Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mr. Meyer
ENC2135
process. The process of planning, executing, and reviewing three projects this semester provided
Project 1 taught me several strategies to employ in my future writing processes. First, the
value of introductions. The introduction articles, such as “How to Write a Good Introduction-The
Writing Center at MSU”, gave me great insight on what it took to formulate a concise, yet
effective introduction. Also, discussion board 6 and the conference in week 5 enabled me to
understand the value of planning out large projects like this. The peer review week gave me the
opportunity to view the strategies of other students, as well as hear feedback from people in my
position. Lastly, the annotated bibliography assignment intertwined with project 1 taught me the
value of finding strong, credible sources. The lessons learned in the annotated bibliography made
introducing me to the topic of genres. The greatest skill I learned throughout this project was
artifact analysis and breaking down the strategies of the author. In addition, the journal 7 Knives
Out critical analysis assignment improved my rhetorical analysis strategies greatly. Looking at
the ‘why”, such as why writers employ certain techniques gave me the ability to better analyze
the artifacts in project 2. It also aided me in project 3, as I better understood what it took to
Project 3 gave me tremendous insight on genres, as well as how to use different genres
and modes of communication to promote the same message. Although I had taken advanced
placement English courses in high school, the concept of genres was completely foreign to me
before this class. The practice activity in Journal 9 was paramount in helping me understand how
different circumstances dictate the correct genre, yet still produce the same message. I emulated
this in project 3 when using two different genres to target two distinct audiences. Discussion
Board 10: Genre Conventions gave me a space to formulate my thoughts about which genres I
was thinking about using. Although my plan changed, it forced me to begin brainstorming about
what I needed to do. Lastly, the rhetorical rationale gave me the ability to reflect on my own
work and why I employed the techniques I used. It enabled a “roles-reversed” situation from
project 2.
Individually, each project taught me different strategies for the writing process. However,
overall, the taught me an important lesson about myself. Although I entered the year as an
exploratory major, I now leave with a greater sense of what I would like to pursue, and this class
contributed to that. For years I despised writing, as I was always writing about concepts, I was
not passionate about. However, once given the ability to choose what I want, I naturally
gravitated to a medical issue. I produced strong projects and they did not feel like obligations.