The document reports power factor (PF) test results for two different settings. For the first setting with R=300, the running PF is 0.950 which is lower than the desired PF of 0.990. The reactive power (Q) is 56. For the second setting with R=800, the running PF is 0.930 which is lower than the expected PF of 0.979, and the reactive power is 150. Additional details are provided for an initial stage test including voltage, current transformer ratio, and capacitors/reactors values where the running PF was measured to be 0.92 at an angle of 23 degrees with currents of 30 for Ip and 0.5000 for Is.
The document reports power factor (PF) test results for two different settings. For the first setting with R=300, the running PF is 0.950 which is lower than the desired PF of 0.990. The reactive power (Q) is 56. For the second setting with R=800, the running PF is 0.930 which is lower than the expected PF of 0.979, and the reactive power is 150. Additional details are provided for an initial stage test including voltage, current transformer ratio, and capacitors/reactors values where the running PF was measured to be 0.92 at an angle of 23 degrees with currents of 30 for Ip and 0.5000 for Is.
The document reports power factor (PF) test results for two different settings. For the first setting with R=300, the running PF is 0.950 which is lower than the desired PF of 0.990. The reactive power (Q) is 56. For the second setting with R=800, the running PF is 0.930 which is lower than the expected PF of 0.979, and the reactive power is 150. Additional details are provided for an initial stage test including voltage, current transformer ratio, and capacitors/reactors values where the running PF was measured to be 0.92 at an angle of 23 degrees with currents of 30 for Ip and 0.5000 for Is.