Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Deep Foundations
1.1 Carrying capacity of a single pile
Ultimate load carrying capacity of a pile (Qu) is given by the addition of skin friction (Qs) and end bearing (Qb).
Thus,
𝑄𝑢 = 𝑄𝑏 + 𝑄𝑠 [1.1]
𝑄𝑏 = 𝑁𝑐 × 𝐶𝑏 × 𝐴𝑏 [1.2]
Where Nc is bearing capacity factor, widely accepted as equal to 9.0; Cb is undrained shear strength at the base of
the pile and Ab is the area of the base of the pile.
𝑄𝑠 = 𝛼 × ̅̅̅
𝐶𝑢 × 𝐴𝑠 [1.3]
̅̅̅̅
𝑸𝒖 = 𝑪𝒃 𝑵𝒄 𝑨𝒃 + 𝜶𝑪 𝒖 𝑨𝒔 [1.4]
Copyright© 2021 – Dr.M.C.M. Nasvi-All right reserved CVX9416 1
1.1.2 Carrying capacity of pile in sand
The ultimate pile load in cohesionless soil is estimated using drained soil parameters (𝑐 ′ and ∅′ ), and assuming any
contribution from 𝑐 ′ is zero.
𝑄𝑏 = 𝑞𝑏 𝐴𝑏 = 𝜎𝑣′ 𝑁𝑞 𝐴𝑏 [1.5]
Where 𝜎𝑣′ is the effective overburden pressure at the base of the pile, 𝑁𝑞 is bearing capacity coefficient and Ab is the
area of the base of the pile.
The selection of a suitable value of Nq is a crucial part of the design of pile. The values suggested by Berezentzev et
al., (1961) are often used and the variation is shown in Figure 1.2.
𝑄𝑠 = 𝑓𝑠 × 𝐴𝑠 [1.6]
Where 𝑓𝑠 is average value of ultimate skin friction over embedded length of pile.
Meyerhof (1959) suggested that for the average value of the ultimate skin friction:
̅̅̅𝑣′ 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝛿
𝑓𝑠 = 𝐾𝜎 [1.7]
Typical values of δ and K suggested by Broms (1966) are given in Table 1.1.
Ks
Pile Material δ Relative density of soil
Loose Dense
Steel 20 º 0.5 1.0
Concrete 0.75∅′ 1.0 2.0
Timber 0.67∅′ 1.5 4.0
̅̅̅′𝒗̅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝜹
𝑸𝒖 = 𝝈′𝒗 𝑵𝒒 𝑨𝒃 + 𝑨𝒔 𝑲𝝈 [1.8]
For driven piles, bearing capacity of pile group is higher than sum of the individual pile bearing capacity due to
densification associated with driving. Bored or cast-in situ piles will loosen the soil and hence group capacity will be
somewhat less than the sum of the capacities of individual piles.
̅̅̅′𝒗̅𝒕𝒂𝒏𝜹)
𝑸𝒈 = 𝜼𝒏𝟏 𝒏𝟐 (𝝈′𝒗 𝑵𝒒 𝑨𝒃 + 𝑨𝒔 𝑲𝝈 [1.10]
Considerable amount of remoulding of soil takes pace when piles are driven in cohesive soils. The mode of failure of
pile group in cohesive soils depends primarily on the spacing of piles. For smaller spacing, “block failure” may occur,
in other words, the group capacity as a block will be less than the sum of individual pile capacities. This is when the soil
fails along the perimeter of the pile group (See Fig 1.4). The ultimate capacity of group pile is obtained based on the
following procedure:
𝑸𝒃 = 𝟗𝑪𝒖 𝑩𝑳
̅̅̅̅
𝑸𝒔 = 𝟐(𝑳 + 𝑩)𝑪 𝒖𝐃
̅̅̅̅
𝑸𝒈 = 𝟗𝑪𝒖 𝑩𝑳 + 𝟐(𝑳 + 𝑩)𝑪 𝒖𝐃 [1.12]
The lower of the two values in Equations [1.11] and [1.12] will give Qg
for piles in cohesive soils.
Negative skin friction is a phenomenon which occurs when a soil layer surrounding a portion of the pile shaft settles
more than the pile. If a soft or loose layer settles after the pile has been installed, the skin friction developed in this zone
is in the direction of the soil movement, pulling the pile downward. The negative skin friction occurs under conditions
such as following:
a) When a fill of clay is filled over a granular soil. Consolidation of fill will exert a downward drag on the pile (Fig
1.5a).
b) When a fill of granular soil is placed over soft clay, consolidation takes place in clay layer exerting downward
drag force on the pile (Fig 1.5b).
c) Lowering of ground water will increase the effective stress inducing consolidation and consequent settlement
around the pile.
𝑸𝒏 = 𝜶 × ̅̅
𝑪̅̅
𝒖 × 𝑨𝒔
Negative skin friction occurs up to neutral depth (Refer Fig 2.5b). The neutral depth is given by:
If ULS design calculations are carried out with NSF load as an action, its value shall be the maximum [Cl 7.3.2.2 (1)].
When designing piles subjected to drag-down, the resulting axial load is treated as a permanent unfavourable action.
EC7 Part 1 requires down-drag displacements to be treated in one of two ways: (1) as an indirect action in a soil-structure
interaction analysis; or (2) as an equivalent direct action, calculated separately as an upper bound value. Table 1.2 shows
the partial factor sets to be used when NSF is treated as an action.
Table 1.2: Partial factor sets to apply when NSF is treated as an action
The characteristic vertical compressive action (Fck) is given by 𝑭𝒄𝒌 = 𝑷𝑮𝒌 + 𝑾𝑮𝒌 + 𝑫𝑮𝒌 [1.15]
where PGk – Characteristic imposed load; WGk – Piles characteristics self-weight; DGk – characteristic downward drag on
the pile.
In principle, Fc;d should include the weight of the pile itself and Rc;d should include the overburden pressure of the soil
at the foundation base. However, these two items may be disregarded if they cancel approximately. They need not cancel
if:
— the pile extends above the surface of the ground [Cl 7.6.2.1(2)].
The elastic settlement of a pile under a vertical load (Qw) is given by Equation [1.16].
where 𝑆𝑒(1) – elastic settlement of the pile, 𝑆𝑒(2) – settlement of the pile caused by the load at the pile tip and
𝑆𝑒(3) – Settlement of pile caused by the load transmitted along the pile shaft
If the pile material is assumed to be elastic, deformation of pile shaft can be evaluated using Equation [1.17]:
(𝑄𝑤𝑝 +𝜉𝑄𝑤𝑠 )𝐿
𝑠𝑒(1) = [1.17]
𝐴𝑝 𝐸𝑝
where 𝑄𝑤𝑝 – load carried at the pile point under working load condition, 𝑄𝑤𝑠 - load carried by frictional
resistance under working load condition, 𝐴𝑝 – area of cross section of pile, L – length of pile, 𝐸𝑝 – modulus of
elasticity of pile material and 𝜉 – varies between 0.5 and 0.67 and the value depends on the nature of the
distribution of the unit friction resistance (f ) along the shaft.
s
The settlement of the pile caused by the load carried at the pile point is given by Equation [1.18]:
𝑞𝑤𝑝 𝐷
𝑠𝑒(2) = (1 − 𝜇𝑠2 )𝐼𝑤𝑝 [1.18]
𝐸𝑠
𝑄𝑤𝑝
where 𝐷 - width or dimeter of pile, 𝑞𝑤𝑝 – point load per unit area at the pile point = ⁄𝐴 , 𝜇𝑠 – Poisson’s
𝑝
ratio of soil and 𝐼𝑤𝑝 – influence factor ≈ 0.85
Vesic (1969) proposed the following simple relationship to obtain the settlement of group piles:
𝐵𝑔
𝑆𝑔(𝑒) = √ 𝐷 𝑆𝑒 [2.20]
where 𝑆𝑔(𝑒) – elastic settlement of group piles, 𝐵𝑔 – width of group pile, D – diameter or width of each pile in
the group, 𝑆𝑒 – elastic settlement of each pile at comparable working load
Equations for consolidation settlement can be used to determine the settlement treating the pile as a block or a
unit. For this purpose, increase in stress, Δσ, needs to be evaluated due to the vertical load Qg. Computation of
stress depends on the type of soil through which pile is installed, and the stresses can be computed based on
the following methods (Figure 1.6):
Case 1: The soil is homogeneous clay (Figure 1.6a). The load Qg is assumed to act on a fictitious footing at a
depth 2/3D from the surface and distributed over the sectional area of the group. The load on the pile group
acting at this level is assumed to spread out at a 4V:1H slope.
Case 2: The pile passes through a very weak layer of depth L1 and the lower portion of length D is embedded
in a strong layer (Figure 1.6b). In this case, the load Qg is assumed to act at a depth equal to 2/3D below the
surface of the strong layer and spreads at a 4V:1H slope
Case 3: The piles are point bearing piles (Figure 1.6c). The load in this case is assumed to act at the level of
the firm stratum.
Where ∆𝜎𝑖′ is increase in effective stress at the middle layer i, Lg and Bg are length and width of pile group,
and Zi is distance from 0 to middle of the ith layer.
The consolidation settlement of each layer can be computed based on:
∆𝑒
∆𝑆𝑐(𝑖) = 𝐻𝑖 [1.22]
1+𝑒0
Where ∆𝑆𝑐(𝑖) is consolidation settlement of layer i, ∆𝑒𝑖 is change in void ratio caused by stress increase in layer
i, 𝑒0(𝑖) is initial void ratio of layer I and Hi is thickness of layer i.
The relationship between changes in void ratio caused by increase in load is given by:
𝜎0′ +∆𝜎′
∆𝑒 = 𝐶𝑐 log [1.23]
𝜎0′