You are on page 1of 35

STRUCTURAL DESIGN

REPORT
OF
THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING OF
Mr. Rajkumar Subedi at Nakhipot , Lalitpur, Nepal

November, 2020
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

This report comprises the summary of the design of the residential building of Mr. Ramkumar
Subedi, at Nakhipot, Lalitpur, Nepal. The report consists of the design procedures adopted, the
assumptions made, the inputs made in the design and the design output. During the design, it is
assumed that the client will completely follow the architectural as well as the structural design. It is
assumed that client maintains the quality of the material provided to him/her during construction
and works are executed as per design standard. It is also assumed that the construction will be
supervised by a professional engineer.

The designer will not be responsible if any alterations to the structural system is made by the
client or the contractor without the prior written permission from the designer, or the alterations
to the non-structural system is made such that the weight of each individual floor or the weight of
the building is altered by more than 10% of the design weight of each floor and the total weight.

The design calculations and the derivations are limited to only a minimum to let the concerned
people know the methodology adopted. And also no soil test report has been provided during design
period so the soil bearing capacity has been assumed for preliminary design but during construction
phase it is strictly recommended to perform soil test before implementation and if needed necessary
revision in the design may take place. However, the calculations may be provided to the client or the
concerned authorities when needed, upon request.

Designer,
Er. Sailesh Maharjan
Nec: 21726 civil A
Contents
1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Salient Features....................................................................................................................... 1
1.2.1 Project Information ............................................................................................................. 1
1.2.2 Building Features ................................................................................................................ 1
1.2.3 Site Condition ...................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 Geometry of the Building ........................................................................................................ 2
2 Design Approach and Methodology ................................................................................................ 3
2.1 Design Methods of Structural Elements ................................................................................. 3
2.1.1 Working Stress Method ...................................................................................................... 3
2.1.2 Limit State Method ............................................................................................................. 3
2.2 Standard and Code.................................................................................................................. 4
2.3 Software used: (Introduction to Analysis software) ............................................................... 4
2.4 Structural Performance........................................................................................................... 4
2.4.1 Deformation under Vertical Loads. ..................................................................................... 4
2.4.2 Deformation under Lateral Loads ....................................................................................... 5
3 Analysis ............................................................................................................................................ 6
3.1 Loading details/ Types of Loads .............................................................................................. 6
3.2 Material Specification ............................................................................................................. 6
3.3 Loading on Structural Model .................................................................................................. 8
3.4 Load Cases............................................................................................................................... 8
3.5 Load Combination ................................................................................................................... 8
3.6 Assumptions ............................................................................................................................ 9
3.7 Analysis and Design................................................................................................................. 9
3.8 Method of Seismic Analysis .................................................................................................... 9
3.8.1 Design Seismic Forces ....................................................................................................... 10
3.9 Design and Detailing ............................................................................................................. 10
3.9.1 Earthquake Resistant Design ............................................................................................ 10
3.9.2 Detailing of Reinforcement as per IS 13920: 1993 ........................................................... 11
3.9.3 Detailing of Steel ............................................................................................................... 11
3.10 Load Calculations .................................................................................................................. 11
3.10.1 Dead load ...................................................................................................................... 11
4 Detail Design .................................................................................................................................. 12
4.1.1 RCC Structure .................................................................................................................... 12
4.1.2 Detail Design of Base Plate ............................................................................................... 15
4.1.3 Result and Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 16
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
This report summarizes the structural analysis and design of "The Proposed Residential Building of Mr.
Rajkumar Subedi at Nakhipot, Lalitpur, Nepal. The analysis and design has been based on the prevailing
codes that are in practice in Nepal, the National Building code of Nepal and the IS code where
applicable. This report consists of the design procedures adopted, the assumptions made, the inputs
made in the design and the design output.

The basic aim of the structural design is to build a structure, which is safe, fulfilling the intended
purpose during its estimated life span, economical in terms of initial and maintenance cost, durable and
also maintaining a good aesthetic appearance.
A building is considered to be structurally sound, if the individual elements and the building as a whole
satisfy the criteria for strength, stability and serviceability and in seismic areas additional criteria for
ductility and energy absorption capabilities. The overall building must be strong enough to transfer all
loads through the structure to the ground without collapsing or losing structural integrity by rupture of
the material at the critical sections, by transformation of the whole or parts into mechanisms or by
instability.
Failure of one structural element (e.g., due of explosions or collisions) should not cause progressive
collapse of the entire structure. Such a building will normally have alternate load paths or mechanisms
to transfer loads safely to the foundation.

1.2 Salient Features


1.2.1 Project Information

Client : Mr. Rajkumar Subedi

Building Type : Residential Building

Location : Nakhipot, Lalitpur, Nepal

1.2.2 Building Features

Type of Structure : Steel Framed Structure

Frame System : Special Moment Resisting Frame

Floor System : One-way Composite Deck

Storey : Three storey

Extension Provision : None

Storey Height : 2.74m

Page | 1
Total Height : 8.22 m

1.2.3 Site Condition

II (for seismic consideration as per


Soil Type : IS1893_1)

Seismic Zone Factor : 0.32

2
Soil bearing capacity : 120 KN/m (assumed)

1.3 Geometry of the Building

Configuration of the building is Irregular shaped. It consists of three storey. The maximum length of the
building is 12.85 m and maximum width of the building is 5.58 m.

Page | 2
2 Design Approach and Methodology
2.1 Design Methods of Structural Elements
Indian Standard Code of Practice for Steel Structure, i.e.IS: 800-1984 for design of Structural Elements
has been followed.

2.1.1 Working Stress Method


It is also known as allowable stress method of design being widely practiced for design of steel structure
is a practice which entails the designer ensuring that the stresses imposed on the structures owing to
the service load don’t exceed the elastic limit.
Indian Standard Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete, i.e.IS: 456-2000 for design of
Structural Elements had been followed.

2.1.2 Limit State Method


It based on safety and serviceability requirements associated with the design loads and design strengths
of the materials. These design loads and design strengths are obtained by applying partial safety factors
for characteristic loads and strengths of the materials concrete and steel.The Limit State method of
design covers the various forms of failure. There are several limit states at which the structure ceases to
function, the most important among them being,
a) The limit state of collapse or total failure of structure.
It corresponds to the maximum load carrying capacity. Violation of collapse implies failure. This limit
state corresponds to Flexure, Compression, Shear and Torsion.

b) The limit state of serviceability


This includes excessive deflection and excessive local damage criteria. Excessive deflection adversely
affects the finishes and excessive local damage results in cracking of concrete, which impairs the
efficiency, or appearance of the structure.

Analysis and Design of the Structural Elements:


The Structure is analyzed and designed by commercial software Staad Pro Connect Edition. It is widely
used structural engineering software for analysis and design. It is equipped with the powerful analysis,
design, graphics, and visualization capabilities.
The structure is analyzed with Finite Element Method (FEM). Beams and columns are modeled as frame
(line) elements with sufficient and appropriate meshing. Modulus of elasticity and Possion's ratio for the
materials used are taken accordingly. The section properties used are based on preliminary section
sizing with consideration for deflection, minimum sizing specified and serviceability. Computation for
stiffness as a whole is carried out using FEM based on this software.

It is applied for lateral seismic force distribution generated with IS 1893 based spectral Function for soil
type-II.

For section design and check, suitable load combinations as suggested in NBC 105:1994 and if not
covered in that, IS 1893-2002 is referred with consideration of envelopes of internal forces developed.

Foundation design is carried out to satisfy strength and stability requirements.

Page | 3
2.2 Standard and Code
The structural calculation of this building shall be in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations
of the Government of Nepal, and its referral to any other standards. A summary of the codes and
standards in used in structural analysis and design have been listed as below.
a. IS 875 (Part I to IV) -1987, Code of practice for design loads in Building and structure

b. IS800 – 1987, Code of practice for design of steel structure.

c. IS 1893 - (Part I ) - 2002 , Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design structure

d. NBC105:1994 Seismic Design of Building in Nepal

e. IS 456-2000 Design of reinforced concrete structure

f. SP 34 (S&T) Hand book on concrete reinforcement and detailing.

g. SP 16 Handbook on Design Aids for Reinforced concrete to IS 456-2000

h. IS 1084-1985 Design and construction of shallow foundations in soils (other than Raft, Ring & Shell)

i. 1904-1986 Design and construction of foundations in soils General Requirements

j. IS: 8009-1976 Calculation of settlement of shallow foundation

2.3 Software used: (Introduction to Analysis software)

The analysis has been carried out using a standard software package Staad pro Connect Edition and
Staad Advanced Foundation based on finite element method. The software is capable of carrying out a
Three-Dimensional analysis. It is windows-based software. It has a user-friendly graphical input and
output interface. It can account for the rigid zones at the beam - column junction. It has a capability to
create a special joint at any grid intersection. The program has a facility to create shell elements also.
Shell elements can be used for the analysis of Slabs and Shear walls. A full 3D finite element model using
frame and shell elements can also be created using Staad pro Connect Edition.

2.4 Structural Performance

Structural response under limit state of serviceability is thoroughly checked. The force and stiffness
relationship resulting the deflection under various load cases and combined action of forces are duly
evaluated. Basically short- term elastic deflection due to vertical loads and lateral deflection due t
seismic forces are of major importance along with the long-term defection of beam elements under
sustained loading condition due to shrinkage and creep are also taken into account.
2.4.1 Deformation under Vertical Loads.

Maximum vertical deflection in all beam and deck elements that resulted under vertical load of
combined effect of self, imposed dead and live load are checked for critical elements and maintained to
be within permissible limit. Short-term elastic deflection and long-term deflection due to shrinkage and

Page | 4
creep due to sustained loads are also maintained within permissible limits for all the elements. In order
to control deflection of structural elements, the criteria given in IS 800 is proposed to be used.

2.4.2 Deformation under Lateral Loads

An effect of lateral load due to seismic force is analyzed using response spectrum input compatible with
codal provision. Using Compatible Quadratic combination (CQC) method of modal combinations combines
the deformations and related forced reported. To control overall deflection due to earthquake load, the
criteria given in clause 7.11 of is 1893-2002: the storey drift in any storey due to the minimum
specified design lateral force, with partial load factor of 1 does not exceed 0.004 times the storey
height.

Page | 5
3 Analysis
3.1 Loading details/ Types of Loads

a. Dead Load: The Dead load comprises the loads due to the materials used in the construction
and parts or components in a building. It consists of the loads due to structural elements like
beam, column, wall slab, staircase, etc; finishes applied in the building and some permanent
structures line water tanks etc.

b. Imposed Load: The imposed load comprises the loads due to the physical contribution to people
and the loads due to the nature of occupancy, the furniture and other equipment which are a
part of the character of the occupancy. The imposed loads on the structural system are based
on the codal provisions as specified in IS 875(part2)-1987.

c. Earthquake load: The Earthquake load is the horizontal/ lateral load induced by the ground
motion due to earthquakes. The design lateral load / force is considered in two orthogonal
horizontal directions of the structures. The earthquake induced lateral loads on the
structural system are based on the codal provisions as specified in NBC 105:1994

3.2 Material Specification


Considering Architectural, Economic and strength demands, Steel is used as the major structural
material, the selected material also confirms the availability and ease in construction. The Steel Used is
Fe550.Along with steel, footing, plinth beam and slab has been provided as RCC structure.
The concrete grade used is M20 in general. Fe 500 is provided as longitudinal and shear reinforcement
is structural elements wherever RCC is used.
Grade of Structural Steel and Concrete should be according to the provisions of the Indian Code.
For analysis / design consideration structural steel section has been considered as:
i) Minimum Yield Strength, fy = 250N/mm2
ii) Modulus of elasticity of steel, Es = 200,000 N/mm2
iii) Allowable Stress for steel section, fall = As per IS 800:1987
The Indian Code IS 456-2000, permits a minimum grade of concrete for reinforced concrete members as
M 20 and the following concrete grades shall be used for “normal” conditions:
Steel: Fe500, conforming to IS 1786-1985.
Cement: OPC meeting the requirements of IS standard
Aggregate: Fine aggregates will be clean natural sand.
Coarse aggregates will be crushed gravel or stone.
All aggregates shall meet the requirements of IS code.

Page | 6
Clear cover to the main reinforcement in the various structural elements shall be as follows:
a) Footings (Bottom) 50 mm
b) Footings (Top and Sides) 50 mm
c) Columns 40 mm
d) Pedestals 40 mm
e) Beams 25 mm or bar dia whichever is greater

The system of concrete and steel reinforcing strength combinations will be used as follows.
Concrete grade, fck= 20 N/mm2 for all concrete structures
Reinforcing steel, Fe500 (elongation >14.5%)
Modulus of elastic for steel, Es=200,000 N/mm2

Considerations of material for loading and strength parameter are as detailed below:
Concrete
Grade: M20
2
Characteristic Compressive strength: 20 N/mm
3
Unit weight: 25 KN/m
2
Young's modulus of elasticity (E) = 5000*sqrt (fck) = 22360679.8 KN/m
Poisson’s Ratio = 0.2

Steel Reinforcement (for both longitudinal and shear reinforcement)


Grade: Fe 500
2
Yield stress: 500 N/mm

Finishing
3
Cement Plaster (20mm thick): 20.4 KN/m
3
Screed (38mm thick):19.2 KN/m
2 2
Live load: Lobby & Staircase: 3KN/m ; Rooms: 2KN/m

Page | 7
3.3 Loading on Structural Model
The following considerations are made during the loading on the structural model;
• The loads distributed over the area are imposed on area element and that distributed
over length are imposed on line element whenever possible.
• Where such loading is not applicable, equivalent conversion to different loading
distribution is carried to load the model near the real case as far as possible.
• For lateral load, necessary calculations are performed to comply with the requirements
of NBC 105:1994.

The earthquake induced lateral loads are determined and used from the spectral load cases based on
NBC 105:1994 Spectrum for Soil Type III. Lateral load thus developed is the product of structural seismic
mass, modal response and respective spectral ordinates.

3.4 Load Cases


The following load cases were used for loading during the analysis;
Dead : Self-Weight of the building structural components
Finish : Weight of the finishing of the slabs
Wall : Wall loads
Live : Live load in the building area elements
D-Stair : Dead load of the stair (including finishing)
L-Stair : Live load of the staircase
Eqx : Spectral seismic load in X-Direction
Eqy : Spectral seismic load in Y-Direction

3.5 Load Combination


The load combinations are based on IS1893:2000_1. The following load combinations for Limit State
Method of design are specified by IS1893:2000_1.

1. 1.5DL + 1.5LL
2. 1.2(DL + LL + EQPX)
3. 1.2(DL + LL + EQNX)
4. 1.2(DL + LL + EQPY)
5. 1.2(DL + LL + EQNY)
6. 1.5DL + 1.5EQPX
7. 1.5DL + 1.5EQNX
8. 1.5DL + 1.5EQPY
9. 1.5DL + 1.5EQNY
10. 0.9DL + 1.5EQPX
11. 0.9DL + 1.5EQNX
12. 0.9DL + 1.5EQPY
13. 0.9DL + 1.5EQNY

Page | 8
14. 1.5DL
Where, DL: Dead load
LL: Live load
EQ: Earthquake load

3.6 Assumptions
The following assumptions are taken into consideration in the seismic resistant analysis and design of
structures:
• Adequate supervision and quality systems are provided during execution of the works.
• Construction is carried out by personnel having the appropriate skill and experience.
• Construction materials and products confirm to the pertinent codes and specifications.
• The structure is adequately maintained.
• The structure is used in accordance with the design brief.

• An earthquake is not likely to occur simultaneously with maximum flood, wind, waves of tides.
• Resonance as visualized under steady state sinusoidal excitation will not occur, as the small
duration of earthquake is not enough to build up resonance amplitudes.
• Subsoil does not considerably settle or slide due to earthquake at the site of structure.

3.7 Analysis and Design

The analysis has been carried out using a standard software package Staad pro and safe based
on finite element method. The software is capable of carrying out a Three- Dimensional
analysis. It is windows-based software. It has a user- friendly graphical input and output
interface. It can account for the rigid zones at the beam - column junction. It has a capability to
create a special joint at any grid intersection. The program has a facility to create plate
elements also. Shell elements can be used for the analysis of Slabs and Shear walls. A full 3D
finite element model using frame and surface elements can also be created using staad pro.

The structure is assumed to be fixed at the plinth level. The compartments between the
plinth beams are filled with compacted earth. The stiffness contribution of brick walls on
the structure has been ignored and the building has been modeled as a “Bare Frame” with
no infill wall panels. The flange effect of the slab has been neglected. The beams have
been modeled as rectangular beams.

3.8 Method of Seismic Analysis

The building can be classified as a regular one. It satisfies the criteria listed in the clause 5.2
and 5.3 of NBC 105 (H<40 m) and also of IS Code 1893_1. Hence, an equivalent Static Analysis
(Seismic Coefficient Method) has been performed according to IS Code 1893 _1. The seismic
forces determined by seismic analysis are directly applied at the “special joint” created at the

Page | 9
centre of mass of each floor level. The program automatically calculates the centre of stiffness
of the structure. Therefore, Torsion is automatically accounted by the program itself. So, no
extra calculation is needed to find out extra forces due to torsion.

3.8.1 Design Seismic Forces

The computation of horizontal forces and their distribution has been carried out as per 7.5 of
IS1893_1.
The horizontal seismic shear force at the base of the structure is given by:
Vb = Ah*Wt
The horizontal seismic force coefficient Ah is given by:
Ah = (Z*I*Sa/g)/2*R
The horizontal seismic force is distributed at each level i according to the following
equation:
Qi = V Wi hi^2 / Σ Wi hi^2

3.9 Design and Detailing

The design of reinforced concrete structural members includes selection of material properties
(grade of steel and concrete), shape and size of cross section, factor of safety and amount of
steel required. The design of reinforced concrete members are carried out using limit state
method as per IS 456: 2000. The limit state method is the modern and latest design
methodology. This method evolved around 1970’s.
Prior to this working stress method and ultimate load methods were in use. Limit state method is
based on the concept of multiple safety factors and attempts to provide adequate safety at the
ultimate loads and adequate serviceability at service loads. Limit state method can be termed as an
extension of Working state method and ultimate load method.

3.9.1 Earthquake Resistant Design


Engineers do not design earthquake proof buildings. Instead engineers make earthquake
resistant buildings. Such buildings may get severely damaged but will not collapse even in the
event of severe earthquake. In seismic resistant design, actual forces experienced by the
structure are reduced and reliance is placed on the ductility of the structure.

Page | 10
3.9.2 Detailing of Reinforcement as per IS 13920: 1993
IS 13920: 1993 is used for special design and detailing, related to earthquake resistant design.
Special design provisions are meant for achieving ductility in the structure. Ductility is achieved
by avoiding brittle modes of failure, namely, shear failure, bond failure. Detailing of steel
reinforcement is an important aspect of structural design. Poor reinforcement detailing can
lead to structural failures.

3.9.3 Detailing of Steel

For steel structure detailing IS800:1984 – Code of practice for general construction of steel
structure has been followed for detailing of structural steel element whereas Hand book on
Concrete Reinforcement and Detailing SP: 34(S&T)-1987 NBC201:1994 and NBC205:2012 has been
followed for RCC element detailing. Structural steel section obtained from design results of Sap2000
were used for detailing.
3.10 Load Calculations
3.10.1 Dead load
Wall Load Calculation
For Brick wall
Thickness of the wall = 230 mm (9")
Floor to floor height of the building = 2.74 m
Height of the building after beam depth deduction = 2.54m
3
Unit weight = 19 KN/m
Now, Load = γ * (height * thickness)
= 19 * 2.54 * 0.23
= 11.09 KN/m
Taking 80% for opening deduction =8.87 KN/m

For Prefab
Thickness of internal wall = 100 mm (4") = 0.100 m
Floor to floor height of the building = 2.74 m
3
Unit weight of concrete= 25 KN/m
Now, Load = γ * (height * thickness)
= 25* (2.74-0.150) * 0.100
= 6.475 KN/m (taking 6.5 KN/m)
For wall load for parapet = 19*1.2*0.100 = 2.28 KN/m

Page | 11
4 Detail Design
4.1.1 RCC Structure
4.1.1.1 Plinth Beam:
Material and Section Properties
Material Section
Light
Cover
Concrete SLAB Eff.
Fck Fy Fys B D
Type Shape THK. Width
(MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (mm) (mm) Top Use Bot
CHK Factor (mm) (mm)
(mm) Top (mm)

20 500 500 0 1.00 250 300 25 1 25 Double Rect 150 0.6

Design Information and Output


Member Forces & Design Information
Mu Rebar
Vu
TYPE Top Bot. Each Top/Bot Stirrup
(kN) Top Bottom
(kN.m) (kN.m) Layer Same Bar (mm)

45.00 0.00 34.00 3- P16 2- P16 2- P10 @150


Type-3 0.00 30.00 0.00 0 1 2- P16 2- P16 2- P10 @200
45.00 0.00 34.00 3- P16 2- P16 2- P10 @150

Deflection Result
Deflection Result
Short Term Long Term Ratio
Short
d d allow d d allow Long
Term
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) Term
(mm)

0.003 2.083 0.007 2.778 0.002 0.003

Page | 12
4.1.1.2 Isolated Footing Design
Material
Characteristics Strength of Concrete 20 KN/mm2
Grade of Steel 500
Load
Axial Load (Pu) 396 KN
Moment along X 0
Moment Along Y 0
Self-Weight 1
Surcharge 1KN/M2
Section
Depth 220mm
Cover 50mm
Column 350mmx350mm
Eccentricity Ex. 0
Eccentricity Ey. 0
Foundation Geometry
Length 1.7m
Width 1.7m
Soil Properties
Soil Bearing Capacity 120

Reinforcement
Main Bar
Along y Direction 12mm ɸ@150mm
Along X Direction 12mm ɸ@200mm
Design Result
Soil Bearing Capacity 0.994
Moment Along X 0.772
Moment Along y 0.935
One Way Shear Along X 0.991
One Way Shear Along Y 0.896
Two Way Shear 0.949

Page | 13
4.1.1.3 Combined Footing

Combined Footing Design Detail


Characteristics Strength of Concrete 20 KN/mm2
Grade of Steel 500
Load
Axial Load (Pu) 396 KN
Moment along X 0
Moment Along Y 0
Self -Weight 1
Surcharge 1KN/M2
Section
Depth 275mm
Cover 50mm
Column 350mmx350mm
Number of Column 2Nos.
Eccentricity Ex. 0
Eccentricity Ey. 0
Foundation Geometry
Z Length 1.90m
Width 1.25m
Extra Projection X 0.18m
Extra Projection Y 0.48m
Soil Properties
Soil Bearing Capacity 120

Reinforcement
Main Bar
Along y Direction 16mm ɸ@150mm
Along X Direction 12mm ɸ@150mm
Design Result
Soil Bearing Capacity 0.860
Moment Along X 0.937
Moment Along y 0.820
One Way Shear Along X 0.831
One Way Shear Along Y 0.831
Two Way Shear 0.857

Page | 14
4.1.2 Detail Design of Base Plate

Material Force Section


Plate EN275 Pu(kN) 288.00 Shape H Section
Anchor
EN 275 Mux(kN.m) 31.00 Name 250x125x6.9/12.5
Bolt
Fck (MPa) 20.00 Muy(kN.m) 64.00
Base Plate Vux(kN) 50.00
Shape Rectangle Vuy(kN) -102.00

B(mm) 350.00
H(mm) 350.00
Pedestal
Shape Rectangle
B(mm) 350.00
H(mm) 350.00

Plate Rib Plate


Wing Plate t(mm) 12
t(mm) 8.00 H1(mm) 175
H(mm) 100 H2(mm) 50
Hor. 1 L1(mm) 5
Ver. 1 L2(mm) 50
NoX 0
NoY 4

Anchor Bolt
Cast-In-Place
Install Type
Anchor Bolt
Type M20
Length Position No
Cast(D) Post(mm) X(mm) Y(mm) X Y
20.00 100.00 50.00 50.00 2 2
Design Force
Base Rib Wing Anchor
Bearing
Plate Plate Plate Bolt
Comp. Tens. Mux Muy Mu Vu Mu Vu Vu Tu L
(MPa) (kN) (kN.m/m) (kN.m/m) (kN.m) (kN) (kN.m) (kN) (kN) (kN) (mm)
-
23.31 -18.95 -18.77 11.92 197.84 - - 18.93 -40.30 400.00
40.30
Design Ratio
Bearing Base PL Rib Plate Wing Plate Anchor Bolt
Comp. Tens. Mux Muy Mu Vu Mu Vu Vu Tu L Dist.
1.10 0.551 0.940 0.931 0.871 0.703 - - 0.486 0.677 0.861 -

Page | 15
4.1.3 Result and Conclusion
Hence the Residential Building with steel structure has been designed and checked for all the
possible load cases specified by code for its intended period of service life. It is advisable to consult
with consultancy for any queries / confusions if encountered during construction.
Table 1: Reinforcement Summary

Column
Main Vertical Bar-4Nos-16mm & 4-12mm dia bar
Ties:8mm dia bar@6”c-c
Plinth Beam
Top Bar-3Nos-16mm dia bar
Bottom Bar: 2Nos-16mm dia bar
Ties:8mm dia bar@6”c-c
Isolated Footing
Main Bar:12mm dia Bar @ 6” c-c
Distribution Bar:12mm dia Bar @ 6” c-c

Combined Footing
Top Bar:12mm Dia Bar@ 6”c-c both ways
Bottom Main Bar:16mm Dia Bar@6”c-c
Bottom Distribution Bar:12mmDia Bar@6”c-c

Table 2: Steel Section Detail

Column ISMC 150


Main Beam ISMB 200
Secondary Beam ISMB 150
Secondary Beam ISMC 75

Page | 16
Annex
Job No Sheet No Rev
1
Software licensed to Lavteam Part
CONNECTED User: Not signed in
Job Title Ref

By Date09-Nov-20 Chd

Client File Area change model.STD Date/Time 09-Nov-2020 16:12

Max: 1.810 mm
Max:
Max: 4.799
5.046 mmmm
Max: 3.745 mm

Max: 2.750 mm
Max: 3.061 mm
Max: 2.511 mm
Max: 1.019 mm

Max: 1.092 mm

Max: 0.909 mm
Max: 1.817 mm
Max:
Max:
Max: 3.452
3.528
3.529 mm
mm mm
Max: 2.768 mm
Max: 0.877 mm
Max: 1.529 mm
Max: 1.674 mm
Max: 1.520 mm
Max: 0.729 mm
Max: 0.741 mm

Max: 1.590 mm
Max:
Max:
Max: 3.401
3.465
3.457 mm
mm mm
Max: 2.473 mm Max: 0.544 mm
Max: 0.555 mm
Max: 1.666 mm
Max: 1.888 mm
Max: 1.664 mm

Max: 0.432 mm

Max: 0.156 mm

Max: 0.089 mm

Whole Structure Displacements 1000mm:1m 1001 COMBINATION 1001

Print Time/Date: 10/11/2020 15:09 STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition 21.00.02.30 Print Run 1 of 3

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Job No Sheet No Rev
2
Software licensed to Lavteam Part
CONNECTED User: Not signed in
Job Title Ref

By Date09-Nov-20 Chd

Client File Area change model.STD Date/Time 09-Nov-2020 16:12

3.278
-0.041kN-m
kN-m
0.972 kN-m
0.963
-1.895
-2.211
-2.221 kN-m
kN-m
-1.163 kN-m
-1.161
3.830 kN-m
2.419
-1.314 kN-m
-1.234 kN-m
-1.057 kN-m
-1.063
2.573 kN-m
-0.333 kN-m

16.538 kN-m
-2.171 kN-m
0.373 kN-m
1.578 kN-m
1.633

21.444 kN-m -11.134


-11.137 kN-m
13.074 kN-m -11.621
-11.528 kN-m
-7.142 kN-m
-7.234
-1.683 kN-m
1.790 kN-m
-3.819 kN-m
-3.826
9.416 kN-m-4.496 kN-m
-4.488
-1.605 kN-m
0.391 kN-m

17.536 kN-m
-1.453 kN-m
kN-m
1.662 2.386
1.880 kN-m

22.932 kN-m
16.780 kN-m -13.030
-13.033 kN-m
-13.827
-13.803
-5.371 kN-m
-5.370 kN-m
-1.284 kN-m
0.311 kN-m

-6.097 kN-m
-6.106
12.309 kN-m
-6.740 kN-m
-6.720
-0.718 kN-m
1.407 kN-m

14.335 kN-m
0.841 kN-m

14.335 kN-m
10.843 kN-m
0.663 kN-m

10.843 kN-m
0.497 kN-m

Whole Structure Mz 25kN-m:1m 1001 COMBINATION 1001

Print Time/Date: 10/11/2020 15:09 STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition 21.00.02.30 Print Run 2 of 3

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Job No Sheet No Rev
3
Software licensed to Lavteam Part
CONNECTED User: Not signed in
Job Title Ref

By Date09-Nov-20 Chd

Client File Area change model.STD Date/Time 09-Nov-2020 16:12

0.144 kN
-4.472 kN
-3.118 kN
-4.266
-1.208
1.110
-1.118 kNkN
-2.616
kN
4.554
1.722 kN
5.432
-0.128kN
kN
-3.908 kN
-0.268
-2.920 kN
3.191
0.610 kN
4.069
0.252 kN
kN

0.144
1.588 kN
23.161 kN -2.843 -18.283 kN
-33.050
kN kN
1.937
-0.001
34.194 kN 10.128 kN kNkN
kN
-7.250 kN -23.411

-0.515
-0.128 kN

8.388 kN -6.186 kN -21.722 kN


-9.854 kN
19.421 kN 4.846 kN
0.252
1.050 kN

0.799
1.588 kN
22.224 kN
7.084 kN kN -21.278 kN
-32.810
34.381 kN 15.875 kN -4.303
-1.375 kNkN -27.018
-8.706 kN kN

-0.515 kN
0.678 kN
12.950 kN -6.712 kN -27.959 kN
25.107 kN 5.445 kN -14.803 kN
0.423 kN
1.050

0.799 kN
-24.366 kN
24.366 kN
0.678 kN
-21.191 kN
21.191 kN
0.423 kN

Whole Structure Fy 35kN:1m 1001 COMBINATION 1001

Print Time/Date: 10/11/2020 15:09 STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition 21.00.02.30 Print Run 3 of 3

You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com)
Design of Base plate
Factored axial load Pu 323 KN
Shear load Vx 40.5 KN
Grade of concrete fck 20 N/mm2
Grade of steel Fy 250 N/mm2
Bearing strength of concrete 0.6fck 12 N/mm2
Factored bending moment M 52 kNm
Eccentricity e 0.16 m
Length of base plate required l 965.94 mm
Adopted bearing plate length l adopted 350 mm
Maximum bearing pressure Pmax 10.69084 N/mm2
Width of base plate b 324.56 mm
Adopted bearing plate width b adopted 350 mm
Provided plate 350mmx350mm
For this plate Pmax 9.91 N/mm2

distance from edge to flange X1 75.00 mm


distance from other edge to that flange X2 275.00 mm
Bearing pressure at the flange Pflange 7.79 N/mm2
Maximum bending moment is right after flange M 25890.70 Nmm
M=1.2*Ze*fy/ꝩm0 25890.70 Nmm
Thickness of base plate t 23.87 25 mm

Provide 350 x350 x25mm base plate.


Design of connection
Taking the weld thickness as 8 mm OK
fwd=fwn/
λmw 49.88 N/mm2
Strength of weld per mm 279.35 N/mm
length of weld 144.98 150 mm
length of weld on each edge of channel 75 mm
Thickness of channel flange Ct 9 mm
Provide length of weld of 75mm both side
Provide 4-M20 bolts on four corner.
1. General Information
Unit System : N, mm

2. Material
(1) H-Beam
Fy : 248MPa 1-M13@230

Es : 199,948MPa
(2) Stud Bolt

126
Fy : 248MPa

80
Fu : 400MPa

(3) Concrete

8
Fck : 20.00MPa

150
3. Section
5
(1) H-Beam : BH-150x75x5/8

8
As : 1,940mm^2
Xc : 37.50mm 75
Xy : 75.00mm
Ycp : 75.00mm
Ycm : 75.00mm
Ix : 7,352,014mm^4
Iy : 565,508mm^4
ix : 61.57mm
iy : 17.08mm
Sx : 98,027mm^3
Sy : 15,080mm^3
Zx : 107,645mm^3
Zy : 23,338mm^3
(2) Slab
Thickness : 126mm
Shape : T-Section
(3) Stud Bolt
Type : M13 ( Diameter = 13.00mm )
Columns : 1 EA
Space : 230mm
Length : 80.00mm
(4) Deck Plate : DPL-80x230x70x102x1.2
Direction : Perpendicular to Beam

4. Span
(1) Span
Span : 4.500m
Space : 1.000m
Lb : 1.000m
(2) Support : No

5. Design Load
(1) Uniform Load
Live Load : 2.000kN/m^2
Finish Load : 1.000kN/m^2
Construction Load : 1.500kN/m^2

6. Criteria for deflection


(1) Deflections During Construction : 40.00mm
(2) Deflections by Live Load : Span / 360
(3) Deflections by Dead & Live Load : Span / 240

7. Calculate Width-Thickness Ratio


(1) Web
λp = 107

2020-09-02 1
λr = 162
h/tw = 23.20 < λr -> O.K
Compact Section -> Plastic Design

8. Check Requirement for Stud


(1) Check Size
dstud = 13.00 < 20.00mm -> O.K
lstud = 80.00 > 52.00mm -> O.K
sstud = 230 < 900mm -> O.K
(2) Check Material
fck = 20.00 < 20.00 -> O.k
fck = 20.00 < 70.00 -> O.K
(3) Material Properties (Applied)
fck = 21.00MPa

9. Calculate Effective Width of Slab


(1) Effective Width of Slab
nside = 2
be1 = Span/8 = 0.563m
be2 = Space/2 = 0.500m
be = n ㆍ min(be1 , be2 ) = 1.000m

10. Calculate Design Load by Self Weight


(1) Calculate Thickness of Deck Slab
Hr = 80.00mm
ttopping = 46.00mm
tdeck = 29.10mm
(2) Thickness of Concrete
THK. = 75.10mm
Density = 24.00kN/m^3
ωself = 1.711kN/m^2

11. Calculate Design Force during Construction


(1) Calculate design moment
1.4D = 6.062kN.m
1.2D+1.6L = 11.27kN.m
Mu = 11.27kN.m
(2) Calculate Design Shear Force
1.4D = 5.388kN
1.2D+1.6L = 10.02kN
Vu = 10.02kN

12. Check Flexural Strength About Major Axis (X)


(1) Elastic section modulus referred to tension and compression flanges
Sxc = 98,027mm^3
Sxt = 98,027mm^3
(2) Calculate limiting width-thickness ratio of flange for flexure
FL = 0.7 Fy = 174MPa
kc = 0.760
λp = 0.38 Es / Fy = 10.79
λr = 0.95 kc Es / FL = 28.10
(3) Calculate limiting width-thickness ratio of web for flexure
λp = 3.76 Es / Fy = 107
λr = 5.70 Es / Fy = 162
(4) Check width-thickness ratio of flange (BTR)
BTR = 4.688 < λp = 10.79 -> Compact
(5) Check width-thickness ratio of web (DTR)
DTR = 23.20 < λp = 107 -> Compact
(6) Calculate nominal flexural strength for Yielding (Y)
Mn = Mp = Fy Zx = 26.72kN.m
(7) Calculate flexural strength about major axis
Resistance factor for flexure : ø = 0.900
2020-09-02 2
øMnx = 23.53kN.m
Mux / øM_nx4 = 0.479 < 1.000 -> O.K

13. Check Interaction of Combined Strength


(1) Calculate interaction ratio of combined strength
Pr / Pc < 0.2 -> Formula
Pr Mrx Mry
ComRat = +( + ) =0.479 < 1.000 -> O.K
2 Pc Mcx Mcy

14. Check Shear Strength


(1) Calculate the web plate buckling coefficient (kv )
kv = 5.000 (for stiffened webs)
(2) Calculate the web shear coefficient (Cv )
for webs of all other doubly/singly symmetric shapes and channels
h / tw = 23.20 < 1.10 kv Es / Fy = 69.81
Cv = 1.000
(3) Calculate shear strength in local-y direction
Aw = 750mm^2
Vny = 0.6 Fy Aw Cv = 112kN
Resistance factor for shear : ø = 0.900
øVny = 101kN
Vuy / øVny = 0.0997
Vuy / øVny = 0.0997 < 1.000 -> O.K

15. Check Deflection during Construction


(1) Check Deflection by Dead Load
δDL = 6.213 < 40.00mm -> O.K

(2) Check Deflection by Live Load


δLL = 5.448 < Span/360 = 12.50mm -> O.K

16. Calculate Strength of Stud


(1) Calculate Elastic Modulus of Concrete
fck = 21.00MPa
Fu = 400MPa
Ec = 26,115MPa
(2) Calculate Strength of Stud (Qn )
Asc = 133mm^2
Qn1 = 0.5Asc fck Ec = 49.15kN/stud
Rg = 1.000
Rp = 0.600
emid-ht = 36.50mm
Qn.max = Rg Rp Asc Fu = 31.85kN/stud
Qn = min(Qn1 , Qn.max ) = 31.85kN/stud
(3) Calculate Number of Stud
Xmax = 2.250m
L = 2.250m
nstud = 9EA
(4) Calculate Strength of Stud
tc = 46.00mm
Ac = 46,000mm^2
Vcon = 0.85 fck Ac = 821kN
Vstl = Fy As = 481kN
Vstud = ∑Qn = 287kN
V' = min( Vcon , Vstl ) = 481kN
(5) Calculate Composition Ratio
V' = 481kN
∑Qn / V' = 59.54%

17. Calculate Design Force


(1) Calculate design moment
1.4D = 9.606kN.m
1.2D+1.6L = 16.33kN.m

2020-09-02 3
Mu = 16.33kN.m
(2) Calculate Design Shear Force
1.4D = 8.538kN
1.2D+1.6L = 14.52kN
Vu = 14.52kN

18. Check Moment Strength (Positive Moment)


(1) Calculate Effective Width of Slab
Vstud / Vcon = 0.349
Beff = 349mm
(2) Calculate moment strength
ø = 0.900
YP.N.A = 131mm
Ccon = 287kN
Cstl = 88.76kN
Tstl = 375kN
d1 = 103mm
d2 = 2.384mm
d3 = 75.00mm
Mn = 65.16kN.m
øMn = 58.65kN.m
(3) Calculate ratio
Mu = 16.33kN.m
Mu / øMn = 0.279 < 1.000 -> O.K

19. Check Shear Strength


(1) Calculate shear strength
h/tw = 23.20 < 69.81 = 2.24 E/Fy
øv = 0.900
Cv = 1.000
Aw = 750mm^2
Vn = 112kN
øVn = 101kN
(2) Calculate ratio
Vu = 14.52kN
Vu / øVn = 0.144 < 1.000 -> O.K

20. Check Deflection


(1) Calculate Moment of Inertia
n = 7.657
be = 1.000m
yc = 66.44mm
Itr = 54,866,512mm^4
(2) Calculate Effective Moment of Inertia
∑Qn / Cf = 1.000
Ieq = Is + ∑Qn / Cf + (Itr - Is ) = 54,866,512mm^4
Ieff = 0.75 Ieq = 41,149,884mm^4
(3) Calculate Lower Limit for Moment of Inertia
As d3 + (∑Qn / Fy ) (2 d3 + d1 )
YENA = = 141mm
As + (∑Qn / Fy )
2 2
Ilb = Is + As (YENA - d3 ) + (∑Qn / Fy ) ( 2 d3 + d1 - YENA ) = 30,285,490mm^4
(4) Check Deflection
Ieff = 41,149,884mm^4
δDL = 0.649mm

δLL = 1.298 < Span/360 = 12.50mm -> O.K

δALL = 8.160 < Span/240 = 18.75mm -> O.K

21. Calculate Beam Mode Properties


(1) Calculate Effective Width
L1 = 1.000m
L2 = 1.800m
L = min(L1 , L2 ) = 1.000m

2020-09-02 4
(2) Calculate Transformed Moment of Inertia
n = Es / 1.35Ec = 5.672
yb = 57.35mm
Ij = 58,375,073mm^4
(3) Calculate Deflection & Frequency
wj = 2.911kN/m
Δj = 1.331mm
fj = 15.45Hz
(4) Calculate Transformed Moment of Inertia per Unit Width
de = 86.00mm
3
Ds = (de ) / 12n = 9,346mm^3
Dj = Ij / S = 58,375mm^3
(5) Calculate Effective Beam Panel Width
Cj = 2.000
1/4
Bj1 = Cj (Ds / Dj ) Lj = 5.693m
Bj2 = 2/3 Span = 9.000m
Bj = min(Bj1 , Bj2 ) = 5.693m
(6) Calculate Weight of Beam Panel
Wj = 1.5 (wj / S) Bj Lj = 74.57kN

22. Calculate Girder Mode Properties


(1) Calculate Effective Width
L1 = 0.4Lg = 1.800m
L2 = 4.500m
L = min(L1 , L2 ) = 1.800m
(2) Calculate Transformed Moment of Inertia
n = Es / 1.35Ec = 5.672
yb = 58.84mm
Ig = 130,416,746mm^4
(3) Calculate Deflection & Frequency
wg = Lj wj / S = 13.10kN/m
Δg = 2.682mm
fg = 10.88Hz
(4) Calculate Effective Girder Panel Width
Cg = 1.800
Dg = Ig / Lj = 28,981mm^3
1/4
Bg1 = Cg (Dj / Dg ) Lg = 9.650m
Bg2 = 2/3 Span = 9.000m
Bg = min(Bg1 , Bg2 ) = 9.000m
(5) Calculate Weight of Beam Panel
Wg = (wg / Lj ) Bg Lg = 118kN

23. Check Vibration (Combined Mode)


(1) Adjust Girder Deflection
Δg ' = min(Δg , (Lg / Bj ) Δg ) = 2.120mm
(2) Calculate Floor Fundamental Frequency
fn = 9.595Hz > 4.000Hz -> O.K
(3) Calculate Equivalent Combined Mode Panel Weight
W = 101kN
β = 0.0200
βW = 2.023kN
(4) Calculate Peak Acceleration
P0 = 0.290kN
ap / g = 0.499% < 0.500% -> O.K

2020-09-02 5
25

10
Rhythmic Activities,
Outdoor Footbridges

Indoor Footbridges,
Peak Acceleration (% Gravity)

2.5 Shopping Malls,


Dining and Dancing

Offices,
Residences
0.5
Freq.:9.595, Accel.:0.499

0.25

0.1 ISO Baseline Curve


for RMS Acceleration

0.05

1 3 4 5 8 10 25 40

Frequency (Hz)

2020-09-02 6
Job No Sheet No Rev
Aayu Consulting Engineers 1
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title Ref

By Date09-Nov-20 Chd

Client File Area change model.STD Date/Time 11-Nov-2020 00:31

Steel Design (Track 2) Beam 17 Check 1


|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Y PROPERTIES |
|************* | IN CM UNIT |
| * |=============================| ===|=== ------------ |
|MEMBER 17 * | INDIAN SECTIONS | | AX = 19.1 |
| * | ST ISMB150 | | --Z AY = 7.5 |
|DESIGN CODE * | | | AZ = 8.0 |
| IS-800 * =============================== ===|=== SY = 12.5 |
| * SZ = 95.7 |
| * |<---LENGTH (ME= 1.00 --->| RY = 1.6 |
|************* RZ = 6.1 |
| |
| 13.5( KN-METR) |
|PARAMETER |L2006 STRESSES |
|IN NEWT MM | L2006 IN NEWT MM|
|--------------- + -------------|
| KL/R-Y= 63.9 | L2006 FA = 249.0 |
| KL/R-Z= 50.1 + L2006 fa = 0.0 |
| UNL = 1000.0 | L2006 FCZ = 227.0 |
| C = 400.0 + FTZ = 273.9 |
| CMY = 0.60 | FCY = 273.9 |
| CMZ = 0.59 + L2006 FTY = 273.9 |
| FYLD = 415.0 | L200L200L200L200L200fbz = 141.1 |
| NSF = 1.0 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---| fby = 0.0 |
| DFF = 0.0 3.9 FV = 166.0 |
| dff = 0.0 ABSOLUTE MZ ENVELOPE fv = 24.0 |
| (WITH LOAD NO.) |
| |
| MAX FORCE/ MOMENT SUMMARY ( KN-METR) |
| ------------------------- |
| |
| AXIAL SHEAR-Y SHEAR-Z MOMENT-Y MOMENT-Z |
| |
| VALUE 0.0 18.0 0.0 0.0 13.5 |
| LOCATION 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 |
| LOADING 0 2006 0 0 2006 |
| |
|**************************************************************************|
|* *|
|* DESIGN SUMMARY ( KN-METR) *|
|* -------------- *|
|* *|
|* RESULT/ CRITICAL COND/ RATIO/ LOADING/ *|
| FX MY MZ LOCATION |
| ====================================================== |
| PASS IS-7.1.1(A) 0.621 2006 |
| 0.00 T 0.0 13.5 0.00 |
|* *|
|**************************************************************************|
| |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
17 ST ISMB150 (INDIAN SECTIONS)

Print Time/Date: 11/11/2020 00:39 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33 Print Run 1 of 5
Job No Sheet No Rev
Aayu Consulting Engineers 2
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title Ref

By Date09-Nov-20 Chd

Client File Area change model.STD Date/Time 11-Nov-2020 00:31

Steel Design (Track 2) Beam 18 Check 1


|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Y PROPERTIES |
|************* | IN CM UNIT |
| * |=============================| ===|=== ------------ |
|MEMBER 18 * | INDIAN SECTIONS | | AX = 19.1 |
| * | ST ISMB150 | | --Z AY = 7.5 |
|DESIGN CODE * | | | AZ = 8.0 |
| IS-800 * =============================== ===|=== SY = 12.5 |
| * SZ = 95.7 |
| * |<---LENGTH (ME= 1.00 --->| RY = 1.6 |
|************* RZ = 6.1 |
| |
| 22.8( KN-METR) |
|PARAMETER |L2006 STRESSES |
|IN NEWT MM | L2006 IN NEWT MM|
|--------------- + -------------|
| KL/R-Y= 63.9 | L2006 FA = 249.0 |
| KL/R-Z= 50.1 + L2006 fa = 0.3 |
| UNL = 1000.0 | L2006 FCZ = 227.0 |
| C = 400.0 + FTZ = 273.9 |
| CMY = 0.47 | FCY = 273.9 |
| CMZ = 0.61 + L2006 FTY = 273.9 |
| FYLD = 415.0 | L200L200L200L200L200fbz = 238.3 |
| NSF = 1.0 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---| fby = 14.5 |
| DFF = 0.0 7.3 FV = 166.0 |
| dff = 0.0 ABSOLUTE MZ ENVELOPE fv = 36.6 |
| (WITH LOAD NO.) |
| |
| MAX FORCE/ MOMENT SUMMARY ( KN-METR) |
| ------------------------- |
| |
| AXIAL SHEAR-Y SHEAR-Z MOMENT-Y MOMENT-Z |
| |
| VALUE -3.6 27.6 0.2 0.2 22.8 |
| LOCATION 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 |
| LOADING 2009 2010 2006 2006 2006 |
| |
|**************************************************************************|
|* *|
|* DESIGN SUMMARY ( KN-METR) *|
|* -------------- *|
|* *|
|* RESULT/ CRITICAL COND/ RATIO/ LOADING/ *|
| FX MY MZ LOCATION |
| ====================================================== |
| PASS 7.1.2 BEND C 1.103 2006 |
| 0.66 T 0.2 22.8 0.00 |
|* *|
|**************************************************************************|
| |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
* 18 ST ISMB150 (INDIAN SECTIONS)

Print Time/Date: 11/11/2020 00:39 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33 Print Run 2 of 5
Job No Sheet No Rev
Aayu Consulting Engineers 3
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title Ref

By Date09-Nov-20 Chd

Client File Area change model.STD Date/Time 11-Nov-2020 00:31

Steel Design (Track 2) Beam 19 Check 1


|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Y PROPERTIES |
|************* | IN CM UNIT |
| * |=============================| ===|=== ------------ |
|MEMBER 19 * | INDIAN SECTIONS | | AX = 30.8 |
| * | ST ISMB200 | | --Z AY = 11.4 |
|DESIGN CODE * | | | AZ = 13.3 |
| IS-800 * =============================== ===|=== SY = 27.4 |
| * SZ = 211.5 |
| * |<---LENGTH (ME= 1.00 --->| RY = 2.1 |
|************* RZ = 8.3 |
| |
| 47.9( KN-METR) |
|PARAMETER |L2010 STRESSES |
|IN NEWT MM | L2010 IN NEWT MM|
|--------------- + L2010 -------------|
| KL/R-Y= 47.4 | L2010 FA = 249.0 |
| KL/R-Z= 57.9 + L2006 fa = 1.7 |
| UNL = 1000.0 | L2006 FCZ = 247.7 |
| C = 400.0 + L2006 FTZ = 273.9 |
| CMY = 0.42 | FCY = 273.9 |
| CMZ = 0.67 + L200L2006 FTY = 273.9 |
| FYLD = 415.0 | L200L200fbz = 226.3 |
| NSF = 1.0 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---| fby = 1.8 |
| DFF = 0.0 12.0 FV = 166.0 |
| dff = 0.0 ABSOLUTE MZ ENVELOPE fv = 38.7 |
| (WITH LOAD NO.) |
| |
| MAX FORCE/ MOMENT SUMMARY ( KN-METR) |
| ------------------------- |
| |
| AXIAL SHEAR-Y SHEAR-Z MOMENT-Y MOMENT-Z |
| |
| VALUE -7.7 45.7 0.2 0.1 47.9 |
| LOCATION 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 |
| LOADING 1001 1001 2007 2007 2010 |
| |
|**************************************************************************|
|* *|
|* DESIGN SUMMARY ( KN-METR) *|
|* -------------- *|
|* *|
|* RESULT/ CRITICAL COND/ RATIO/ LOADING/ *|
| FX MY MZ LOCATION |
| ====================================================== |
| PASS 7.1.2 BEND C 0.920 2010 |
| 5.38 T 0.0 47.9 0.00 |
|* *|
|**************************************************************************|
| |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
19 ST ISMB200 (INDIAN SECTIONS)

Print Time/Date: 11/11/2020 00:39 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33 Print Run 3 of 5
Job No Sheet No Rev
Aayu Consulting Engineers 4
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title Ref

By Date09-Nov-20 Chd

Client File Area change model.STD Date/Time 11-Nov-2020 00:31

Steel Design (Track 2) Beam 20 Check 1


|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Y PROPERTIES |
|************* | IN CM UNIT |
| * |=============================| ===|=== ------------ |
|MEMBER 20 * | INDIAN SECTIONS | | AX = 30.8 |
| * | ST ISMB200 | | --Z AY = 11.4 |
|DESIGN CODE * | | | AZ = 13.3 |
| IS-800 * =============================== ===|=== SY = 27.4 |
| * SZ = 211.5 |
| * |<---LENGTH (ME= 1.00 --->| RY = 2.1 |
|************* RZ = 8.3 |
| |
| 34.8( KN-METR) |
|PARAMETER |L2006 STRESSES |
|IN NEWT MM | L2006 IN NEWT MM|
|--------------- + L2006 -------------|
| KL/R-Y= 47.4 | FA = 200.9 |
| KL/R-Z= 37.0 + L2006 fa = 0.2 |
| UNL = 1000.0 | L2006 FCZ = 247.7 |
| C = 400.0 + FTZ = 273.9 |
| CMY = 0.61 | L2006 FCY = 273.9 |
| CMZ = 0.66 + L200L200L2005 FTY = 273.9 |
| FYLD = 415.0 | L200L200fbz = 164.4 |
| NSF = 1.0 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---| fby = 3.1 |
| DFF = 0.0 12.9 FV = 166.0 |
| dff = 0.0 ABSOLUTE MZ ENVELOPE fv = 30.5 |
| (WITH LOAD NO.) |
| |
| MAX FORCE/ MOMENT SUMMARY ( KN-METR) |
| ------------------------- |
| |
| AXIAL SHEAR-Y SHEAR-Z MOMENT-Y MOMENT-Z |
| |
| VALUE -3.1 34.8 0.2 0.2 34.8 |
| LOCATION 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 |
| LOADING 2005 2006 2007 2007 2006 |
| |
|**************************************************************************|
|* *|
|* DESIGN SUMMARY ( KN-METR) *|
|* -------------- *|
|* *|
|* RESULT/ CRITICAL COND/ RATIO/ LOADING/ *|
| FX MY MZ LOCATION |
| ====================================================== |
| PASS IS-7.1.1(A) 0.676 2006 |
| 0.57 C -0.1 34.8 0.00 |
|* *|
|**************************************************************************|
| |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
20 ST ISMB200 (INDIAN SECTIONS)

Print Time/Date: 11/11/2020 00:39 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33 Print Run 4 of 5
Job No Sheet No Rev
Aayu Consulting Engineers 5
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title Ref

By Date09-Nov-20 Chd

Client File Area change model.STD Date/Time 11-Nov-2020 00:31

Steel Design (Track 2) Beam 25 Check 1


|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Y PROPERTIES |
|************* | IN CM UNIT |
| * |=============================| ===|=== ------------ |
|MEMBER 25 * | INDIAN SECTIONS | | AX = 19.1 |
| * | ST ISMB150 | | --Z AY = 7.5 |
|DESIGN CODE * | | | AZ = 8.0 |
| IS-800 * =============================== ===|=== SY = 12.5 |
| * SZ = 95.7 |
| * |<---LENGTH (ME= 1.12 --->| RY = 1.6 |
|************* RZ = 6.1 |
| |
| 17.7( KN-METR) |
|PARAMETER |L2008 STRESSES |
|IN NEWT MM | L2008 IN NEWT MM|
|--------------- + -------------|
| KL/R-Y= 71.6 | L2008 FA = 146.1 |
| KL/R-Z= 50.9 + L2008 fa = 0.1 |
| UNL = 1120.0 | L2008 FCZ = 216.7 |
| C = 400.0 + FTZ = 273.9 |
| CMY = 0.46 | FCY = 273.9 |
| CMZ = 0.59 + L2008 FTY = 273.9 |
| FYLD = 415.0 | L200L200L200L200L200fbz = 184.8 |
| NSF = 1.0 +---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---| fby = 6.4 |
| DFF = 0.0 5.1 FV = 166.0 |
| dff = 0.0 ABSOLUTE MZ ENVELOPE fv = 27.5 |
| (WITH LOAD NO.) |
| |
| MAX FORCE/ MOMENT SUMMARY ( KN-METR) |
| ------------------------- |
| |
| AXIAL SHEAR-Y SHEAR-Z MOMENT-Y MOMENT-Z |
| |
| VALUE -3.2 20.6 0.4 0.3 17.7 |
| LOCATION 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 |
| LOADING 2007 2008 2005 2005 2008 |
| |
|**************************************************************************|
|* *|
|* DESIGN SUMMARY ( KN-METR) *|
|* -------------- *|
|* *|
|* RESULT/ CRITICAL COND/ RATIO/ LOADING/ *|
| FX MY MZ LOCATION |
| ====================================================== |
| PASS IS-7.1.1(A) 0.877 2008 |
| 0.19 C 0.1 17.7 0.00 |
|* *|
|**************************************************************************|
| |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
25 ST ISMB150 (INDIAN SECTIONS)

Print Time/Date: 11/11/2020 00:39 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.33 Print Run 5 of 5

You might also like