Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ionnai
resf
or:
Gender
,Soci
etyandDev
elopment
Cour
se:
SOC153
Year
:2013
1.Whatdoyouunderst
andbyGender?Howdoy oudif
fer
ent
iat
eSexandGender
?
Cr
it
ical
l
ydiscusst
heMy t
hsaboutGenderSt
udies.
2.Howdot heagenci
esofSoci
ali
zat
ionef
fecti
ncr
eat
ionofr
olesi
nhumanbei
ng?
Descr
ibewit
hexamplefr
om Bangl
adesh.
3.Whatar
ethemaj
ortheor
iesofFemini
sm?Makeacompar
ati
vedi
scussi
onof
Li
ber
alf
emini
stt
houghtandRadicalf
emi
nistt
hought
.
4.‘
…LikeWollstonecraft,
Taylor
,andMil
lbeforeher,Fr
iedansentwomenoutinto
thepubl
icrealm wi t
houtsummoningmeni ntotheprivat
edomain.
’(Putnam
Tong)-
--
Withr efer
encet ot
hisstat
ementcri
tical
lydi
scusshowLiberal
Feminism
i
soblivi
ousdi rect
ingwomen’ sper
sonhood.
5.Def
ineempowerment.Whatar
ethemaj
ori
ndi
cat
orsofEmpower
mentofwomen
i
nourcount
ry?Cri
ti
call
ydi
scuss.
6.Howdoyouanal
yzethemajorcomponentsofpoli
ti
cal
par
ti
cipat
ionofwomen?
Di
scusswi
thr
efer
encetodevelopi
ngcountr
ies.
7.Whatdoyouunder
standbyv i
olence?Whyv i
olencei
saGenderi
ssue?Cr
it
ical
l
y
di
scusst
hecausesandtrendsofv i
olencei
nBangladesh.
8.Whataret
hetypesofvi
olenceofwomen?Cri
ti
call
yanaly
zethepossi
ble
sol
uti
onst
oreducingv
iol
enceagainstwomeninourcountr
y.
9.How‘Devel
opment’
becomeaGenderi
ssue?Di
scusst
heemer
genceofGAD
f
rom WIDwithr
efer
encewi
thCar
oli
neMoser.
10.
WhatisEco-
femini
sm?HowEco-
femi
nism i
sconnect
edwi
thWEDi
nrel
evanceof
env
ironment
?Discuss.
11.
Whati
sGendermainst
reaming?Discusst
hegov
ernmentst
epsi
nmai
nst
reami
ng
womeninDevel
opmentprocess.
12.
Whati
sCEDAW andPl
atf
ormforAct
ion?Di
scusst
her
elev
anceandcont
ri
but
ion
oft
hesepr
ogr
amsindevel
opmentofwomen.
INTRODUCTION TO GENDER
BY
TAHSINA AKHTER
ASSISTANT PROFFESOR
UNIVERSITY OF DHAKA
INTRODUCTION TO GENDER STUDY
Introduction
What is Gender
Differences between the terms ‘Gender’ and
‘Sex’
Debates on nature and nurture
Boundaries and negotiations between men
and women
INTRODUCTION
1840, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, wife of Henry
Brewster Stanton along with Lucretia Mott
were barred at the World Anti-Slavery
Convention, because they were women.
1848, at Seneca Falls, New York, the 1st
women’s rights gathering was held. They
discussed the issues of discrimination of
black and women on property rights, enter into
business, testify against their husbands or
legal voting.
CONTINUE
1865, 13 Amendment to the Constitution
th
Suffrage parade,
New York City, May
6, 1912
"Woman suffrage headquarters ...
Cleveland" (1912)
WOMEN WHO FOUGHT FOR SUFFRAGE IN
USA
CONT.
Another way of putting it is:
Sex refers to a natural or biological feature.
Gender refers to cultural or learned significance of sex.
According to Medilexicon's medical dictionary:
Sex is "The biologic character or quality that
distinguishes male and female from one another as
expressed by analysis of the person's gonadal,
morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and
hormonal characteristics."
Gender is "The category to which an individual is
assigned by self or others, on the basis of sex."
The word gender comes from Middle English
gendre, which came from Old French, which
in turn came from the Latin word genus,
meaning 'kind', 'type', or 'sort'.
TAHSINA AKHTER
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF DHAKA
Key Concepts
Equality
Difference
Choice
Care
Time
Motherhood and Womanhood- experiences
Feminist stand point
Androgyny
Power over to Power to
Pleasure with
Masculinity- Feminity
Capitalism
Patriarchy
Pornography
Commodification of womanhood
Introducing Diversity of feminism
I'm not a feminist but I believe that women should
earn equal pay for equal work; or I'm not a feminist
but I'm delighted that first-rate women basketball
players are finally getting some recognition in the
WNBA.
Feminism
The term ‘feminism’ has many different uses and its
meanings are often contested. For example, some
writers use the term ‘feminism’ to refer to a historically
specific political movement in the US and Europe;
other writers use it to refer to the belief that there are
injustices against women. In the mid-1800s the term
‘feminism’ was used to refer to “the qualities of
females”, and it was not until after the First
International Women's Conference in Paris in 1892 that
the term, following the French term féministe, was
used regularly in English for a belief in and advocacy of
equal rights for women based on the idea of the
equality of the sexes.
Cont.
Defining Feminism
There are variations on the definitions of feminism
depending on the perspectives each scholar perceived.
Yet we can define a basic definition by J. J. Macionis
(1992:248):
‘…feminism is the advocacy of social equality for the
sexes, in opposition to patriarchy and sexism.’
Major theoretical stands
Liberal Feminism
Radical Feminism
Marxist Feminism
Socialist Feminism
Liberal feminism
School
of Industrial Separation of production
Political Schoolfrom home and family
Revolution
Emergence
thought
18th
of formal century:
Home based , married, economicall
bourgeois, privileged y equal
Emergence 18th
women
Home based , married,education,
unproductiv of formal century:
ebourgeois,
women privileged economicall
persohoody equal
women unproductiv education,
e women persohood
Lack of
Education can help
Critique capability of
developing emancipation of those
s own powers unconscious Lack
cased women
feathered
of
Education can help
Critique
of reason capability
developing
of
emancipation of those
s own powers unconscious feathered
cased women
of reason
th
19 Century
Beliefs in Reform
Betty Friedan was the founder and first president of the
National Organization for Women (NOW)
The Feminist Mystique (1974)
Super Women
Mother-wife role
Flex time
The Second Stage (1981)
Beta-style of thinking--Culturally feminine
Alpha-style of thinking--Culturally masculine
The Fountain of Age (1993)
Androgynous—each person combining the same ‘’correct’’
blend of positive masculine and feminine characteristics
in order to be equal with every other person
Critiques of Liberal Feminism
Revolutionary Changes
Alison Jaggar and Paula Rothenberg’s claims
(46-47, Tong)
Kate Millett : Sexual Politics(1970) Men and women
relationship is Political relationship ; power relation
Shulamith Firestone: Dialectic of Sex
Marilyn French
Mary daly
Cont.
Types
Radical androgyn
Libertarian y
Radical
Feminis
m Radical
Femaleness
Cultural
Millett and Firestone
Pornography
Freud
Parson
Androgyny
French and Daly
Creates
Colectively
Men
and
Society
Wome
n Again Re-
shapes
Marxist Socialist
Pay respect to Marx and Engles and Twentieth Century thinkers like
19th century thinkers. Althusser and Habermas
Tahsina Akhter
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Dhaka
politics
Politics may be defined as a distinctive public activity,
a conscious , deliberate participation in a process by
which access to and control over the community
resources is gained ( Randall, V. Women and Politics
1987.)
Reference: http://elyaskhan.blogspot.com/2012/04/women-
participation-in-local-government.html
CEDAW
CEDAW is the most important human rights treaty
for women. The Convention’s states
parties are legally obliged, firstly, to eliminate all
forms of discrimination against women
in all areas of life, and, secondly, to ensure women’s
full development and advancement
in order that they can exercise and enjoy their
human rights and fundamental freedoms
in the same way as men. Thirdly, a state party must
allow the CEDAW Committee to
scrutinize its efforts to implement the treaty, by
reporting to the body at regular
intervals.
The legislative guarantees provided in the
constitution of Bangladesh providing equal rights
and nondiscrimination of women are further
supported by the ratification of the United Nations
Convention on the Elimination of All forms of
Discrimination against Women (UNCEDAW).
Article 7 & 8 :
• http://www.gov.nl.ca/VPI/types/
Nine Types of Violence and Abuse
Physical Violence Sexual Violence Emotional Violence
Physical violence occurs Sexual violence occurs Emotional violence occurs
when someone uses a part when a person is forced to when someone says or
of their body or an object to unwillingly take part in does something to make a
control a person’s actions. sexual activity. person feel stupid or
worthless.
http://www.who.int/violenceprevention/approach/definition/en/
Types of violence
Level Physical Cultural Structural
Family Beating, child/force Deprivation of girls Spirit of indifference,
labor, calling names, from education, not malnutrition, poverty
intimidation, allowing children to at family level, not to
imprisonment, express their ideas, express opinion.
depriving from food unhealthy cultural
values and tradition,
superstition
6. Postmodernising GAD?
7. Consolidating GAD?
8. Repoliticising GAD?
9. Concluding questions
1. Introduction: feminism and anthropology
Some milestones:
Edwin Ardener, ‘Belief and the Problem of Women’, 1972:
highlighted the absence of women’s voices in ethnographic
texts and challenged women anthropologists
1970s: a series of volumes addressing this question (e.g.
Rosaldo and Lamphere (eds.), Women, Culture and Society,
1974; S. Ardener (ed.) Perceiving Women, 1975) plus
ethnographic monographs (e.g. Strathern, Women in
Between, 1972)
1980s: gender, conceived as a social construct, became the
primary focus of interest…
(cf. Henrietta Moore, Feminism and Anthropology, 1988)
“The basis for the feminist critique is not the study of women,
but the analysis of gender relations, and of gender as a
structuring principle in all human societies” (Moore 1988: vii)
2. The development of WID The origins of WID, “Women in Development”
WID perspective was developed by American liberal feminists. “WID” was the name
of a women’s caucus formed by the Society for International Development (SID/WID);
part of a deliberate strategy to bring gender issues to the attention of policy-makers
Important role also played by the UN Commission on the Status of Women (> UN
Decade for Women 1976-85) (see Tinker 1990)
Criticism of WID
e.g. Sen and Grown, Development Crises and Alternative Visions: Third World
Women’s Perspectives, 1987: popularised the concept of empowerment
4. The development of GAD
Kate Young, ‘Gender and Development’, 1992 (in Visvanathan et al. 1997):
overview of the differences between WID and GAD. These include:
GAD focuses on gender relations rather than women per se
GAD views women as active rather than passive agents of development, though
they may be unaware of the roots of their subordination
GAD starts from a holistic perspective, the totality of social organisation, and
economic and political life (vs a focus on particular aspects of women’s lives, e.g.
economic production)
GAD stresses the need for women’s self-organisation to increase their political
power within the economic system (vs WID which emphasises the formation of
productive groups and access to cash income as group members or individuals)
GAD is less optimistic about the role of the market as a distributor of benefits to
women but places equal emphasis on the role of the state in promoting women’s
emancipation
GAD in practice
“The GAD approach does not easily lend
itself to integration into ongoing
development strategies and programs.
It demands a degree of commitment to
structural change and power shifts that
is unlikely to be found either in national
or international agencies” (Rathgeber
1990: 495)
To what extent
has GAD been
incorporated
into mainstream
policy and
institutions?
Has it been
neutralised?
Is this just
business – and
modernisation –
as usual?
WID, WAD, GAD:
Theoretical Debates and
Issues
Theoretical Framework
• WED - Ecofeminists
Theoretical basis of Women in
Development (WID)
Some milestones:
Edwin Ardener, ‘Belief and the Problem of Women’,
1972: highlighted the absence of women’s voices
in ethnographic texts and challenged women
anthropologists
1970s: a series of volumes addressing this question
(e.g. Rosaldo and Lamphere (eds.), Women, Cultur
and Society, 1974; S. Ardener (ed.) Perceiving
Women, 1975) plus ethnographic monographs (e.g
Strathern, Women in Between, 1972)
1980s: gender, conceived as a social construct,
became the primary focus of interest…
cf. Henrietta Moore, Feminism and Anthropology,
1988)
The origins of WID, “Women in
Development”
Ester Boserup’s Women’s Role in Economic
Development (1970), a comparative
analysis of women’s work :
Gender a basic factor in the division of
labour
Women’s labour at home and on the farm
generally under-reported
Analysed some of the reasons for
regional differences (e.g. in different
farming systems)
Related these to participation in off-farm
employment and labour migration
Highlighted the negative impacts of
colonialism and the penetration of
capitalism(see also Boserup in Tinker
1990)
• Boserup’s study put gender on the development
agenda.
• Later criticised for its oversimplification of the
nature of women’s work and roles (Beneria and
Sen in Visvanathan 1997)
The development of WID
• Welfare approach
• Equity approach
• Anti-poverty approach
• Efficiency approach
• Empowerment approach
Policy and Analytic Approaches
• Welfare: Focus on poor women, mainly in the roles of wife and mother. This
was the only approach during colonial periods, and was favoured by many
missionaries.
• Equity: Focus on equality between women and men and fair distribution of
benefits of development
• Anti-poverty: Women targeted as the poorest of the poor, with emphasis on
income-generating activities and access to productive resources such as
training and micro-finance.
• Efficiency: Emphasis on need for women’s participation for success,
effectiveness of development; assumes increased economic participation
will result in increased equity. They are most likely to be useful when
advocacy for the advancement of women is based on the more effective
use of all factors of production, and/or desire for stronger and more
sustainable project results. This is the approach currently most favoured by
development agencies
• Empowerment: Focus on increasing women’s capacity to analyze their own
situation and determine their own life choices and societal directions. likely
to be most useful where a human development and rights-based approach
to development predominates, or is desired.
Criticism of WID
By the mid-late 1970s it was becoming clear that
women had often fared worse under
modernisation and the development efforts of
the past decade. WID focused on integration and
advocacy for greater participation. It didn’t
question why women’s position was often
declining and what the sources and nature of
women’s subordination and oppression were. It
was often ahistorical and shared in many of the
weaknesses of the modernisation paradigm.
WID also tended to focus on women as
producers and ignore or minimise their
reproductive role.
Theoretical basis of Women and
Development (WAD):
Women And Development Approach (WAD)
Origin:
• Emerged from a critique of the modernization theory and the WID
approach in the second half of the 1970s
Theoretical base :
• Draws from the dependency theory
Focus:
• Women have always been part of development process-therefore
integrating women in development is a myth
• Focuses on relationship between women and development process
WAD Approach
Contribution :
Features :
Features:
• GAD rejects the public/private dichotomy .
• It gives special attention to oppression of women in the family by entering
the so called `private sphere’
• It emphasizes the state’s duty to provide social services in promoting
women’s emancipation.
• Women seen as agents of change rather than as passive recipients of
development assistance.
• Stresses the need for women to organize themselves for a more effective
political voice.
• Recognizes that patriarchy operates within and across classes to oppress
women
• Focuses on strengthening women’s legal rights, including the reform of
inheritance and land laws.
• It talks in terms of upsetting the existing power relations in society between
men and women.
The development of GAD
Kate Young, ‘Gender and Development’, 1992 (in Visvanathan et al. 1997):
overview of the differences between WID and GAD. These include:
GAD focuses on gender relations rather than women per se
GAD views women as active rather than passive agents of development, though
they may be unaware of the roots of their subordination
GAD starts from a holistic perspective, the totality of social organisation, and
economic and political life (vs a focus on particular aspects of women’s lives, e.g.
economic production)
GAD stresses the need for women’s self-organisation to increase their political
power within the economic system (vs WID which emphasises the formation of
productive groups and access to cash income as group members or individuals)
GAD is less optimistic about the role of the market as a distributor of benefits to
women but places equal emphasis on the role of the state in promoting women’s
emancipation
Strategic interests :
• Long-term
• Common to all women (e.g. vulnerability to physical violence, legal
limitations on rights to hold or inherit property, difficulty of gaining
access to higher education)
• Women are not always in a position to recognize the sources or
basis of their strategic disadvantages or limitations
• Solutions must involve women as active agents
• Must be addressed through consciousness raising, education and
political mobilization at all levels of society
• Improves the position of all women in a society
• Has the potential to transform or fundamentally change one or
more aspects of women's lives. This is called 'transformatory
potential' of the project/policy