Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Owner:
Mrs. Sunita Bhusal
Location:
KMC-16, Banasthali
Structural Analysis and Design Report
This report comprises the summary of the residential building of Mrs. Sunita
Bhusal at KMC-16, Banasthali, Nepal. The reports consist of the design
procedures adopted, the assumptions made, the inputs made in the design and
the design output. During the design, it is assumed that the client will completely
follow the architectural as well as the structural design. It is also assumed that
the construction will be supervised by professional engineer.
The designer will not be responsible if any alterations to the structural system is
made by the client or the contractor without the prior written permission from
the designer, or the alterations to non-structural system is made such that the
weight of each individual floor or the weight of the whole building is altered by
more than 10% of design weight of each floor and the total weight.
The design calculations and derivations are limited to only a minimum to let the
concerned people know the methodology adopted. However, the calculations may
be provided to the client or concerned authorities when needed, upon request.
Hence the building is safe.
ii
Structural Analysis and Design Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
iii
PART I: GENERAL DATA
Introduction
This report has been prepared as a part of the structural engineering analysis and
design of the residence building.
The massive data inputs, design analysis, calculations and outputs of the result are
computer aided by the Structural analysis and design software ETABS, which is a
special purpose computer program developed specifically for building structures by
CSI America. It provides the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to
create, modify, analyze, design, and optimize the structural elements in a building
model.
Based on the final results, the designs have been performed and drawings were
prepared using AutoCAD 2014.
Nepal is located in boundary between the Indian and Tibetan plates, along which a
relative shear strain of about 2 cm per year has been estimated. The Indian plate is
also sub-ducting at a rate of, thought to be, about 3 cm per year. The existence of the
Himalayan range with the world’s highest peaks is evidence of continued uplift. As a
result, Nepal is very active seismically.
Reinforced concrete buildings may fail due to the either columns are overstressed
and burst due to lack of enough strength to resist the shock of the earth tremor and
vibration or failure of reinforced concrete members like beams at the poor ductile
detailing. Columns also do fail due to short column effect and splicing failure. Beams
fail due to anchorage failure, shear failure and confinement failure.
For the design of the building, the Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant
design IS 1893:2002 have been referred. According to the IS Code, the seismic zone
for Kathmandu has been taken falling in Zone V with very severe seismic intensity
(zone factor z = 0.36) and accordingly all other parameters like spectral coefficient
(Sa/g) and tremor response period or fundamental natural period (T) were calculated.
After that all design requirements such as seismic weight of building, lateral forces at
different floor levels and different column heads, base shear, distribution of design
forces to different floor levels are considered.
The characteristic compressive strength for concrete of 20 N/mm 2 (M20) was used in
all structural members and characteristic strength of 500 N/mm 2 (Fe500) was used
for reinforcing steel.
1
Structural Analysis and Design Report
SLAB
For slab, preliminary design is done according to deflection criteria span /effective
depth = 40*modification factor. (IS 456-2000 Art 24.1)
BEAM
Thumb rule of (d=L/10 to L/12) basis is adopted to consider the preliminary design of
the beam section.
b 1
=
D 2
i) Depth of beam:
We have,
1 1
to
dbeam = 10 12 of span
ii) Width of beam:
1 2
to
We have, bbeam = 2 3 of d beam
COLUMN
2
Structural Analysis and Design Report
Preliminary design of column is done consideration and interior column. For the load
acting in the column, live load is decreased according to IS 875-1978.
Cross-section of the column is adopted considering the economy. Square column
section is adopted in this building project as per the internal aesthetic requirements.
A percentage of steel is taken as 0.8 to 6 percentage of cross section area of
column, but as taking 6% area of steel is more at a laps section so generally % of
steel is taken up to 4% only..
We have,
pA p A
P= 0.4
f A +0. 67 f A
ck c y sc=0. 4 f ( A −100
ck g
g
)+0. 67 f y 100
g
STAIRCASE
Stairs is designed as per drawing. Column for stairs boxes is not included in the grid
system but they are assumed to be simply tied with main frame with beam.
3
Structural Analysis and Design Report
4
Structural Analysis and Design Report
Reaction produce by staircase have been calculated and this reactions have
been changed into uniformly distributed load over the beam by dividing span of
beam.
The total design lateral force or design seismic base shear (V B) along any principal
direction shall be determined by the following expression:
VB = Ah.W
(
Z I Sa
× ×
VB = 2 R g
×W )
3
4
T =0 . 075 h For RCC frame building
Where,
VB = Base shear
Ah = Design horizontal acc. spectrum
Z = Zone Factor
I = Importance Factor
R = Response Reduction Factor
Sa
g = Average Response Acceleration Coefficient
W = Seismic Weight of building
T = Natural period of vibration
h = Height of Building in m
d = Base Dimension at Plinth level
5
Structural Analysis and Design Report
B. Live Load
IS: 875 (Part 2)-1987
Normal Residential building: 2 kN/m2
Roof:
LL = 1.5 kN/ m2
H. Parapet Wall
Load = 0.115(W)*1(H)*19.20
= 2.21 kN/m
6
Structural Analysis and Design Report
Ta = 0.075*h0.75
Where,
h = Height of Building in meter, includes the basement storey and
Ta = 0.075*h0.75
= 0.075*8.61.75
=0.377sec
R = 5 (Page 23)
Ah = ZISa/2Rg
= 0.36*1*2.5/ (2*5)
= 0.09
The total design lateral force or design seismic base shear (V B) along any principal
direction is determined by the following expression
VB = Ah*W
=0.09*2338.2943 KN
=210.4465 KN
7
Structural Analysis and Design Report
METHOD OF ANALYSIS
Analysis method adopted for EQ resistant design : Seismic coefficient
Level of design : Professionally engineered
structure
Total number of design load cases considered : 13
Seismic zoning factor : 0.36
Basic seismic coefficient : 0.09
Important factor : 1.0
Structural performance factor : 1.0
Weight of structure : 2338.2943 KN
Horizontal base shear at plinth level : 210.4465 KN
8
Structural Analysis and Design Report
1.1.5(DL+LL)
2. 1.2(DL+LL+EQX)
3. 1.2(DL+LL-EQX)
4. 1.2(DL+LL+EQZ)
5.1.2(DL+LL-EQZ)
6. 1.5(DL+EQX)
7. 1.5(DL-EQX)
8. 1.5(DL+EQZ)
9. 1.5(DL-EQZ)
10. 0.9DL+1.5EQX
11. 0.9DL-1.5EQX
12. 0.9DL+1.5EQZ
13. 0.9DL-1.5EQZ
Analysis Detail:
9
Structural Analysis and Design Report
Fig : 3D VIEW
10
Structural Analysis and Design Report
RESULT OUTPUT
Support Reactions
TABLE: Joint Reactions
Story Joint Label Load Case/Combo FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
kN kN kN kN-m kN-m kN-m
Base 1 DL+LL 3.2376 1.5085 104.1279 12.921 3.0822 0.1713
Base 2 DL+LL 5.5192 -3.3297 274.3241 3.7644 2.1072 0.1934
Base 3 DL+LL 6.6405 1.0231 248.2602 12.848 -8.689 0.1713
Base 4 DL+LL 0.4678 -0.6033 415.7525 -10.9264 -7.3421 0.1713
Base 5 DL+LL -6.5023 0.7345 181.8905 9.0626 13.1389 0.1713
Base 6 DL+LL 1.4053 -0.491 188.2494 -8.6209 1.6937 0.1713
Base 7 DL+LL 2.2278 -3.558 170.2964 -6.5578 -7.961 0.1713
Base 8 DL+LL 0.5701 -4.9149 295.7405 2.0836 11.2256 0.1713
Base 9 DL+LL -1.133 0.5226 315.7866 11.4961 6.6 0.1713
Base 10 DL+LL 0.2111 1.7653 180.9849 11.4138 3.6316 0.1713
Base 11 DL+LL -3.07 -3.0409 213.0467 -7.2097 8.6245 0.1713
Base 12 DL+LL -0.3454 -6.0627 330.5666 -6.4393 0.6084 0.1713
Base 13 DL+LL 2.5268 -2.6014 135.029 0.1738 -9.6163 0.1713
13
Structural Analysis and Design Report
14
Structural Analysis and Design Report
15
Structural Analysis and Design Report
16
Structural Analysis and Design Report
17
Structural Analysis and Design Report
Drift (Sample)
18
Structural Analysis and Design Report
Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case
or load combination.
Input Data
Name StoryResp1
Display Type Max story displ Story Range All Stories
Load Case Ex Top Story Story3
Output Type Max Bottom Story Base
Plot
19
Structural Analysis and Design Report
Summary Description
This is story response output for a specified range of stories and a selected load case
or load combination.
Input Data
Name StoryResp1
Display Type Max story displ Story Range All Stories
Load Case Ey Top Story Story3
Output Type Max Bottom Story Base
Plot
20
Structural Analysis and Design Report
STORY DRIFT
23
Structural Analysis and Design Report
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
304.8 304.8 56 30
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
24
Structural Analysis and Design Report
Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed
25
Structural Analysis and Design Report
26
Structural Analysis and Design Report
27
Structural Analysis and Design Report
Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
228.6 355.6 228.6 0 30 30
28
Structural Analysis and Design Report
Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
22360.68 20 1 500 500
29
Structural Analysis and Design Report
30
Structural Analysis and Design Report
31
Structural Analysis and Design Report
1. Indian Standards Code of Practice For Plain & Reinforced Concrete IS:
456-2000; Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), July 2000, New Delhi
2. Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete IS: 456-1978 Special Publication:
16 Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi
3. Nepal National Building Code, NBC 105: 1994, Department of Housing
and Physical Planning.
4. Handbook on Concrete reinforcement and Detailing, Special
Publication: 34 [SP: 34 –1987].
5. Explanatory Handbook on Code for Earthquake Engineering IS: 1893 –
2002, Beau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi.
6. Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to
Seismic forces- Indian Code of Practice IS 13920: 1993, Beau of Indian
Standards (BIS), New Delhi.
ANNEX
32