Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The 1990 Luzon earthquake struck the island of Luzon in the Philippines at 4:26 p.m. on
July 16 with an estimated moment magnitude of 7.8 and a maximum Mercalli intensity
of IX (Violent).
How many lives were lost? How many were injured and missing? Can the
loss of lives be quantified in terms of peso or dollars?
Casualties: 2,142
Missing: 321
Injured: 3,513
Approximately 15 billion pesos in property damage (loss of lives cannot be quantified
in terms of money?!?)
What could have prevented the loss of many lives?
Phivolcs Director Renato Solidum said the 1990 earthquake left 4 valuable lessons: The
public needs to respond properly during earthquakes. Hazards and their effects should
be simulated. Building codes should be implemented properly and land use should be
carefully planned.
What was the resulting damage as a percent of GNP for the year the
disaster happened?
It is estimated that 120,000 people were left homeless and property losses were
approximately 15 billion pesos. The flow of goods and supplies for famers and
manufacturers were choked and as a result people who barely noticed the event felt
their standard of living declining. The earthquake resulted in increased food prices and
higher unemployment rates.
Did the disaster affect the performance of the country’s economy years
after it happened? How?
The earthquake placed a heavy burden on a nation already struggling with major
economic and other problems. The affected physical environment, cities, and towns,
villages, and transport and other networks, were rehabilitated for the economic and
social systems to return to normal.
How much did the country spend for rescue, relief, and rehabilitation
works?
The costs of caring for evacuees (including construction of evacuation camps and
relocation centers) was at least 2.5 billion pesos ($US 93 million) in 1991-92 An
additional 4.2 billion pesos ($US 154 million) was spent during the same period on dikes
and dams to control lahars.
All measures and the budget that went into government’s pre-disaster plans are well-
justified. These are the things that are considered an important part of governance,
which should primarily care for the welfare and safety of its constituents. Moreover, the
presence of well-budgeted disaster mitigation plans should be a priority, not only in the
national government, but also in the local government level.
http://sharedtable.kitchengardenfoundation.org.au/bundles/stfalcontinymce/blog/How
-much-did-the-country-spend-for-rescue%2C-relief-and-rehabilitation-works-in-1990-
Luzon-earthquake-9f30f9 (Walang nakalagay kung sino naggawa nito)