Pt. Tripatra Engineering: Calculation Sheet

PT.
TRIPATRA ENGINEERING
CALCULATION SHEET
CLIENT UNOCAL PROJECT Attaka Power De-Bottleneck & Expansion (WO # 013) DATE 17-Mar-21
SUBJECT Module Assembly, Padeye & Lifting Design of deck extension attaka "D" platfor JOB NO. 2542
BY CHY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY SHEET OF
C.2 PADEYE, SLING & SHACKLE DESIGN OF DECK EXTENSION ATTAKA " D "
PLATFORM
Padeye, sling and shackle for module 1 will be designed together with module 2. The biggest load to be used for the
analysis.
SLING DESIGN
The selection of sling type to be used for lifting is based on its breaking strength capacity, given by sling's
manufacturer. Force data from SACS output is compared with this capacity, with considering the requirement of
API RP-2A section 2.4.2f., which
Forces
Maximum Sling Force = 3.603 kips ( without load factor)
Design Axial Force ( P ) = 4 x 3.6 = 14.4 kips
= 6.5 tons
Selection of Sling Type

The characteristic of sling to be used for this deck extension module lifting is as follows:
Diameter = 7/16 in
Minimum Breaking Strength = 8.9 tons (Bright, I.W.R.C.)
SHACKLE DESIGN
Similar with sling, the shackle is selected based on its manufacturer's rated working load with minimum safety
factor of 3, according to the requirement in API RP-2A section 2.4.2f.
Forces
Maximum Sling Force = 3.6 kips
Design Axial Force ( P ) = 3 x 3.6 = 10.8 kips
= 4.9 tons
Selection of Shackle Type

The type of shackle to be used for this deck extension module lifting is as follows:
Type = G-210 S-215

Safe Working Load = 6.5 tons
Pin Diameter = 1 in
PADEYE DESIGN
This padeye is intended to have the capability in resisting the lift forces of deck module during lifting operation.
The design include horizontal force of 5% of static sling force and dynamic factor of 2.0 according to the API RP 2
A requirement in secti
PT. TRIPATRA ENGINEERING
CALCULATION SHEET
Forces
Maximum Sling Force = 3.6 kips
Design Axial Force (P) = 2 x 3.6 = 7.2 kips = 3.603 short ton
Design Lateral Force ( PL ) = 5% x 7.2 = 0.4 kips = 0.2 short ton
Padeye Properties
Fy = 36 ksi
Fu = 58 ksi
Pin -----> diameter ( dp ) = 1 in
hole diameter ( dh ) = 1 + 1/8 = 1.125 in
hole radius ( rh ) = 1.125 / 2 = 0.563 in
Main Plate -----> thick. ( tm ) = 0.50 in
Determination of Main Plate

- Allowable Shear Stress : FV = 0.4 x Fy
= 14.4 ksi
- Try to use : Main Plate radius ( rm ) = 1.56 in
Shear Stress Check

- Shear Capacity : FV-c = 2 x ( rm - rh ) x tm x FV
= 2 x ( 1.5625 - 0.563 ) x 0.5 x 14.4
= 14.4 kips
- Shear Stress Ratio : IR = 7.2 / 14.4
= 0.5 < 1.000 -----> OK
Bearing Stress Check

- Allowable Bearing Stress : FB = 0.9 x Fy
= 32.4 ksi
- Bearing Capacity : FB-c = dp x ( tm x FB )
= 1 x ( 0.5 x 32.4)
= 16.2 ksi
- Bearing Stress Ratio : IR = 7.2 / 16.2
= 0.445 < 1.000 -----> OK
Stress at The Base of Padeye

- Forces : PV = P x sin 60o
= 7.2 x 0.866
= 6.2 kips
PH = P x cos 60o
= 7.2 x 0.5
= 3.6 kips
CALCULATION SHEET
PS = PH
= 3.6 kips Y Y
rm
rh
A X
0.56
2 B
3
6.12 C
SECT-C SECT-A SECT-B
- Area : AA = 0.5 x 6.12

= 3.1 in2
AB = 0.5 x 6.12 + 2 x 3 x 0.5
= 6.1 in2
- Moment of Inertia : IXA = 1/12 x 0.5 x 6.12^3
= 9.6 in4
IXB = 1/12 x 0.5 x 6.12^3 + 1/6 x 3 x 0.5^3 + 2 x 0.5 x 3 x 3.06^2
= 39.9 in4
IYA = 1/12 x 6.12 x 0.5^3
= 0.1 in4
IYB = 1/12 x 6.12 x 0.5^3 + 1/6 x 0.5 x 3^3
= 2.3 in4
check 1
- Moment of Neutral Axis : MX = PH x 0.5625
= 2.0 kips in
MY = PL x 0.5625
= 0.8 kips in
- Axial Stress : FA = PV / A A
= 6.2 / 3.1 = 2.0 ksi (tension)
- Bending Stress : FBX = MX / IXA x Y / 2
= 2.0 / 9.6 x 6.12 / 2
= 0.649 ksi
FBY = MY / IYA x X / 2
= 0.8 / 0.1 x 0.50 / 2
= 3.137 ksi
- Combine Stress Ratio : IR = FA / ( 0.6 x FY ) + ( FBX + FBY ) / ( 0.66 x FY )

= 0.254 < 1.000 -----> OK
CALCULATION SHEET
check 2
- Moment of Neutral Axis : MX = PH x 2.5625
= 9.2 kips in
MY = PL x 2.5625
= 1.0 kips in
- Axial Stress : FA = PV / A B
= 6.2 / 6.1 = 1.0 ksi (tension)
- Bending Stress : FBX = MX / IXB x Y / 2
= 9.2 / 39.9 x 6.12 / 2
= 0.708 ksi
FBY = MY / IYB x X / 2
= 1.0 / 2.3 x 3.00 / 2
= 0.665 ksi
- Combine Stress Ratio : IR = FA / ( 0.6 x FY ) + ( FBX + FBY ) / ( 0.66 x FY )

= 0.105 < 1.000 -----> OK
Main Plate to Beam Full Weld

Weld type E-70XX Electrod ---> FY = 70.0 ksi
Allowable Stress ---> FW = 0.3 x FY = 21.0 ksi
- Minimum Weld Thickness : tw = ( P / ( ( 2 x 6.12 + 4 x 3 ) x Fw )) / 0.707

= 0.04 in ---> use 1/4 in the fillet weld
CALCULATION SHEET
CLIENT UNOCAL PROJECT DATE

ATTAKA POWER DE-BOTTLENECK & EXPANSION ( WO # 013 ) 17-Mar-21
SUBJECT CONNECTION DETAIL FOR ATTAKA "D" PLATFORM JOB NO. 2542
C.1 CONNECTION DETAIL
C.1.1 CONNECTION BETWEEN W12x26 AND W24x76

Used E70XX WELD ---> Fu = 70 ksi
To determine nominal thickness of weld, the moment and shear capacity of W 12x26 by load combination 17 (operating condition)
is used , as follows:
Forces data
MY = -260.945 kips.in VY = 0.2887 kips P= -0.2544 kips

MZ = -9.5823 kips.in VZ = 5.172 kips
Connection sketches
Z
A Ftension
VZ
MY VZ VY MY
Y
W12X26
Fcompression
MZ
W24X76
A
SECTION A-
A
Profile data
W12X26 W24X76
web height ( bf ) = 12.220 in web height ( hw ) = 23.92 in
flange width ( d ) = 6.490 in flange width ( wf ) = 8.99 in
flange thick. ( tf ) = 0.380 in flange thick. ( tf ) = 0.68 in
web thick. ( tw ) = 0.230 in web thick. ( tw ) = 0.44 in
Allowable Stress
Allowable stress on fillet weld for tension/compression force is same as base metal (0.6 Fy) refer to TABLE J2.5, AISC-
ASD 9th Edition.
Allowable Tension Stress = Allowable Compression Stress = F = 0.6 x 36 = 21.600 ksi

CALCULATION SHEET

Welding properties
Connection use 1/8" nominal thickness fillet weld, tn = 0.125 in ; for groove weld, tn = plate thickness
Z
Le1
: Groove weld
e2
: Fillet weld
L
Welding projection area
( W 12X26 ) ----> Le1 = bf - tw = 6.490 - 0.230 = 6.260 in

Le2 = d - 2 tf = 12.220 - 0.76 = 11.46 in
Aeff = ( 2 x Le1 + 2 x Le2 ) x tn x 0.707 + Le1 x tf = 5.51081 in2

Sy = ( Le1 x Le2 + Le2 /3 ) x tn x 0.707 + Le1 x Le2 x tf / 2
2
= 23.83932 in3
Sz = Le1 /3 x tn x 0.707 + Le1 /6 x tf
2 2
= 3.636283 in3
Connection check
Shear
f'y = Vy / A = 0.2887 / 5.51081 = 0.05 ksi
f'z = Vz / A = 5.172 / 5.51081 = 0.94 ksi
Axial
f'x = P/ A = -0.2544 / 5.51081 = -0.05 ksi
Bending
f'"y = My / Sy = -260.945 / 23.83932 = -10.95 ksi
f'"z = Mz / Sz = -9.5823 / 3.636283 = -2.64 ksi
Therefore, the capacity of this connection will be :
fy = f'y2 + (f"x + f"'y + f"'z)2 = 13.62746 ksi < 21.6 ksi ===> OK
UC = 0.630901
fz = f'z2 + (f"x + f"'y + f"'z)2 = 13.65963 ksi < 21.6 ksi ===> OK
CALCULATION SHEET

UC = 0.63239
C.1.2 CONNECTION BETWEEN C12x30 AND W12x26

To determine nominal thickness of weld, the moment and shear capacity of C12x30 by load combination 19 (operating
condition) is used , as follows:
Forces data
MY = -115.929 kips.in VY = -0.1055 kips P= 1.2523 kips

MZ = -3.4396 kips.in VZ = 0.6661 kips
Connection sketches
A Ftension
VZ
MY VZ
VY
MZ
MY
C 12X30 W 12X26
A Fcompression
SECTION A-
A
Profile data
C12X30 W12X26
web height ( d ) = 12.000 in web height ( hw ) = 12.220 in
flange width ( bf ) = 3.170 in flange width ( wf ) = 6.490 in
Allowable
ASD 9th Edition.
CALCULATION SHEET

Welding properties
Z
Le1 : Groove weld
: Fillet weld
Le2
Le1 = bf - tw = 3.170 - 0.510 = 2.66 in

Le2 = d - 2 tf = 12.000 - 1.002 = 10.998 in
Aeff = 2 x Le2 x 0.707 x tn + 2 x Le1 x tf = 4.609217 in2

Sy = Le2 /3 x tn x 0.707 + Le1 x Le2 x tf
2
= 18.21976 in3
Sz = Le1 /3 x tf + Le1 x Le2 x 0.707 x tn
2
= 3.767008 in3
Connection check
Shear
f'y = Vy / A = -0.1055 / 4.609217 = -0.02 ksi
f'z = Vz / A = 0.6661 / 4.609217 = 0.14 ksi
Axial
f"x = P/ A = 1.2523 / 4.609217 = 0.27 ksi
Bending
f'"y = My / Sy = -115.929 / 18.21976 = -6.36 ksi
f'"z = Mz / Sz = -3.4396 / 3.767008 = -0.91 ksi
UC = 0.324271
UC = 0.324338
CALCULATION SHEET

C.1.3 CONNECTION BETWEEN C12x30 AND W24x76

Forces data
MY = -267.701 kips.in VY = 0.0065 kips P= 1.1277 kips

MZ = 0.8669 kips.in VZ = -5.8505 kips
Connection sketches
A Ftension
VZ
VY MZ
MY VZ
C 12X30
MY
W 24X76
A Fcompression
SECTION A-
A
Profile data
C12X30 W24X76
Allowable
ASD 9th Edition.
CALCULATION SHEET

ASD 9th Edition.
Welding properties
Z
Le1 : Groove weld
: Fillet weld
Le2
Le1 = bf - tw = 3.170 - 0.510 = 2.66 in

Le2 = d - 2 tf = 12.000 - 1.002 = 10.998 in
Aeff = ( 2 x Le1 + 2 x Le2 ) x tn x 0.707 + Le1 x tf = 3.746712 in2

Sy = Le2 /3 x tn x 0.707 + Le1 x Le2 x tf / 2 + Le1 x Le2 x tn
2
= 14.54829 in3
Sz = Le1 /6 x tf + Le1 /3 x tn x .0.707+ Le1 x Le2 x tn x 0.707
2 2
= 3.38463 in3
Connection check
Shear
f'y = Vy / A = 0.0065 / 3.746712 = 0.00 ksi
f'z = Vz / A = -5.8505 / 3.746712 = -1.56 ksi
Axial
f"x = P/ A = 1.1277 / 3.746712 = 0.30 ksi
Bending
f'"y = My / Sy = -267.701 / 14.54829 = -18.40 ksi
f'"z = Mz / Sz = 0.8669 / 3.38463 = 0.26 ksi
UC = 0.826099
CALCULATION SHEET

UC = 0.829256
C.1.4 CONNECTION BETWEEN C12x30 AND C12x30

Forces data
MY = 10.919 kips.in VY = -0.0163 kips P= 0.1394 kips

MZ = 0.3956 kips.in VZ = -0.1004 kips
Connection sketches
A Ftension
VZ
MY VZ
VY MY
MZ
C12x3
0
C12x30
A Fcompression
SECTION A-
A
Profile data
C12x30 C12x30
Allowable
CALCULATION SHEET

ASD 9th Edition.
Welding properties
All connection use 1/8" nominal thickness fillet weld, tn = 0.125 in ; for groove weld, tn = plate thickness
Z
Le1 : Groove weld
: Fillet weld
Le2
Le1 = bf - tw = 3.170 - 0.510 = 2.66 in

Le2 = d - 2 tf = 12.000 - 1.002 = 10.998 in
Aeff = 2 x Le2 x 0.707 x tn + 2 x Le1 x tf = 4.609217 in2

Sy = Le2 /3 x tn x 0.707 + Le1 x Le2 x tf
2
= 18.21976 in3
Sz = Le1 /3 x tf + Le1 x Le2 x 0.707 x tn
2
= 3.767008 in3
Connection check
Shear
f'y = Vy / A = -0.0163 / 4.609217 = 0.00 ksi
f'z = Vz / A = -0.1004 / 4.609217 = -0.02 ksi
Axial
f"x = P/ A = 0.1394 / 4.609217 = 0.03 ksi
Bending
f'"y = My / Sy = 10.919 / 18.21976 = 0.60 ksi
f'"z = Mz / Sz = 0.3956 / 3.767008 = 0.11 ksi
UC = 0.034008
CALCULATION SHEET

UC = 0.034022
APPENDIX D
Structural Model
D.1
Structure model of Deck Extension for
In-place analysis
D.2
Structure model of Deck Extension for
Lift analysis
APPENDIX C
Deck Detail Design

C.1
Connection Detail
C.2
Padeye, sling and Shackle design
APPENDIX B
Lift Analysis
B.1
Input file of Lift Analysis
B.2
Output file of Lift Analysis
APPENDIX A
In-Place Analysis
A.1
Input File of In-Place Analysis
A.2
Output File of In-Place Analysis
CALCULATION SHEET
SUBJECT Deck extension Attaka " D " platform analysis JOB NO. 2542
BY RDM / CHY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY SHEET OF
VI SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS RESULTS
VI.1 Summary Loading
The structure loadings included in the analysis are as follows:
VI.1.1 Summary Loading of In-place Analysis
Vertical
Operating Storm
No. Basic Load Case
(kips) (kips)
1 Structural steel selfweight (including 10% contingency) 22.140 22.140
2 Blanket live load, appurtenances, & Equipment 162.334 125.630
Total 184.474 147.770
Horizontal
X -dir Y - dir
No. Basic Load Case
(kips) (kips)
1 Wind load (Operating) 0.321 0.944
2 Wind load (Extreme Storm) 0.332 0.978
4 Earthquake 22.68 22.68
VI.1.2 Summary Loading of Lift Analysis
Lifting of the deck extension has divided as two modules.
Module 1 (West side of A1) ;
Operating
No. Basic Load Case
(kips)
1 Structural steel selfweight (including 10% contingency) 9.418
2 Deck plates 2.691
Total 12.109
Module 2 (South side of A1) ;
Operating
No. Basic Load Case
(kips)
1 Structural steel selfweight (including 10% contingency) 1.409
2 Deck plates 1.133
Total 2.542
file: 514706816.xls/SUMMARY OF STR CHECK

CALCULATION SHEET
VI.2 Summary Stresses check
The following maximum member checks are obtained for various locations in the structure. All
members were checked against API and AISC criteria for buckling and yield.
VI.2.1 Summary Stresses check of In-place Analysis
Operating Condition
Member Description ( Memb. Group) Unity Check Load Comb. Remark

Existing Beam ( BE1 ) 0.21 17 W 27X102
Existing Beam ( BE5 ) 0.68 19 C 8 x 8.2
Bracing of Deck Extension ( VB1 ) 0.28 18 Ø 12" x 0.375
Beam of Deck Extension (BM1) 0.49 19 W 12X26
Beam of Deck Extension (BM2) 0.53 20 C 12X30
Extreme Storm Condition


CALCULATION SHEET
Earthquake Condition

VI.2.2 Summary Stresses check of Lift Analysis

VI.3 Summary Joint Deflections
The following maximum joint deflections are obtained in the deck extension and existing deck
structure.
VI.3.1 Summary Joint Deflections of In-place Analysis
Operating Condition
Deflection Rotation
Joint Number Load Comb.
( inch ) ( rad )
10 0.494 0.0039 19
Extreme Storm Condition
Deflection Rotation
( inch ) ( rad )
10 0.386 0.0031 23

CALCULATION SHEET
Earthquake Condition
Deflection Rotation
( inch ) ( rad )
10 0.428 0.0035 30
VI.3.2 Summary Joint Deflections of Lift Analysis
Deflection Rotation
( inch ) ( rad )
103 0.32 0.0015 3
VI.4 Foundation Check
Additional load due to deck extension will be as follows:
- Self weight of structure include contingency 10 % = 9,419 lbs

- Deck plates, 7.6 psf, with plane area are 23.0' x 7.8' and = 1,862 lbs
10.1' x 6.5'.
- Blanket area load, 100 psf, with plane area are 23.0' x = 24,505 lbs
7.8' and 10.1' x 6.5'.
- Shield roof load, 20 psf, with plane area are 23.0' x 7.8' = 4,901 lbs
and 10.1' x 6.5'.
- Transformer = 8,201 lbs
+
Total = 48,889 lbs
= 49 kips
This additional weight will be conservatively assumed to be taken by pile axis A1.
Refer to original design from design report with document number A0104-ST-REP-0002 rev 0
have ilustrated as follows:
Worst case 103. Minimum required safety factor is 1.5

CALCULATION SHEET
Based on table: Pile axial capacity safety factors (Based on society's loads and axial capacity
curves, borehole 1A, attaka area.)
Pile A1 B1 A2 B2 A3 B3
Case Penetration (ft) 301 300 301 300 301 301
103 Load (kips) 540 432 121 1310 665 1639
Original
Capacity (kips) 1670 1730 1730 1730 1730 1730

Safety Factor 3.1 4.00 14.30 1.32 2.60 1.06
Load (kips) 589 432 121 1310 665 1639
+ New
Capacity (kips) 1670 1730 1730 1730 1730 1730

Safety Factor 2.8 4.00 14.30 1.32 2.60 1.06
Based on table: Pile axial capacity safety factors (Based on society's loads and McClelland's
capacity curves, borehole 1A, attaka area.)
Pile A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3
Case Penetration (ft) 301 300 301 300 301 301
103 Load (kips) 540 432 121 1310 665 1639
Original
Capacity (kips) 2160 2310 2310 2310 2310 2310

Safety Factor 4.0 5.35 19.09 1.76 3.47 1.41
Load (kips) 589 432 121 1310 665 1639
+ New
Capacity (kips) 2160 2310 2310 2310 2310 2310

Safety Factor 3.7 5.35 19.09 1.76 3.47 1.41
The above results show that the deck leg still acceptable for attaka " D " with new deck extension.

CALCULATION SHEET
IV METHOD OF ANALYSIS
To represent the existing member affected by the additional extension, part of the cellar deck framing will be
modelled in the structural model for the deck extension. The structure will be modeled and analyzed by SACS
program with static analysis method. For earthquake analysis will use static equivalent method. The overall
structure was assumed adequate to accommodate this additional.
Stress analysis of new structures will be done with several assumptions as follows:
1 Member lengths are assumed from node to node.

2 Loading is generally assumed, as blanket area load that will be described in the section design loading.
3 Connection between new structure and existing structure will be considered as fixed connection.
4 Self-weight is considered by 10% contingency to accommodate steel plate out of computer modeled.
5 Static equivalent analysis is used to calculate distribution of seismic forces. The seismic load will be
calculated by taking of the X, Y, and 0.5 of the Z responses, refer to API RP 2A (WSD) 20th Edition
section C 2.3.6. Seismic load are working on each beam subject to have gravity loads.
6 Self weight and deck plates loads only will be considered for lift analysis. Sludge shield is assumed to be
lifted as separately module. For lift analysis, the deck extension its self to be divided by two modules.
Module 1, for west side of 1A. And Module 2, for south side of 1A.
7 Additional load of deck extension to previous structure will be considered for foundation analysis. That
will be compared with the existing pile capacity. No detail pile stress analysis is carried out, however
appraisal of pile axial load factor safety will be based on the Llyod's inspection report for Attaka D
platform - table "Pile Axial Capacity safety factors" based Society's loads and Mc Clelland's capacity
curves, Borehole 1A.
V. DESIGN LOADING
The platform has been analyzed both for gravity and lateral loads.
V.1. Gravity Loads
Gravity loads, which can be evaluated as a function of model member volumes are generated by
providing appropriate densities. Other non-generated loads are calculated externally to the model and
input as either member or nodal loads.
a. Structural Dead Weight
The structure dead weight will be taken as the self weight of structure modelled and not modelled
including deck plates, stairway.
- Self weight of structure modelled. computer generated + contingency 10%

- Deck plates. 7.6 psf as area loads
- Stairway. 1.2 kips as point loads
file: 514706816.xls/DESIGN LOADING

CALCULATION SHEET
b. Area Live Loads
Distributed area load which cover equipment loads, piping, electrical and fluid.
Blanket loads are presented as follows:

Deck extension
- Operating Condition 100 psf
- Storm Condition 75 psf
- Seismic Condition 75 psf
c. Vertical loads of Equipment
Loading of equipment load will be as follow:
Description Weigth (lbs) Area Load (psf) Size (width x length)

Asul Unit 11040 1) 200 4.8 ft x 11.5 ft
Transformer 8201 250 6.8 ft x 8 ft
Sludge shield/roof - 20 -
The loading of sludge shield/roof will be distributed to 10 joints as supported column.

1)
weight of ansul unit is estimation.
V.2. Lateral Loads
a. Wind Loads
The one minute sustained wind will be used in the analysis.

Wind load, which will be considered in the analysis, is subject to act at both X and Y direction.
The pressure is given by:

P = 0.00256 Cs V2 (psf)
Cs = 1.0 for overall
Operating wind pressure :
P = 2.72 psf
Extreme storm wind pressure :
P = 3.70 psf
Plane area;
Y dir.
N
52.5 ft
17.9 ft
dir.
X

CALCULATION SHEET
height of equipment average is 6.6 ft
Projection area for each wind directions will be as follows:
X direction;
Area = 6.6 x 17.9 = 118 ft2
Y direction;
Area = 6.6 x 52.5 = 347 ft2
Wind forces:
Forces to be distributed to 8 joints for the wind from Y direction and to 7 joints for
the wind from X direction.
Operating wind force:

FX = 2.72 x 118 / 7 = 46 lb
FY = 2.72 x 347 / 8 = 118 lb
Extreme storm wind force:

FX = 3.70 x 118 / 7 = 62 lb
FY = 3.70 x 347 / 8 = 160 lb
V.3. Load Combination
Allowable
1 110% Dead load + Blanket live load + Equipment Dead Weight + Operating Wind 1.00
2 110% Dead load + 75% Blanket live load + Equipment Dead Weight + Extreme Wi 1.33
3 110% Dead load + 75% Blanket live load + Equipment Dead Weight + Operating 1.00
4 110% Dead load + 75% Blanket live load + Equipment Dead weight + Earthquake 1.70
5 Dead Load ( for lift analysis with dynamic load factor 2.) 0.50
6 Dead Load ( for lift analysis with dynamic load factor 1.35.) 0.74

CALCULATION SHEET
III. STRUCTURAL MODELING
III.1 Equipment Layout
N module
1
29.5' 16.5' 6.5'
7.8'
100 psf
200 psf
ansul unit 250 psf
Transformer
10.1'
200 psf
1
18' 18' module
stairway 2
CELLAR DECK
EXTENSION
el. 35' 03/8"
note:
deck extension
existing
file: 514706816.xls/STRUCTURAL MODEL

CALCULATION SHEET
III.2 Structural Model
This section present of the structural model in the computer program for In-place analysis and Lift
analysis. The deck extension model to be presented in the next sheet (appendix D).
Every Structural model consist of Joint numbering, Member group, and member properties.
III.3 Member Properties
Member properties of the deck extension will be as follows:
MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER

NO. REMARK
GROUP PROPERTIES GRADE
1 BE1 W 27X102 A 36 Existing
5 BE5 C 8 x 8.2 A 36 Existing
6 BM1 W 12X26 A 36 New Deck Extension
7 BM2 C 12X30 A 36 New Deck Extension
8 BM3 W 24X76 A 36 New Deck Extension
9 VB1 Ø 12" x 0.375 API 5 L New Deck Extension
file: 514706816.xls/STRUCTURAL MODEL

CALCULATION SHEET
I. INTRODUCTION
Unocal Indonesia intends to upgrade the existing power transformer, to replace and relocate sub-standard load
break oil switch at attaka D platform. The existing transformer on the roof of switch gear room and will be
removed. The replacement transformer will be located at cellar deck, south west of A1, and occupy the location
of existing ansul unit. Therefore the ansul unit and associated piping have to relocate. The platform needs to
be modified to accommodate these changes. The replacement load break oil switch is located adjacent to
present oil switch D1, which are sufficient place at external of switch gear room south.
Size of the modules deck extension are 23.0 ft x 7.8 ft and 6.5 ft x 10.1 ft. they will be at cellar deck, south side
and west side of A1.
This report covers the deck extension analysis to accommodate ansul unit, new transformer, and maintenance
access includes sludge shield. The strength analysis to be considered by static loading only.
Deck extensions will be checked and calculated by local analysis only, as separate structure with the existing
platform, based on TRIPATRA’s scope of work. The existing platform was assumed adequate to accommodate
the deck extensions.
II. DESIGN CRITERIA
II.1 Environmental Criteria
The design environmental criteria used in the analysis refer to UOI-GS-18
*) wind speed in 33' height above CD

Wind
Design Conditions Speed
(MPH) *
5-year Operating Storm 32.6

50-year Extreme Storm 38.0
II.2 Blanket Uniformly Distributed Loads
Area live load of a new deck extension refer to table 1 in the specification no. UI-M-SSP-GEN for
miscellaneous steel structures will be taken as 100 psf.
Deck extension Existing Deck

- Operating Condition 100 psf 200 **
- Storm Condition 75 psf 150
file: 514706816.xls/INTRODUCTION
CALCULATION SHEET
- Seismic Condition 75 psf 150
( ** refer to DWG. No. U-4788 sheet no. 202 cellar deck framing, based on design report no. A0104-ST-REP-0002 )
II.3 Earthquake Criteria
The deck extension platform is checked for ductility level eartquake (DLE) which correspond to 2000 year
return period events.
Peak Ground Acceleration as a function of return period is taken from UOI-GS-18 is as follow:
Seismic Level Return Period (year) PGA (g)

Ductility 2000 0.125
II.4 Design Codes
The following codes, standard, specifications, and existing design report are to be used to design,
fabricate and install the structure.
API RP2A. Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore
Platforms, 20th edition, July 1993 issued by American Petroleum Institute.
AISC Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design, 9th edition, 1989 issued by
American Institute of Steel Construction.
AWS D1.1 Structural Welding Code issued by American Welding Society.
UI-M-SSP-GEN General Specification for Miscellaneous Steel for Offshore Structure.
UOI-GS-18 General Specification for Site Condition and Climate, revision 3.
A0104-ST-REP-0002 rev 0 Design report of local structure study attaka "D" platform - Water Treatment
Project - by PT. Kvaerner.
CALCULATION SHEET
II.5 Allowable Stresses
The following increase in allowable stresses have been considered for the design.
Load Conditions Allowable Stresses Increased

Operating Storm 1.000
Extreme Storm 1.333
Earthquake 1.700
II.6 Material Grades
All steel beam material shall conform to ASTM A36 (Fy=36 ksi) except tubular shall be API 5L grade B
(Fy=35 ksi).
CALCULATION SHEET
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I INTRODUCTION
II DESIGN CRITERIA
II.1 Environmental Criteria

II.2 Blanket Uniformly Distributed Loads
II.3 Earthquake Criteria
II.4 Design Code
II.5 Allowable Stresses
II.6 Material Grades
III STRUCTURAL MODELING
III.1 Equipment Lay Out

III.2 Structural Model
III.3 Member Properties
IV METHOD OF ANALYSIS
V LOADING of DESIGN
V.1 Gravity Load

V.2 Lateral load
V.3 Load Combination
VI SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS RESULT
VI.1 Summary Loading

VI.2 Summary Stresses check
VI.3 Summary Joint Deflections
VI.4 Foundation Check
APPENDIX A In-Place Analysis
A. 1 Input File of In-Place Analysis
file: 514706816.xls/TOC
CALCULATION SHEET
A. 2 Output File of In-Place Analysis
APPENDIX B Lift Analysis
B.1 Input File of Lift Analysis

B.2 Output File of Lift Analysis
APPENDIX C Deck Detail Design
C.1 Connection Detail

C.2 Padeye, sling, and shackle design
APPENDIX D Structural Model
D.1 Structure model of Deck Extension for In-place analysis

D.2 Structure model of Deck Extension for Lift analysis

Pt. Tripatra Engineering: Calculation Sheet

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pt. Tripatra Engineering: Calculation Sheet

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PT.

Selection of Sling Type

Selection of Shackle Type

Type = G-210 S-215

Determination of Main Plate

Shear Stress Check

Bearing Stress Check

Stress at The Base of Padeye

- Area : AA = 0.5 x 6.12

- Combine Stress Ratio : IR = FA / ( 0.6 x FY ) + ( FBX + FBY ) / ( 0.66 x FY )

- Combine Stress Ratio : IR = FA / ( 0.6 x FY ) + ( FBX + FBY ) / ( 0.66 x FY )

Main Plate to Beam Full Weld

- Minimum Weld Thickness : tw = ( P / ( ( 2 x 6.12 + 4 x 3 ) x Fw )) / 0.707

CLIENT UNOCAL PROJECT DATE

C.1 CONNECTION DETAIL

C.1.1 CONNECTION BETWEEN W12x26 AND W24x76

MY = -260.945 kips.in VY = 0.2887 kips P= -0.2544 kips

Allowable Tension Stress = Allowable Compression Stress = F = 0.6 x 36 = 21.600 ksi

CLIENT UNOCAL PROJECT DATE

Welding projection area

( W 12X26 ) ----> Le1 = bf - tw = 6.490 - 0.230 = 6.260 in

Aeff = ( 2 x Le1 + 2 x Le2 ) x tn x 0.707 + Le1 x tf = 5.51081 in2

Therefore, the capacity of this connection will be :

CLIENT UNOCAL PROJECT DATE

C.1.2 CONNECTION BETWEEN C12x30 AND W12x26

MY = -115.929 kips.in VY = -0.1055 kips P= 1.2523 kips

CLIENT UNOCAL PROJECT DATE

Le1 = bf - tw = 3.170 - 0.510 = 2.66 in

Aeff = 2 x Le2 x 0.707 x tn + 2 x Le1 x tf = 4.609217 in2

Therefore, the capacity of this connection will be :

CLIENT UNOCAL PROJECT DATE

C.1.3 CONNECTION BETWEEN C12x30 AND W24x76

MY = -267.701 kips.in VY = 0.0065 kips P= 1.1277 kips

CLIENT UNOCAL PROJECT DATE

Le1 = bf - tw = 3.170 - 0.510 = 2.66 in

Aeff = ( 2 x Le1 + 2 x Le2 ) x tn x 0.707 + Le1 x tf = 3.746712 in2

Therefore, the capacity of this connection will be :

CLIENT UNOCAL PROJECT DATE

C.1.4 CONNECTION BETWEEN C12x30 AND C12x30

MY = 10.919 kips.in VY = -0.0163 kips P= 0.1394 kips

CLIENT UNOCAL PROJECT DATE

Le1 = bf - tw = 3.170 - 0.510 = 2.66 in

Aeff = 2 x Le2 x 0.707 x tn + 2 x Le1 x tf = 4.609217 in2

Therefore, the capacity of this connection will be :

CLIENT UNOCAL PROJECT DATE

Deck Detail Design

VI SUMMARY OF ANALYSIS RESULTS

VI.1 Summary Loading

The structure loadings included in the analysis are as follows:

VI.1.1 Summary Loading of In-place Analysis

VI.1.2 Summary Loading of Lift Analysis

Lifting of the deck extension has divided as two modules.

Module 1 (West side of A1) ;

Module 2 (South side of A1) ;

file: 514706816.xls/SUMMARY OF STR CHECK

VI.2 Summary Stresses check

VI.2.1 Summary Stresses check of In-place Analysis

Member Description ( Memb. Group) Unity Check Load Comb. Remark

Extreme Storm Condition

Member Description ( Memb. Group) Unity Check Load Comb. Remark

file: 514706816.xls/SUMMARY OF STR CHECK

Member Description ( Memb. Group) Unity Check Load Comb. Remark