specification X0231-UAE-GDM-PO-00002-00 29 May 2019

[11] Interface Management Plan C0306-S02-GEI-PL-00001-00 20 October 2019

[12] Quality Plan C0306-S02-GQA-PL-00001-00 31 October 2019

[13] Document Management Plan C0306-S02-GDM-PL-0000-00 31 October 2019

[14] Stakeholder Management Plan C0306-S02-GEI-PL-00002-AC 30 October 2019

[15] Configuration Management Plan C0306-S02-GCM-PL-00001-00 03 November 2019

[16] Requirements Management Plan C0306-S02-GCM-PL-00002-00 28 October 2019

[17] System RAM Plan C0306-S02-GER-PL-00001-AC 28 October 2019

[18] System Safety Management Plan C0306-S02-GER-PL-00002-AB 28 October 2019

[22] Design Basis Report – Rail C0306-S02-ERA-RP-00001-AB 11 November 2019

[23] Design Basis Report – Utilities C0306-S02-EUT-RP-00001-00 28 October 2019

[25] Design Basis Report – Sand Mitigation C0306-S02-ELS-RP-00001-AB 14 November 2019

[26] Design Management Plan C0306-S02-GEM-PL-00002-00 31 October 2019

Figure 1: Project Layout

2.1 Intent of this Design Report

Package Chainage/ Location

Package 1 DMB 1 - 47+140.319 to 59+000

Package 2 DMB 2 - 59+000 to 69+000

Package 3 DMB 3 - 69+000 to 72+000

Package 5 JBL 1 - 3+000 to 8+000

Package 6 JBL 2 - 8+000 to 11+150

Package 7A JBL 3 (A) - 11+150 to 14+000

Package 7B JBL 3 (B) - 14+000 to 17+600

Package 8 JBL 4 - 17+600 to End of JBL

Package 9 JBL 5 - JART

Package 10A DMC 1 (A) - 0+000 to 7+000

Package 10B DMC 1 (B) – 7+000 to 10+000

Package 11 DMC 2 - 10+000 to 20+000

Package 12 DMC 3 - 20+000 to 32+000

Package 13A DMC 4 (A) - 32+000 to 38+000

Package 13B DMC 4 (B) - 38+000 to End of DMC

2.2 Existing Condition

2.3 Description of Rail Network

Figure 2: Package 2C Layout

2.4 Outline Scope

2.5 Engineering Disciplines

3 Review of Existing Data

4 Topographic and Geotechnical Surveys

4.2 Geotechnical Investigations

6 Design Development for the DCP Stage

6.1 Design Basis Report

6.2 Design Update from DCP2

Figure 3: Midas Model Snap

9 Risk and Opportunity

Risk / Opportunity Impact Action and Mitigation

fsu = f's [ 1- (γ / β1 ) ( p* x f's / f'c ) ]

fsu = 1750 Mpa < fy = 1674 (AREMA 17.18.4)

fsu = f's [ 1- (γ / β1 ) ( p* x f's / f'c ) ]

fsu = 1754 Mpa < fy = 1674 (AREMA 17.18.4)