A Design Report

On
Protection works for
LALITPUR MUNICIAPLITY NEW BLOCK
BUILDING
at Lalitpur, Kathmandu

Submitted By:

Sanju Jain Geotech Firm (P) Ltd

Bagdol, Lalitpur, Nepal
Email: gsgroup.jain@gmail.com
Cell 9851118335
July, 2022

0
 Lalitpur Municipality Block, Lalitpur.
Sheraton Hotel
Calculation of Surcharge, Active Earth Pressure, Design of Cantilever Retention piles and Soil Anchors

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 2

SCOPING OF THIS CALCULATION AND DESIGN .................................................................................................... 2

BASIC PHILOSOPHY OF CALCULATION OF THESE LOADS .................................................................................. 3

ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE .................................................................................................................................. 3

CALCULATION SURCHARGE LAODS DUE TO ADJACENT BUILDINGS ............................................................ 3

FORMULAE USED AND LOAD CALCULATION FOR ANALYSIS ARE AS FOLLOWS ............................................. 5

SUMMARY OF OUTPUT OF CALCULATIONS .......................................................................................................... 5

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 7

WORKING METHOD FOR BASEMENT PROTECTION SYSTEM INSTALALTION AND BASEMENT EXCAVATION

..................................................................................................................................................................................... 7

ANNEXURE ................................................................................................................................................................. 9

Design by:Geotech Engg. Sanju Kumar Jain 1

 Lalitpur Municipality Block, Lalitpur.
Sheraton Hotel
Calculation of Surcharge, Active Earth Pressure, Design of Cantilever Retention piles and Soil Anchors

INTRODUCTION
The Location of this building is behind the Main Municipality building at Pulchowk, Lalitpur. The upcoming
block is located in the Flat terrain surrounded at all Five sides intermittently by Neighboring residential
buildings. The proposed Buildings have two sides surrounded by Neighboring building and remaining two
sites have no adjacent building near the basement excavation. Bore hole has been carried out at the building
footprint area. After analyzing the proposed building layout inside the existing topography, Two different
type of loadings has been identified and have been adopted to analyze the Soil and surcharge loading
conditions in order to evaluate the critical case in the proximity with the depth of excavation [basement -
6.6m] required for the upcoming building at that location. Considering this fact of basement excavation
requirement due to land Cost effectiveness, Protection works is required to be installed in place before
carrying out the excavation for the basement in order to retain the adjacent Soil mass, Public road and
neighboring property.

SCOPING OF THIS CALCULATION AND DESIGN

The building has Double storey basement floor with depth -7.05m including Mat thickness, PCC and gravel
bedding. Due to this scenario, it is required to calculate the surcharge load from the adjacent neighbor
building using Boussinesq equation and design of the protection system using the surcharge load and active
earth pressure to the protection system. After site reconnaissance, Two zone for the Protection system has
been identified [all around the building]. After surcharge calculation, two different Zones namely Zone 1 and
Zone [2+3] has been considered in the FEM Modal analysis for the design of Protection system using RCC
bored pile and soil anchor for support. Design drawings attached in Annexure. The retention piles location
and its layout has been assumed for practical space requirements for installation procedure minimizing the
space of the protection works. All of the calculation detail information were based on provided soil
investigation report and the provided site plan and information based on site. Consideration of Earthquake
forces has been taken into account during design and calculation of lateral earth pressure. The Span/
deflection ratio has been considered as L/90 to check the deflection of RCC bored piles. This is because
the protection system are considered to be temporary structures. The Design of Protection system is done
in two stages. In Ist stage, Calculation of Surcharge load, active earth pressure is calculated and then the
result obtained from Earth pressure calculation superimposed with surcharge pressure diagram to form
combined pressure diagram. In the IInd stage, FEM modal verification is carried out using stick model with
subgrade modules assigned to modal. Furthermore, the Phase FEM software has been used to calculate
the anchor length, diameter, its spacing and pull out force required to sustain the soil and surcharge pressure
for Zone 1 and Zone 2 within drift limit of L/90. The Subgrade modulus is calculated using the soil test report
data and then combined pressure is assigned to the FEM modal to obtain RCC design of Protection system.
Design by:Geotech Engg. Sanju Kumar Jain 2
 Lalitpur Municipality Block, Lalitpur.
Sheraton Hotel
Calculation of Surcharge, Active Earth Pressure, Design of Cantilever Retention piles and Soil Anchors

This information is attached in Annexure of Report.

BASIC PHILOSOPHY OF CALCULATION OF THESE LOADS

ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE

The Active Earth pressure is calculated using Coulomb’s theory. According to Coulomb’s theory, active earth
pressure is given by the following formula:

where: σz - vertical geostatic stress

cef - effective cohesion of soil
Ka - coefficient of active earth pressure
Kae - coefficient of active earth pressure due to cohesion

The coefficient of active earth pressure Ka is given by:

The coefficient of active earth pressure Kac is given by:

for:

for:

CALCULATION SURCHARGE LAODS DUE TO ADJACENT BUILDINGS

Basic rule for vertical strip loading q acting parallel with structure on the ground surface along an infinitely
long strip the trapezoidal increment of active earth pressure applied to the Protection Pile over a given
segment h is assumed – see figure below.

Design by:Geotech Engg. Sanju Kumar Jain 3

 Lalitpur Municipality Block, Lalitpur.
Sheraton Hotel
Calculation of Surcharge, Active Earth Pressure, Design of Cantilever Retention piles and Soil Anchors

The general equation for determining the pressure at distance h below the ground line is

Point loads from a concrete Footing of adjacent building to Micropile is considered when the building is
adjacent to the excavation
We have used all the above mentioned formulae for Point loading during calculation of the surcharge load
on Micropile. The detail soil parameters assumed and input in the calculation and their graphical
interpretation of the result are attached in Annexure.

Design by:Geotech Engg. Sanju Kumar Jain 4

 Lalitpur Municipality Block, Lalitpur.
Sheraton Hotel
Calculation of Surcharge, Active Earth Pressure, Design of Cantilever Retention piles and Soil Anchors

FORMULAE USED AND LOAD CALCULATION FOR ANALYSIS ARE AS FOLLOWS

• Active earth pressure calculation - Coulomb Theory of active Earth Pressure.
• Surcharge load Calculation- Boussinesq equation for Strip/Point load has been used for Calculation of
Surcharge.
• Embedment length of RCC bored pile has been checked as per IS2911 and Soil anchor has been employed
to make the retention pile within the drift limit from Phase modal verification..
• In the FEM model verification, the spring [lateral Subgrade modulus] for the soil is calculated from the IS2911.

SUMMARY OF OUTPUT OF CALCULATIONS

The Maximum Earth pressure located at 6.6m due to Active Earth for protection piles and Surcharge effect
at Zone-2 and at 7.05m due to Active Earth for protection piles and Surcharge effect at Zone-2. All the
pressure calculated has been shown summarized below in Tabular format.

Design by:Geotech Engg. Sanju Kumar Jain 5

 Lalitpur Municipality Block, Lalitpur.
Sheraton Hotel
Calculation of Surcharge, Active Earth Pressure, Design of Cantilever Retention piles and Soil Anchors

SUMMARY OF LOAD CALCULATIONS

Z1- Ex- 6.6m; Ø600mm Z2- Ex- 6.6m; Ø600+Ø300mm

DEPTH
pile @ 1.235m c/c pile @ 1.235m c/c
0.00 0 0
1.00 22.171 24.471
2.00 88.684 76.849
3.00 199.54 157.786
4.00 310.363 237.157
5.00 484.942 362.695
6.00 698.317 516.642
7.00 950.486 699.094
7.00 964.113 708.965
7.05 43.086 47.334
8.00 43.086 46.65
9.00 43.086 46.059
10.00 43.086 45.577
11.00 43.086 45.183

Design by:Geotech Engg. Sanju Kumar Jain 6

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
SUMMARY OF PROTECTION SYSTEM DESIGN
Soil Anchors of Ø25mm threaded rod inserted in drill holes of
Grade Cle Longitudi Helical Pile Cap Beam Size 600 (W) x500(D) for all
40~50mm @ angle of 30⁰ to horizon @ horizontal spacing of 1.235m
of Steel ar nal Rebar Stirrups Zone
c/c
Con for Soil Cov Reba % of
Proxi Buildin Depth Verti Verti Verti Verti Grade Grad
tigi Anchor er Design r Rebar
mity g of Bor Len Allow cal Allow cal cal Allow cal of e of Design
ous Spaci Base Maxim drift fro Shear area area in
distan Surchar Excav ed gth Ist able dist 2nd able dist 3rd Allowa dist 4th able dist Steel drift Conr Moment
ZO Bor ng of Plate of um Exceed m Force Thr in Cross
ce of ge near ation Pile, of Laye capa ance Laye capa ance Laye ble ance Laye capa ance for Calcula ete, from Thro
NE ed Piles, 10mm deflecti L/90 Mai from o Spa Longitudinal Cros sectio
Surch the consi Ø, Pile, r city from r city from r capaci from r city from Soil iton fck, ETABS, bars Ø,
Pile, , mm thick, on, mm check n ETABS bars cing bars lateral Stirrups in lateral face s n
arge, Protecti dered, mm m Len of Top Len of Top Len ty of Top Len of Top Anch N/m KNm Ø, mm
Ø, 150mm Bar , KN , , mm face secti [Overa
m on Pile m gth, anch of gth, anch of gth, ancho of gth, anch of or, Fy m2 mm
mm X s Nos on ll]
m or, Pile m or, Pile m r, KN Pile m or, Pile
150mm, (m
KN Cap, KN Cap, Cap, KN Cap,
Fy m)
m m m m
1- Yes 7.050 600 1235 11.0 12 50.95 2 8 66.65 4 8 56.97 5 6 58.21 6 Fe575 Fe525 40.065 0.006 OK 50 M25 83.216 446.13 20 8 10 175 5-Ø16mm (T/B) Ø8mm -2LS @ 150mm O.C. 2513 0.89%
2 3.000 Yes 7.050 600 300 1235 11.0 12 50.95 2 8 66.65 4 8 56.97 5 6 58.21 6 Fe575 Fe525 72.015 0.010 OK 50 M25 193.216 572.60 20 8 10 175 5-Ø16mm (T/B) Ø8mm -2LS @ 150mm O.C. 2513 0.89%

WORKING METHOD FOR BASEMENT PROTECTION SYSTEM INSTALALTION AND BASEMENT EXCAVATION
The Method of work execution should be as instructed below:
➢ After Installation of RCC bored pile as shown in the design drawings, RCC pile cap needs to be installed.
➢ Next is the Ist level of excavation from -2m from OGL needs to be carried out in stretch not more than 7~10m which should cover the installation of Ist laer of Soil anchor at
this level.
➢ Next stage, Installation of Top down wall to hold the scouring of soil as shown in design drawings.
7
 Lalitpur Municipality Block, Lalitpur.
Sheraton Hotel
Calculation of Surcharge, Active Earth Pressure, Design of Cantilever Retention piles and Soil Anchors
➢ Repeat the above stages of excavation for next 7~10m stretch till we reach the bottom of exacavation from 2nd level of anchor to 4th level of anchor and top down wall
construction.

Design by:Geotech Engg. Sanju Kumar Jain 8

ANNEXURE

9
 SUMMARY OF PROTECTION SYSTEM DESIGN

Soil Anchors of Ø25mm threaded rod inserted in drill holes of 40~50mm @ Grade Cle Longitudi Helical Pile Cap Beam Size 600 (W) x500(D) for all
angle of 30⁰ to horizon @ horizontal spacing of 1.235m c/c of Steel ar nal Rebar Stirrups Zone % of
Con for Soil Cov Reb
Proxi Depth Verti Verti Verti Verti Grade Grad Rebar
Building tigio Anchor er Design ar
mity of Bor cal cal cal cal of e of Design area
Surchar us Spaci Leng Allow Allow Base Maximu drift fro Shear area
distan Excav ed dista Allow dista Allowa dista dista Steel drift Conr Moment in
ZO ge near Bor ng of th of Ist able 2nd 3rd 4th able Plate of m Exceed m
ete,
Force in
ce of ation Pile, nce able nce ble nce nce for Calculai from Thro Thro Cross
NE the ed Piles,, Pile, Laye capac Laye Laye Laye capac 10mm deflecti L/90 Mai from Spac Cros
Surch consid Ø, from capac from capacit from from Soil ton fck, ETABS, bars bars Ø, Longitudinal sectio
Protecti Pile, mm m r ity of r r r ity of thick, on, mm check n ETABS, ing, Stirrups in lateral face s
arge, ered, mm Top ity of Top y of Top Top Ancho N/m KNm Ø, , mm bars lateral face n
on Pile Ø, Leng anch Leng Leng Leng anch 150mm Bar KN mm secti
m m of ancho of anchor of of r, Fy m2 mm Nos [Overa
mm th, m or, th, m th, m th, m or, X s on
Pile r, KN Pile , KN Pile Pile ll]
KN KN 150mm, (m
Cap, Cap, Cap, Cap,
Fy m)
m m m m
1- Yes 7.050 600 1235 11.0 12 50.95 2 8 66.65 4 8 56.97 5 6 58.21 6 Fe575 Fe525 40.065 0.006 OK 50 M25 83.216 446.13 20 8 10 175 5-Ø16mm (T/B) Ø8mm -2LS @ 150mm O.C. 2513 0.89%
2 3.000 Yes 7.050 600 300 1235 11.0 12 50.95 2 8 66.65 4 8 56.97 5 6 58.21 6 Fe575 Fe525 72.015 0.010 OK 50 M25 193.216 572.60 20 8 10 175 5-Ø16mm (T/B) Ø8mm -2LS @ 150mm O.C. 2513 0.89%
 ZONE-II STAGE-I :- SURCHARGE CALCULATION FOR BUILDING
A Input Data :-
Height of RCC Pile from Top ground level to Top (h1) = Assume 0.000 m
Height of RCC Pile from Formation Level to Top ground level (h2) = 7.050 m
Height of RCC Pile from Formation Level (h3)= h2= 3.950 m
Stiffnes factor in normally loaded clays = = 2.295 m
Embedment length required for Short rigid Pile in Normal clay = d 0 3.442 m
Total Length of RCC Pile required = H1 =h2+d0 10.492 m
Total height of RCC Pile provided, H = h1+h2+h3 = 11.000 m
Factor of Safety for Root penetration depth = H/H 1 1.05
Height for holding soil mass= 7.050 m
Grade of Steel/Rebar, fy = Fe500
Grade of Concrete fck = M25
3
Subgrade Modulus of Soil As per IS 2911 or calculation Medium Stiff clay ηb= 2500 KN/m
LL limit Unconfined Strength of Soil= 100
UL limit Unconfined Strength of Soil= 200
Critical Unconfined value from Bore logs for root penetration/Embed length= 114 MPa Assumed
Critical Soil Condition = Submerged
RCC curtain wall height for holding soil mass= 11.000 m
Outer Diameter of RCC Pile(ØD) = 0.600 m
Adopt Wall Thickness Tw= 200 mm
Inner Diameter of RCC Pile(Ød) = 0.600 m
Spacing of RCC Pile, S,m = 1.235 m
Surcharge load from Vehicle Considered = No
Surcharge load from adjacent building Considered = No
Length of adjacent Building ┴r to the RCC Pile Array, L, m = 16.600 m
Breadth of adjacent Building // to the RCC Pile Array, B,m = 13.500 m
Number of Floors of adjacent Building, nf = 4.000 Nos
Adjacent Building has Strip, Mat or Isolated Footing = Isolated Footing
Numbers of Columns ┴r the direction of RCC Pile, n1 = 3.000 Nos
Numbers of Columns // to the direction of RCC Pile, n2 = 4.000 Nos
Spacing of Column ┴r between 1st & 2nd array of Columns, s1,m = 3.000 m
Spacing of Columns ┴r between 2nd & 3rd array of Columns, s2,m = 3.000 m
Spacing of Columns ┴r between 3rd & 4th array of Columns, s3,m = 3.000 m
Spacing of Columns ┴r between 4th & 5th array of Columns, s4,m = 3.000 m
Spacing of Rows of Columns 1 & 2 along RCC Piles = 3.000 m
Spacing of Rows of Columns 2 & 3 along RCC Piles = 3.000 m
Spacing of Rows of Columns 3 & 4 along RCC Piles = 1st G 2nd G 3rd G 3.000 m
Length of Isolated Footing, l,m = 1.500 1.800 1.50 m
Breadth of Isolated Footing, l,m = 1.500 1.800 1.500 m
2
Total Footing Area, At = 27.000 m
Total Number of walls/Columns, Tc= 12.000 Nos
dist. of RCC Pile to Nearest Coln or pt. load of adj. bldg d1 ,m= 3.000 m
Unit weight of soil (ϒs) = 17.952 KN/m3
Soil parameters from Critical BH2

Water Table, wT= 4.000 m

Φ = internal friction angle of soil 0.000 º
data of Soil test report

Cohesion of soil C = 61.000 KN/m2

back fill of soil inclination, β = 0.000 º
Friction coefficient between Soil and Structure, μ = 0.500
Frinction angle between soil and structure, δ = 26.565 º
Back face inclination of RCC Pile, α = 90.000 º
Building Plinth Area, Ab = L x B = 16.6 m x 13.5 m 224.100 m2
Assumed Thumb Rule for weight of Building , w= 1.600 ton/m2
Total weight of Structure , WT, KN = 14070 KN
2
Surcharge Load q1, KN/m2 on each Footing = 0.00 KN/m
2
Surcharge Load q1, KN/m2 on each Footing = 0.00 KN/m at distance of 3m
2
Surcharge Load q1, KN/m2 on each Footing = 0.00 KN/m at distance of 6m
 0.000 0 0.000 0 0 2
0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.000 0
0.000 -1 0.000 -1
0.000 -1
0.000 -2 0.000 -2
0.000 -2
0.000 -3 0.000 -3
0.000 -3
0.000 -4 0.000 -4
0.000 -4

0.000 -5 0.000 -5
0.000 -5

0.000 -6 0.000 -6
0.000 -6
DEPTH, M

DEPTH, M
0.000 -7 0.000 -7

DEPTH, M
0.000 -7

0.000 -8 0.000 -8 0.000 -8

0.000 -9 0.000 -9 0.000 -9

0.000 -10 0.000 -10 0.000 -10

0.000 -11 0.000 -11 0.000 -11

+
-12 + -12 -12

-13 -13 -13

-14 -14 -14

SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO 1ST VEHICLE SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO 3rd VEHICLE
SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO 2nD VEHICLE -15
-15 -15
KN/M2 KN/M2 KN/M2

Line of Action of Surcharge Load due to adjacent building

𝐴1 𝑋1 + 𝐴2 𝑋2 + 𝐴3 𝑋3 + 𝐴4 𝑋4 + ⋯ . 𝐴5 𝑋5 + 𝐴6.5 𝑋6.5 hs= 0.000 m from bottom of
𝑋ത = Excavation depth or dredge line
σ𝑛1 𝐴𝑛
𝐴1 = 0.000 KN/m 𝑋1 = 6.250 m 0.000 0
𝐴2 = 0.000 KN/m 𝑋2 = 5.250 m 0.0 0.000 0.5 1.0 -1
𝐴3 = 0.000 KN/m 𝑋3 = 4.250 m 0.000 -2
𝐴4 = 0.000 KN/m 𝑋4 = 3.250 m 0.000 -3
𝐴5 = 0.000 KN/m 𝑋5 = 2.250 m
0.000 -4
𝐴6 = 0.000 KN/m 𝑋6 = 1.250 m
0.000 -5
𝐴6.5 = 0.000 KN/m 𝑋6.5 = 0.250 m 0.000 -6
Ps= 𝐴 = 0.000 KN/m
DEPTH, M

𝑛 0.000 -7
0.000 -8
0.000 -9
0.000 -10
0.000 -11
-12
-13
COMBINED SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO ALL
VEHICLE LOADS -14
-15
KN/M2
Zone 1: Cloud Marked Portion with this color Zone 2: Cloud Marked Portion with this color

1
L 𝐴1 = 𝐿1 𝑎
2
a 1
L 𝐴2 = 𝐿2 (𝑎 + 𝑏)
b 2
1
L 𝐴𝑛 = 𝐿𝑛 (𝑏 + 𝑐)
c
12
L4/3 𝐴4 = 𝐿4 (0.7 ・𝑐)
(L4=15m-8.7m=6.3m) L 2

Sketches of Point load Calculation from Surcharge Pressure

 ZONE-II STAGE- II:- DYNAMIC EQ ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE CALCULATION
A Geometry Data :-
Height of RCC pile from Ground level to Top (h1) = 0.000 m
Height of RCC pile from Foundation Level to Top ground level (h2) = 7.050 m
Total height of RCC pile, H = h1+h2+h3 = 7.050 m
distance from base of Excavation to the point of action of active earth pressure (h4)= 2.350 m
Spacing of Pile = 1.235 m
Initial Void Ratio of Soil, e0= 0.662

Soil parameters from Critical BH2 data of

Water Table wT= 4.000 m
Water Content due to Rain w = 100 % 1.000
Unit weight of Water, ϒw= 9.810 KN/m3
Specific Gravity of Soil, Gs= 1.830

Soil test report

3
Unit weight of soil (ϒ) = 17.952 KN/m
1+𝜔 ∗𝐺𝑠 ∗𝛾𝑤
Saturated Unit weight of Soil = 𝛾𝑆𝑎𝑡 = = 21.603 KN/m3
n (1+𝑒0 )
Φ = angle bet resultant force and normal to failure plane/friction angle of soil 0.000 º
3
Cohesion of soil at base C'2 61.000 KN/m
Frictional coefficient μ = 0.500
Maximum Existing back slope of Existing Ground with horizontal = α = 0.000 º
Angle between back face of Micropile with horizontal = β 90.000 º
Angle of friction betn the soil & wall = δ = betn ⅟₂φ to ⅔φ 0.50 0.000 º
Include Earthquake effect in soil= Yes
Maxm Peak ground acceln PGA 3 Sec in horiz. Dir. for EQ amax= k h x g 0.350 g from NBC105-2020
Assume vert. comp. of PGA for EQ = k v x g 0.000 % of kh 0.000 g
= 19.290 º

CALCULATION OF ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE+WATER PORE WATER PRESSURE

Excavation Side Passive Earth Pressure Protected Side Net Pa Earth Pressure Calculation
Pa of water Pa of Saturated Pa of water Pa of Saturated
Z, m Z, m AEP -Ex AEP-P Net EP
Pressure Soil Pressure Soil
0 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
1 -1.00 0.00 0.000 1 -1.00 11.09 11.09 22.17 0.00 22.17 22.171
2 -2.00 0.00 0.000 2 -2.00 44.34 44.34 88.68 0.00 88.68 88.684
3 -3.00 0.00 0.000 3 -3.00 99.77 99.77 199.54 0.00 199.54 199.540
4 -4.00 0.00 0.000 4 -4.00 96.92 213.44 310.36 0.00 310.36 310.363
5 -5.00 0.00 0.000 4 -5.00 151.44 333.50 484.94 0.00 484.94 484.942
6 -6.00 0.00 0.000 5 -6.00 218.08 480.24 698.32 0.00 698.32 698.317
7 -7.00 0.00 0.000 6 -7.00 296.83 653.66 950.49 0.00 950.49 950.486
8 -7.05 0.00 0.000 7 -7.05 301.08 663.03 964.11 0.00 964.11 964.113
9 -7.05 0.00 0.000 8 -7.05 301.08 663.03 964.11 0.00 964.11 43.086
10 -8.00 -5.47 -12.039 9 -8.00 387.69 853.76 1223.95 -17.51 1241.45 43.086
11 -9.00 -23.03 -50.725 10 -9.00 490.67 1080.54 1497.45 -73.76 1571.21 43.086
12 -10.00 -52.72 -116.091 11 -10.00 605.77 1334.00 1770.96 -168.81 1939.77 43.086
13 -11.00 -94.51 -208.137 12 -11.00 732.98 1614.14 2044.47 -302.65 2347.12 43.086

Coulomb's theory of active earth pressure coeff. At wall at static condition (K A) =

𝑆𝑖𝑛2 ∅ + 𝛽
𝐾𝑎 = 2
sin ∅ + 𝛿 sin ∅ − 𝛼
1.000
𝑆𝑖𝑛2 𝛽𝑆𝑖𝑛 𝛽 − 𝛿 1+
sin 𝛽 + 𝛿 sin 𝛼 − 𝛽

Equivalent AEP, Ø600/1235= 0.4858 = -88.684 KN/m -43.086 #REF!

Active earth pressure at wall in Static Condition = 550.979 KN/m

 Coulomb's theory for total static and dynamic Active earth pressure coeff. at wall caused by earthquake (K AE ) =

1.000

Equivalent AEP, Ø600/1235= 0.49 = -243.882 KN/m -118.485 #REF!

Active earth pressure at wall in Static Condition = 446.137 KN/m

Line of Action due to Total Static and dynamic Earthquake effect and Active earth Pressure=
𝐴1 𝑋1 + 𝐴2 𝑋2 + 𝐴3 𝑋3 + 𝐴4 𝑋4 + 𝐴5 𝑋5 + ⋯ . +𝐴7 𝑋7 + 𝐴7.05 𝑋7.05 ha= 1.590 m from
𝑋ത =
σ𝑛1 𝐴𝑛 bottom of
𝐴1 = 5.543 KN/m 𝑋1 = 7.025 m Protection
𝐴2 = 27.714 KN/m 𝑋2 = 6.025 m Pile
𝐴3 = 72.056 KN/m 𝑋3 = 5.025 m
𝐴4 = 156.605 KN/m 𝑋4 = 4.025 m
𝐴5 = 273.470 KN/m 𝑋5 = 3.025 m
𝐴6 = 406.870 KN/m 𝑋6 = 2.025 m
𝐴7 = 566.950 KN/m 1.025 m
𝑋7 =
𝐴7.05 = 658.346 KN/m 𝑋7.05 = 0.025 m
Pa= 𝐴𝑛 = 446.14 KN/m

1
L1 𝐴1 = 𝐿1 𝑎
a 2
1
L2 𝐴2 = 𝐿2 (𝑎 + 𝑏)
b 2
1
L3 𝐴3 = 𝐿3 (𝑏 + 𝑐)
c 2
Sketches of Point load Calculation from Active Earth Pressure of Soil

Excavation Side AEP with Water Table Protected Side Dynamic AEP with Water Table
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
-350.00 -300.00 -250.00 -200.00 -150.00 -100.00 -50.00 0.00 0.00 500.00 1000.00 1500.00 2000.00 2500.00

0.00 -1.00 -1.00 22.171

0.00 -2.00 -2.00 88.684

0.00 -3.00 -3.00 199.540

0.00 -4.00 -4.00 310.363

0.00 -5.00 -5.00 484.942

0.00 -6.00 -6.00 698.317

0.00 -7.00 -7.00 950.486

964.113

-17.51 -8.00 -8.00 1,241.452

-73.76 -9.00 -9.00 1,571.212

-168.81 -10.00 -10.00 1,939.768

-302.65 -11.00 -11.00 2,347.119

-12.00 -12.00
 Net Dynamic AEP Diagram with Water Table on Piles
0.00 0.000
0.000 200.000 400.000 600.000 800.000 1000.000 1200.000
-1.00 22.171

-2.00 88.684

-3.00 199.540

-4.00 310.363

-5.00 484.942

-6.00 698.317

-7.00 43.086 950.486

964.113

-8.00 43.086

-9.00 43.086

-10.00 43.086

-11.00 43.086

-12.00

Combined Pressure
Depth Soil-ActiveSurchargeCombined Combined Pressure Diagram
m kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2
0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 [Surcharge from Bldg +
-1.00 22.171 0.000 22.171 Earthquake+Water Table]
-2.00 88.684 0.000 88.684
0.00 0.000
-3.00 199.540 0.000 199.540

1000
1025
0
50
25
75

350

925
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
325
375
400
425
450
475
500
525
550
575
600
625
650
675
700
725
750
775
800
825
850
875
900
950
975
-4.00 310.363 0.000 310.363 -1.00 22.171
-5.00 484.942 0.000 484.942
-6.00 698.317 0.000 698.317 -2.00 88.684
-7.00 950.486 0.000 950.486 -3.00 199.540
-7.05 964.113 0.000 964.113
-7.05 43.086 0.000 43.086 -4.00 310.363
-8.00 43.086 0.000 43.086 -5.00 484.942
-9.00 43.086 0.000 43.086
-10.00 43.086 0.000 43.086 -6.00 698.317
-11.00 43.086 0.000 43.086 -7.00 950.486
43.086 964.113

-8.00 43.086

-9.00 43.086

-10.00 43.086

-11.00 43.086

-12.00
 ZONE-II STAGE-I :- SURCHARGE CALCULATION FOR BUILDING
A Input Data :-
Height of RCC Pile from Top ground level to Top (h1) = Assume 0.000 m
Height of RCC Pile from Formation Level to Top ground level (h2) = 7.050 m
Height of RCC Pile from Formation Level (h3)= h2= 3.950 m
Stiffnes factor in normally loaded clays = = 2.295 m
Embedment length required for Short rigid Pile in Normal clay = d 0 3.442 m
Total Length of RCC Pile required = H1 =h2+d0 10.492 m
Total height of RCC Pile provided, H = h1+h2+h3 = 11.000 m
Factor of Safety for Root penetration depth = H/H1 1.05
Height for holding soil mass= 7.050 m
Grade of Steel/Rebar, fy = Fe500
Grade of Concrete fck = M25
3
Subgrade Modulus of Soil As per IS 2911 or calculation Medium Stiff clay ηb= 2500 KN/m
LL limit Unconfined Strength of Soil= 100
UL limit Unconfined Strength of Soil= 200
Critical Unconfined value from Bore logs for root penetration/Embed length= 114 MPa Assumed
Critical Soil Condition = Submerged
RCC curtain wall height for holding soil mass= 11.000 m
Outer Diameter of RCC Pile(ØD) = 0.600 m
Adopt Wall Thickness Tw= 200 mm
Inner Diameter of RCC Pile(Ød) = 0.600 m
Spacing of RCC Pile, S,m = 0.900 m
Surcharge load from Vehicle Considered = No
Surcharge load from adjacent building Considered = Yes
Length of adjacent Building ┴r to the RCC Pile Array, L, m = 16.600 m
Breadth of adjacent Building // to the RCC Pile Array, B,m = 13.500 m
Number of Floors of adjacent Building, nf = 4.000 Nos
Adjacent Building has Strip, Mat or Isolated Footing = Isolated Footing
Numbers of Columns ┴r the direction of RCC Pile, n1 = 3.000 Nos
Numbers of Columns // to the direction of RCC Pile, n2 = 4.000 Nos
Spacing of Column ┴r between 1st & 2nd array of Columns, s1,m = 3.000 m
Spacing of Columns ┴r between 2nd & 3rd array of Columns, s2,m = 3.000 m
Spacing of Columns ┴r between 3rd & 4th array of Columns, s3,m = 3.000 m
Spacing of Columns ┴r between 4th & 5th array of Columns, s4,m = 3.000 m
Spacing of Rows of Columns 1 & 2 along RCC Piles = 3.000 m
Spacing of Rows of Columns 2 & 3 along RCC Piles = 3.000 m
Spacing of Rows of Columns 3 & 4 along RCC Piles = 1st G 2nd G 3rd G 3.000 m
Length of Isolated Footing, l,m = 1.500 1.800 1.50 m
Breadth of Isolated Footing, l,m = 1.500 1.800 1.500 m
2
Total Footing Area, At = 27.000 m
Total Number of walls/Columns, Tc= 12.000 Nos
dist. of RCC Pile to Nearest Coln or pt. load of adj. bldg d1 ,m= 3.000 m
Unit weight of soil (ϒs) = 17.952 KN/m3
Soil parameters from Critical BH2

Water Table, wT= 4.000 m

Φ = internal friction angle of soil 0.000 º
data of Soil test report

Cohesion of soil C = 61.000 KN/m2

back fill of soil inclination, β = 0.000 º
Friction coefficient between Soil and Structure, μ = 0.500
Frinction angle between soil and structure, δ = 26.565 º
Back face inclination of RCC Pile, α = 90.000 º
Building Plinth Area, Ab = L x B = 16.6 m x 13.5 m 224.100 m2
Assumed Thumb Rule for weight of Building , w= 1.600 ton/m2
Total weight of Structure , WT, KN = 14070 KN
2
Surcharge Load q1, KN/m2 on each Footing = 57.90 KN/m
2
Surcharge Load q1, KN/m2 on each Footing = 57.90 KN/m at distance of 3m
2
Surcharge Load q1, KN/m2 on each Footing = 57.90 KN/m at distance of 6m
 0.000 0 0.000 0 0 2
0.0 5.0 10.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 0.000 0
6.380 -1 1.379 -1
0.555 -1
8.755-2 2.425 -2
1.041 -2
7.977 -3 2.986 -3
1.409 -3
6.230 -4 3.110 -4
1.642 -4
4.607 -5 2.943 -5
1.746-5
3.366 -6 2.631 -6
1.749-6
DEPTH, M

DEPTH, M
2.477
2.440 -7 2.275
2.257 -7

DEPTH, M
1.680 -7
1.675

1.849 -8 1.931 -8 1.567 -8

1.404 -9 1.623 -9 1.432 -9

1.084 -10 1.361 -10 1.291 -10

0.851 -11 1.141 -11 1.153 -11

+
-12 + -12 -12

-13 -13 -13

-14 -14 -14

SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO 1ST VEHICLE SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO 3rd VEHICLE
SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO 2nD VEHICLE -15
-15 -15
KN/M2 KN/M2 KN/M2

Line of Action of Surcharge Load due to adjacent building

𝐴1 𝑋1 + 𝐴2 𝑋2 + 𝐴3 𝑋3 + 𝐴4 𝑋4 + ⋯ . 𝐴5 𝑋5 + 𝐴6.5 𝑋6.5 hs= 3.201 m from bottom of
𝑋ത = Excavation depth or dredge line
σ𝑛1 𝐴𝑛
𝐴1 = -4.157 KN/m 𝑋1 = 6.250 m 0.000 0
𝐴2 = -10.268 KN/m 𝑋2 = 5.250 m 0.0 5.0 10.0
8.314 15.0-1
𝐴3 = -12.296 KN/m 𝑋3 = 4.250 m 12.221 -2
𝐴4 = -11.677 KN/m 𝑋4 = 3.250 m 12.372 -3
𝐴5 = -10.139 KN/m 𝑋5 = 2.250 m
10.982 -4
𝐴6 = -8.521 KN/m 𝑋6 = 1.250 m
9.296 -5
𝐴6.5 = -7.089 KN/m 𝑋6.5 = 0.250 m 7.747 -6
Ps= 𝐴 = -64.148 KN/m
DEPTH, M

𝑛 6.432
4.248 6.372 -7
3.564 -8
2.973 -9
2.491 -10
2.097 -11
-12
-13
COMBINED SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO ALL
VEHICLE LOADS -14
-15
KN/M2
Zone 1: Cloud Marked Portion with this color Zone 2: Cloud Marked Portion with this color

1
L 𝐴1 = 𝐿1 𝑎
2
a 1
L 𝐴2 = 𝐿2 (𝑎 + 𝑏)
b 2
1
L 𝐴𝑛 = 𝐿𝑛 (𝑏 + 𝑐)
c
12
L4/3 𝐴4 = 𝐿4 (0.7 ・𝑐)
(L4=15m-8.7m=6.3m) L 2

Sketches of Point load Calculation from Surcharge Pressure

 ZONE-II STAGE- II:- DYNAMIC EQ ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE CALCULATION
A Geometry Data :-
Height of RCC pile from Ground level to Top (h1) = 0.000 m
Height of RCC pile from Foundation Level to Top ground level (h2) = 7.050 m
Total height of RCC pile, H = h1+h2+h3 = 7.050 m
distance from base of Excavation to the point of action of active earth pressure (h4)= 2.350 m
Spacing of Pile = 0.900 m
Initial Void Ratio of Soil, e0= 0.662

Soil parameters from Critical BH2 data of

Water Table wT= 4.000 m
Water Content due to Rain w = 100 % 1.000
Unit weight of Water, ϒw= 9.810 KN/m3
Specific Gravity of Soil, Gs= 1.830

Soil test report

3
Unit weight of soil (ϒ) = 17.952 KN/m
1+𝜔 ∗𝐺𝑠 ∗𝛾𝑤
Saturated Unit weight of Soil = 𝛾𝑆𝑎𝑡 = = 21.603 KN/m3
n (1+𝑒0 )
Φ = angle bet resultant force and normal to failure plane/friction angle of soil 0.000 º
3
Cohesion of soil at base C'2 61.000 KN/m
Frictional coefficient μ = 0.500
Maximum Existing back slope of Existing Ground with horizontal = α = 0.000 º
Angle between back face of Micropile with horizontal = β 90.000 º
Angle of friction betn the soil & wall = δ = betn ⅟₂φ to ⅔φ 0.50 0.000 º
Include Earthquake effect in soil= Yes
Maxm Peak ground acceln PGA 3 Sec in horiz. Dir. for EQ amax= k h x g 0.350 g from NBC105-2020
Assume vert. comp. of PGA for EQ = k v x g 0.000 % of kh 0.000 g
= 19.290 º

CALCULATION OF ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE+WATER PORE WATER PRESSURE

Excavation Side Passive Earth Pressure Protected Side Net Pa Earth Pressure Calculation
Pa of water Pa of Saturated Pa of water Pa of Saturated
Z, m Z, m AEP -Ex AEP-P Net EP
Pressure Soil Pressure Soil
0 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
1 -1.00 0.00 0.000 1 -1.00 8.08 8.08 16.16 0.00 16.16 16.157
2 -2.00 0.00 0.000 2 -2.00 32.31 32.31 64.63 0.00 64.63 64.628
3 -3.00 0.00 0.000 3 -3.00 72.71 72.71 145.41 0.00 145.41 145.414
4 -4.00 0.00 0.000 4 -4.00 70.63 155.54 226.18 0.00 226.18 226.175
5 -5.00 0.00 0.000 4 -5.00 110.36 243.04 353.40 0.00 353.40 353.399
6 -6.00 0.00 0.000 5 -6.00 158.92 349.97 508.89 0.00 508.89 508.895
7 -7.00 0.00 0.000 6 -7.00 216.31 476.35 692.66 0.00 692.66 692.662
8 -7.05 0.00 0.000 7 -7.05 219.41 483.18 702.59 0.00 702.59 702.593
9 -7.05 0.00 0.000 8 -7.05 219.41 483.18 702.59 0.00 702.59 43.086
10 -8.00 -3.98 -8.774 9 -8.00 282.53 622.17 891.94 -12.76 904.70 43.086
11 -9.00 -16.79 -36.966 10 -9.00 357.57 787.44 1091.26 -53.75 1145.01 43.086
12 -10.00 -38.42 -84.601 11 -10.00 441.45 972.15 1290.58 -123.02 1413.60 43.086
13 -11.00 -68.88 -151.679 12 -11.00 534.15 1176.30 1489.90 -220.56 1710.45 43.086

Coulomb's theory of active earth pressure coeff. At wall at static condition (K A) =

𝑆𝑖𝑛2 ∅ + 𝛽
𝐾𝑎 = 2
sin ∅ + 𝛿 sin ∅ − 𝛼
1.000
𝑆𝑖𝑛2 𝛽𝑆𝑖𝑛 𝛽 − 𝛿 1+
sin 𝛽 + 𝛿 sin 𝛼 − 𝛽

Equivalent AEP, Ø600/900= 0.6667 = -64.628 KN/m -43.086 #REF!

Active earth pressure at wall in Static Condition = 401.523 KN/m

Coulomb's theory for total static and dynamic Active earth pressure coeff. at wall caused by earthquake (K AE ) =
 1.000

Equivalent AEP, Ø600/900= 0.67 = -177.728 KN/m -118.485 #REF!

Active earth pressure at wall in Static Condition = 446.137 KN/m

Line of Action due to Total Static and dynamic Earthquake effect and Active earth Pressure=
𝐴1 𝑋1 + 𝐴2 𝑋2 + 𝐴3 𝑋3 + 𝐴4 𝑋4 + 𝐴5 𝑋5 + ⋯ . +𝐴7 𝑋7 + 𝐴7.05 𝑋7.05 ha= 1.590 m from
𝑋ത =
σ𝑛1 𝐴𝑛 bottom of
𝐴1 = 4.039 KN/m 𝑋1 = 7.025 m Protection
𝐴2 = 20.196 KN/m 𝑋2 = 6.025 m Pile
𝐴3 = 52.510 KN/m 𝑋3 = 5.025 m
𝐴4 = 114.125 KN/m 𝑋4 = 4.025 m
𝐴5 = 199.290 KN/m 𝑋5 = 3.025 m
𝐴6 = 296.505 KN/m 𝑋6 = 2.025 m
𝐴7 = 413.162 KN/m 1.025 m
𝑋7 =
𝐴7.05 = 479.766 KN/m 𝑋7.05 = 0.025 m
Pa= 𝐴𝑛 = 446.14 KN/m

1
L1 𝐴1 = 𝐿1 𝑎
a 2
1
L2 𝐴2 = 𝐿2 (𝑎 + 𝑏)
b 2
1
L3 𝐴3 = 𝐿3 (𝑏 + 𝑐)
c 2
Sketches of Point load Calculation from Active Earth Pressure of Soil

Excavation Side AEP with Water Table Protected Side Dynamic AEP with Water Table
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
-250.00 -200.00 -150.00 -100.00 -50.00 0.00 0.00 200.00 400.00 600.00 800.00 1000.00 1200.00 1400.00 1600.00 1800.00

0.00 -1.00 -1.00 16.157

0.00 -2.00 -2.00 64.628

0.00 -3.00 -3.00 145.414

0.00 -4.00 -4.00 226.175

0.00 -5.00 -5.00 353.399

0.00 -6.00 -6.00 508.895

0.00 -7.00 -7.00 692.662

702.593

-12.76 -8.00 -8.00 904.702

-53.75 -9.00 -9.00 1,145.013

-123.02 -10.00 -10.00 1,413.596

-220.56 -11.00 -11.00 1,710.451

-12.00 -12.00

Net Dynamic AEP Diagram with Water Table on Piles

 Net Dynamic AEP Diagram with Water Table on Piles
0.00 0.000
0.000 100.000 200.000 300.000 400.000 500.000 600.000 700.000 800.000
-1.00 16.157

-2.00 64.628

-3.00 145.414

-4.00 226.175

-5.00 353.399

-6.00 508.895

-7.00 43.086 692.662

702.593

-8.00 43.086

-9.00 43.086

-10.00 43.086

-11.00 43.086

-12.00

Combined Pressure
Depth Soil-ActiveSurchargeCombined Combined Pressure Diagram
m kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2
0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 [Surcharge from Bldg +
-1.00 16.157 8.314 24.471 Earthquake+Water Table]
-2.00 64.628 12.221 76.849
0.00 0.000
-3.00 145.414 12.372 157.786
0
25
50
75

550
600
650
700
750
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
325
350
375
400
425
450
475
500
525
575
625
675
725
-4.00 226.175 10.982 237.157 -1.00 24.471
-5.00 353.399 9.296 362.695
-6.00 508.895 7.747 516.642 -2.00 76.849
-7.00 692.662 6.432 699.094 -3.00 157.786
-7.05 702.593 6.372 708.965
-7.05 43.086 4.248 47.334 -4.00 237.157
-8.00 43.086 3.564 46.650 -5.00 362.695
-9.00 43.086 2.973 46.059
-10.00 43.086 2.491 45.577 -6.00 516.642
-11.00 43.086 2.097 45.183 -7.00 699.094
47.334 708.965

-8.00 46.650

-9.00 46.059

-10.00 45.577

-11.00 45.183

-12.00
 ZONE-III STAGE-I :- SURCHARGE CALCULATION FOR BUILDING
A Input Data :-
Height of RCC Pile from Top ground level to Top (h1) = Assume 0.000 m
Height of RCC Pile from Formation Level to Top ground level (h2) = 7.050 m
Height of RCC Pile from Formation Level (h3)= h2= 3.950 m
Stiffnes factor in normally loaded clays = = 1.318 m
Embedment length required for Short rigid Pile in Normal clay = d 0 1.977 m
Total Length of RCC Pile required = H1 =h2+d0 9.027 m
Total height of RCC Pile provided, H = h1+h2+h3 = 11.000 m
Factor of Safety for Root penetration depth = H/H 1 1.22
Height for holding soil mass= 7.050 m
Grade of Steel/Rebar, fy = Fe500
Grade of Concrete fck = M25
3
Subgrade Modulus of Soil As per IS 2911 or calculation Medium Stiff clay ηb= 2500 KN/m
LL limit Unconfined Strength of Soil= 100
UL limit Unconfined Strength of Soil= 200
Critical Unconfined value from Bore logs for root penetration/Embed length= 114 MPa Assumed
Critical Soil Condition = Submerged
RCC curtain wall height for holding soil mass= 11.000 m
Outer Diameter of RCC Pile(ØD) = 0.300 m
Adopt Wall Thickness Tw= 200 mm
Inner Diameter of RCC Pile(Ød) = 0.300 m
Spacing of RCC Pile, S,m = 0.300 m
Surcharge load from Vehicle Considered = No
Surcharge load from adjacent building Considered = Yes
Length of adjacent Building ┴r to the RCC Pile Array, L, m = 16.600 m
Breadth of adjacent Building // to the RCC Pile Array, B,m = 13.500 m
Number of Floors of adjacent Building, nf = 4.000 Nos
Adjacent Building has Strip, Mat or Isolated Footing = Isolated Footing
Numbers of Columns ┴r the direction of RCC Pile, n1 = 3.000 Nos
Numbers of Columns // to the direction of RCC Pile, n2 = 4.000 Nos
Spacing of Column ┴r between 1st & 2nd array of Columns, s1,m = 3.000 m
Spacing of Columns ┴r between 2nd & 3rd array of Columns, s2,m = 3.000 m
Spacing of Columns ┴r between 3rd & 4th array of Columns, s3,m = 3.000 m
Spacing of Columns ┴r between 4th & 5th array of Columns, s4,m = 3.000 m
Spacing of Rows of Columns 1 & 2 along RCC Piles = 3.000 m
Spacing of Rows of Columns 2 & 3 along RCC Piles = 3.000 m
Spacing of Rows of Columns 3 & 4 along RCC Piles = 1st G 2nd G 3rd G 3.000 m
Length of Isolated Footing, l,m = 1.500 1.800 1.50 m
Breadth of Isolated Footing, l,m = 1.500 1.800 1.500 m
2
Total Footing Area, At = 27.000 m
Total Number of walls/Columns, Tc= 12.000 Nos
dist. of RCC Pile to Nearest Coln or pt. load of adj. bldg d1 ,m= 3.000 m
Unit weight of soil (ϒs) = 17.952 KN/m3
Soil parameters from Critical BH2

Water Table, wT= 4.000 m

Φ = internal friction angle of soil 0.000 º
data of Soil test report

Cohesion of soil C = 61.000 KN/m2

back fill of soil inclination, β = 0.000 º
Friction coefficient between Soil and Structure, μ = 0.500
Frinction angle between soil and structure, δ = 26.565 º
Back face inclination of RCC Pile, α = 90.000 º
Building Plinth Area, Ab = L x B = 16.6 m x 13.5 m 224.100 m2
Assumed Thumb Rule for weight of Building , w= 1.600 ton/m2
Total weight of Structure , WT, KN = 14070 KN
2
Surcharge Load q1, KN/m2 on each Footing = 57.90 KN/m
2
Surcharge Load q1, KN/m2 on each Footing = 57.90 KN/m at distance of 3m
2
Surcharge Load q1, KN/m2 on each Footing = 57.90 KN/m at distance of 6m
 0.000 0 0.000 0 0 2
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.000 0

2.127 -1 0.460 -1
0.185 -1

2.918 -2 0.808 -2
0.347 -2

2.659 -3 0.995 -3
0.470 -3

2.077 -4 1.037 -4
0.547 -4

1.536 -5 0.981 -5
0.582 -5
DEPTH, M

DEPTH, M

DEPTH, M
1.122 -6 0.877 -6
0.583 -6

0.826
0.813 -7 0.758
0.752 -7 0.560
0.558 -7

0.616 -8 0.644 -8 0.522 -8

0.468 -9 0.541 -9 0.477 -9

+ +
0.361 -10 0.454 -10 0.430 -10

0.284 -11 0.380 -11 0.384 -11

SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO 1ST VEHICLE SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO 3rd VEHICLE
SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO 2nD VEHICLE -12
-12 -12
KN/M2 KN/M2 KN/M2

Line of Action of Surcharge Load due to adjacent building

𝐴1 𝑋1 + 𝐴2 𝑋2 + 𝐴3 𝑋3 + 𝐴4 𝑋4 + ⋯ . 𝐴5 𝑋5 + 𝐴6.5 𝑋6.5 hs= 3.201 m from bottom of
𝑋ത = Excavation depth or dredge line
σ𝑛1 𝐴𝑛
𝐴1 = -1.386 KN/m 𝑋1 = 6.250 m 0.000 0
𝐴2 = -3.423 KN/m 𝑋2 = 5.250 m 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0
2.771 -1
𝐴3 = -4.099 KN/m 𝑋3 = 4.250 m
𝐴4 = -3.892 KN/m 𝑋4 = 3.250 m 4.074 -2
𝐴5 = -3.380 KN/m 𝑋5 = 2.250 m 4.124 -3
𝐴6 = -2.840 KN/m 𝑋6 = 1.250 m
3.661 -4
𝐴6.5 = -2.363 KN/m 𝑋6.5 = 0.250 m
Ps= 𝐴 = -21.383 KN/m 3.099 -5
DEPTH, M

𝑛
2.582 -6

2.144
2.124 -7

1.782 -8

1.486 -9

1.245 -10
COMBINED SURCHARGE LOAD DUE TO ALL
1.049 -11
VEHICLE LOADS
-12
KN/M2
Zone 1: Cloud Marked Portion with this color Zone 2: Cloud Marked Portion with this color

1
L 𝐴1 = 𝐿1 𝑎
2
a 1
L 𝐴2 = 𝐿2 (𝑎 + 𝑏)
b 2
1
L 𝐴𝑛 = 𝐿𝑛 (𝑏 + 𝑐)
c
12
L4/3 𝐴4 = 𝐿4 (0.7 ・𝑐)
(L4=15m-8.7m=6.3m) L 2

Sketches of Point load Calculation from Surcharge Pressure

 ZONE-III STAGE- II:- DYNAMIC EQ ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE CALCULATION
A Geometry Data :-
Height of RCC pile from Ground level to Top (h1) = 0.000 m
Height of RCC pile from Foundation Level to Top ground level (h2) = 7.050 m
Total height of RCC pile, H = h1+h2+h3 = 7.050 m
distance from base of Excavation to the point of action of active earth pressure (h4)= 2.350 m
Spacing of Pile = 0.300 m
Initial Void Ratio of Soil, e0= 0.662

Soil parameters from Critical BH2 data of

Water Table wT= 4.000 m
Water Content due to Rain w = 100 % 1.000
Unit weight of Water, ϒw= 9.810 KN/m3
Specific Gravity of Soil, Gs= 1.830

Soil test report

3
Unit weight of soil (ϒ) = 17.952 KN/m
1+𝜔 ∗𝐺𝑠 ∗𝛾𝑤
Saturated Unit weight of Soil = 𝛾𝑆𝑎𝑡 = = 21.603 KN/m3
n (1+𝑒0 )
Φ = angle bet resultant force and normal to failure plane/friction angle of soil 0.000 º
3
Cohesion of soil at base C'2 61.000 KN/m
Frictional coefficient μ = 0.500
Maximum Existing back slope of Existing Ground with horizontal = α = 0.000 º
Angle between back face of Micropile with horizontal = β 90.000 º
Angle of friction betn the soil & wall = δ = betn ⅟₂φ to ⅔φ 0.50 0.000 º
Include Earthquake effect in soil= Yes
Maxm Peak ground acceln PGA 3 Sec in horiz. Dir. for EQ amax= k h x g 0.350 g from NBC105-2020
Assume vert. comp. of PGA for EQ = k v x g 0.000 % of kh 0.000 g
= 19.290 º

CALCULATION OF ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE+WATER PORE WATER PRESSURE

Excavation Side Passive Earth Pressure Protected Side Net Pa Earth Pressure Calculation
Pa of water Pa of Saturated Pa of water Pa of Saturated
Z, m Z, m AEP -Ex AEP-P Net EP
Pressure Soil Pressure Soil
0 0.00 0.00 0.000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
1 -1.00 0.00 0.000 1 -1.00 2.69 2.69 5.39 0.00 5.39 5.386
2 -2.00 0.00 0.000 2 -2.00 10.77 10.77 21.54 0.00 21.54 21.543
3 -3.00 0.00 0.000 3 -3.00 24.24 24.24 48.47 0.00 48.47 48.471
4 -4.00 0.00 0.000 4 -4.00 23.54 51.85 75.39 0.00 75.39 75.392
5 -5.00 0.00 0.000 4 -5.00 36.79 81.01 117.80 0.00 117.80 117.800
6 -6.00 0.00 0.000 5 -6.00 52.97 116.66 169.63 0.00 169.63 169.632
7 -7.00 0.00 0.000 6 -7.00 72.10 158.78 230.89 0.00 230.89 230.887
8 -7.05 0.00 0.000 7 -7.05 73.14 161.06 234.20 0.00 234.20 234.198
9 -7.05 0.00 0.000 8 -7.05 73.14 161.06 234.20 0.00 234.20 21.543
10 -8.00 -1.33 -2.925 9 -8.00 94.18 207.39 297.31 -4.25 301.57 21.543
11 -9.00 -5.60 -12.322 10 -9.00 119.19 262.48 363.75 -17.92 381.67 21.543
12 -10.00 -12.81 -28.200 11 -10.00 147.15 324.05 430.19 -41.01 471.20 21.543
13 -11.00 -22.96 -50.560 12 -11.00 178.05 392.10 496.63 -73.52 570.15 21.543

Coulomb's theory of active earth pressure coeff. At wall at static condition (K A) =

𝑆𝑖𝑛2 ∅ + 𝛽
𝐾𝑎 = 2
sin ∅ + 𝛿 sin ∅ − 𝛼
1.000
𝑆𝑖𝑛2 𝛽𝑆𝑖𝑛 𝛽 − 𝛿 1+
sin 𝛽 + 𝛿 sin 𝛼 − 𝛽

Equivalent AEP, Ø300/300= 1.0000 = -21.543 KN/m -21.543 #REF!

Active earth pressure at wall in Static Condition = 133.841 KN/m

 Coulomb's theory for total static and dynamic Active earth pressure coeff. at wall caused by earthquake (K AE ) =

1.000

Equivalent AEP, Ø300/300= 1.00 = -59.243 KN/m -59.243 #REF!

Active earth pressure at wall in Static Condition = 446.137 KN/m

Line of Action due to Total Static and dynamic Earthquake effect and Active earth Pressure=
𝐴1 𝑋1 + 𝐴2 𝑋2 + 𝐴3 𝑋3 + 𝐴4 𝑋4 + 𝐴5 𝑋5 + ⋯ . +𝐴7 𝑋7 + 𝐴7.05 𝑋7.05 ha= 1.590 m from
𝑋ത =
σ𝑛1 𝐴𝑛 bottom of
𝐴1 = 1.346 KN/m 𝑋1 = 7.025 m Protection
𝐴2 = 6.732 KN/m 𝑋2 = 6.025 m Pile
𝐴3 = 17.503 KN/m 𝑋3 = 5.025 m
𝐴4 = 38.042 KN/m 𝑋4 = 4.025 m
𝐴5 = 66.430 KN/m 𝑋5 = 3.025 m
𝐴6 = 98.835 KN/m 𝑋6 = 2.025 m
𝐴7 = 137.721 KN/m 1.025 m
𝑋7 =
𝐴7.05 = 159.922 KN/m 𝑋7.05 = 0.025 m
Pa= 𝐴𝑛 = 446.14 KN/m

1
L1 𝐴1 = 𝐿1 𝑎
a 2
1
L2 𝐴2 = 𝐿2 (𝑎 + 𝑏)
b 2
1
L3 𝐴3 = 𝐿3 (𝑏 + 𝑐)
c 2
Sketches of Point load Calculation from Active Earth Pressure of Soil

Excavation Side AEP with Water Table Protected Side Dynamic AEP with Water Table
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000
-80.00 -60.00 -40.00 -20.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 600.00

0.00 -1.00 -1.00 5.386

0.00 -2.00 -2.00 21.543

0.00 -3.00 -3.00 48.471

0.00 -4.00 -4.00 75.392

0.00 -5.00 -5.00 117.800

0.00 -6.00 -6.00 169.632

0.00 -7.00 -7.00 230.887

234.198

-4.25 -8.00 -8.00 301.567

-17.92 -9.00 -9.00 381.671

-41.01 -10.00 -10.00 471.199

-73.52 -11.00 -11.00 570.150

-12.00 -12.00
 Net Dynamic AEP Diagram with Water Table on Piles
0.00 0.000
0.000 50.000 100.000 150.000 200.000 250.000
-1.00 5.386

-2.00 21.543

-3.00 48.471

-4.00 75.392

-5.00 117.800

-6.00 169.632

-7.00 21.543 230.887

234.198

-8.00 21.543

-9.00 21.543

-10.00 21.543

-11.00 21.543

-12.00

Combined Pressure
Depth Soil-ActiveSurchargeCombined Combined Pressure Diagram
m kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2
0.00 0.000 0.000 0.000 [Surcharge from Bldg +
-1.00 5.386 2.771 8.157 Earthquake+Water Table]
-2.00 21.543 4.074 25.617
0.00 0.000
-3.00 48.471 4.124 52.595
0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

225

250
-4.00 75.392 3.661 79.053 -1.00 8.157
-5.00 117.800 3.099 120.899
-6.00 169.632 2.582 172.214 -2.00 25.617
-7.00 230.887 2.144 233.031 -3.00 52.595
-7.05 234.198 2.124 236.322
-7.05 21.543 2.124 23.667 -4.00 79.053
-8.00 21.543 1.782 23.325 -5.00 120.899
-9.00 21.543 1.486 23.029
-10.00 21.543 1.245 22.788 -6.00 172.214
-11.00 21.543 1.049 22.592 -7.00 233.031
23.667 236.322

-8.00 23.325

-9.00 23.029

-10.00 22.788

-11.00 22.592

-12.00
 Anchor Rod Spring Calculation

Dia of Length of Young's Modulus Cross Section Inclination Spring Constant Spring Constant
S. No. EL/A Remarks
Anchor, mm Anchor, L m of Rod, E, KN/m2 Area, A, m2 angle along X along Z
1 25 12 210000000 0.000490874 8590 30 7439 4295
2 25 10 210000000 0.000490874 10308 30 8927 5154
3 25 8 210000000 0.000490874 12885 30 11159 6443
4 25 6 210000000 0.000490874 17181 30 14879 8590

b=EL/ACos30
30
P=EL/ASin30
EL
/A
ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

ETABS Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 + IS 13920:2016 Column Section Design Pile Edge Section Design

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary) (Part 1 of 2)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc
-9m C61 726 Ø600[9-Ø25]10-175 Total Combined Soil+Surcharge Pressure load 1000

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary) (Part 2 of 2)

Length (mm) LLRF
1000 1

Section Properties
d (mm) h0 (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
600 527.5 72.5 40

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar % Capacity Ratio
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m % Unitless
308.5765 -5.8504 -318.3573 0 0 1.4 0.907

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 1.2 1000 -257.0895 0 0
Minor Bend(M2) 1.2 3950 -4.6634 0 0

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 176.1186 169.3439 105.3321 0 665.06
Minor, Vu3 2.9674 169.3439 105.3321 0 665.06

Pile Design 11m long Ø600-8-Ø20 [T]+8-Ø20[E].EDBPage 1 of 2 6/3/2022

ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.4) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
2827.4 39.3 4633.1632 1428.8248 308.5765 1

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) No 1 600 2 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) No 3.95 600 7.9 12 No 0

Notes:

N/A: Not Applicable

N/C: Not Calculated

N/N: Not Needed

Pile Design 11m long Ø600-8-Ø20 [T]+8-Ø20[E].EDBPage 2 of 2 6/3/2022

ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

ETABS Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 + IS 13920:2016 Column Section Design + PILE CAP DESIGN

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary) (Part 1 of 2)

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID
0m B56 663 PileCap600x500[5-Ø160]Ø8-100 Total Combined Soil + Surcharge Pressure load

Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary) (Part 2 of 2)

Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
935 1235 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
600 500 56 30

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar % Capacity Ratio
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m % Unitless
-65.9505 -0.1527 -1.5269 0 0 0.67 0.084

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 1.2 635 -1.1747 0 0
Minor Bend(M2) 1.2 635 0.1958 0 0

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 3.7671 113.5575 106.5592 0 665.06
Minor, Vu3 0.9147 114.8456 108.7993 0 554.22

Pile Design 11m long Ø600-8-Ø20 [T]+8-Ø20[E].EDBPage 1 of 2 6/3/2022

ETABS 18.1.1 License #*1VHQUC7UK2NRLHB

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.4) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
3000 24 0 1526.436 -65.9505 0

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) No 0.514 500 0 0 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) No 0.514 600 0 0 No 0

Notes:

N/A: Not Applicable

N/C: Not Calculated

N/N: Not Needed

Pile Design 11m long Ø600-8-Ø20 [T]+8-Ø20[E].EDBPage 2 of 2 6/3/2022

 STIFFNESS CALCULATION OF SOIL DATA
SOIL DATA from Bore Hole:- 2
CALCULATION OF YOUNG'S MODULUS BASED ON SOIL TEST DATA
140 𝜎𝑥 + 𝜎𝑦 + 𝜎𝑧 Density of Confined UnConfined Average,
σx = KpxƳsh, σy = KpyƳsh, σz = Ƴsh, Friction
Voild 𝐸 = 𝑒𝑥100 Soil, Ƴs, Pressure Soil, Pressure Soil, Young's
S. No. h, m Kpx or py 3 angle of
KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 Ratio, e
KN/m2 KN/m3 qc, KN/m2 qu, KN/m2 Soil, Ø◦
Modulus,
KN/m2
0 0.00 1.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.662 0.000 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
1 1.50 1.000 26.914 26.91 26.91 0.662 11754.936 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
2 3.00 1.000 53.827 53.83 53.83 0.662 16623.989 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
3 4.50 1.000 80.741 80.74 80.74 0.662 20360.146 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
4 6.00 1.000 107.655 107.65 107.65 0.662 23509.871 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
23959
5 7.50 1.000 134.569 134.57 134.57 0.662 26284.835 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
6 9.00 1.000 161.482 161.48 161.48 0.662 28793.594 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
7 10.50 1.000 188.396 188.40 188.40 0.662 31100.636 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
8 12.00 1.000 215.310 215.31 215.31 0.662 33247.979 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
9 13.50 1.000 242.224 242.22 242.22 0.662 35264.807 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
10 15.00 1.000 269.137 269.14 269.14 0.662 37172.370 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
38036
11 16.50 1.000 296.051 296.05 296.05 0.662 38986.711 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
12 18.00 1.000 322.965 322.96 322.96 0.662 40720.292 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
13 19.50 1.000 349.879 349.88 349.88 0.662 42383.023 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
14 21.00 1.000 376.792 376.79 376.79 0.662 43982.942 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
15 22.50 1.000 403.706 403.71 403.71 0.662 45526.670 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
16 24.00 1.000 430.620 430.62 430.62 0.662 47019.743 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
17 25.50 1.000 457.533 457.53 457.53 0.662 48466.841 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
18 27.00 1.000 484.447 484.45 484.45 0.662 49871.968 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000
19 30.00 1.000 538.275 538.27 538.27 0.662 52569.670 17.942 7848 114.000 0.000

Coulomb's theory of passive earth pressure coeff. At wall at static condition (Kpx or py) =
𝑆𝑖𝑛2 𝛼 − ∅
𝐾𝑝𝑥 𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑦 = 2 1.000
𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∅ + 𝛿 𝑠𝑖𝑛 ∅ + 𝛽
𝑆𝑖𝑛2 𝛼𝑆𝑖𝑛 𝛼 + 𝛿 1−
𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝛼 + 𝛿 𝑠𝑖𝑛 𝛼 + 𝛽

⬚
 F

B
D

A
C

NOTES :
A B C D E

1
1

22000
110mm Th. PEA GRAVEL 5000 5500 5500 5500
SHOTCRETE 1: 1 21:2

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED

(CEMENT,SAND, AGGREGATE) WITH 600 Ø PROTECTION PILE
TMT 8Ø BAR MESH @200 c/c 11.00 m LONG
HORIZONTALLY & VERTICALLY

ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETER.

BOUNDARY WALL(RC WALL)
76.1 Ø MICRO PILE
RAFT LINE
RAFT LINE
110mm Th. PEA GRAVEL
BOUNDARY WALL(RC WALL)
SHOTCRETE 1: 1 21:2
600 Ø PROTECTION PILE 11.00 m LONG (CEMENT,SAND,

2
2

600 x500 PILE CAP AGGREGATE) WITH

1235 1235 1235 1235 1235 TMT 8Ø BAR MESH @200 c/c
600 Ø PROTECTION PILE HORIZONTALLY &
11.00 m LONG VERTICALLY

PROJECT :
7 76.1 Ø MICRO PILE

ZONE-II 300 Ø PROTECTION PILE

11.00 m LONG

6000

3
3

BASEMENT EXCAVATION
PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR
6

6000

4
4

ZONE= I & II
9000

5
5

DRAWING TITLE :
ZONE-II
ZONE-I

39500
4

LAYOUT OF PROTECTION PILE

6000

6
6

3
DESIGN BY:
6000

Bagdol, Lalitpur

7
7

2
Cell: +977-9851118335
[31227]
102'-5"

6000

SANJU JAIN GEOTECH PVT. LTD.

8
8

ZONE-I
1235 1235 1235 1235

CONSTRUCTION OF BLOCK B

1
LMC AT PULCHOWK, LALITPUR
1235 1235 1235 1235 1235

76.1 Ø MICRO PILE

1235 1235 1235 1235 1235
110mm Th. PEA GRAVEL 600 x500 PILE CAP
SHOTCRETE 1: 1 21:2 600 Ø PROTECTION PILE 11.00 m LONG
(CEMENT,SAND, AGGREGATE) WITH
TMT 8Ø BAR MESH @200 c/c BOUNDARY WALL(RC WALL)
HORIZONTALLY & VERTICALLY
Date :-

RAFT LINE
Drawn By:-

BOUNDARY WALL(RC WALL)

10/16/2021

Design By:-

9
9

110mm Th. PEA GRAVEL SHOTCRETE 1: 1

Scale :-1: 175

RAFT LINE (CEMENT,SAND, AGGREGATE) WITH

76.1 Ø MICRO PILE TMT 8Ø BAR MESH @200 c/c
PSR

600 Ø PROTECTION PILE

SKJ

11.0m LONG HORIZONTALLY & VERTICALLY

600 x500 PILE CAP
Sheet

300 Ø PROTECTION PILE

11.0m LONG
S1.01
Sheet
Number
F

B
E

A
C
 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

F
5 nos. TMT16 Ø F

600
E E

500
D
D
TMT8 Ø -4LS@ 100 c/c

...

C C

B B

A A

A1.01
A1.01

.....
.....

DRAWING TITLE : CONSTRUCTION OF BLOCK B Scale :-1: 50, 16,10

Sheet Number
NOTES : PROJECT : LMC AT PULCHOWK, LALITPUR
ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETER.
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR PROTECTION PILE DETAIL OF DESIGN BY:
Drawn By:-
S1.02
SANJU JAIN GEOTECH PVT. LTD. PSR
BASEMENT EXCAVATION Bagdol, Lalitpur
Sheet

Design By:-
Cell: +977-9851118335 SKJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

F F

E E

D D

C C

B B
A1.01

A A

DRAWING TITLE : CONSTRUCTION OF BLOCK B Scale :-1: 10

Sheet Number
NOTES : PROJECT : LMC AT PULCHOWK, LALITPUR
ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETER. Date :-
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SECTION OF PROTECTION PILE, DESIGN BY:
10/16/2021
S1.03
PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR PILE CAP & PROTECTION WALL Drawn By:-
SANJU JAIN GEOTECH PVT. LTD. PSR
BASEMENT EXCAVATION Bagdol, Lalitpur
Sheet

Design By:-
Cell: +977-9851118335 SKJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
± 000 PLINTH LEVEL

F WRAPPED IN WRAPPED IN F

POLYTHENE SHEET POLYTHENE SHEET -750 GROUND LEVEL

RCC PILE CAP 5nos.TMT 16 Ø

TMT8 Ø @ 100 c/c

500
TMT16 Ø DOWEL 5nos.TMT 16 Ø
600x450 RCC
PILE CAP

3300
E
BAR @ 1000 c/c [FOR LEVEL
REFER TO E
THE RELEVANT
MICRO PILE DRAWING]

TMT 8 Ø @ 200 c/c

-3300 UPPER BASEMENT LEVEL

D DOWEL BAR DETAIL MICRO PILE
D
TMT 16 Ø

Scale=1:15

MICRO PILE

3300
C C
TMT 16 Ø
(INTERMEDIARY
BORDERING BARS)
WRAPPED IN WRAPPED IN MICRO PILE

POLYTHENE SHEET POLYTHENE SHEET

-6600 LOWER BASEMENT LEVEL B

B

1050
TMT10 Ø DOWEL RCC RAFT 1235 1235 1235

100 mm TH. P.C.C.(1:3:6)

A
BAR @ 200 c/c A
300 mm TH.SAND MIXED GRAVEL
COMPACTION(40:60)

DOWEL BAR DETAIL COMPACTED EARTH

Scale=1:15 SECTIONAL ELEVATION :2.2

600 Ø RCC PROTECTION PILE
[11 m LONG]

DRAWING TITLE : CONSTRUCTION OF BLOCK B Scale :-1: 10

Sheet Number
NOTES : PROJECT : LMC AT PULCHOWK, LALITPUR
ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETER. Date :-
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR
DETAIL OF MOUSTACHE DESIGN BY:
10/16/2021
S1.04
Drawn By:-
SANJU JAIN GEOTECH PVT. LTD.
BASEMENT EXCAVATION RING FOR DOWEL BARS Bagdol, Lalitpur
PSR Sheet

Design By:-
Cell: +977-9851118335 SKJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

± 000 PLINTH LEVEL

F F

600
-750 GROUND LEVEL
5 nos. TMT16 Ø 5 nos. TMT16 Ø

500
TMT8 Ø -4LS@ 100 c/c

3300

2000
200 200

E E

110 mm TH.PEA GRAVEL CONCRETE 1:1 12":2

[CEMENT ,SAND, AGGREGATE] WITH TMT 8 Ø BAR
MESH @ 200 c/c HORIZONTALLY & VERTICALLY.

GROUTING WITH CEMENT WATER RATIO 1:0.6 &

30°
GROUTING PRESSURE SHOULD BE 0.5-1.1 MPC
-3300 UPPER BASEMENT LEVEL TMT 16 Ø BAR

D D

REINFORCEMENT AS PER DETAIL

2500
6850
12
00
0
1
2"STAGGARED PERFORATION Ce
Inj men
@ 9" C/C ec
tio t Gro
TM n b ut
T 25 yP

3300
Ø ac C
C BA ke
R r

76.1Ø M PIPE Ce
MI
Inj men
ec
tio t Gro Ø7 CRO

30°
n b ut @ 6.1m PIL
yP 1.2 m E
REINFORCEMENT ac 35 -12

1000
TMT 16 Ø BAR k m[ m
er H] L
AS PER DETAIL C/ ong
C
80
00

MI
Ce Ø7 CRO
Inj men @ 6.1m PIL
ec
tio t Gro 1.2 m E

30°
-6600 LOWER BASEMENT LEVEL n b ut 35 -8m
m B
B yP [H Lon
ac ]C g
k

1100
TMT 16 Ø BAR er /C
RCC RAFT TM 80
750

00
T2
5Ø
TM BA
T2 R
5Ø Ce
BA Inj men
60 ec
R 00 tio t Gro
n b ut
yP
76.1 Ø ac
k er
TM

A
MICRO PILE PLAN POSITIVE WATER
PROOFING LAYER [BASF]
T2
5Ø
A
BA
R
800 mm TH.RCC RAFT 600Ø RCC PILE
100 mm TH. P.C.C.(1:3:6) [ 11 m LONG]
75

300 mm TH. SAND

MIXED GRAVEL
76.1 DIA. MICRO PILE COMPACTION(40:60)
COMPACTED EARTH
MI
SECTION AT :1.1 Ø7 CRO
@ 6.1m PIL
1.2 m E
35 -6m
m
[H Lon
]C g
/C
DRAWING TITLE : CONSTRUCTION OF BLOCK B Scale :-1: 40
Sheet Number
NOTES : PROJECT : LMC AT PULCHOWK, LALITPUR
ALL DIMENSIONS ARE MILLIMETER. Date :-
TYPICAL SECTION OF PROTECTION
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR PILE, PILE CAP, ANCHOR &
DESIGN BY:
10/16/2021

Drawn By:-
S1.05
SANJU JAIN GEOTECH PVT. LTD. PSR
BASEMENT EXCAVATION PROTECTION WALL Bagdol, Lalitpur
Sheet

Design By:-
Cell: +977-9851118335 SKJ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9