Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LEARNING PLAN
Focus:
Eisner’s Artistic Approach
Connoisseurship and Criticism Model and its different dimensions
Motivation:
The class will be asked the following questions:
1. Is there art in teaching? Do you consider teaching as an art?
2. How can you use art in your teaching strategies/methods/techniques?
II. Lesson Development
A. Presentation of Concepts
1. The students will be able to distinguish connoisseurship and criticism of Eisner’s artistic approach to curriculum
evaluation.
2. The students will be able evaluate their own ways of teaching through Eisner’s approach to curriculum evaluation
B. Broadening of Concept
1. Why is there a need for evaluation and assessment in a curriculum?
2. How significant are these learnings to me in becoming a teacher?
C. Integration
A. Ignacian Core/Related Values: Excellence: How will I be able to see, evaluate, and judge causes and effects of
varied universal issues related to these events to further human development?
B. Social Orientation: Are teachers equipped with the necessary competencies to implement learner-centered
curricula to the 21st century learners/millennials?
C. Lesson Across Discipline: Music and Art: How will be able to improve my teaching process through the use of
Eisner’s artistic approach?
D. Faith/Biblical Reflection: 1 Corinthians 14:29 “Two or three prophets should speak and the others should weigh
carefully what is said.”
III. Evaluation/Assessment
IV. Summary/Action
Criticism and connoisseurship reveals the complexities of the education enterprise and reeducates others’ perception of it. The
primary aim is to bring about improvement, not just accountability.
V. Purposive Assignment
Research about other models (at least 2) use to evaluate curriculum. Compare and contrast the two models, and identify its
implications.
VI. References
Eisner, E.W. (1976). Educational connoisseurship and criticism. Their form and functions in education evaluation. Journal
Aesthetic Education