Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1536-1225 © 2014 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
298 IEEE ANTENNAS AND WIRELESS PROPAGATION LETTERS, VOL. 14, 2015
TABLE I
DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED ANTENNA (ALL DIMENSIONS IN MILLIMETERS)
Fig. 2. Dispersion relation calculated for the balanced CRLH unit cell.
The second step of the design procedure, as shown in
Fig. 3(b), is to add the first CRLH cell composed of a meander
line with a length mm to operate at the WiMAX
frequency 3.8 GHz. The reflection coefficient for Fig. 3(b) is
shown as a blue dashed line in Fig. 4.
The third step of the design procedure, as shown in Fig. 3(c),
is to add the large IFA arm composed of arm length mm
to operate at GSM 1.8 GHz, shown as the brown dashed-dotted
line in Fig. 4.
The final step of the design procedure, as shown in Fig. 3(d),
Fig. 3. Design steps of the proposed quad-band printed-IFA. (a) First step. is to load the second CRLH cell composed of a meander line
(b) Second step. (c) Third step. (d) Fourth step.
with a length mm to operate at GSM 1.8 GHz,
while the resonant frequency of the second arm is reduced from
1.8 to 1.4 GHz for LTE applications, as shown in Fig. 4 as the red
dashed line. From the previous work [7], the IFA arm length
and the mender line length of the unit cell are used to con-
trol the resonant frequency of the IFA and unit cell, respectively.
Therefore, the IFA arm lengths and and the mender line
lengths and of unit cells are optimized to enable
the antenna to operate at GSM 1.8 GHz, Bluetooth 2.4 GHz,
WiMAX 3.5 GHz, and WLAN 5.2 GHz, as shown in Fig. 4 as
a black solid line. The optimized dimensions of the proposed
antenna are given in Table I.
A. Current Distribution
Fig. 4. design procedures of the proposed antenna.
The surface current distributions at each resonant frequency
are plotted in Fig. 5. The two fundamental resonant frequencies
relation of the unit cell calculated for the balanced case is shown of the two IFA arms are at 1.4 and 2.4 GHz as shown in Fig. 5(a)
in Fig. 2. and (c). Loading the two CRLH unit cells introduces two extra
In this case, the dimensions of the interdigital capacitor and resonant frequencies at 1.8 and 3.8 GHz. At 1.4 and 2.4 GHz,
the stub inductor are adjusted so that the CRLH unit cell is the surface current density mainly flows on its corresponding
nearly balanced at frequency around 2.4 GHz [6]. The frequency IFA arm and the meander slot of corresponding unit cell, which
within the left-handed (LH) and the right-handed (RH) regions causes a slight change on the resonant frequency of each IFA
of the CRLH are the same. arm by loading each CRLH unit cell.
The design flow can be described with the aid of Fig. 3(a)–(d),
and its corresponding reflection coefficient is shown in B. Equivalent Circuit
Fig. 4.
An electrical model using a ADS ver. 6.2 tool, based on the
The design starts with simulating the conventional CPW-fed
resonant circuits, is proposed to give a physical insight
printed-IFA with arm length mm to operate at Blue-
into the behavior of the USB antenna presented in this letter.
tooth 2.5 GHz as shown in Fig. 3(a). Reflection coefficient is
The proposed electrical model is shown in Fig. 6(a). It is based
shown as the green dotted line in Fig. 4. The resonant frequency
on the circuit model for patch antennas presented in [9], which
of each IFA arm can be approximately determined by [8]
was extended for a multiband planar IFA (PIFA) in [10]. There
is a good agreement between the corresponding reflection coef-
(1) ficient using the ADS tool and HFSS as shown in Fig. 6(b). The
coupling between the two nearby CRLH unit cells with each
where , , and are the speed of light, the IFA first other and with the ground plane was taken into account through
and second arm lengths, and the effective dielectric constant, adding the capacitors , and . It is noticed that each ele-
respectively. ment has its own parallel equivalent circuit. The inductor
SOLIMAN et al.: MULTIBAND PRINTED METAMATERIAL IFA FOR USB APPLICATIONS 299
Fig. 5. Surface current distribution at (a) 1.4, (b) 1.8, (c) 2.4, and (d) 3.8 GHz.
Fig. 7. Fabricated antenna (a) upper layer and (b) bottom layer. Simulated and
measured result of (c) implemented antenna and (d) optimized antenna for wire-
less applications.
TABLE II with independent tuning [7], easier fabrication, and reduced de-
BRIEF COMPARISON OF THE PROPOSED ANTENNA TO PUBLISHED PAPERS sign complexity.
Table III shows the simulated and measured radiation patterns
in two antenna main planes ( ) and ( ) at
1.8, 2.4, 3.5, and 5.2 GHz, with normalized co- and cross po-
larization ( and ), respectively. For almost all frequency
bands, the normalized copolarized patterns show near omni-
directional radiations, and their corresponding cross-polarized
patterns exhibit monopole-like. The average difference between
the co- and cross levels in the main plane for most of the fre-
quencies is higher than 10 dB. Some discrepancy appears at cer-
tain frequencies that may be attributed to the inadequate size of
the absorbers in addition to poor isolation. The measured real-
ized gains at 1.8, 2.4, 3.5, and 5.2 GHz are 2.8, 1.9, 3.1, and
TABLE III 2.1 dBi, respectively. The radiation efficiency was measured by
RADIATION PATTERNS. SIMULATED: BLACK LINES. MEASURED: RED LINES.
: SOLID LINES. : DOTTED LINES AT EACH RESONANT FREQUENCY.
using the Wheeler cap method [11]. The average radiation effi-
AXES ARE SHOWN IN FIG. 1 ciency is more than 75% over the operating bands.
IV. CONCLUSION
A quad-band printed-IFA is loaded with two CRLH unit cells.
The proposed antenna supports most data wireless communi-
cation standards for USB applications. The antenna was de-
signed to create four operating bands at GSM 1.8 GHz, Blue-
tooth 2.4 GHz, WiMAX 3.5 GHz, and upper WLAN 5.2 GHz
bands. The theory of the proposed antenna was verified by using
electromagnetic (EM) simulators ADS and HFSS and measure-
ments. The radiation patterns approximate an omnidirectional
pattern. The overall size of the antenna including the ground
plane is mm . The proposed antenna was easily
fabricated on FR4 substrate. These features make the antenna a
good candidate for USB applications.
REFERENCES
[1] S. Lee and Y. Sung, “Multiband antenna for wireless USB dongle ap-
plications,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 10, pp. 25–28,
2011.
[2] L. Qi, J. Pereira, and H. Salgado, “Multiband loaded fractal loop
monopole antenna for USB dongle applications,” in Proc. IEEE
Loughborough Antennas Propag. Conf., 2009, pp. 245–247.
[3] Y. K. Park, D. Kang, and Y. Sung, “Compact folded triband monopole
antenna for USB dongle applications,” IEEE Antennas Wireless
Propag. Lett., vol. 11, pp. 228–231, 2012.
[4] K. L. Wong and C. H. Kuo, “Internal GSM_DCS_PCS antenna for
USB dongle application,” Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 48, pp.
2408–2412, 2006.
[5] A. Erentok and R. W. Ziolkowski, “Metamaterial-inspired efficient
electrically small antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 56,
no. 3, pp. 691–707, Mar. 2008.
[6] A. A. Ibrahim, A. M. E. Safwat, and H. El-Hennawy, “Triple-band
microstrip-fed monopole antenna loaded with CRLH unit cell,” IEEE
Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., vol. 10, pp. 1547–1550, 2011.
[7] A. M. Soliman, D. M. El-sheakh, E. A. Abdallah, and H. El-Henawy,
“Compact independent tri-band printed-IFA loaded with inspired
metamaterial for wireless communication applications,” in Proc. 7th
EuCAP, Apr. 2013, pp. 931–934.
[8] D. M. Nashaat, H. A. Elsadek, and H. Ghali, “Single feed compact
are suitable for the channel bandwidth of the LTE band 11 quad-band PIFA antenna for wireless communication applications,”
(1.42–1.47 GHz), GSM1800 (1780–1890 MHz), Bluetooth IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 36–43, Aug. 2005.
(2.4–2.45 GHz), WiMAX standards (3.4–3.5 and 3.7–4 GHz), [9] J. Anguera, C. Puente, and C. Borja, “A procedure to design stacked
microstrip patch antenna based on a simple network model,” Microw.
and upper WLAN (5.2–5.25 GHz). There is a good agreement Opt. Technol. Lett., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 149–151, Aug. 2001.
between the simulated and measured results. [10] J. Anguera, E. Martínez, C. Puente, C. Borja, and J. Soler, “Multiband
Table II shows a brief comparison between our design and the handset antenna combining a PIFA, slots, and ground plane modes,”
previous published papers. The great advantage of this design is IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2526–2533, Sep.
2009.
that it is easy to extend the proposed design to cover multiser- [11] H. A. Wheeler, “The radiansphere around a small antenna,” Proc. IRE,
vice through adding a new IFA arm with loaded CRLH unit cells vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1325–1331, Aug. 1959.