Phase 3

GROUP 2 Submission

ROLL NO. 26, 30, 07, 38, 47, 17

 Frequency distribution of Masses Based on Following Factors:
Factors Numbers Pie chart Interpretation

Gender No. of Faculty

Female 18

Gender Male 12

other 0

Work No. of
experience Faculty
Below 5 13
years
Work Experience Above 5 17
years

No. of
Age
Faculty
23-35
17
Years
Age Group 35-60
13
Years
 Factors Numbers Pie chart Interpretation

Distance No. of Faculty

Below 5 km 14
Distance between Residence and
the College Above 5 km 16

Highest Qualification Achieved

Mode of No. of
transport Faculty
Public
19
Mode of Transport transport
Private
11
transport
 Frequency Distribution Table for Factors Affecting Satisfaction Level
(Combined)
Frequency distribution for factors affecting Faculty satisfaction Level (Combined)
5 4 3 2 1
Sr.
Statement Highly
Total No. of samples Mean
No. Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied
Satisfied
Relationship
1 with other 4 15 11 0 0 30 3.766666667
faculty

2 Teaching load 5 14 11 0 0 30 3.8

Physical facilities
3 for teacher (ac, 5 8 6 2 9 30 2.933333333
projector, Etc...)

4 Pay scale 5 10 15 0 0 30 3.666666667

Working
5 Environment 3 11 8 8 0 30 3.3

6 Job 5 13 6 6 0 30 3.566666667
Scope for Self-
7 Development 3 8 9 4 6 30 2.933333333

8 Promotion 6 8 8 8 0 30 3.4

9 Students Matter 2 8 9 11 0 30 3.033333333

 Behaviour of the
10 students 1 8 9 11 1 30 2.9

Graph For Both Male & Female

OVERALL SATISFECTION OF BOTH MALE AND FEMALE

Overall Satisfaction (BOTH) Mean

= Sum of means of all factors / Total No. of Factors

= 33.3/10

= 3.33
 Frequency Distribution Table for Factors Affecting Satisfaction Level
(FEMALE)
Frequency distribution for factors affecting Faculty satisfaction Level (FEMALE)
5 4 3 2 1
Sr.
Statement Highly Neutra Highly
Total No. of samples Mean
No. Satisfied Dissatisfied
Satisfied l Dissatisfied
Relationship with
1 other faculty 2 10 6 0 0 18 3.777777778

2 Teaching load 3 8 7 0 0 18 3.777777778

Physical facilities
3 for teacher (ac, 2 4 5 1 6 18 2.722222222
projector, Etc...)

4 Pay scale 4 7 7 0 0 18 3.833333333

Working
5 Environment 2 8 3 5 0 18 3.388888889

6 Job 2 6 5 5 0 18 3.277777778
Scope for Self-
7 Development 1 3 9 1 4 18 2.777777778

8 Promotion 3 4 5 6 0 18 3.222222222

9 Students Matter 1 4 5 8 0 18 2.888888889

 Behaviour of the
10 students 0 5 5 7 1 18 2.777777778

Graph For Female

OVERALL SATISFECTION OF FEMALE

Overall Satisfaction (FEMALE) Mean

= Sum of means of all factors / Total No. of Factors

= 31.66666667/10

= 3.166666667
Frequency Distribution Table for Factors Affecting Satisfaction Level (MALE)
Frequency distribution for factors affecting Faculty satisfaction Level (MALE)
5 4 3 2 1
Sr. Total No. of
Statement Highly Highly Mean
No. Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied samples
Satisfied Dissatisfied
Relationship with
1 other faculty 2 5 5 0 0 12 3.75

2 Teaching load 2 6 4 0 0 12 3.833333333

Physical facilities
3 for teacher (ac, 3 4 1 1 3 12 3.25
projector, Etc...)

4 Pay scale 1 3 8 0 0 12 3.416666667

Working
5 Environment 1 3 5 3 0 12 3.166666667

6 Job 3 7 1 1 0 12 4
Scope for Self-
7 Development 2 5 0 3 2 12 3.166666667

8 Promotion 3 4 3 2 0 12 3.666666667

9 Students Matter 1 4 4 3 0 12 3.25

Behaviour of the
10 students 1 3 4 4 0 12 3.083333333
 Graph For Male

OVERALL SATISFECTION OF MALE

Overall Satisfaction (MALE) Mean

= Sum of means of all factors / Total No. of Factors

= 34.58333333/10

= 3.458333333
Comparative Graph of Mean Based Of Different Classifications

Conclusion
Findings