Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
The paper entitled "An analysis of Dr. John Dolittle, the main character in Dolittle movie ”is
to analyze the character of the main character in the Dolittle film, played by Robert Downey Jr. In this
film he plays the main character who is strong but also fragile so badly hit. The writer focuses this
paper on the characteristics and development process of the character Dr. John Dolittle. This character
change begins because of a bad incident that happened to him, from an adventurous, loving, and
helpful person, to being someone who closes himself from the world. The writer analyzes this
character from a psychological aspect through the qualitative method of structuralism and
characteristic theory.
In this paper, the writer finds that the main character has a dynamic character in which this
character has a special change from the beginning of the film to the end. From this research, the writer
found several Dr. John Dolittle was discovered by the writer as a great doctor, strong, adventurous,
helpful, fragile, and traumatized by the death of his wife. This paper is expected to provide more
information about the main character of this film.
Abstrak
Makalah berjudul “An analysis of Dr. John Dolittle, the main character in Dolittle movie”
adalah untuk menganalisis karakter dari pemeran utama di film dolittle yang diperankan oleh Robert
Downey Jr. Dalam film ini dia berperan sebagai pemeran utama yang kuat tetapi juga rapuh begitu
ditimpa keburukan. Penulis memfokuskan makalah ini pada karakteristik dan proses perkembangan
dari karakterPria Dr. John Dolittle. Perubahan karakter ini bermula karena adanya sebuah kejadian
buruk yang menimpanya, dari seorang yang suka berpetualang, penyayang dan penolong, menjadi
seseorang yang menutup diri dari dunia.Penulis menganalisis karakter ini dari aspek psikologi melalui
metode kualitatif teori strukturalisme dan karakteristik.
Dalam Makalah ini, penulis menemukan bahwa sang pemeran utama memiliki karakter
dinamis yang mana karakter ini memiliki perubahan khusus dari awal film hingga akhir. Dari
penelitian ini, penulis menemukan beberapa karakter Dr. John Dolittleyang ditemukan oleh penulis
yaitu dokter hebat, kuat, sang petualang, penolong, rapuh,dan trauma akibat kematian
istrinya.Makalah ini diharapkan dapat memberikan informasi lebih tentang karakter utama dari film
ini.
Therefore, in this paper, the writer chooses a literary film entitled Dolittle as research
material.
Dolittle is a sequel to the film adapted from the children's book series by Hugh Lofting in
1920. Besides, this film is also a reboot of the film Dolittle (1998). This adaptation film was made by
director Stephen Gaghan. This film tells the story of a well-known doctor who treats everything, has a
unique and rare ability to communicate with animals, and likes to travel with his wife and animal
friends. Dr. John is originally a male protagonist who is adventurous and helpful. Until one day his
wife died while on an expedition to remote parts of the world and Dolittle went into exile in his
mansion with his animal companions who didn't want to treat anyone anymore and could not recover
from his wife's death.
This movie was chosen as the object of research because Dolittle has a unique character,
namely the ability to communicate with animals and his intelligence. He is described as a doctor who
is great at treating patients because of the abilities he has and also because of the experiences he has
had while traveling to the islands. Character development is an issue chosen by the writer. This
problem illustrates the change from Dolittle's character from a doctor who famously loves to treat
anyone, to a man who isolates himself from humans. In this paper, the writer focus on Dolittle's
character development using structuralism and characteristic theory. Following the previous
explanation, the purpose of this paper is to describe Dolittle's character and Dolittle's character
development.
Theoritical part
1. Qualitative Approach
Qualitative research methods are research procedures that produce descriptive data
including written or spoken words of observed behavior towards others (quoted in Bogdan and
Taylor 5). A qualitative approach leads to the background and the individual as a whole.
Qualitative research relies on human observation and relates to people in a certain scope (Kirk
and Miller in Moeleong 3). Qualitative research focuses on terms with the values of social
experience and the acquisition of meaning that has not been measured in terms of quantity or
does not involve calculation through statistical procedures.
Qualitative research tends to produce findings obtained through data collected by
various means, such as interviews, observations, documents or archives, and tests. In qualitative
research, it is necessary to go through the stages of a scientific-critical thinking process, namely
thinking inductively to capture facts and social phenomena that occur in the field through
observation. Qualitative methods can assist in conducting in-depth descriptions and analyzes of
a particular case. What is meant by a case here can be a person, a group, a program, an
institution, a certain society, or a certain policy. For example, a case study of a particular school
that has succeeded in becoming a favorite school even though its origin was a school that
experienced many difficulties when it was just founded.
In some fields of study, the use of qualitative approaches or methods is suggested in
studies related to the analysis of experiences of people who change religions, drug dependence,
increased enthusiasm for learning, growing motivation, and so on. Cases like this can
encourage critical-scientific thinking to reveal the reasons behind the incident through
qualitative methods.
2. Structuralism theory
Structuralism is included in the idealistic cultural theory because structuralism
examines thoughts that occur in humans. Structuralism analyzes the human thinking process
from concepts to the emergence of symbols or signs to form a language system.
This structuralism was developed by Ferdinand De Saussure who explained the concept
of language. Structuralism is a concept for analyzing the subject of literary texts such as
actions, characters, stories, themes, and so on (quoted in Pettit 42). This structuralism approach
is suggested to be used in narrative elements such as character development, plot, and thematic.
3. Intrinsik Element
According to Wellek and Warren, in starting the interpretation and analysis of the
content of literary works, the intrinsic elements are the starting point before continuing further
analysis (139). These intrinsic elements present the main content of literary works such as plot,
characters, settings, themes, and points of view. Chatman explains in his book Narrative Fiction
that narrative is built through two basic components, namely story and writing (18).
This intrinsic element is very important in making literary works to build a whole story.
The intrinsic element is the element that builds the literary work itself (quoted in Nurgiyanto
23)
3.1. Character
Character is important for life because it is one part of every human being. Character
is required in the intrinsic element (quoted in Rosenheim 79). A character can carry moral,
emotional, and appearance values. According to Chatman character is "a process for analyzing
natural human actions, actions that include attitudes using narrative elements" (108).
A character has a relationship with the plot, setting, and point of view. Likewise,
characters and points of view show relationships by influencing the character itself through the
perspectives of other characters. Characters play an important role in making the stories in
films look more alive (quoted in Pope 86). A character in the movie has an important role and a
big influence to represent important things. For example, conveyed through the various moral
messages contained in the movie.
3.2. Characterization
Characterization is the process of creating a character or feature in a narrative (quoted in
Chatman (60). There are two types of characterization, namely direct and indirect. The process
shown by the narrator through actual words and distinctive adjectives is called direct
characterization, and the process that is shown through speech and thought by the character is
called indirect characteristics (Chatman 61).
Characterization is needed in literary works to build characters, such as in terms of
appearance, speech, and conversation. DiYanni states that characterization is "the way the
writer presents and expresses the character" (56). According to this definition, it can be
concluded that characterization can expose the characteristics of each character a player has
according to the author's creations.
There is also an understanding according to Kenan "characterization as part of a literary
element that explains character traits" (61). Kenan “divided four indicators of indirect
presentation they are action, speech, external appearance and environment”. Action is a trait
where the character shows an action. Kenan explains that "these actions are added to one of
three categories consisting of commission actions (something that a character does), acts of
neglect (something the character shouldn't have done), and contemplated actions (unrealized
plans or intentions of characters)" (63).
While speech is an indicator that presents indirectly in a conversation, usually showing
character traits through content and form (Kenan 64). Speech style is a way to show
characterization in narrative text with accented language of characters describing these
characteristics (quoted in Kenan 64).
Furthermore, characterization can also be demonstrated through style. This style can be
shown through the origin, place of residence, social class, and even profession. Outward
appearance is usually an indicator used to describe traits through outward appearance, namely
the physical appearance of a character including character, clothing, and appearance (quoted in
Kenan 67)
Through characterization in literary works, writers can develop characters and create
character images for the audience in a literary work. Besides, according to Bennet and Royle,
"the writer can express his character in a work of fiction or a characterization method" (65).
Also, it is very helpful for analyzing the development of the main character.
3.6. Setting
According to Chatman, this one intrinsic element is in the form of an interpretation of
the place or background of the incident that describes how an event could have happened (63).
5. Conclusion
The writer concludes the characteristics of this character through two theories. First, the
writer found several characteristics in Dr. John Dolittle by using the characteristic theory. The
writer found the characteristics possessed by Dr. John Dolittle were kind, great, helpful,
compassionate, strong, fragile, courageous, and adventurous. From this, it can be concluded
that he has different characters. These characters are depicted directly and indirectly through
their actions, speech, external appearance, and environment.
The writer found the influence of intrinsic elements on character development through
the method of structuralism theory. The intrinsic element contained in this movie is the plot
which makes the characterization of the main character develop and change. The plot of the
story describes the transformation process from the development of the characters from
beginning to end. At first, Dr. John is described as a well-known doctor who likes to treat
anyone and likes to take new journeys. Then, the death of his wife had a bad impact on Dr.
John. He isolated himself from the world. Besides, the point of view of his father-in-law made
him feel guilty about his wife's death.
Furthermore, the character Dr. John is again transformed into a great and brave figure
to come out of the worst times. This is influenced by the intrinsic element of setting the place in
which the incident occurred. That incident made Dr. John faced his trauma so that he finally
came to terms with the situation.
Thus, it can be concluded that structuralism theory and characteristic theory are highly
recommended for analyzing film literature. The contents of these literary works can be
analyzed through actions, speech, outward appearance, and environment.
References
Hasanah, Anisa Nur, Muhammad Natsir dan Setya Ariani. “Character development of agatha
prenderghast in cody kimmel's paranorman novel.” English literature department and
faculty of cultural sciences mulawarman university (2018): 268-265.
Nugrahani, Farida. Metode penelitian kualitatif dalam penelitian pendidikan bahasa. Surakarta,
2014.
Putri, Cindy. “The characterization of the main character in gone girl film.” (2017).
Wulansari, Citra Dita Septi dan Arif Hidayat. “Characterization analysis of the main character of the
secret garden (A comparative study of characterization in the movie an novel).” (2016):
2086-6151.