Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UK l NORWAY
A
APPROHS
FOURTH
'
ACHâ
)
f E
? E
S
t L L L
t
Figure 33.3. Eaat-west cross auction A-A’ across the Central Graben (GECO line CGT-81-OB after Spencer et at., 19B6a).
See Figure 3 1 for location of crocs section and Figure 33.10 for the burial history cherL Pre-dft, syn-rift, and post-
riR sedimentary rocks are shown ontt›e right.
the most productive example. The reservoir models claim the rift formed earlier, in the Triassic
sandstones of the Paleogene and Upper Jurassic are (FLsher and Mudge, 1990), in Permian tGlennie, l99tk) or
the next most important, while minor reservoir rorks
range in age from Dex'onian to Triassic—Lower
Cretaceous.
The seals arc often intraformational. For example,
the
seal rc›ck for the chalk reservoirs is the same Upper
Cretaceous and basal Teroary chalk, but in an
imperme- able Lacies. The Paleogene fan and
turbidite sandstones are sealed by the surrounding
coeval shales. The Upper Jurassic sandstones are
sealed by the Upper Jurassic mudstones of the
Mandal and Farsund formations, while the Devonian
and Perrriian reservoirs of the Auk and Argyll area
are sealed by an unconformable layer of Upper
Cretaceous chalk. Given a single source rock of Late
Jurassic arid earliest Cretaceous aJ;e and subsequent
continuous sedimentation, the overburden rock was
deposited from the Early Cretaceous to Holocene.
Structural History
\Vhen the Central Craben formed is still debated
(Ziegler, 19d2, 1988; Kooi et al., 19b9). Generally, it
is thought that the crust thinned and domed in the
Middle Jurassic, from which a graben developed in
the Late Jurassic. ’l’he thermal sag phase controlled
sedimentation from the Early Cretaceous to the
present day (Figure 33.3). This simple case of rift
evolution was used by McKenzie (l978J to develop a
general oustnl-stretching model, later tested and
refined by Sclater and Christie t1980), food and
Barton (1983), arid Barton and \Vood (1984). A
palinspastically restored stiahgraphic section iS
presented by Thorne and Watts (1989). Subsequent
AAPG Memoir 60 - Copyright © 2009 The American Association of Petroleum
Geologists
in the Carboniferous (Haszeldirte and Russell,
1987). However, all these mcdeis accept that the
majnr graben developed during the lurassic and
that the thickest Penn-Triassic lay to the east of
the younger Central Graben(Wgur33.3)
Structurally, the graben itself is simple, but
because of periodic salt movements during the
Early Triassic, Late Jurassic, Late Cretaceous,
and Tertiary, the graben fill is complex (Taylor,
1990). The oil fields in Upper Creta- ceous chalk
resein'oirs in the southern part of the Central
Graben have developed over salt swells and
pillows, with most fields in the entire Central Graben
being affwted to some degree by haJokinesis. The
unusual reservoir geometry in the Clyde and
Fulmar oil fields on the southwestern flank of the
graben demonstrates a subtle influence of
halokinesis (Stevens and Wallis, 1994), while the
Ula oil field trend on the no theastcrn flank
contains structural domes assciciated with salt
sw'ells and d iapirs (Spencer ct al., 4986b). The
structure of the Tertiary sandstone reservoir uf
the Cod gas field ale formed in response to
underlying salt piercement (PHeur, 1987b).
Based on reflection seismic profiles, a boundary
fault occurs along the southwestern margin t›f
the Central Ciraben which displaces sedimentary
rocks of Early Cretaceous age and older. Where
this boundary fault is displaced by a series of
offset (transfer) Cults, traps are found,
such as in the Auk and Are')
fields (Gibbs, 1989). The northeastern Central
Graben margin has less definition at the basal
Cretaceous because this frank of the graben is
formed by flexure plus a series of smaller dip-
sIip faults rather than a single major fault. To the
northwest, the fault-bounded intra- graberi horst
of the Forties—Montrose High has pmduced
Stratigraphy
Figure 33.4 shows o generalized strahgraphic column
for the Central Graben worth the source rocks,
reservoir rorks, and field names (see also Table 53.1).
In terms of reservoi r rocks, t he Iie Eds of t he
Mandal—Ekofisk petroleu m syste m fall into lhrce ma
in groups. (1) Jurassic, Permian, and Devonian sandstones
and carbon- ates (pre- and synrift); (2) Upper
Cretaceous—Lower Paleocene chalk (postrift); and
(3} Upper Paleocene— Eocene sandstones (postrift).
Given the widespread source rock fpr this petroleum
system, the essential
elements and processes controlling the distribution of
oils in these three reservoirs arc presented in a temporal
way(Fi e]35)
Basement Rock
l*re-Devonian basement rocks are not penetrated
by wells in the Centra1 Graben. By ana logy with the
flanking rocks in the United Kingdom and southern
Morwegian onshore area, the basement rocks are pre-
Cambrian, Cambrian—Ordovician, and Silurian
sedimen- tary rinks that were metamorphosed during
the Cale- donian orogeny and intruded by lute
Caledonian granite.
HALTMKnYlREt
4
VA LA N Q I N I
AN
Valanginian time is found in the development of Jurasssc Ula Formation (Spencer ct al., l98fib; Home
separate stratigraphies (Figure 33.6D). Cessation of 1987; Larter etal., 1990),
inter- on exchange, coupled with deepening of the
w'ater in the graben and flank basin areas, facilitated
development of stratified, stagnant water favoring
organic matter p rva0Om.
Sally derived Upper Jurassic ‹x›arse-trained silici-
classic sandstones of the Eldfisk Formation
(informally called the Fulmar sandstones in the
United Kingdom) constitute locally important
rmervoir rocks on the south- western flank of the
newly /ormed rift (Table 33.1). Examples are the
Fulmar tHelm et al., 1990; Stockbridge and Gray, 1991),
Durxan (Robson, 1991), and Clyde oil heads (Stevens and
Tallis, 19911. On the Norwegian rift margin, the Ula
trend contains shallow marine sand- stones of the Upper
AAPG Memoir 60 - Copyright © 2009 The American Association of Petroleum
Geologists
Postrift Sedimentary Rock
Subsidence due to cooling of the basement rock
along the North Sea graben axis during the Early
Cretaceous reconnected the Tethyan and Boreal water
masses, recre- ating an oxygenated seaway. During this
subsidence, organic-lean mudstone and siltstone with
some sandstone accumulated. Although reservoir
rock of this age is found north of the Central Graben,
no significant commercial accumulations have been
reported in the Vallull, Sola, or Rodby formations.
Minor oil production, however, is attributed to an
unusual Albian-Aptian carbonate breccia in the Auk
field (Trewin and Branwell, 1991).
In the Late Cretaceous-ear)y Paleocerle, rising sea
level, active phytoplankton (Gfobigerina) gmwth in
the surface water, and continued broad regional
subsidence
favored deposition of chalk over the entire Central irzben. A wparate, lateral submarine fan contains the
firñlx'n area. These rt›rks ronstitiite the most important
upper reservoir rc›rks of the Garnet field pools, with the
rcwrvoir in the Ma ndal—Ekofi,sk trpleum systems South Can net pool in a proximal position and the
A fine-grained carbonate ocz.e accumulated on the Central and North Gannet pools in middle fan facies
sea
(Armstrong L4 al., 19b7).
fioor and, where unstable on the basin flanks, slumped
down from the northeast into the deep water axis of the The Hordaland Group was deposited during the Eocene
graben, where autochthonous, stump, debris flow, and —oligocene. This dominantly mudstone unit provides
turbidite facies are recognized (Kennedy, 1987; Taylor additional thickening to the overburden rock and acts as
and Lapie, 1987). These chalks are maJr reservoir rorks a seal tr› the Rogaland Group reservoirs, Oil shows fbut
(Table 33.1), particularly in the greater Ekoiisk area no signihcant accumulations) in the coarser units of the
where synsedirnentary slumping fostered the pTeserva- Hordaland Group attest to limited vertical migration
tion of primary porosity. Other Chalk reservoirs are the possibilities. The top of the Hordaland Group is marked
Tommeliten, Albuskjell, and West Ekofisk gas— by a regionally extensive Miocene unconfor- mity (Figures
conden- sate fields,and the Edda, Ekofisk, Eldfisk, Hod, 33.3 and 33.4) (Nielsen ct al.,1986). From the rate
Tor, and Valhai oil fields which all lie in the Miocene tc› the Holocene, the sedimentation rates of
southeastem part of the Central Graben (D’Heur, 4 986). mudstone have continued to increase (Mielsen ct aI.,
In addition, the Chalk Group is an important part of 198fi). These mudstones have significantly thickened
the overburden rock, as its deposition initiated generation the overburden rock, substantially broadening the area and
of petroleum from the underlying source rock in the hence the volume of mature source reek.
deepest parts of the Central Graben.
The Rogaland Grciup, deposited during the remainder
of the Paleocene and into the early Eocene, marks a Central
major change in sedimentation frorn the chalk.
Marine silts.!rlostir sandstone with some fine mud, often
in lhe form of submarine fans, was introduced
sporadically from the west and northwest into the
graben (kuvell, 1990). Thus, fields with a Rogaland
Group sandstone reservoir art lie in the northwestern part
of the Centml Graben (Figure 33.1). It has been
suggested that these fans are related to the updoming or
rejuvenation of the GreenJandWaledonian hinterland
prior to the opening of the Norih Atlantic (Thompson
and Cibson, 1991). The sandstones in these fans as the
second most important reserx'oir horizon of the Mandal—
Ekofisk petroleum system. In addition, the Rogaland
Group created addi- tional ox erburden rock, burying a
wider area of the Scandal Formation and hence
increasing the volume of mature scurce rock
A deep water submarine fan has long been accepted
as the dcpositional model for the Rogaland Group
sandstone reservoir rocks. Recognized fan facies include
marine deltaic, shelf-slope, and upper, midd le, and
lower fan assemblages (Stewart, 198a. An example oJ
this association is the Fnrties field where, paradoxically,
the thickest upper and middle fan deposits uncon-
formably overlie the Forties-Monhose High, presumably
a subdued structure during the Paleogene. Near the
bnse of the sermon, the Forties field reservoir sandstone is
a turbidite fan that grades to a debris flow toward the
top (Wilb and Peattie, 1990). This field developed
structuml closure from two processes: (1) rejuvenation
of the tectonically positive Forties—Montrose High,
which formed a drape over the previously deposited
fan, and
(2) differential compaction of the dominantly interfan
mud sequence around the thick pod of sand (Wills,
t991). The Montrose field represents a middle fan facies
of a stratigraphically older fan system (Crawford ct a1.,
1994), while the Cod field accumulated in a more distnl
fan facies lLfHeur, 1987b). These fields have reservoirs
in submarine fans that run dow o the axis of the
AAPG Memoir 60 - Copyright © 2009 The American Association of Petroleum
Geologists
MANDAL—EKOFISKI!I PETROLEUM
SYSTEM
No previous workers have attempted to discuss
the North Sea in general or the Central Graben in
particular in terms of a petroleum system, although
Demaison and Huizinga (1991) in their general
review of petroleum system types estabhshed the
Central Graben as a verti- cally drained, high
impedance system. Damtoft et al. (1987) described
most elements of the petroleum system in the
Danish Central Truugh tTail End Graben) to the
south.
The earliest volumetric calculations were
published by Fuller (J975, J980) for the entire
North Sea petroleum province, and in particular.
for basins and graberts in the northern North Sea.
In a paper describing the Valhall oil field,
Leonan3 and Mums (1S87) defined a drainage area
and thickness for the Mandal Formation source
rock underlying the field. Using an average oJ wt.
V TOC, they estimated post—middle Miocene
generation of 3.5 billion m of oil, giving an overall
efficiency factor for the field of 8° for expulsion,
migration, and entrapment. The t ernporal
relationship of the elements of a nd proses in the
Mandal—Ekofisk system arc discussed later
(Figure 33.5).
A B
I•II •
620mgPy/g
TOC
-
820mgP
y/gTOC
!!I ! Yaluea Up la
iiI I t6ST0C
0 Z 1 6 6 TO 12 14 f5
%T0C (wt/w0
Figure 33.7. Otafacterlstce of the Mandal Formation ao e rock In the Cenoal Gmben.(A) Ranga ard average praeent-
day TDC vats{B) Rock•EvaI pyrolyele 6t yidd relaéve to TOC, showing the average HI (elope) and dead
carbon content (Intozsept on theTOC axb\ (C) Kerogen type of the Manzlal Formalon as defined on a modlfled van
Kreyclen diagram. (D) Etecraaae In HI whh depth during oil generation. (After Romford, 1090, whh addhfonal
data.)
TA
ML
DAkiS
H
FgRTlJ
APPROACH curre
ES
az
Table 33.2. Levels of Thermal Maturñy in Terms Table 33.3. Surface Temperature and Moat Flow
af Vitrinite Reflectance (R ) and Depth for the Values U6ed To Make the Model In Figure 33.10
Nonvegian
Ula Area• Age Sea Heat
Floor flow
Levels of Thermal Rm Depth {Ma) (°C) (mW/ Comments
mg
Maturity (°6) (m) Pres 6 45
ent
immature (oil and gas) 0.55 3350 15 18 45 Warm Oligo—Mio
climate
Early mature(oil) 0.60 3550 65 15 45
Peak oil generation 0.80 4000 100 12 4S
Late mature (oil) 0.90 4200 120 15 60 Thermal oecay
Early(wet) gas 1.10 4500 144 10 75 Rifting. deaper water
Main(dry) gas 1.30 ? 163 20 90 Thermal updoming
Hayley’s(1987} stLdy of It"e M.K. CentmJ gra x•n quoles level off rre1arnor-
phism values • t ou refarerce to deph. From Laner et at. (19 D).
Tdaa
Flgure 39.10. Tlzuwral maturity modeling in th Central GraLan along section A••A' (eee Flgure 3 3 fbr k›cañon\ (A)
Bwlat hletory diagram sharing isotfierms and kinetic generation windows forlhe Mandal Formation(BaeinM tB)
Raservdr temperatures aqainat depth wlth a fuet0t IIne af 53 mWAr heal flow.(C) Thermal rruturlty callbratlon of
nzeaa\xsd and modeled vlo1nite refleeta (D)
Generation (w oi and gas per m+ of aouroe rock) versus ams for the Mardal Fonnatlon sour‹s rock at tlds k›cz
Ion. The time of peak generation (-@ la) at the location of the burial history chart defines the critical moment for
this petroleum ayetem.
changed considerably from the Neogene (18 ”C) to used for the Late Cretaceous and most of the Tertiary to
subzero temperatures in the quaternary tlce Ages),
and finally to bV for the present-day interglacial (Table
33.3) (Comtord, 19Rl).
Paleoheat Flow
The paleogeothermal gradient and heat flow are more
problematic to establish than prment-day heat flow, but
a decreasing heat flow with time from the Late Jurassic
crusta 1 thinning and rift event is thought to have
occurred. As concluded later, a lower heat flow value is