Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared by : YR
Checked by : GAM/ZI
1. INTRODUCTION
The objective of this spreadsheet is to calculate the expansion length of pipeline's both ends (hot end and cold end)
due to pressure and temperature during hydrotest and operating condition. The expansion analysis is carried out in
accordance with OTC 4067.
2. REFERENCES
[1]. OTC 4067, Movements of Submarine Pipelines Close to Platforms, Andrew C. Palmer and Michael T.S. Ling,
1981;
[2]. ASME B31.8, Gas Transmission and Distribution Piping Systems, 2018
[3]. DNVGL-RP-F114, Pipe-Soil Interaction for Submarine Pipelines, 2017
[4]. Subsea Design Pipeline, Analysis, and Installation, Qiang Bai, Yong Bai, 2014
[5]. 1902-01PL-30-02B-G0085, Pipeline Design Basis
3. INPUT DATA
-5 -1
Coefficient Thermal Expansion of steel αs ≔ 1.17 ⋅ 10 Δ°C
7
Young's Modulus of Steel Es ≔ 3 ⋅ 10 psi
-3
Steel Density ρs ≔ 7850 kg ⋅ m
-3
Anti-Corrosion Coating Density ρacc ≔ 900 kg ⋅ m
-3
Field Joint Coating Density ρfjc ≔ 0 kg ⋅ m
Page 1 of 7
Pipeline Length Lpl ≔ 4400 m
-5 -1
Coefficient Thermal Expansion of Cladding αclad ≔ 1.4 ⋅ 10 Δ°C
-3
Clad Density ρclad ≔ 8140 kg ⋅ m
-3
Density of Pipe Content during Operation ρop ≔ 64.15 kg ⋅ m
-3
Density of Pipe Content during Hydrotest ρh ≔ 1000 kg ⋅ m
-3
Unit Weight γs ≔ 17.56 kN ⋅ m
4. CALCULATION
⎛ 2 2⎞
Weight of Steel Pipe Ws (pc) ≔ 0.25 ⋅ π ⋅ ⎝Do - ID (pc) ⎠ ⋅ ρs ⋅ g
2 2
⎛ Lpj - 2 ⋅ lcbc ⎞
Weight of Anti-Corrosion Coating Wacc ≔ 0.25 ⋅ π ⋅ ⎛⎝Dacc - Do ⎞⎠ ⋅ ⎜―――― ⎟ ⋅ ρacc ⋅ g
-1 ⎝ Lpj ⎠
Wacc = 20.29 N ⋅ m
2 2
⎛ 2 ⋅ lcbc ⎞
Weight of Field Joint Coating Wfjc ≔ 0.25 ⋅ π ⋅ ⎛⎝Dacc - Do ⎞⎠ ⋅ ⎜――⎟ ⋅ ρfjc ⋅ g
Wfjc = 0 N ⋅ m
-1 ⎝ Lpj ⎠
2
Weight of Pipe Content Wcont (pc) ≔ 0.25 ⋅ π ⋅ ID (pc) ⋅ ρcont (pc) ⋅ g
⎛ 2 2⎞
Weight of Pipe Cladding Wclad (pc) ≔ 0.25 ⋅ π ⋅ ⎝ID (pc) - Dclad (pc) ⎠ ⋅ ρclad ⋅ g
Total Pipeline Weight Wtot (pc) ≔ Ws (pc) + Wacc + Wfjc + Wcont (pc) + Wclad (pc)
-1
Wtot (“hydrotest”) = 1614.77 N ⋅ m
-1
Wtot (“operating”) = 935.02 N ⋅ m
Page 3 of 7
1.635
1.565
1.495
1.425
1.355
Wtot (“hydrotest”) ⎛⎝kN ⋅ m ⎞⎠
-1
1.285
1.215
Wtot (“operating”) ⎛⎝kN ⋅ m ⎞⎠
-1
1.145
1.075
1.005
0.935
0 450 900 1.35⋅10³ 1.8⋅10³ 2.25⋅10³ 2.7⋅10³ 3.15⋅10³ 3.6⋅10³ 4.05⋅10³ 4.5⋅10³
x (m)
⎛ 2 2⎞
Sectional Area of Steel Pipe Ast (pc) ≔ 0.25 ⋅ π ⋅ ⎝Do - ID (pc) ⎠
ts tclad
Thermal Expansion Coefficient Linear αth ≔ αs ⋅ ― + αclad ⋅ ――
tth tth
Thermal Expansion Force FT (pc) ≔ Ast (pc) ⋅ αth ⋅ Es ⋅ ⎛⎝Ti (pc) - Tamb⎞⎠
Equation 2, 15, Ref. [1]
Pi (pc) ⋅ Do
Pressure Expansion Force due to Poisson's Effect FP (x , pc) ≔ ν ⋅ ―――― ⋅ Ast (pc)
2 ⋅ tst (pc)
Axial Force Acting on Pipeline Fax (x , pc) ≔ FT (pc) + FE (x , pc) - FP (x , pc)
1.8⋅10³
1.7⋅10³
1.6⋅10³
1.5⋅10³
1.4⋅10³
1.3⋅10³
1.2⋅10³ Fax (x , “hydrotest”) (kN)
1.1⋅10³
1⋅10³
Fax (x , “operating”) (kN)
900
800
700
600
500
0 450 900 1.35⋅10³ 1.8⋅10³ 2.25⋅10³ 2.7⋅10³ 3.15⋅10³ 3.6⋅10³ 4.05⋅10³ 4.5⋅10³
x (m)
Page 4 of 7
4.3 Soil Friction Force Calculation
Lpl
⌠ ⎛⎛ γs ⋅ Do ⎛ Do ⎞ ⎞ ⎞
Soil Friction Force at Cold End Ffr_C (x) ≔ ⎮ μs ⋅ ⎜⎜2 π ⋅ ―― ⋅ ⎜zt + ―⎟ ⋅ ⎛⎝1 + K0⎞⎠⎟ + Wtot (pc)⎟ d x
Equation 5.1, 15, Ref. [3] ⎮
⌡ ⎝⎝ 4 ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎠ ⎠
x
Soil Friction Resistance along the Pipeline Ffr (x) ≔ ‖ if ⎛⎝Ffr_H (x) > Ffr_C (x)⎞⎠
‖
‖ ‖ Ffr_C (x)
‖ ‖
‖ else
‖ ‖ F (x)
‖ ‖ fr_H
7.7⋅10³
7⋅10³
6.3⋅10³
5.6⋅10³
4.9⋅10³
4.2⋅10³
3.5⋅10³ Ffr (x) (kN)
2.8⋅10³
2.1⋅10³
1.4⋅10³
700
0
0 450 900 1.35⋅10³ 1.8⋅10³ 2.25⋅10³ 2.7⋅10³ 3.15⋅10³ 3.6⋅10³ 4.05⋅10³ 4.5⋅10³
x (m)
Figure 3 - Profile of Friction Resistance Force along the Length
Effective Axial Force along the Length Feff (x , pc) ≔ ‖ if Fax (x , pc) > Ffr (x)
‖
‖ ‖ Ffr (x)
‖ ‖
‖ else
‖ ‖ F (x , pc)
‖ ‖ ax
1.8⋅10³
1.65⋅10³
1.5⋅10³
1.35⋅10³
1.2⋅10³
1.05⋅10³
900
Feff (x , “hydrotest”) (kN)
750
600
Feff (x , “operating”) (kN)
450
300
150
0
0 450 900 1.35⋅10³ 1.8⋅10³ 2.25⋅10³ 2.7⋅10³ 3.15⋅10³ 3.6⋅10³ 4.05⋅10³ 4.5⋅10³
x (m)
Page 5 of 7
4.5 Virtual Anchor Length Calculation
Maximum Friction Force of Soil Location KPfr_max ≔ root ⎛⎝Ffr_H (x) - Ffr_C (x) , x , 0 m , Lpl⎞⎠
KPfr_max = 2200 m
Virtual Anchor Length at Hot End (from start point) Va1 (pc) ≔ ‖ if Ffr ⎛⎝KPfr_max⎞⎠ > Fax ⎛⎝KPfr_max , pc⎞⎠
Equation 8, 9, Ref. [1]
‖
‖ ‖ root ⎛⎝Ffr (x) - Fax (x , pc) , x , 0 m , KPfr_max⎞⎠
‖ ‖
‖ else
‖ ‖ KP
‖ ‖ fr_max
Virtual Anchor Length at Cold End (from start point) LVa2 (pc) ≔ ‖ if Ffr ⎛⎝KPfr_max⎞⎠ > Fax ⎛⎝KPfr_max , pc⎞⎠
Equation 8, 9, Ref. [1]
‖
‖ ‖ root ⎛⎝Ffr (x) - Fax (x , pc) , x , KPfr_max , Lpl⎞⎠
‖ ‖
‖ else
‖ ‖ KP (pc)
‖ ‖ fr_max
Virtual Anchor Length at Cold End (from end point) Va2 (pc) ≔ Lpl - LVa2 (pc)
LH (“hydrotest”) = 24.33 mm
LH (“operating”) = 270.3 mm
Lpl
Expansion Length of Pipeline at Cold End ⌠ ⎛F (x , pc) - F (x)⎞
Equation 16, 17, Ref. [1] ⎝ ax
⎮ ――――――― fr ⎠
LC (pc) ≔ dx
⎮
⌡ Es ⋅ Ast
(pc)
LVa2 (pc)
LC (“hydrotest”) = 24.33 mm
LC (“operating”) = 270.3 mm
Page 6 of 7
5. SUMMARY OF CALCULATION
3
Maximum Operating Pressure Pop = ⎛⎝1.2 ⋅ 10 ⎞⎠ psi
Effective Axial Force at Anchor Length (Hot End) Feff ⎛⎝Va1 (“hydrotest”) , “hydrotest”⎞⎠ = 524.03 kN
Feff ⎛⎝Va1 (“operating”) , “operating”⎞⎠ = 1746.54 kN
Effective Axial Force at Anchor Length (Cold End) Feff ⎛⎝LVa2 (“hydrotest”) , “hydrotest”⎞⎠ = 524.03 kN
Feff ⎛⎝LVa2 (“operating”) , “operating”⎞⎠ = 1746.54 kN
Virtual Anchor Length at Hot End (from start point) Va1 (“hydrotest”) = 159.54 m
Va1 (“operating”) = 531.73 m
Virtual Anchor Length at Cold End (from end point) Va2 (“hydrotest”) = 159.54 m
Va2 (“operating”) = 531.73 m
Page 7 of 7