You are on page 1of 69

c-Si industrial cell process: Whole value chain

Today’s c-Si cell process


Behind photovoltaics 57
Industrial process – MG-Si

- Elkem produced ca. 49% of the


world volume 200 000 t per year
for
- Aluminium-Industry
- Chemistry (Silicone)
- Semiconductor-Industry

- PV requiered 2008 ca. 50000 t


per year

- SiO2 (s)+ 2C(s) Si(l) + 2CO

- Purity: 99%

Firma Elkem, Norwegen

Behind photovoltaics 58
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process: Whole value
chain

Behind photovoltaics 59
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process: Whole value
chain

Required purities:

- for Elektronic-Industry: 98 % 10-13 %


- for Photovoltaic: 98 % 10-9 %

Process:
- 1. Destillation of SiHCl3
- 2. Deposition of Si from gas phase

1. Si(s) + 3HCl(g) SiHCl3(g)+ H2 (g) + heat


2. SiHCl3(g) + H2(g) Si(s) + 3HCl(g)

Behind photovoltaics 60
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process: Whole value
chain

Behind photovoltaics 61
Crystallisation
Industrial process: Crystallization

Boron doped Si
Oxygen
Metal impurities e.g. Fei
Mono crystalline Multicrystalline

Behind photovoltaics 62
Industrial process : crystallization

240 kg

Behind photovoltaics 63
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process: Whole value
chain

Behind photovoltaics 64
Industrial process: sawing

Behind photovoltaics 65
Industrial process: Slicing

- Max. Drahtgeschwindigkeit: 15 m/s Industrielle Maschine


- Drahtdurchmesser: 0,14 mm,
- Länge: 800 km

Behind photovoltaics 66
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process: Whole value
chain

How is the costs division for material, cell and


module?
Behind photovoltaics 67
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process
Properties
- P-type Si bulk (ca. 0.5 - 3 Ωcm and 200 µm)

- Texture (KOH+IPA or isotexture)

Ag
- Homogeneous P- emitter (40-60 Ω/sq)
n+
p-type Si - Al-BSF (depth 5 -10 µm)
p+ - Front side PECVD SiNx ARC (73 nm/n=2.1)
Al
AgAl
- Screen printed front Ag-contact
Typical c-Si industrial
- Full Al rear contact + AgAl pads
solar cell

Behind photovoltaics 68
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process

Texture and wafer cleaning

POCl3-diffusion

PECVD SiNx

Screen printing

Co-firing

Edge isolation

220 µm
p-type mc-Si (ca. 1 Ωcm)

Behind photovoltaics 69
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process

Texture and wafer cleaning mc-Si: acidic texture


Cz-Si: alkaline texture
POCl3-diffusion

PECVD SiNx

Screen printing

Co-firing

Edge isolation p 210 µm

Behind photovoltaics 70
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process

Texture and wafer cleaning

POCl3-diffusion

PECVD SiNx

Screen printing

Co-firing
n+
Edge isolation p 55 Ω/sq. on both sides

Behind photovoltaics 71
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process

Texture and wafer cleaning

POCl3-diffusion

PECVD SiNx one sided 70 nm

Screen printing

Co-firing
n+
p
Edge isolation

Behind photovoltaics 72
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process

Texture and wafer cleaning

POCl3-diffusion

PECVD SiNx

Screen printing
Ag
Co-firing
n+
p Ag on front
Edge isolation
Al on rear side
Al
AgAl

Behind photovoltaics 73
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process

Texture and wafer cleaning metal belt furnace

POCl3-diffusion

PECVD SiNx

Screen printing

Co-firing Ag
n+
Edge isolation p
p+
AgAl Al

Behind photovoltaics 74
Today’s c-Si industrial cell process

Texture and wafer cleaning

POCl3-diffusion
− Laser
PECVD SiNx − Wet chemical
treatment
Screen printing
− Dicing saw
Co-firing Ag
n+
Edge isolation p
p+
AgAl Al

Behind photovoltaics 75
Single processes

Behind photovoltaics 76
Texture, saw damage etch

Texture and wafer cleaning mc-Si: acidic texture


Cz-Si: alkaline texture
POCl3-diffusion

PECVD SiNx

Screen printing

Co-firing

Edge isolation p 210 µm

Three ways to remove saw damage at ISC?

Behind photovoltaics 77
Alkaline etching (NaOH, KOH)

50
NaOH-etch - 36.0%

40

Reflectance, %
30

20

10

0
Actec etching and cleaning bench 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Wavelength, nm

Behind photovoltaics 78
Isotexture (HF, HNO3, H2O)

50 NaOH-etch - 36.0%
acidic etching - 25,4%

40

Reflectance, %
30

20

10
Is KOH+IPA even more effective?
RENA inline acidic texturing tool 0
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Wavelength, nm

reflectance curves of wafers after etching. Large


reductions due to texturing.

HNO3: oxidises the surface


HF: etches the oxide
only on as-cut surfaces!!!
SEM picture of an isotropic textured
surface with a screen printed finger standard texture takes ca. 5µm Si from each side
Behind photovoltaics 79
Alkaline texture (KOH+IPA)

- Reduces the reflection on (100) Si- surfaces


Licht
from 36% to 11% (400-1100 nm);

- Simple and cost effective texturisation with


NaOH-IPA or KOH-IPA on (100) surfaces only

but ...

- The reproducibility of the results often not satisfactory


- IPA is expensive and organic
- Texture quite slow to be in-line compatible >>>

Behind photovoltaics 80
Alkaline texture (KOH+IPA)

70

60

50
Reflexion [%]

40

30

20

10

0
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200
Wellenlänge [nm]

keine Textur UKONx-Textur-2 KOH-IPA

How can you reduce the reflection even


more? What other texturisation do you know?
Behind photovoltaics 81
Alkaline texture (KOH+IPA)

- Mechanical abrasion + damage etch!!

- Masking, photolithography, etching

- Remote Plasma Source (RPS) etch

- Reactive Ion Etching (RIE)

Behind photovoltaics 82
Diffusion

Texture and wafer cleaning

POCl3-diffusion

PECVD SiNx

Screen printing

Co-firing
n+
Edge isolation p

55 Ω/sq. on both sides

Behind photovoltaics 83
BBr3-diffusion
ECV measurements of different B-
B-emitter profiles (BBr3-diffusion)
emitters
2 step oxidation (90 Ohm/sq)
in-situ oxidation (90 Ohm/sq)
20
10

carrier concentration p [cm ]


-3
19
10

4BBr3+ 3O2 → 2B2O3 + 6Br2

2B2O3 + 3Si → 4B + 3 SiO2


18
10

principle of BBr3 diffusion and a loaded quartz boat

What other possibilities for diffusion do you


N(x,t)=Ns erfc(x/2sqtr(Dt)) 10 know? 17

0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6


depth [µm]

>> standard 60Ohm/sq diffusion is done at 940°


°C for 40min (2h 38 minutes total time)

Behind photovoltaics 84
BBr3-diffusion: other methods

Precursor deposition by: screen printing,


roller, spin-on, spray on, APCVD…

+
Diffusion in: in-line furnace, tube furnace…
Behind photovoltaics 85
POCl3-diffusion

Why is the P-profile so different from B-


profile?
N2, O2,
POCl3

ECV measurements of different P-


emitters processed at different
temperatures and times
Principle of POCl3 diffusion and a loaded quartz boat

>> standard 55Ohm/sq diffusion is done at 850°


°C for 20 minutes (1h 40 minutes total
time)
Behind photovoltaics 86
PECVD SiNx-deposition

Texture and wafer cleaning

POCl3-diffusion

PECVD SiNx

Screen printing

Co-firing n+
p one sided 70 nm
Edge isolation

Behind photovoltaics 87
PECVD SiNx-deposition

NH3

Schematic drawing of PECVD SiNx reactor

50 NaOH-etch - 36.0%
acidic etching - 25,4%
45
Graphite boat for PECVD SiNx deposition NaOH-etch with SiNx - 9,8%
40 isotexture witch SiNx - 6.8%

35

Reflectance, %
What is SiNx doing to increase the 30
efficiency? 25
20
15
10
Standard SiNx is about 70nm 5

thick resulting in blue colour 0


400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Wavelength, nm

Behind photovoltaics 88
PECVD SiNx-deposition

Anti Reflection Coating (ARC)

surface Ref. [%]

NaOH-etched 36*
NaOH+SiNx 9.8
isotexture 25.4
Iso+SiNx 6.8
KOH+IPA 11
KOH+IPA+SiNx 4

*reflectance between 400 and 1100nm

Behind photovoltaics 89
Screen printing

Texture and wafer cleaning

POCl3-diffusion

PECVD SiNx

Screen printing

Co-firing Ag
n+
Edge isolation p Ag on front
Al Al on rear side
AgAl

Behind photovoltaics 90
Screen printing

Baccini screen printer with improved camera system principle of screen printing

To ensure good fillfactors:


- Geometry of standard screen printed finger:
- Height: 20 µm
- Width110-140 µm
- Amount of paste ~ 150 mg for 156x156
mm2 wafers
How can the shadowing be reduced? standard screen printed finger

Behind photovoltaics 91
Screen printing: other metallisation

Standard screen Fine-line screen Angledcontact


Buried Buried(BC)
Contact
printing printing (ABC)
SiNx
ARC
Front contact
P-emitter

Si

+ easy contact formation + easy contact formation ++NO


veryshading losseslosses
low shading
+ good fill factors (78%) + low shading losses ++very
verygood
good fill
fillfactors
factors
(>80%)
(>80%)

- high shading losses - poor fill factors


--additional
additional process
process steps
steps
- stability problems

Behind photovoltaics 92
Screen printing: other metallisation
Roller-printing technique
for finger Material: mc-Si (Baysix), as-cut thickness 330 µm
metallisation
Solar cell size: 10x10 cm2
texture printing Voc Jsc FF η
[mV] [mA/cm2] [%] [%]
V-textured screen 614 34.2 76.2 16.0
V-textured roller 612 35.4 75.4 16.3

Solar cell size: 12.5x12.5 cm2


Buried-contact cell concept texture hydrogen Voc Jsc FF η
silicon nitride 2
passivation [mV] [mA/cm ] [%] [%]

alkaline no 593 31.0 77.2 14.2


+ plated
n + +
Ni/Cu
n alkaline yes 602 32.1 77.4 15.0
p
+ V-textured yes 628 36.3 76.8 17.5*
p

plated Ni/Cu * POLIX wafer; independently confirmed by FhG-ISE, Freiburg, Germany

M. McCann, B. Raabe, W. Jooss, R. Kopecek and P. Fath, 18.1% Efficiency for a Large Area, Multi-Crystalline Silicon Solar Cell, IEEE 4th World
Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Hawaii, USA (2006)

Behind photovoltaics 93
Belt-furnace firing

Texture and wafer cleaning

POCl3-diffusion

PECVD SiNx Metal belt furnace


Screen printing

Ag
Co-firing
n+
p
Edge isolation p+
AgAl Al

Behind photovoltaics 94
Belt-furnace firing

Placement of solar cell on belt


6 zone belt furnace for fast firing

What contains the Ag-metal paste?


How does the front contact look after
firing?

Temperature on the cell during process Firing temperature dependent on


area and thickness of solar cell
Behind photovoltaics 95
Belt-furnace firing: Front
contact

Behind photovoltaics 96
Belt-furnace firing: front
contact
Ag
glass

Ag crystals tunneling
Cross section of a simple metal/Si interface (top) and a more
realistic picture of glass frit containing metal Ag paste/Si
interface for an industrial solar cell (bottom).

− Separation of Ag-crystals by glass layer


− Contact of Ag to emitter only through few points
− Tunneling of carriers through glass
− Contact resistance?

How does the BSF look after firing?

Behind photovoltaics 97
Edge isolation

How can the edges be isolated?

Texture and wafer cleaning

POCl3-diffusion

PECVD SiNx

Screen printing

Co-firing Ag
n+
Edge isolation p
p+
AgAl Al

− Laser
− Wet chemical treatment
− Dicing saw

Behind photovoltaics 98
Edge isolation

dicing saw:
slow but very good isolation

laser:
fast and good, used in the
industry

sand paper: these methods are used the


good isolation, low yield if not most at isc
done properly
fill factors exceeding 79%
were already processed

wet chemical:
fast and good, used in the industry
!has to be done directly after P-diffusion!

What is behind a solar cell?, June 2013 99


What are we talking about? c-Si solar cells

Semiconductor device consisting of a p-n junction and


metalized regions that directly converts sunlight into electricity.
area 15.6x15.6 cm2
thickness 180 µm area 90x160 cm2
Ag, Al contacts 60 cells in series
17-20 % efficiency 250-300 Wp
4-5 Wp

5/20
Processing
Reflexion:
Texture and wafer cleaning Reduced to 11%
(400 nm–1100 nm)

p-n junction formation (diffusion)

Plasma enhanced chemical


vapour deposition (passivation)
Elkem (1904)
Norway
Metallization
(screen printing)

Firing

Laser edge isolation

6/20
Cell efficiency
FFJ scVoc J max PPVmax PP
Cell efficiency η= where FF =
Pin J scVoc
FF: fill factor (measure of quadrature of JV curve)
JmaxPP and VmaxPP: maximum power point values
Jsc and Voc: short circuit current density and open circuit voltage

8/20
Loss mechanisms

Drawing from: H. Mäckel, 2004


Optical
Reflexion, shading
Transmission

Electrical: (1) recombination, (2) ohmic


(1) Radiative, Auger & Rec. via traps
Surfaces, emitter, bulk & space charge region

(2) Resistance of bulk metals (Ag fingers, Al area), Si


Contact resistance: metal to Si (Ag-Si, Al-Si)
9/20
Resulting contact

Ag finger (Ag bulk)

Ag bulk
Ag crystallites, glass, nano particles

11/20
Trend in PV technology

Behind photovoltaics 105


Trend in PV technology

Thinner wafers
400 - 400 µm in 1990, 180 µm in 2007
wafer thickness [µm]

- aim: 150 µm in 2010


300
Larger wafers
- 1990: 100 cm2
200
- today: 225 cm2
?
100
Use of SoG-Si
0 - chemical purification
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
- metallurgical purification

What happens with the efficiency when <d?

Behind photovoltaics 106


Trend in PV technology
industrial solar cell

Ag
n+
p-type Si
p+
Al cells
Thinner and larger solar
16.5
standard process
16.0 improved rear side passivation
solar cell efficiency

15.5

15.0

14.5
Main losses on the rear side

14.0
250 200 150 100 50
Improved passivation: +25-30 mV / ca.+2
solar cell thickness [µm]
mA/cm2

Behind photovoltaics 107


Trend in PV technology

bow

open
relaxation
passivation
rear contact

Behind photovoltaics 108


Trend in PV technology

front junction bifacial device with BSF

main advantages
- elimination of bow
- improved rear side passivation
- less paste and printing steps used
- increased power output
- applicable for p and n-type Si
- simplified module interconnection
Behind photovoltaics 109
Trend in PV technology

What is the advantage of bi-facial


modules??
Behind photovoltaics 110
Trend in PV technology
Outdoors measurement on roof of PV lab at UKON
(southern Germany)
1,0
80

70
Conditions
0,8

in P [%]units]
- module
60 embedded in black frame (1x0.5) m2
[arbitrary 0,6
- placed
50
on white board
- inclined by 30° and facing to the South
gain

0,4
Pmpp

40
- measured in average gain
andinmonofacial
bifacialbifacial P of 33% (rear side
0,2
30 monofacial
30° covered) arrangement
0,0
20
white board 10 12 14 16 18
timeduring
time duringone
oneday
dayininAugust
August[h][h]
What efficiency can be reached with both sided contacted cells?
Behind photovoltaics 111
Trend in PV technology
Why other processes? - selective emitter
20 - B-BSF rear side
19
- selective emitter
18
- standard rear
efficiency [%]

17

16 - standard cell

15
Do you know other trends?
14 Efficiencies >19% possible with
both sided contacted cells
13
1 10 100 1000
minority carrier lifetime [µs] To exceed 20% rear contact solar
cells needed
Behind photovoltaics 112
Trend in PV technology

improvement of standard process


- Selective emitters Thin film solar cells
- Rear passivated cells - Thin Si absorbers
- CdTe, CIGS, GaAs

rear contact solar cells


- MWT, MWA, EWT, IBC
n-type solar cells
- Al-rear emitter
- B-front emitter

Behind photovoltaics 113


Trend in PV technology

Improvement of standard

carrier concentration n [cm ]


-3
profile of selective emitter
20 30 nm SiNx
10
process: front with barrier (80 Ω/sq)
lasered regions (19 Ω/sq)
- Selective emitters
19
- Improved passivation 10

- Innovative metallisation
18
10
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6

Improvement of standard
What selective emitter methods do you
process: rear know?
- Selective BSF
- Open rear contact
- Improved
passivation
- Innovative
metallisation
Behind photovoltaics 114
Trend in PV technology
n-type solar cells

Rear Al-emitter solar cell Front B-emitter solar cell

n+ (phosphorous-FSF) p+ (boron-emitter)
n n
p+ (Al-emitter) n+ (phosphorous-BSF)

mc-Si: 15.0% mc-Si: 16.4%


FZ-Si: 17.4% Cz-Si: 18.5%
☺ Similar to p-type solar cell process ☺ Low quality material acceptable
☺ Easy implementation into existing ☺ Bifacial character
process lines What kind of rear contact cells do you
know? Passivation of p+ surfaces?
High quality, lowly doped material B-diffusion with mc-Si?
needed
Isofoton BOSCH

Behind photovoltaics 115


Trend in PV technology

Rear contact solar cells

Metallisation Metallisation Emitter


Wrap Around (MWA) Wrap Through (MWT) Wrap Through (EWT)

+ +
+

n
+ + +
+ +

n n
+
+ n + +

n
+
n +
n
p p p

MWA MWA MWT EWT


Voc[mV] 611 614 612 591
Jsc[mA/cm2] 37.2 35.9 37.2 37.4
FF [%] 77.2 75.5 75.8 75.1
h [%] 17.5 16.6 17.2 16.6
Area [cm2] 5x5 10x10 5x5 5x5

What is the large area cell with highest efficiency?

Behind photovoltaics 116


Trend in PV technology

Rear contact solar cells:


IBC cell

Efficiency of 23% was reached!!

Behind photovoltaics 117


Trend in PV technology

HIT solar cell

Efficiency of 22% was


reached

What thin film technologies do you know?

Behind photovoltaics 118


Trend in PV technology

Thin film solar cells:

- CdTe (First Solar)


- CIS, CIGS (Würth)

- a-Si
- micromorph Si
- crystalline Si

UMG - substrate

Behind photovoltaics 119


ISC building

Behind photovoltaics
120
ISC building

Behind photovoltaics
121
Well known research institutes

Behind photovoltaics
Well known research institutes

technlogy transfer highest efficiency

Behind photovoltaics
ZEBRA cell: history and roadmap
2012 EU project moderN-type: Eurotron modules ZEBRA gen2
24 2013 BMU project MetalTopp: p+ metallisation
pilot line and 2013 EU project HERCULES: ion-implantation

technology 23.5%
23 ZEBRA gen1 ion-implantation
transfer screen printed
22.5%
contacts
22 diffusions 330Wp 60 cell
screen printed contacts modules
21% 315Wp 60 cell modules
21 diffusions
screen printed contacts
300Wp 60 cell modules
20
19.7%
19

18
17.6%
17

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Behind photovoltaics
CoO of Module Technologies
High efficiency
Low cost
ZEBRA-IBC Module High efficiency
(expected CoO)
Module
ZEBRA (e.g. Sunpower IBC,
Panasonic HIT, ..)
High efficiency
High cost
Standard efficiency

MWT Module

avg. estimated CoO


2013 Standard Module sales price range (Q1/2013)

Low cost

Data from: Pvinsights, Photon, ITRPV 2013, Eurotron,


own calculations

Behind photovoltaics

You might also like