Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REPORT
OF
THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING OF
Mr. Rajkumar Subedi at Nakhipot , Lalitpur, Nepal
November, 2020
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
This report comprises the summary of the design of the residential building of Mr. Ramkumar
Subedi, at Nakhipot, Lalitpur, Nepal. The report consists of the design procedures adopted, the
assumptions made, the inputs made in the design and the design output. During the design, it is
assumed that the client will completely follow the architectural as well as the structural design. It is
assumed that client maintains the quality of the material provided to him/her during construction
and works are executed as per design standard. It is also assumed that the construction will be
supervised by a professional engineer.
The designer will not be responsible if any alterations to the structural system is made by the
client or the contractor without the prior written permission from the designer, or the alterations
to the non-structural system is made such that the weight of each individual floor or the weight of
the building is altered by more than 10% of the design weight of each floor and the total weight.
The design calculations and the derivations are limited to only a minimum to let the concerned
people know the methodology adopted. And also no soil test report has been provided during design
period so the soil bearing capacity has been assumed for preliminary design but during construction
phase it is strictly recommended to perform soil test before implementation and if needed necessary
revision in the design may take place. However, the calculations may be provided to the client or the
concerned authorities when needed, upon request.
Designer,
Er. Sailesh Maharjan
Nec: 21726 civil A
Contents
1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Salient Features....................................................................................................................... 1
1.2.1 Project Information ............................................................................................................. 1
1.2.2 Building Features ................................................................................................................ 1
1.2.3 Site Condition ...................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Geometry of the Building ........................................................................................................ 2
2 Design Approach and Methodology ................................................................................................ 3
2.1 Design Methods of Structural Elements ................................................................................. 3
2.1.1 Working Stress Method ...................................................................................................... 3
2.1.2 Limit State Method ............................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Standard and Code.................................................................................................................. 4
2.3 Software used: (Introduction to Analysis software) ............................................................... 4
2.4 Structural Performance........................................................................................................... 4
2.4.1 Deformation under Vertical Loads. ..................................................................................... 4
2.4.2 Deformation under Lateral Loads ....................................................................................... 5
3 Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 6
3.1 Loading details/ Types of Loads .............................................................................................. 6
3.2 Material Specification ............................................................................................................. 6
3.3 Loading on Structural Model .................................................................................................. 8
3.4 Load Cases............................................................................................................................... 8
3.5 Load Combination ................................................................................................................... 8
3.6 Assumptions ............................................................................................................................ 9
3.7 Analysis and Design................................................................................................................. 9
3.8 Method of Seismic Analysis .................................................................................................... 9
3.8.1 Design Seismic Forces ....................................................................................................... 10
3.9 Design and Detailing ............................................................................................................. 10
3.9.1 Earthquake Resistant Design ............................................................................................ 10
3.9.2 Detailing of Reinforcement as per IS 13920: 1993 ........................................................... 11
3.9.3 Detailing of Steel ............................................................................................................... 11
3.10 Load Calculations .................................................................................................................. 11
3.10.1 Dead load ...................................................................................................................... 11
4 Detail Design .................................................................................................................................. 12
4.1.1 RCC Structure .................................................................................................................... 12
4.1.2 Detail Design of Base Plate ............................................................................................... 15
4.1.3 Result and Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 16
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
This report summarizes the structural analysis and design of "The Proposed Residential Building of Mr.
Rajkumar Subedi at Nakhipot, Lalitpur, Nepal. The analysis and design has been based on the prevailing
codes that are in practice in Nepal, the National Building code of Nepal and the IS code where
applicable. This report consists of the design procedures adopted, the assumptions made, the inputs
made in the design and the design output.
The basic aim of the structural design is to build a structure, which is safe, fulfilling the intended
purpose during its estimated life span, economical in terms of initial and maintenance cost, durable and
also maintaining a good aesthetic appearance.
A building is considered to be structurally sound, if the individual elements and the building as a whole
satisfy the criteria for strength, stability and serviceability and in seismic areas additional criteria for
ductility and energy absorption capabilities. The overall building must be strong enough to transfer all
loads through the structure to the ground without collapsing or losing structural integrity by rupture of
the material at the critical sections, by transformation of the whole or parts into mechanisms or by
instability.
Failure of one structural element (e.g., due of explosions or collisions) should not cause progressive
collapse of the entire structure. Such a building will normally have alternate load paths or mechanisms
to transfer loads safely to the foundation.
Page | 1
Total Height : 8.22 m
2
Soil bearing capacity : 120 KN/m (assumed)
Configuration of the building is Irregular shaped. It consists of three storey. The maximum length of the
building is 12.85 m and maximum width of the building is 5.58 m.
Page | 2
2 Design Approach and Methodology
2.1 Design Methods of Structural Elements
Indian Standard Code of Practice for Steel Structure, i.e.IS: 800-1984 for design of Structural Elements
has been followed.
It is applied for lateral seismic force distribution generated with IS 1893 based spectral Function for soil
type-II.
For section design and check, suitable load combinations as suggested in NBC 105:1994 and if not
covered in that, IS 1893-2002 is referred with consideration of envelopes of internal forces developed.
Page | 3
2.2 Standard and Code
The structural calculation of this building shall be in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations
of the Government of Nepal, and its referral to any other standards. A summary of the codes and
standards in used in structural analysis and design have been listed as below.
a. IS 875 (Part I to IV) -1987, Code of practice for design loads in Building and structure
h. IS 1084-1985 Design and construction of shallow foundations in soils (other than Raft, Ring & Shell)
The analysis has been carried out using a standard software package Staad pro Connect Edition and
Staad Advanced Foundation based on finite element method. The software is capable of carrying out a
Three-Dimensional analysis. It is windows-based software. It has a user-friendly graphical input and
output interface. It can account for the rigid zones at the beam - column junction. It has a capability to
create a special joint at any grid intersection. The program has a facility to create shell elements also.
Shell elements can be used for the analysis of Slabs and Shear walls. A full 3D finite element model using
frame and shell elements can also be created using Staad pro Connect Edition.
Structural response under limit state of serviceability is thoroughly checked. The force and stiffness
relationship resulting the deflection under various load cases and combined action of forces are duly
evaluated. Basically short- term elastic deflection due to vertical loads and lateral deflection due t
seismic forces are of major importance along with the long-term defection of beam elements under
sustained loading condition due to shrinkage and creep are also taken into account.
2.4.1 Deformation under Vertical Loads.
Maximum vertical deflection in all beam and deck elements that resulted under vertical load of
combined effect of self, imposed dead and live load are checked for critical elements and maintained to
be within permissible limit. Short-term elastic deflection and long-term deflection due to shrinkage and
Page | 4
creep due to sustained loads are also maintained within permissible limits for all the elements. In order
to control deflection of structural elements, the criteria given in IS 800 is proposed to be used.
An effect of lateral load due to seismic force is analyzed using response spectrum input compatible with
codal provision. Using Compatible Quadratic combination (CQC) method of modal combinations combines
the deformations and related forced reported. To control overall deflection due to earthquake load, the
criteria given in clause 7.11 of is 1893-2002: the storey drift in any storey due to the minimum
specified design lateral force, with partial load factor of 1 does not exceed 0.004 times the storey
height.
Page | 5
3 Analysis
3.1 Loading details/ Types of Loads
a. Dead Load: The Dead load comprises the loads due to the materials used in the construction
and parts or components in a building. It consists of the loads due to structural elements like
beam, column, wall slab, staircase, etc; finishes applied in the building and some permanent
structures line water tanks etc.
b. Imposed Load: The imposed load comprises the loads due to the physical contribution to people
and the loads due to the nature of occupancy, the furniture and other equipment which are a
part of the character of the occupancy. The imposed loads on the structural system are based
on the codal provisions as specified in IS 875(part2)-1987.
c. Earthquake load: The Earthquake load is the horizontal/ lateral load induced by the ground
motion due to earthquakes. The design lateral load / force is considered in two orthogonal
horizontal directions of the structures. The earthquake induced lateral loads on the
structural system are based on the codal provisions as specified in NBC 105:1994
Page | 6
Clear cover to the main reinforcement in the various structural elements shall be as follows:
a) Footings (Bottom) 50 mm
b) Footings (Top and Sides) 50 mm
c) Columns 40 mm
d) Pedestals 40 mm
e) Beams 25 mm or bar dia whichever is greater
The system of concrete and steel reinforcing strength combinations will be used as follows.
Concrete grade, fck= 20 N/mm2 for all concrete structures
Reinforcing steel, Fe500 (elongation >14.5%)
Modulus of elastic for steel, Es=200,000 N/mm2
Considerations of material for loading and strength parameter are as detailed below:
Concrete
Grade: M20
2
Characteristic Compressive strength: 20 N/mm
3
Unit weight: 25 KN/m
2
Young's modulus of elasticity (E) = 5000*sqrt (fck) = 22360679.8 KN/m
Poisson’s Ratio = 0.2
Finishing
3
Cement Plaster (20mm thick): 20.4 KN/m
3
Screed (38mm thick):19.2 KN/m
2 2
Live load: Lobby & Staircase: 3KN/m ; Rooms: 2KN/m
Page | 7
3.3 Loading on Structural Model
The following considerations are made during the loading on the structural model;
• The loads distributed over the area are imposed on area element and that distributed
over length are imposed on line element whenever possible.
• Where such loading is not applicable, equivalent conversion to different loading
distribution is carried to load the model near the real case as far as possible.
• For lateral load, necessary calculations are performed to comply with the requirements
of NBC 105:1994.
The earthquake induced lateral loads are determined and used from the spectral load cases based on
NBC 105:1994 Spectrum for Soil Type III. Lateral load thus developed is the product of structural seismic
mass, modal response and respective spectral ordinates.
1. 1.5DL + 1.5LL
2. 1.2(DL + LL + EQPX)
3. 1.2(DL + LL + EQNX)
4. 1.2(DL + LL + EQPY)
5. 1.2(DL + LL + EQNY)
6. 1.5DL + 1.5EQPX
7. 1.5DL + 1.5EQNX
8. 1.5DL + 1.5EQPY
9. 1.5DL + 1.5EQNY
10. 0.9DL + 1.5EQPX
11. 0.9DL + 1.5EQNX
12. 0.9DL + 1.5EQPY
13. 0.9DL + 1.5EQNY
Page | 8
14. 1.5DL
Where, DL: Dead load
LL: Live load
EQ: Earthquake load
3.6 Assumptions
The following assumptions are taken into consideration in the seismic resistant analysis and design of
structures:
• Adequate supervision and quality systems are provided during execution of the works.
• Construction is carried out by personnel having the appropriate skill and experience.
• Construction materials and products confirm to the pertinent codes and specifications.
• The structure is adequately maintained.
• The structure is used in accordance with the design brief.
• An earthquake is not likely to occur simultaneously with maximum flood, wind, waves of tides.
• Resonance as visualized under steady state sinusoidal excitation will not occur, as the small
duration of earthquake is not enough to build up resonance amplitudes.
• Subsoil does not considerably settle or slide due to earthquake at the site of structure.
The analysis has been carried out using a standard software package Staad pro and safe based
on finite element method. The software is capable of carrying out a Three- Dimensional
analysis. It is windows-based software. It has a user- friendly graphical input and output
interface. It can account for the rigid zones at the beam - column junction. It has a capability to
create a special joint at any grid intersection. The program has a facility to create plate
elements also. Shell elements can be used for the analysis of Slabs and Shear walls. A full 3D
finite element model using frame and surface elements can also be created using staad pro.
The structure is assumed to be fixed at the plinth level. The compartments between the
plinth beams are filled with compacted earth. The stiffness contribution of brick walls on
the structure has been ignored and the building has been modeled as a “Bare Frame” with
no infill wall panels. The flange effect of the slab has been neglected. The beams have
been modeled as rectangular beams.
The building can be classified as a regular one. It satisfies the criteria listed in the clause 5.2
and 5.3 of NBC 105 (H<40 m) and also of IS Code 1893_1. Hence, an equivalent Static Analysis
(Seismic Coefficient Method) has been performed according to IS Code 1893 _1. The seismic
forces determined by seismic analysis are directly applied at the “special joint” created at the
Page | 9
centre of mass of each floor level. The program automatically calculates the centre of stiffness
of the structure. Therefore, Torsion is automatically accounted by the program itself. So, no
extra calculation is needed to find out extra forces due to torsion.
The computation of horizontal forces and their distribution has been carried out as per 7.5 of
IS1893_1.
The horizontal seismic shear force at the base of the structure is given by:
Vb = Ah*Wt
The horizontal seismic force coefficient Ah is given by:
Ah = (Z*I*Sa/g)/2*R
The horizontal seismic force is distributed at each level i according to the following
equation:
Qi = V Wi hi^2 / Σ Wi hi^2
The design of reinforced concrete structural members includes selection of material properties
(grade of steel and concrete), shape and size of cross section, factor of safety and amount of
steel required. The design of reinforced concrete members are carried out using limit state
method as per IS 456: 2000. The limit state method is the modern and latest design
methodology. This method evolved around 1970’s.
Prior to this working stress method and ultimate load methods were in use. Limit state method is
based on the concept of multiple safety factors and attempts to provide adequate safety at the
ultimate loads and adequate serviceability at service loads. Limit state method can be termed as an
extension of Working state method and ultimate load method.
Page | 10
3.9.2 Detailing of Reinforcement as per IS 13920: 1993
IS 13920: 1993 is used for special design and detailing, related to earthquake resistant design.
Special design provisions are meant for achieving ductility in the structure. Ductility is achieved
by avoiding brittle modes of failure, namely, shear failure, bond failure. Detailing of steel
reinforcement is an important aspect of structural design. Poor reinforcement detailing can
lead to structural failures.
For steel structure detailing IS800:1984 – Code of practice for general construction of steel
structure has been followed for detailing of structural steel element whereas Hand book on
Concrete Reinforcement and Detailing SP: 34(S&T)-1987 NBC201:1994 and NBC205:2012 has been
followed for RCC element detailing. Structural steel section obtained from design results of Sap2000
were used for detailing.
3.10 Load Calculations
3.10.1 Dead load
Wall Load Calculation
For Brick wall
Thickness of the wall = 230 mm (9")
Floor to floor height of the building = 2.74 m
Height of the building after beam depth deduction = 2.54m
3
Unit weight = 19 KN/m
Now, Load = γ * (height * thickness)
= 19 * 2.54 * 0.23
= 11.09 KN/m
Taking 80% for opening deduction =8.87 KN/m
For Prefab
Thickness of internal wall = 100 mm (4") = 0.100 m
Floor to floor height of the building = 2.74 m
3
Unit weight of concrete= 25 KN/m
Now, Load = γ * (height * thickness)
= 25* (2.74-0.150) * 0.100
= 6.475 KN/m (taking 6.5 KN/m)
For wall load for parapet = 19*1.2*0.100 = 2.28 KN/m
Page | 11
4 Detail Design
4.1.1 RCC Structure
4.1.1.1 Plinth Beam:
Material and Section Properties
Material Section
Light
Cover
Concrete SLAB Eff.
Fck Fy Fys B D
Type Shape THK. Width
(MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (mm) (mm) Top Use Bot
CHK Factor (mm) (mm)
(mm) Top (mm)
Deflection Result
Deflection Result
Short Term Long Term Ratio
Short
d d allow d d allow Long
Term
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) Term
(mm)
Page | 12
4.1.1.2 Isolated Footing Design
Material
Characteristics Strength of Concrete 20 KN/mm2
Grade of Steel 500
Load
Axial Load (Pu) 396 KN
Moment along X 0
Moment Along Y 0
Self-Weight 1
Surcharge 1KN/M2
Section
Depth 220mm
Cover 50mm
Column 350mmx350mm
Eccentricity Ex. 0
Eccentricity Ey. 0
Foundation Geometry
Length 1.7m
Width 1.7m
Soil Properties
Soil Bearing Capacity 120
Reinforcement
Main Bar
Along y Direction 12mm ɸ@150mm
Along X Direction 12mm ɸ@200mm
Design Result
Soil Bearing Capacity 0.994
Moment Along X 0.772
Moment Along y 0.935
One Way Shear Along X 0.991
One Way Shear Along Y 0.896
Two Way Shear 0.949
Page | 13
4.1.1.3 Combined Footing
Reinforcement
Main Bar
Along y Direction 16mm ɸ@150mm
Along X Direction 12mm ɸ@150mm
Design Result
Soil Bearing Capacity 0.860
Moment Along X 0.937
Moment Along y 0.820
One Way Shear Along X 0.831
One Way Shear Along Y 0.831
Two Way Shear 0.857
Page | 14
4.1.2 Detail Design of Base Plate
B(mm) 350.00
H(mm) 350.00
Pedestal
Shape Rectangle
B(mm) 350.00
H(mm) 350.00
Anchor Bolt
Cast-In-Place
Install Type
Anchor Bolt
Type M20
Length Position No
Cast(D) Post(mm) X(mm) Y(mm) X Y
20.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 2 2
Design Force
Base Rib Wing Anchor
Bearing
Plate Plate Plate Bolt
Comp. Tens. Mux Muy Mu Vu Mu Vu Vu Tu L
(MPa) (kN) (kN.m/m) (kN.m/m) (kN.m) (kN) (kN.m) (kN) (kN) (kN) (mm)
-
23.31 -18.95 -18.77 11.92 197.84 - - 18.93 -40.30 400.00
40.30
Design Ratio
Bearing Base PL Rib Plate Wing Plate Anchor Bolt
Comp. Tens. Mux Muy Mu Vu Mu Vu Vu Tu L Dist.
1.10 0.551 0.940 0.931 0.871 0.703 - - 0.486 0.677 0.861 -
Page | 15
4.1.3 Result and Conclusion
Hence the Residential Building with steel structure has been designed and checked for all the
possible load cases specified by code for its intended period of service life. It is advisable to consult
with consultancy for any queries / confusions if encountered during construction.
Table 1: Reinforcement Summary
Column
Main Vertical Bar-4Nos-16mm & 4-12mm dia bar
Ties:8mm dia bar@6”c-c
Plinth Beam
Top Bar-3Nos-16mm dia bar
Bottom Bar: 2Nos-16mm dia bar
Ties:8mm dia bar@6”c-c
Isolated Footing
Main Bar:12mm dia Bar @ 6” c-c
Distribution Bar:12mm dia Bar @ 6” c-c
Combined Footing
Top Bar:12mm Dia Bar@ 6”c-c both ways
Bottom Main Bar:16mm Dia Bar@6”c-c
Bottom Distribution Bar:12mmDia Bar@6”c-c
Page | 16
Annex
Job No Sheet No Rev
1
Software licensed to Lavteam Part
CONNECTED User: Not signed in
Job Title Ref
By Date09-Nov-20 Chd
Max: 1.810 mm
Max:
Max: 4.799
5.046 mmmm
Max: 3.745 mm
Max: 2.750 mm
Max: 3.061 mm
Max: 2.511 mm
Max: 1.019 mm
Max: 1.092 mm
Max: 0.909 mm
Max: 1.817 mm
Max:
Max:
Max: 3.452
3.528
3.529 mm
mm mm
Max: 2.768 mm
Max: 0.877 mm
Max: 1.529 mm
Max: 1.674 mm
Max: 1.520 mm
Max: 0.729 mm
Max: 0.741 mm
Max: 1.590 mm
Max:
Max:
Max: 3.401
3.465
3.457 mm
mm mm
Max: 2.473 mm Max: 0.544 mm
Max: 0.555 mm
Max: 1.666 mm
Max: 1.888 mm
Max: 1.664 mm
Max: 0.432 mm
Max: 0.156 mm
Max: 0.089 mm
Print Time/Date: 10/11/2020 15:09 STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition 21.00.02.30 Print Run 1 of 3
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Job No Sheet No Rev
2
Software licensed to Lavteam Part
CONNECTED User: Not signed in
Job Title Ref
By Date09-Nov-20 Chd
3.278
-0.041kN-m
kN-m
0.972 kN-m
0.963
-1.895
-2.211
-2.221 kN-m
kN-m
-1.163 kN-m
-1.161
3.830 kN-m
2.419
-1.314 kN-m
-1.234 kN-m
-1.057 kN-m
-1.063
2.573 kN-m
-0.333 kN-m
16.538 kN-m
-2.171 kN-m
0.373 kN-m
1.578 kN-m
1.633
17.536 kN-m
-1.453 kN-m
kN-m
1.662 2.386
1.880 kN-m
22.932 kN-m
16.780 kN-m -13.030
-13.033 kN-m
-13.827
-13.803
-5.371 kN-m
-5.370 kN-m
-1.284 kN-m
0.311 kN-m
-6.097 kN-m
-6.106
12.309 kN-m
-6.740 kN-m
-6.720
-0.718 kN-m
1.407 kN-m
14.335 kN-m
0.841 kN-m
14.335 kN-m
10.843 kN-m
0.663 kN-m
10.843 kN-m
0.497 kN-m
Print Time/Date: 10/11/2020 15:09 STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition 21.00.02.30 Print Run 2 of 3
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Job No Sheet No Rev
3
Software licensed to Lavteam Part
CONNECTED User: Not signed in
Job Title Ref
By Date09-Nov-20 Chd
0.144 kN
-4.472 kN
-3.118 kN
-4.266
-1.208
1.110
-1.118 kNkN
-2.616
kN
4.554
1.722 kN
5.432
-0.128kN
kN
-3.908 kN
-0.268
-2.920 kN
3.191
0.610 kN
4.069
0.252 kN
kN
0.144
1.588 kN
23.161 kN -2.843 -18.283 kN
-33.050
kN kN
1.937
-0.001
34.194 kN 10.128 kN kNkN
kN
-7.250 kN -23.411
-0.515
-0.128 kN
0.799
1.588 kN
22.224 kN
7.084 kN kN -21.278 kN
-32.810
34.381 kN 15.875 kN -4.303
-1.375 kNkN -27.018
-8.706 kN kN
-0.515 kN
0.678 kN
12.950 kN -6.712 kN -27.959 kN
25.107 kN 5.445 kN -14.803 kN
0.423 kN
1.050
0.799 kN
-24.366 kN
24.366 kN
0.678 kN
-21.191 kN
21.191 kN
0.423 kN
Print Time/Date: 10/11/2020 15:09 STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition 21.00.02.30 Print Run 3 of 3
You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Design of Base plate
Factored axial load Pu 323 KN
Shear load Vx 40.5 KN
Grade of concrete fck 20 N/mm2
Grade of steel Fy 250 N/mm2
Bearing strength of concrete 0.6fck 12 N/mm2
Factored bending moment M 52 kNm
Eccentricity e 0.16 m
Length of base plate required l 965.94 mm
Adopted bearing plate length l adopted 350 mm
Maximum bearing pressure Pmax 10.69084 N/mm2
Width of base plate b 324.56 mm
Adopted bearing plate width b adopted 350 mm
Provided plate 350mmx350mm
For this plate Pmax 9.91 N/mm2
2. Material
(1) H-Beam
Fy : 248MPa 1-M13@230
Es : 199,948MPa
(2) Stud Bolt
126
Fy : 248MPa
80
Fu : 400MPa
(3) Concrete
8
Fck : 20.00MPa
150
3. Section
5
(1) H-Beam : BH-150x75x5/8
8
As : 1,940mm^2
Xc : 37.50mm 75
Xy : 75.00mm
Ycp : 75.00mm
Ycm : 75.00mm
Ix : 7,352,014mm^4
Iy : 565,508mm^4
ix : 61.57mm
iy : 17.08mm
Sx : 98,027mm^3
Sy : 15,080mm^3
Zx : 107,645mm^3
Zy : 23,338mm^3
(2) Slab
Thickness : 126mm
Shape : T-Section
(3) Stud Bolt
Type : M13 ( Diameter = 13.00mm )
Columns : 1 EA
Space : 230mm
Length : 80.00mm
(4) Deck Plate : DPL-80x230x70x102x1.2
Direction : Perpendicular to Beam
4. Span
(1) Span
Span : 4.500m
Space : 1.000m
Lb : 1.000m
(2) Support : No
5. Design Load
(1) Uniform Load
Live Load : 2.000kN/m^2
Finish Load : 1.000kN/m^2
Construction Load : 1.500kN/m^2
2020-09-02 1
λr = 162
h/tw = 23.20 < λr -> O.K
Compact Section -> Plastic Design
2020-09-02 3
Mu = 16.33kN.m
(2) Calculate Design Shear Force
1.4D = 8.538kN
1.2D+1.6L = 14.52kN
Vu = 14.52kN
2020-09-02 4
(2) Calculate Transformed Moment of Inertia
n = Es / 1.35Ec = 5.672
yb = 57.35mm
Ij = 58,375,073mm^4
(3) Calculate Deflection & Frequency
wj = 2.911kN/m
Δj = 1.331mm
fj = 15.45Hz
(4) Calculate Transformed Moment of Inertia per Unit Width
de = 86.00mm
3
Ds = (de ) / 12n = 9,346mm^3
Dj = Ij / S = 58,375mm^3
(5) Calculate Effective Beam Panel Width
Cj = 2.000
1/4
Bj1 = Cj (Ds / Dj ) Lj = 5.693m
Bj2 = 2/3 Span = 9.000m
Bj = min(Bj1 , Bj2 ) = 5.693m
(6) Calculate Weight of Beam Panel
Wj = 1.5 (wj / S) Bj Lj = 74.57kN
2020-09-02 5
25
10
Rhythmic Activities,
Outdoor Footbridges
Indoor Footbridges,
Peak Acceleration (% Gravity)
Offices,
Residences
0.5
Freq.:9.595, Accel.:0.499
0.25
0.05
1 3 4 5 8 10 25 40
Frequency (Hz)
2020-09-02 6
Job No Sheet No Rev
Aayu Consulting Engineers 1
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title Ref
By Date09-Nov-20 Chd
Print Time/Date: 11/11/2020 00:39 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33 Print Run 1 of 5
Job No Sheet No Rev
Aayu Consulting Engineers 2
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title Ref
By Date09-Nov-20 Chd
Print Time/Date: 11/11/2020 00:39 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33 Print Run 2 of 5
Job No Sheet No Rev
Aayu Consulting Engineers 3
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title Ref
By Date09-Nov-20 Chd
Print Time/Date: 11/11/2020 00:39 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33 Print Run 3 of 5
Job No Sheet No Rev
Aayu Consulting Engineers 4
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title Ref
By Date09-Nov-20 Chd
Print Time/Date: 11/11/2020 00:39 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33 Print Run 4 of 5
Job No Sheet No Rev
Aayu Consulting Engineers 5
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title Ref
By Date09-Nov-20 Chd
Print Time/Date: 11/11/2020 00:39 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33 Print Run 5 of 5