Electronics and Telecommunication Programme(UG)

Welcomes Honorable NBA Committee

12th February 2016
 Outline of Presentation

Part 1 Departmental Profile

Part 2 Presentation As Per NBA Guidelines

Part 3 Conclusion and Overall Improvement

2
 Mission Vision Statement: Institute and Department

Institute Vision: Institute Mission:

Thakur College of Engineering and To provide state of the art infrastructure and right academic
Technology will excel in Technical ambience for developing professional skills as well as an
Education to become an environment for growth of leadership and managerial skills to
internationally renowned premier students which will make them competent engineers to deliver
Institute of Engineering and quality results in industry.
Technology.

Department Vision: Department Mission:

The department of Electronics and
Telecommunication Engineering
envisions developing internationally
competent professionals with a
sense of responsibility and social
sensitivity.
To impart professional education endowed with human values
using active learning techniques to transform the students to
be competent and committed engineers meeting the current
and future demands and capable of providing engineering
solutions with social sensitivity.
3
 Department Profile

Ranked Amber
in 3i survey
66% faculty conducted by
have AICTE-CII in AY
Two Rank experience 14-15.
Holders since higher than 5
Consistent 2010 years in TCET
placement
Consistent 70% faculty
record , and is
Irrespective of Improvement in have more than
above 80% out
Market trends & success rate. 5 years as a
of Eligible
Condition, the whole.
students.
department is able
to attract students
and fill up all the
seats.

4
 Classrooms in the Department

 6 classrooms
 Exclusive with capacity of 74
 Black Board, LCD
Projector, LAN/Internet
Connection, Laptop
 Well illuminated, good air
circulation with large windows
on one wall.

5
Laboratories in the Department to meet the
Curriculum Requirements and the POs

Laboratories Facilities:
 Number :-15  Air Conditioned
 Area :-  Well Illuminated
 10 X 37.11 sq. mtr.  111 PCs with internet
connection
 4 X 74.25 sq. mtr.  Whiteboard / Blackboard
 1 X 87.36 sq. mtr.  Soft boards 6
 Faculty Qualification

Year B.E./B.Tech M.E./M.Tech Pursuing Ph.D Ph.D

2011-12 7 12 9 1
2012-13 3 15 9 3
2013-14 3 11 8 7
2014-15 1 19 8 5
2015-16 2 20 6 7

7
Number of faculty

30 1 3 5
9 7 8 6 Ph.D
9
members

20 8 Pursuing Ph.D
12 15 19 20
10 11 M.E./M.Tech
7 3 3 2
0 1 B.E./B.Tech
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

7
 Faculty Experience in TCET

Year 2015-16

less than 1 year

28%
1 to 2 years of
experience
4 to 5 years of
3% experience
66% 3%
More than 5 years of
experience

8
 Student Entry and Exit profile
Exit:
At the time of Pass out 2014-15
Min Marks score in 4th Year: 890/1550(57.41%)
Max marks score in 4th Year: 1239/1550(79.93%)
79.93%

71%

57.41%
24.5%

Entry Year-2011-12 Exit Year-2014-15

During admission in 2011-12
Min CET Marks: 49/200(24.5%)
Max CET Marks: 142/200(71%) 10
Part 2 Presentation As Per NBA Guidelines

• Programme Educational Objectives, participation of

Constituents, Level of implementation

• Overview of Course Content delivery, course outcome

assessment and evaluation methods

• Overview of Assessment and evaluation of Program

Outcomes

• Curriculum Design and Revision, and Program Specific

Criteria

• Academic Performance of students, participation in

professional activities and their achievements

• Faculty development and research activity

11
 Programme Educational Objectives

1. Process of Establishment.
2. PEO of the Program.
Vision Mission PEO
3. Participation of constituents.
4. Level of PEO Implementation.

13
 Process for establishing the PEOs
Regulating Affiliating
Management
and Accrediting bodies

Industry,
Students,
Parents,
Faculty,
Alumni,
Society

14
 Programme Educational Objectives(PEO)

 PE0-1: To provide students with a strong foundation in the

mathematical, scientific and engineering fundamentals
 PEO-2: To prepare students to demonstrate ability to identify,
formulate and solve electronics and telecommunication
engineering problems.
 PEO-3: To prepare students to demonstrate ability to design
electrical and electronics systems and conduct experiments,
analyse and interpret data.
 PEO-4: To develop the ability amongst students to synthesize data
and technical concepts from applications to product design. 15
 Programme Educational Objectives(PEO)

 PEO-5: To prepare students for a successful career in the industry, by

identifying the gaps between the curriculum and the industry
requirement.
 PEO-6: To provide opportunity to the students to work as part of teams
on multidisciplinary projects, including presentation skills, technical
writing and communication skills.
 PEO-7: To motivate and prepare the students for higher studies and
specialization.
 PEO-8: To promote awareness amongst students for life-long learning
and to inculcate in them professional and ethical attitude, good leadership
qualities and commitment to social responsibilities. 16
 Programme Educational Objectives

Deals Attained
with by
University
Foundation for
Achieved PEO1 Basic
curriculum of first
by Year
Implemented
through

Vision Mission * Ability to

identify, formulate and
solve engineering
PEO2 problems, University
Achieved * Design electrical and curriculum of
by
PEO3 electronics systems Second to Final
PEO4 * Develop the ability Year
amongst to students
synthesize data and
technical concepts
17
 Programme Educational Objectives
Deals with

Prepare students for successful

PEO5 career in the industry Attained
Achieved by through

Deals with
Implemented Campus
Provide opportunity for students to
through
PEO6 connect,
work as part of teams
Bridge
Vision Mission Deals with courses
, Co-
Motivate and prepare the students curricular
PEO7
for higher studies and specialization. activities
& Extra
Deals with curricular
Inculcate in students professional activities
PEO8 and ethical attitude, good leadership
qualities

18
 PEO-Level of Implementation

Tools Criteria Goals Achievements

Education in EXTC prepared At least 50 % of the

me in Theoretical knowledge respondents should 85%
Alumni Survey
of math, science and agree and strongly
engineering agree

PEO1 How many students

FE-70% FE-63.18%
Passed

University
Results How many students passed
50% of those passed 71.02%
with Distinction /First class
19
 PEO-Level of Implementation

Tools Criteria Goals Achievements

75%
At least 50 % of the
Education in EXTC prepared me in respondents should agree
Alumni Identifying, formulating, and and strongly agree
Survey solving problems 82.5%

Above 70%
SE-55.56%
PEO2 Corporate Practical use of Knowledge and skills
TE- 85.4%
Feedback
SE-75% BE- 89.4%
TE- 85%
How many students Passed BE- 90%
University SE-79.8%
Results How many students passed with TE- 78.3%
50% of those passed BE- 80.5%
Distinction/First class
20
 PEO-Level of Implementation

Tools Criteria Goals Achievements

Education at EXTC prepared me in At least 50 % of the

analyzing and interpreting data respondents should agree and 62%
strongly agree
Alumni Survey
Education at EXTC prepared me in
designing a product to meet At least 50 % of the
requirements respondents should agree and 45%
PEO3 strongly agree

Education in EXTC prepared me in the use

Corporate of Modern engineering At least 50 % of the
equipment, software and tools respondents should agree and 62%
Feedback strongly agree

Practical use of Knowledge and skills

Above 70% 82.5%

21
 PEO-Level of Implementation

Tools Criteria Goals Achievements

At least 50 % of the
Education at EXTC prepared me in Designing a 45%
respondents should agree and
product to meet requirements
strongly agree
Alumni Survey
Education at EXTC prepared me in engineering
techniques and skills (practical ability in applying At least 50 % of the
skills) respondents should agree and 72%
strongly agree
PEO4
Education in EXTC prepared me in the use of
Modern engineering equipment, software and
At least 50 % of the
tools 62%
respondents should agree and
Corporate strongly agree
Feedback Education at EXTC prepared me in the ability to
analyze and design complex systems using At least 50 % of the
hardware and software components respondents should agree and 48%
strongly agree

Practical use of Knowledge and skills

Above 70% 82.5%
22
 PEO-Level of implementation

Tools Criteria Goals Achievements

At least 50 % of the
Alumni Education in EXTC prepared respondents should 60 %
Survey me for employment. agree and strongly
agree

PEO5

Number of students 95% of B.E. 2011 - 86.09%

Placement placed in campus interview students who have 2012 - 78.63%
during Graduation secured first class 2013 - 76.42%

23
 PEO-Level of implementation
Tools Criteria Goals Achievements

Education at EXTC prepared me in oral At least 50 % of the

communication respondents should agree 69%
and strongly agree
Alumni Survey

At least 50 % of the
Education at EXTC prepared me in 66%
respondents should agree
written Communication
and strongly agree

PEO6
At least 50 % of the
Education at EXTC prepared me for 76%
respondents should agree
multi-disciplinary Team Work
and strongly agree

Corporate Team spirit Above 70% 87.5%

Feedback

Communication skills Above 70% 87.5%

24
 PEO-Level of Implementation

Tools Criteria Goals Achievements

Education at EXTC At least 50 % of the

prepared me for Higher respondents should 57%
agree and strongly
Education agree

PEO7 Alumni Survey

Did TCET prepare you for At least 20% from

60 %
higher studies usual respondent

25
 PEO-Level of Implementation

Tools Criteria Goals Achievements

Did you pursue advanced At least 20% from

60%
education after graduating usual respondent
Alumni from TCET?
Survey At least 50 % of the
Education at EXTC prepared me for respondents should agree 72%
Lifelong Learning and strongly agree

Education at EXTC
PEO8 At least 50 % of the 68%
prepared me for Ethical and respondents should agree
Professional Behaviour and strongly agree

Education at EXTC prepared me in 47%

Understanding societal impact of At least 30 % of the
engineering solutions respondents should agree
Corporate
and strongly agree
Feedback 77.5% & 90%
Initiative, Eagerness to respectively
learn new things Above 70%

88%
Communication skills Above 70%
26
 Level of Implementation

 Summary and steps to Improve

Level of Level of
Gaps in Steps towards
PEO Implementation Implementation
Implementation Improvement
(Before) (After)
Bridge course on
Product development 45% Electronic product
PEO 3 82%
training is rated low development is
initiated.
Ability to analyze and
design complex systems Bridge course on
PEO 4 using hardware and 48% Computer Networks 59%
software components is started.
which is rated low

27
 Course Overview
Content Delivery, Outcome Assessment and
Evaluation Methods

28
 Course Objectives and Outcomes

 University of Mumbai provided course objectives and

course outcomes for all courses from curriculum.

 In our courses we have rewritten course outcomes in

measurable forms.

 We aligned content delivery and assessment with course

outcomes.
29
 Example of course objectives and Course Outcomes
Image and Video Processing (Sem VII) (ETC701)

Course Objectives:-
 To cover the fundamentals and mathematical models in digital image and video processing.
 To develop time and frequency domain techniques for image enhancement.
 To expose the students to current technologies and issues in image and video processing.
 To develop image and video processing applications in practice.
Course outcomes:-
Students will be able to
 Understand theory and models in Image and Video Processing.
 Interpret and analyze 2D signals in frequency domain through image transforms.
 Apply quantitative models of image and video processing for various engineering applications.
 Develop innovative design for practical applications in various fields.
30
 Example of course objectives and Course Outcomes
Image and Video Processing (Sem VII) (ETC701)

University Defined course outcomes Modified course outcomes

Students will be able to: Students will be able to:

 Understand theory and models in
Image and Video Processing.
 Interpret and analyze 2D signals in
frequency domain through image
transforms.
 Apply quantitative models of image
and video processing for various
engineering applications.
 Develop innovative design for practical
applications in various fields.
 List the elements of a Digital Image processing system and
also describe the formation of digital images in a computer.
 Calculate the transform of a given image and also the inverse
transform
 Describe and perform image enhancement in spatial and
frequency domain.
 Describe image segmentation techniques and also describe
Morphological tools
 Describe Image Restoration Techniques
 Describe Video formation, Perception and Representation
and also describe 2D Motion Estimation
31
 Content Delivery Mode

Use of Visuals
such as Lectures
Classroom PPTS, Diagrams Interspersed
etc. with discussion
explanations

e-resources
Lab courses and Online
learning

Group Projects
Demonstration
activity /Presentations
32
 Example

 OPTSIM is software for simulation of optical network.

 Course Outcome:- Students should be able to simulate an
optical network and analyse the network performance.
 e-resource :- OPTSIM introduction tutorial is designed.

33
 Course Outcomes Assessment and
Evaluation Method

 Direct:- Internal Assessment

 Two term tests with questions mapped to course
outcomes
 Indirect:- Course Survey
 Survey questions based on attainment of CO.

34
 Example of Course Outcome Attainment
Image Processing (Sem VIII)(ETC804)
Course Outcomes
1. Students should be able to list the elements of a Digital Image processing system and also
describe the formation of digital images in a computer.

2. Students should be able to calculate the transform of a given image and also the inverse
transform

3. Students should be able to describe and perform image enhancement in spatial and
frequency domain.

4. Students should be able to describe lossless and lossy image compression principles and
techniques.

5. Students should be able to describe image segmentation techniques based on

Discontinuities and Similarities and also describe image restoration models and techniques.
35
 Blueprint for Term Test I

Sr. Marks
Question
No.
CO1 CO2 CO3 Total marks
1 Q1 (a) 05
10
2 Q1 (b) 05
3 Q2 10 10
4 Q3 10 10
5 Q4 10 10
6 Q5 10 10
Total Marks 15 10 25 50
36
 Course Attainment of IP

CO CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5

Percentage
64.89 70.11 52.22 35.89 60.26
Attainment

37
 PO Attainment through CO direct assessment

PO-1 PO-2 PO-3 PO-4 PO-5 PO-6 PO-7 PO-8 PO-9 PO-10
✓
CO-1

✓ ✓ ✓
CO-2 ✓ ✓ ✓
Image ✓ ✓ ✓
Processing CO-3 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

CO-4 ✓

CO-5 ✓

Attainment for IP 61.16 61.17 61.16 56.67 52.22 61.16 61.16

38
 CO attainment –Indirect assessment

• The students’ response to each question is one of the five:

Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, and Strongly Agree.

• The responses in which the students either agree or strongly

agree to a certain outcome are only considered towards
attainment.

• The student perception of the outcomes attained is then

considered as an indirect way of measurement of attainment of
Programme Outcomes.
40
 CO Attainment through course survey

Course Course
Survey Questions based on CO Outcomes (CO) attainment
mapped (sample size = 50)

1. I am able to list the elements of a Digital Image processing system and also CO-1 88 %
describe the formation of digital images in a computer.
2. I am able to calculate the transform of a given image and also the inverse CO-2 94 %
transform
3. I am able to describe and perform image enhancement in spatial and CO-3 90 %
frequency domain.
4. I am able to describe lossless and lossy image compression principles and CO-4 88 %
techniques.
5. I am able to describe image segmentation techniques based on
Discontinuities and Similarities and also describe image restoration models CO-5 88 %
and techniques.
41
 PO attainment through Course survey

PO-1 PO-2 PO-3 PO-4 PO-5 PO-6 PO-7 PO-8 PO-9 PO-10
CO-1 ✓

CO-2 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Image CO-3 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Processing
CO-4 ✓

CO-5 ✓

Attainment for IP 92% 92% 92% 90% 92% 92%

42
 CO Attainment : Summary

CO attainment CO attainment
Course Outcomes through Direct through Indirect
Assessment Assessment
Students should be able to list the elements of a Digital Image
processing system and also describe the formation of digital images 64.89 % 88 %
in a computer.
Students should be able to calculate the transform of a given image
70.11 % 94 %
and also the inverse transform
Students should be able to describe and perform image
52.22 % 90 %
enhancement in spatial and frequency domain.
Students should be able to describe lossless and lossy image
35.89 % 88 %
compression principles and techniques.
Students should be able to describe image segmentation
techniques based on Discontinuities and Similarities and also 60.26 % 88 %
describe image restoration models and techniques.
44
PO- Overview on Assessment and Evaluation

45
 PO-Overview on Assessment and Evaluation

Programme Outcomes(PO)
1. Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics (differential equations, vector
calculus, complex variables, matrix theory, probability theory), science
(physics, chemistry, EVS etc.), and engineering (electrical, electronics,
mechanical etc.).
2. Ability to design and perform experiments as well as analyse and interpret
data.
3. Ability to design, simulate and test a system to meet desired specification.
4. Ability to apply the knowledge of electrical and electronic circuits, computer
programming, analogue and digital electronics, principles of communication
engineering, data communications, and telecommunications systems in the
solution of engineering problems. 46
 Programme Outcomes(PO)-CONTD

5. Ability to function on multidisciplinary teams for projects.

6. Ability to communicate effectively in both verbal and written form.
7. Ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a
global/societal context.
8. Ability to recognize of the need for and ability to engage in lifelong
learning and understanding of professional and ethical responsibility.
9. Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice.
10. Ability to participate and succeed in competitive examinations like GATE,
GRE etc. and also professional practice examinations at various levels.
47
PO-Overview on Assessment and Evaluation

48
 Attainment of Program Outcomes

Direct
Attainment of Assessment
Programme
Outcomes Indirect
Assessment

49
 Attainment of Program Outcomes

Course Direct
PO
Assessment 1-4, 6-7, 9-10
(Term test)

Student PO
Validation 1-4,6-10
Direct
Assessment
University PO
result 1-4

PO
Projects
1-9

Assessment and evaluation of PO for all tools is shown for 2011-2015 batch 50
 PO Attainment through Direct Assessment
(Term Test)

Frequency
Details of Description of process of PO Data
tools (ISO Process Reference) occurrence attained collection
of process

After the
Course Direct Average assessment of CO
end of the PO 1-4, 6- Term Test I
Assessment attainment for Term Test 1
every 7, 9-10 & II
(Term Test) and Term Test 2
semester

51
 PO Attainment through Direct Assessment
(Term Test)

Course
80.00
Assessment
70.00
Percent Attainment

60.00 53.56
46.93 48.92 46.98 46.98 47.42
50.00 43.26 42.98
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PO outcomes

52
 PO Attainment through student validation

Frequency of
Details of Description of process PO
occurrence Data collection
tools (ISO Process Reference) attained
of process
Term Test I
& II,
Learning of the student
After the University
can be monitored by the
Student end of the 1,2,3,4, Marks
faculty members on the
Validation every 6,7,9,10 (previous),
basis of profiling of the
semester Term Work
students
Marks &
Attendance

53
 PO Attainment through students validation

Attainment through students validation

100
85.38 87.30 85.43 87.11 89.12
90 84.53 83.83
81.36
Students validation score

80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10 Students
validation format
0
PO-1 PO-2 PO-3 PO-4 PO-5 PO-6 PO-7 PO-8 PO-9 PO-10
Programme Outcomes
54
 PO Attainment through University Results

Frequency
Description of process
Details of of PO Data
(ISO Process
tools occurrence attained collection
Reference)
of process
Number of students
University
University passed ,no.of students
Annually 1,2,3,4 result
results passed with first class,
gazette
success rate

56
 University Results (mapping of PO1,2,3,4)

University Results
100
90.18
Success
87.21
90
77.02
84.36 Rate=0.85
80 71.81 70.59
70 62.99 63.5
% of students

60
50
40
30 Overall result
20 First class and Distinction
10
0
Includes
First Class
FE SE TE BE and
Distinction
May-12 May-13 May-14 May-15 both
Year of passing

57
 PO Attainment through Projects

Frequency
Details of Description of Process of PO Data
Tools (ISO Process Reference) occurrence Attained Collection
of process
Project categorized into
best and average projects
1,2,3,4,5,6, Project
Project based on Rubrics and Annually
7,8,9 evaluation
project evaluation done
above 85%

58
 Project Evaluation (Batch 2011-2015)
Quality Method

Quality of projects -Best,average and poor

9%
29%
Best
Average
Poor

62%

59
Project evaluation Overall

Overall project evaluation

24%
Below 85%
Above 85%
76%

60
 Attainment of Program Outcomes

Course PO
Survey 1-10
Indirect
Assessment
Exit PO
Survey 1-10
61
 Example question from course survey and PO
attainments through course survey

Course name:- Data Compression and Encryption (SEM-VII)(ETC 705)

Programme Outcomes
Course
Survey Questions
Outcomes
based on CO/PO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(CO) mapped

I am able to describe
and compute different
source coding
techniques for
text compression and CO-1 91 91 91 91 91
also evaluate the
efficiency and
performance of the
coding techniques.

62
 Attainment of Program Outcomes

Course PO
Survey 1-10
Indirect
Assessment
Exit PO
Survey 1-10
64
Response analysis of Programme
Exit Survey-Example

66
 PO attainment through all tools

Measurement of Attainment of Programme Outcomes through various tools

Direct Assessment Indirect Assessment

Programme
Outcome Average
Direct Project Evaluation
University Student Course Attainment
Assessment Exit Survey
Results Validation Best/Average Overall Survey
(Term Tests)
project project
1 53.56 62.99 81.36 28.57 75.95 78.25 86.10 66.68
2 46.93 83.07 85.38 28.57 75.95 76.23 88.20 69.19
3 43.26 83.07 87.30 28.57 75.95 49.32 85.60 64.72
4 48.92 83.07 84.53 28.57 75.95 70.64 84.80 68.07
5 28.57 75.95 63.40 84.90 63.21
6 46.98 85.43 28.57 75.95 79.18 84.90 66.83
7 42.98 87.11 28.57 75.95 77.50 85.60 66.28
8 28.57 75.95 73.10 84.80 65.61
9 46.98 89.12 28.57 75.95 77.79 86.20 67.43
10 47.42 83.83 79.23 83.60 73.52 67
 Attainment of Program Outcomes

Overall PO Attainment
76.00
73.52
74.00
72.00
% Attainments

70.00 69.19
68.07
68.00 66.83 67.43
66.68 66.28
66.00 65.61
64.72
64.00 63.21
62.00
60.00
58.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Programme outcomes
68
 Correlation Between POs and PEOs

Programme Programme Educational Objectives

Outcomes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 ✓
2 ✓ ✓
3 ✓ ✓
4 ✓ ✓ ✓
5 ✓ ✓
6 ✓ ✓
7 ✓
8 ✓ ✓
9 ✓ ✓ ✓
10 ✓ ✓ ✓ 69
 PEO Attainment through PO

Programme Programme Educational Objectives

Outcomes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 66.68
2 69.19 69.19
3 64.72 64.72
4 68.06 68.06 68.06
5 63.20 63.20
6 66.83 66.83
7 66.28
8 65.60 65.60
9 67.43 67.43 67.43

10 73.51 73.51 73.51

Average 51.71 68.06 67.32 67.35 66.83 65.82 68.84 67.14

70
Curriculum Design and Revision ,
Programme specific Criteria

71
 Program Specific criteria
Specific criteria for
programme
Mathematics Basic Engineering topics
Need of through sciences required to design
probability and differential and systems
statistics and its integral calculus
application

AE-I,AE-II, Logic
Curriculum design, circuit theory
courses like Applied and transmission
RSA,DCOM, I maths Basic lines
mage sciences
processing UOM syllabus fulfils programme
etc. specific criteria requirements 72
 Curriculum Design & Revision
Steps to identify gaps of
curriculum to meet PO
PO mapping with theory and lab courses.
Comparison of AICTE prescribed
components and its credits with existing
university curriculum components and its
credits.
Alumni feedback through Alumni survey
Identified Gaps
University curriculum suffice
PO1,2,3,4,6,9,10, but it does not contribute
to PO 5,7,8.
Less number of credits available for
Humanities & Social Science and Electives
1. Gap between industry requirements
and Curriculum
2. Need of project at second year level.
3. Need of soft skill development training
facility of internship.
4. Need of Entrepreneurship cell
Steps taken to bridge the gap
• Bridge courses and Infosys Campus
Connect Programmes started to
fulfil this gap.
• Domain specific bridge courses
initiated.
• Workshop and seminars related to
domain are conducted.
• Student development Programme
started which includes soft skills
training.
• Project competition IC THE FUTURE
started for second year students.
73
 Bridge Courses

Computer
Networks

Electronic
Product
Development

Introduction
to Scilab

74
 Academic Performance of students,
participation in Professional Activities
and their Achievements

75
 Admission intake in the program

Students
Sanctioned Intake (120) + Lateral Entry (24)

Placement Professional
and Higher Development
Studies &
Academic performance(API ) Achievements
Success rate

76
 Success Index

Item
Approximating the API by the
LYG LYG LYG LYG-1 Success Index
following mid-point
2011- 2010- 2009- 2008- 1
Analysis (Final year:% to CGPA 0.85
12 11 10 09 0.81
conversion: Given on back of mark 0.76
0.8
sheet)
Number of students admitted in 0.6
the corresponding First Year +
159 144 143 143
admitted via lateral entry in 2nd 0.4
year
0.2
Number of students who have
136 116 109 117
graduated in the stipulated period 0
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
Success index (SI) 0.85 0.81 0.76 0.80 Success Index

78
 Academic performance Index(API)

Academic Performance
16

14

12

10

0
2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-10 2008-09 2007-08
API 7.4 7.39 7.54 7.37 7.28
Assessment 14.8 14.78 15.08 14.74 14.56

79
 BE RESULTS

BE Result BE Result with First Class

93.8 94.12 100

100 89.26
90 91.03 90.74
90
90
90 90

Students Passing with First Class

77.78 84.09 84.36
90 90 80 74.38
80

80.26 70
Passing Percentage

70
60
60
50 50 50
50
40 50 50 50
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015
May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015

TCET Result ISO Requirment % Passing TCET Result ISO Requirment % Passed

80
 TE RESULTS

TE Result TE Result with First Class

100 91.89 100

Students Passing with First Class

90 85 85 89.7 85.61 84.75
90 82.35
85 85
80 86.76 80.67
Passing Percentage

85.03 85 80
67.48 77.02
70 70
60 60
50 50 50 50
40 40 50 50 50
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015
TCET Result ISO Requirment % Passed TCET Result ISO Requirment % Passed

Examination Distinction First Class

May 2015 38 (31.93%) 58(48.73%)
(above GPA 7.75) (above GPA 6.75 & < GPA 7.75)
May 2014 70(47.30%) 44(29.73%)
(above GPA 7.75) (above GPA 6.75 & < GPA 7.75)
May 2013 57(41.91%) 55(40.44%)
May 2012 57(48.31%) 43(36.44%)
May 2011 34(27.64%) 49(39.84%)
81
 SE RESULTS

SE Result SE Result with First Class

100 100

Students Passing with First Class

90 90
86.87
75 75 75 80 81.82 83
80
Passing Percentage

75 75
70 70 70.59 68.69
77.27
63.46 60
60
63.86 55.56
50 50 50 50 50 50 50
53.1
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015
TCET Result ISO Requirment % Passed
TCET Result ISO Requirment % Passed

Examination Distinction First Class

May 2015 30(33.33% ) 39 (39.39%)
(above GPA 7.75) (above GPA 6.75 & < GPA 7.75)
May 2014 51 (60 % ) 34(40% )
(above GPA 7.75) (above GPA 6.75 & < GPA 7.75)
May 2013 29(24.37%) 55(46.22%)
May 2012 27(35.06%) 36(46.75%)
May 2011 36(36.36%) 50(50.51%)
82
 FE RESULTS

FE Result FE Result with First Class

98.87
100 100
96.65
90 90

Students Passing with First Class

80 80 81.57
70 70 70
Passing Percentage

70 70 70 70 63.5
63.48 57.47
60 60
62.99 50.69
50 61.14
50 50 50
40 48.02 50 50 50
40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015 May 2011 May 2012 May 2013 May 2014 May 2015
TCET Result ISO Requirment % Passing
TCET Result ISO Requirment % Passed

83
 Comparison of BE results with
University results

BE Result Comparison with University

100
90
80

Passing Percentage
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 Jan-15

May-12 May-13 May-14 May-15

College Result 94.03 80.67 91.03 90.74
University Result 87 86.49 86.43 87.78

84
Programme Toppers (2015)

85
 Student Placement

Placement
120
100 2015-16
No of Students

80
 Maximum Salary: Rs. 4.50
60 Lacs p.a.
40
 Minimum Salary: Rs. 1.44
20
Lacs p.a.
0
Eligible Camp. Place Off. Camp Total Placed
Average Salary: Rs. 3.19
2015-16 94 70 0 70 Lacs p.a.
2014-15 105 90 10 100
2013-14 102 71 13 84
2012-13 106 81 0 81
86
 Higher Studies

Higher Studies
40

35

30
No of Students

25

20

15

10

0
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Higher Studies 18 30 33 35

87
 Professional Activities & Achievements

Odd Semester
Academic Orientation TCET-MUN Inter Zephyr-Inter Collegiate
NSS Residential Camp
Programme (AOP) Collegiate/ School Technical Festival
[December]
[July] [September] [September]

Even Semester
Academic Tspark Enertia Soujorn
Orientation
Multicon-W, E-WEEK
Event of EDC ICWET, IOW Annual Annual Cultural
Programme
(AOP) [January ] cell [February] [February] [February] Sports Event Event [March]
[March]

88
 Students Professional Activities
STUDENTS ACTIVITIES

Seminars EDC
R&D and CELL
Activities •• B.E
Workshop PROJECT exhibition
• It willof the
IC THE FUTURE is• a The objective provide a
conference is
showcases
miniproject the projects
to made platform together
bring for the the
by Final Year
competition forstudents students, researchers
while
2nd specialists, experts from different
encouraging and faculty
year students.them to develop
fields and eminent personalities
NEN
innovative ideas. acquainted
CII with the
IOW, IEE from currentindustries,
trends and research
• SDPEach team is required
E, institutes,to government
MULTICON practices in industrial
IC THE MINDS EYE
AND design, construct and operate
organizations and academicians
‘Industry Oriented .
FUTURE Project
ICWET a prototype. • National
competition
EDC Entrepreneurship
Workshop’
was developed is
in
proposed
Network (NEN) Membership in
A. Y. 2014-2015 for
MULTICON.
in TCET
• The Confederation of Indian Industry was taken with a
creating awareness
(CII) organized events: mission to inspire, educate and
support among high the students
potential
Starting your own start up regarding
entrepreneurs to create of
entrepreneurship
high-value jobs. as a
career option.
89
 Students Professional Activities

Students Publications in
OUTCOMES OF STUDENTS ACTIVITIES
the year
Prizes Shared in the Year
2014-15: 4
2013-14: 6
2013-14: 3 2012-13: 4
Prizes won in the Year
R&D
2012-13: 5 Activities 2011-12:
2014-15: 3 2 Events Organized by
2011-12: 8 Technical 2013-14: 3 Professional Society in
Paper 2012-13: 3 the year
Presentation 2014-15: 7
2011-12: 4
2013-14: 6
2012-13: 9
2011-12: 6
MINDS EYE 2010-11: 6
Project MULTICON
IC THE competition AND ICWET
FUTURE

HIGHER
STUDIES

90
 Students Activities And Outcomes

OUTCOMES OF STUDENTS ACTIVITIES

Seminars and
IEEE Seminars / Workshop
Workshops conducted Number of students participated in
2014-15: 7 IOW
2013-14: 3 2014: 342
2012-13: 6 2013: 318
IOW, IEEE
, SDP
SDP Seminars/Workshops
conducted
2014-15 : 3
2013-14 : 2
PLACEMENTS 2012-13 : 1
TO THE
INDUSTRY

91
 Technical Seminar (2015-16)

Students Lectures
Seminar Topics Year Duration PEO PO
Attended Conducted

1 Basics of networking SE 92 2Hrs 28/01/16 2,4,8 4,6

TE
2 Industrial Automation
BE
206 2Hrs 27/01/16 2,4,5 1,2,7,9

BE
3 Conference Paper writing
ME
27 1.5Hrs 14/01/16 6,8 5,6,8,10

Students Lectures
Seminar Topics Year Duration PEO PO
Attended Conducted

1 Project management BE 113 2Hrs 30/07/15 5,6 3,4,7

Practical applications of
2 Signal Processing
TE 128 2Hrs 31/07/15 5 2,3,7,9

Need of Electronics for

3 Electronic Engineer
SE 107 2Hrs 30/07/15 5 2,3,4,7
92
 Technical Seminar (2014-15)
Students Lectures
Seminar Topics Year Duration PEO PO
Attended Conducted
Project Selection for Final Year
1 BE 80 2Hrs 29-01-15 5,6 4, 5, 6, 8, 9
Engineering Students
2 Harmful effects of Mobile and WiFi BE 80 2Hrs 29-01-15 2,8 8,9
3 Raspberry pi TE 108 2Hrs 06-02-15 2,3,4 1,2,7,9
4 Computer Networking TE 48 2Hrs 05-02-15 2,4,5 2,3,4,7
Bridging the gap in Telecom & IT
5 SE 81 2Hrs 05-02-15 5 2,3,4,7
sector
6 Higher studies after Engineering TE 124 1Hr. 24-02-2015 7 8,9,10

Students Lectures
Seminar Topics Year Duration PEO PO
Attended Conducted

1 Project Research & Innovation BE 84 2Hrs 01-08-14 5,6 4, 5, 6, 8, 9

BE
2 Project management 101 2Hrs 01-08-14 5,6 4, 5, 6, 8, 9
TE
Need of Electronics for Electronic
3 SE 102 2Hrs 01-08-14 5 2,3,4,7
Engineer 93
 Technical Seminar (2013-14)

Students Lectures
Seminar Topics Year Duration PEO PO
Attended Conducted

Ethical Hacking and

1
Network Security
BE 96 2Hrs 18-03-14 5,7 7, 8, 9

2 Future Engineering Trends TE 114 2Hrs 23-01-14 5,7 7,8

Application of Aakash to
3 explore real-time audio SE 57 1Hrs 24-01-14 3 4,7,8
signal

94
 Bridge Course Details (2015-16)

Students Lectures
Bridge Course Topics Year Duration PEO PO
Attended Conducted

Project design and 6 Feb – 2

1 SE 57 40 Hrs. 1,2,3,4,5,6 1,2,3,4,5,7
implementation Jun,2016

Computer 23 Jan-19 Mar

2 TE 16+2 (ext.) 48 Hrs 1,2,5,7 1,2,3,4,8,9,10
Networks 2016

Ethics in
3 SE EXTC 150 06Hrs. 22 Sep,2015 5,6,7 8, 9, 10
Engineering

95
 Bridge Course Details (2014-15)

Students Lectures
Bridge Course Topics Year Duration PEO PO
Attended Conducted
Eessentials of
SE & TE 13 Mar –
electronic project
1 design and
(EXTC & 57 40 Hrs. 18 2,3,4,5,6 2,3,4,5,7
ETRX) Apr,2015
implementation

Computer 23 Jun- 25 1,2,3,4,8,

2 Networks
TE 14+1 (ext.) 40 Hrs
Jul,2015
1,2,5,7
9,10

28 July –
Ethics in
3 Engineering
SE EXTC 150 06Hrs. 22 5,6,8 8
Sep,2015

96
 Students achievements

2014-15
2013-14
1. Electronic• Mr. Ketul Shah: Technophilia Systems
Oxygen Start-ups
Tree “Technical paper
Project grants presentationPvt,
by Ltd.
Khan Mohd Bilal
Sponsored him and Sangeeta
for making his
Pal was awarded 1 st Prize at Vasantdada Patil
B. E. Project on Swarm Robotics.
College of Engineering at National Level.
Student • Mr. Bilal Khan, got grant of Rs.16,000/-
2. “RFID Traffic Control” at National Level
achievements for his project on Solar Tree.
technical paper presented by Khan Mohd Bilal
• Mr.PalTraush
and Sangeeta Shenoy
at Atharva is working
College of on the
Engineering.project for developing a Textbook
Paper Project
3. Rahul TiwariCompanion
and Amit Keshri Presented
in Scilab underpaperthe
publications competitions
on “Sixth Sense Technology” at LTCOE national
mentorship of Dr. Lochan Jolly.
level
97
 Students achievements
2015-16
• Six students won Texas Instruments “Analog Makers Competition”
• 1st prize: Mr. Ashish Rawat and Ms. Arshdeep Sood. Mr. Pratik Jain and Ms.
Shivani Seksaria Project Start-ups
• 1st Runner up: Mr. Amitraj Varma and Mr. Anish Shukla
grants
2014-15
• “EDC best Debutant” Students: Manav Nayak
• Sanmith Shetty & Smit Mistry Student
2012-13 achievement
• Omkar Joglekar won 1st prize in 'Electoworks-National level Electronics
Mr. Abhishek Shah alumni from 2014 batch
competition' held at SPIT s
• Omkarhas initiated
Joglekar won 1stto start
prize up with
in project his company
competition held at DJ Sanghavi
collegeSTRATAGILE
of Engg. in Nov 2015.
•
Paper
Mahipal Singh Rajpurohit won 1st Prize in project competition held at TSEC Project
• publicatio
Sarvesh Giri won 1st Prize in project competition held at TSEC competitions
•
ns
Sayali Naringrekar, Akansha Patel & Siddhesh Parab won 3rd prize in
'Electoworks-National level Electronics competition' held at SPIT
• Ketul Shah won 4th prize 'Electoworks-National level Electronics competition'
held at SPIT 98
Faculty Development and Research Activities

99
 Faculty Competencies

Resources
1. Domain Specialization
Vision 2. Faculty Development
Mission 3. Faculty Training
PEOs Faculty 4. Faculty Research efforts
PO
5. Faculty Achievements

Students

100
 Faculty Competencies (Domain Specialization)
Dr. B.K. Mishra, Mrs. Sujata Kulkarni, Mrs. Kalawati Patil, Ms. Sangeeta
Mishra, Ms. Sukruti Kaulgud, Ms. Megha Gupta, Ms. Ankita Chakor

Mrs. Payel Saha, Mrs. Rupali

Mane, Ms. Rutvi Panchal, Ms.
Dr. B.K. Mishra, Dr. Lochan Jolly, Mrs. Poonam Chaudhary, Mr. Deepak
Communication Sinha
Madhuri Mavinkurve, Ms. Sonia Engg.
Behra, Ms. Anvita Birje, , Ms. Amruta
Naik, Ms. Sonali Singh, Mr. Niket Amoda

Embedded
Electronic System
Devices and
Modeling
EXTC
(Domain)

Antenna Mr. Sanjeev Ghosh, Ms. Aradhana

Dr. Vinitkumar Dongre, Mr. and Micro Signal Manekar, Mr. Manoj Chavan, Mr. Deepak
Shailendra Shastri, Ms. Archana Wave Engg. Processing Shete, Mrs. Rashmita Kumari
Deshpande, Mr. Nikhil Tiwari Mohapatra, Mr. Biju Balakrishnan

101
 Faculty Development
Awareness of PO,CO,LO
and its alignment in • IITB remote
teaching learning process
Domain center
Teaching Skills supportive
Pedagogy workshop for Enhancement courses on
effective teaching, training Enhancing
specific
IET Membership educational
courses such
asproductivity
Analog
Positive
electronics
Dimensions Professional attitude
signals and
R&D of Faculty and Work and etc.
systems
integration into
Development force related • Latest
leadership
academics Training quality.
technology
awareness
• Industry institute • NS2 training
symposium, • LAB migration
Interaction Faculty as Guest lecturers
in SCI-LAB
• Industrial visits for various
(Reliance –Sep with Industry Resource • Embedded
sessions to share
2015, ABB-July 2015) Person system
their expertise
• Conferences outside institute 102
 Faculty Training

Academic Number of No. of People % Outcome

Year Name of FDP & STTP Person used knowledge attainment
attended
1. ISTE approved workshop on
“Introduction to research
methodologies” at TCET 7 5 71%
2012-13 remote center, IITBombay
under NMEICT MHRD India.
2. Workshop on Analog
3 1 33%
Electronics by IIT Kharagpur

1. FDP on Android application 9 2 22%

2013-14 2. IMC RBNQA Proposal writing 3 3 100%

3. Effective counselling for
19 19 100%
engg. Students
103
 Faculty Training
Number of Person No. of People used
Academic Year Name of FDP & STTP % Outcome attainment
attended knowledge
4. Positive attitude for self
10 10 100%
development
5. Bridging the industry
16 16 100%
GAP
6. ISTE workshop on Signal
4 4 100%
and system
7. Opportunities of
18 18 100%
Research and antennas
2013-14 8. Learning objective 16 16 100%
9. Effective use of
Visualisation in the class 16 10 63%
room
10. Leadership Quality
15 15 100%
Enhancement
11. CISCO Training 6 6 100%
12. Workshop on CCNA By
6 6 100%
IIT Bombay
104
 Faculty Training
Academic Number of No. of People used % Outcome
Name of FDP & SDP
Year Person attended knowledge attainment
1. ISTE workshop on cyber
3 3 100%
security
2. Institute level FDP on
"Emotional intelligence , Rubrics" 17 17 100%

3. Institute level FDP on

"concept map and thesis writing" 16 16 100%

4. Institute level FDP on

2014-15 "Effective integration of
16 16 100%
visualization for effective
learning"
5. Art of living mind and
11 11 100%
matters
6. FDP on" Lab Migration in Sci-
6 3 50%
lab"
7. Two Week ISTE Workshop on
Pedagogy for Effective Use of ICT 8 8 100%
in Engineering 105
 Faculty Training

Number of Person No. of People used % Outcome

Academic Year Name of FDP & SDP
attended knowledge attainment
8. FDP on Financial Planning &
20 20 100%
Tax Planning

9. ISTE STTP on "Integration of

2014-15 R &D consultancy with 6 6 100%
academics"
10. Workshop Control systems
2 2 100%
by IIT KGP
1. ISTE STTP on "Embedded
Systems and Advanced Micro 19 5 26%
controller"
2. Self Defence Seminar for
2015-2016 10 10 100%
Women
3. Texas Instruments training 2 2 100%

4. ISO auditors training 3 3 100%

106
 Faculty Research Efforts

IEEE Explorer
Academic
Springer Years:
2012-13: 27
IJCA
Published In: 2013-14: 20
IJCER
Research
Publication 2014-15:19
IJRRAS
Details No. of research IJCSIT
papers published IJARECE
Faculty Research Dr. Vinitkumarof
ICCICT
Development
Efforts University of Dongre
Mumbai Research
WirelessDr.Networking
Lochan
MeghaJolly
Gupta
Project:
Lab: Gain and
Grant
Funded R&D bandwidth
Project:
Training for Next Home
Projects enhancement Project:
of
generation
faculty(50Hrs) & Farming
Automation
Trust Grants helical loaded cavity
Amount(Rs.):15,000
student(40Hrs)
backed Amount(Rs.):15,000
antenna
TotalYear:2014
cost:Year:2014
Amount(Rs.):25,000
Rs. 4.45 Lacs
Year:2012

108
 Faculty Achievements

• Three patents are filed by Dr. B.K.Mishra and Dr. Vinitkumar Dongre in Nov 2015

IPR and Feb 2016.

• Dr. B.K.Mishra received copyrights for three books in May 2014.

• Remote center of IIT-Bombay funding for 21 STTPs of Rs. 19.53 Lacs.

• Two projects of faculty members Dr. Lochan Jolly and Dr. Sangeeta Mishra
received funding under IEDC scheme by DST, New Delhi.

Funding
• Three projects of Dr. Lochan Jolly, Dr. Vinitkumar Dongre and Ms. Megha Gupta
received minor grant of University of Mumbai totaling Rs. 55 thousand.
• Five projects of Mr. Sanjeev Ghosh, Mr. Manoj Chavan, Dr. Sangeeta Mishra
, Mr. Deepak Shete, and Ms. Anvita Birje have received minor grants from the
University of Mumbai totaling Rs. 1.55 Lacs recently.

109
 Faculty Achievements

• Mrs. Kalawati Patil developed Scilab Manuals for Digital

Lab Migration Communication which was funded by a grant from National Mission
Education through ICT in 2014.
to Open Source • Dr. Lochan Jolly developed Scilab Manuals for Satellite Communication
Software Lab, Optical Communication and CSEM which was funded by a grant
from the National Mission Education through ICT in 2014.

• The students of Thakur College of Engineering and

Applications Technology, under the guidance of Dr. Kamal Shah and Dr. Madhuri
Mavinkurve have developed an application for Android based
Developed tablets which helps students of Hindi medium schools to learn
Mathematics in a better manner.

110
 Faculty Achievements

• Ms. Sujata Kulkarni won best paper award in ICAET-2014,Nagpur

Winners of Awards for her paper titled “Finger Vein Recognition”.
& Scholarships • Dr. Madhuri Mavinkurve won APSCE Merit scholarship at ICCE13
Bali, Indonesia for contribution to educational technology field.

• Dr. Lochan Jolly received a certificate of 6 weeks internship from

IIT, Bombay for developing a Text Book Companion In Scilab.
• Dr. Lochan Jolly, Mr. Sanjeev Ghosh, Ms. Sukruti Kaulgud received
Internships & consultancy offer from Pulsar Electronics Private Limited for project Next
Consultancy Generation Farming.
• Dr. Lochan Jolly, Ms. Sukruti Kaulgud and Ms. Kalawati Patil received
consultancy offer from Pulsar Electronics Private Limited for project
Security Systems

111
 Conclusion
Consistent
increase in
intake with
100%
Qualified
admission
Faculty &
100% Term
well
grant.
Equipped
labs
Conclusion
Consistent Consistent
campus Success
placement rate with
s & higher average
studies Consistent 80%
in achieving
the patents
Filed.
112
 Overall Improvement

2010
ICWET 1st
2008 International
PG Programs Conference with
2005 Started with 18 ACM
RvA Accreditation intake Upgraded ISO to
2003 under ISO 9001:2008
9000:2000 Standard
Intake increased to
2001 120 Certification
Program started Started Students
with Intake 60 IEEE Chapter

113
 Overall Improvement
2016
IEDC Grant of 48
2015 Lacs for 5 years
University of Academic
2014 Mumbai Ph. D. Affiliation with IET
Research grant Research Center 7th International
2013 received from Started HOC Cell
Conference ICWET
University of in Association with
TCET Accenture Started IET.
2012 Innovation Center Mumbai by two
faculty members incubation Center IMC RBNQA
Research grant Started
2011 for project in NEN Best Debut AWARD in
received from Graded Medium Education Sector
University of communication Award at National
NBA first by AICTE-CII 3i domain Level
Mumbai by one Embedded system
Accreditation for Survey
faculty member Started EDC Cell Texas Instruments center of
3 Years Excellence with
for project in Graded High by center of
Started R&D Cell Antenna domain Excellence
ARM university
AICTE-CII 3i and Cypress
Survey Patent filed by Semiconductors.
one faculty 2 patents are filed.
member
ISO-9000: 2015
awareness
114
Thank You

115