International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research (IJLTER)

Review Results-2449

Author(s): Anonymous

Title: Teacher Education Institutions in the Philippines towards Education 4.0

Topic Area: Education

Dimension Critics Suggestions Max Marks Attained

Marks
Title Title is not It may be like N/A N/A
consistent with “Readiness of
the contents of Teacher Education
the paper Institutions in the
Philippines towards
Education 4.0”
Abstract  Initial  Start abstract from Language= 6 4
introductory aim of the paper Length = 2 1
lines are not  Follow Clarity in
appropriate for grammarly.com for Objectives and
abstract corrections Outcomes= 5 4
 Restrict to 250  Insert colon Keywords= 2 2
words between each = =
keyword 15 11
 Consider guideline
attached with
review results
Research Gap  Theoretical gap Identify what has not 2.5 2
is been done so far in 2.5 2
comprehensivel theoretical as well as = =
y mentioned practical terms. 5 4
 Practical gap is Theoretical gap is,
shortly what is missing in
discussed theory so far relevant
to your variables
while practical gap
is, how practitioners
and policy makers
may better use your
research idea
compared to
previous ideas
Problem/ Nothing has been Generate Objectives 10 3
Questions/Objective drawn from and Research
s/Hypotheses research aim questions from
research aim
International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research (IJLTER)

Hypotheses may be
generated from
literature
Literature Review Comprehensive Conduct LR 10 7
LR is merged separately
with intro section
Theoretical Model No model has Theoretical model 5 0
been drawn must be originated
from literature
Research Design Mixed method Use citations to 5 3
research support
Research Strategy Detailed strategy 5 2
on data collection
is missing
Population/Samplin Nothing has been Provide sampling 10 0
g/Tool mentioned about details
population and Validate the
sampling. instrument with the
Instrument help of senior
validity and Professors
reliability is Measure
missing. Chronbach’s alpha
From where for reliability
instrument is
adopted?

Data Analysis Weighted mean is Calculating weighted 10 6

used for analysis mean is not
sufficient for
quantitative analysis,
apply some advanced
analysis on
quantitative data
Graphical Support Not Shown 5 0
Discussions/Findings Discussions are 5 4
based upon
quantitative and
content analysis
performed
Conclusion,  Conclusion is Author may describe 5 3
Recommendations brief and how many aims of
and Limitations focused. research are
 Recommendatio accomplished.
ns are missing Provide details how
 Limitations are this research may be
also missing used by practitioners
International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research (IJLTER)

References All citations are Strictly follow APA 10 6

referred but not in style
APA
TOTAL MARKS 100 49
Marks = 90 to 100 = Strongly Accepted
Marks = 75 to 89 = Accepted with Minor Revisions
Marks = 60 to 74 = Accepted with Major Revisions
Marks = 40 to 59 = Resubmission
Marks = Less than 40 = Rejected

Recommendation for Publication: Resubmission