You are on page 1of 3

Instructor: Prof. Ho Thanh Phong.

Name: Tran Quang Ngan

Student’s ID: BAIU08057

ASSIGNMENT CHAPTER 3

m
er as
Critical Thinking

co
eH w
o.
rs e
ou urc
DEDUCTION AND INDUCTION
o
aC s

Exercises 3.3: I – Determine whether the following arguments are deductive


v i y re

or inductive. For each argument, state which test(s) you used in reaching
your decision (i.e. the indicator word test, the strict necessity test, the
common pattern test, and/or the principle of charity test). If the common
ed d

pattern test is used, indicate which specific pattern the argument exemplifies
ar stu

(e.g., causal argument, argument from authority, and so on)

2. According to New York Public Library Desk Reference, the pop-up toaster was
sh is

invented by Charles Strite in 1927(1). The New York Public Library Desk Reference is a
Th

highly reliable reference work(2). Therefore, it’s reasonable to believe that Charles
Strite did invent the pop-up toaster in 1927(3).

We obtained the 3 arguments which I denoted 1,2 and 3. From (1) and (2) we conclude the
(3) for:

• New York Public Library Desk Reference (NYPLDR) is a highly reliable

• NYPLDR confirmed the pop-up toaster was invented by Charles Strite in 1927

 Charles Strite did invent the pop-up toaster in 1927

1
This study source was downloaded by 100000804270748 from CourseHero.com on 03-27-2021 01:56:04 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/13555000/Assignment-chp3/
So, the 3 arguments above are inductive. The pattern test is the strict pattern test.

5. The burglar is tall and thin (1). Duncan is short and fat(2). Obviously, therefore,
Duncan isn’t the burglar(3)

We obtained the 3 arguments which is:

o The burglar and Duncan was being compared

o Tall and thin ≠ short and fat.

o The burglar is tall and thin but Duncan is short and fat

 Duncan is not the burglar

So, the arguments of 5 are inductive. The pattern test is the strict pattern test.

m
er as
9. All inductive generalizations are inductive. Some inductive generalizations are

co
unreliable. Therefore some inductive arguments are unreliable.

eH w
o.
This is an deductive pattern. And the pattern is Categorical Syllogism
rs e
ou urc
The pattern is defined by the three-line argument and the words: all, some

11. if the batter bunts in this situation, he’ll move the runner to second base. But the
o

batter won’t bunt in this situation. Therefore, the runner will never be moved over to
aC s

second base.
v i y re

This is the common pattern test. And the pattern is the Hypothetical Syllogism

if the batter bunts in this situation (If A), then (B) he’ll move the runner to second base
ed d
ar stu

(not A) But the batter won’t bunt in this situation

Then (not B) the runner will never be moved over to second base
sh is

So, the 3 argument are deductive arguments


Th

15. All previous observed polar bears have weighed less than 1500 pounds. Therefore,
all polar bears probably weigh less than 1500 pounds.

The 33 arguments are inductive arguments. The pattern is the indicator word test

The indicator word in the second argument is “Probably”, so the second argument will be the
premise and the first is the conclusion.

2
This study source was downloaded by 100000804270748 from CourseHero.com on 03-27-2021 01:56:04 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/13555000/Assignment-chp3/
18. Yale is an Ivy League school, and it has a good library. Harvard is an Ivy League
school, and it has a good library. Therefore, because Brown is an Ivy League School, it
must have a good library, too.

The arguments is inductive arguments

The pattern is common pattern, of the argument from analogy

Yale is Ivy League school => Yale has a good library

Harvard is Ivy League school => Harvard has a good library

=> Brown is Ivy League school, Brown has a good library

21. Whatever the Church teaches as infallible doctrine is true. The Church teaches as
infallible doctrine that God is eternal. Therefore, God is eternal.

m
er as
The arguments is inductive arguments.

co
eH w
The patterns is common pattern of Argument from analogy

o.
rs e
24. Tiger Woods is one of the best Golfers in the World. Melvin Rumsley has never
ou urc
played golf in his life. It is certain, therefore, that Melvin Rumsley could never beat
Tiger Woods in a round of golf
o

The argument are deductive arguments. The pattern is the indicator word test
aC s
v i y re

The indicator words are: “it is certain”

26. Some college students love pizza. Some college students love ice cream. It stands to
reason, therefore, that some college students who love pizza are college students who
ed d

love ice cream.


ar stu

The arguments are deductive arguments. And the pattern is the indicator word test
sh is

The indicator words are: “it stands to reason”


Th

29. Studies show that between 35 and 45 percent of marriages end in divorce. Therefore,
one should not enter into marriage lightly.

The arguments are inductive arguments.

The pattern is common patterns and that patterns is statistical argument

3
This study source was downloaded by 100000804270748 from CourseHero.com on 03-27-2021 01:56:04 GMT -05:00

https://www.coursehero.com/file/13555000/Assignment-chp3/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

You might also like