Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Historical Bias - Short Response

    Uploaded by

    Micaila Chalmers
    37 views1 page
    The document discusses the differences between authors Zinn and Schweikart, with Zinn showing socialist views that the government is not for the people while Schweikart demonstrated more conservative views. While their interpretations differed, the document argues that Schweikart included more personal feelings in his writing whereas Zinn focused more on facts and experiences. There is a perceived bias in Schweikart's writing, while Zinn's work takes into account citizens and their feelings.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Historical Bias- Short Response

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses the differences between authors Zinn and Schweikart, with Zinn showing socialist views that the government is not for the people while Schweikart demonstrated more conservative views. While their interpretations differed, the document argues that Schweikart included more personal feelings in his writing whereas Zinn focused more on facts and experiences. There is a perceived bias in Schweikart's writing, while Zinn's work takes into account citizens and their feelings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    37 views1 page

    Historical Bias - Short Response

    Uploaded by

    Micaila Chalmers
    The document discusses the differences between authors Zinn and Schweikart, with Zinn showing socialist views that the government is not for the people while Schweikart demonstrated more conservative views. While their interpretations differed, the document argues that Schweikart included more personal feelings in his writing whereas Zinn focused more on facts and experiences. There is a perceived bias in Schweikart's writing, while Zinn's work takes into account citizens and their feelings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    A major distinction between Zinn and Schweikart is patriotism.

    Zinn showed great


    socialism and that the government was not for the people. However, Schweikart
    demonstrated very conservative views in his writing.

    The interpretations between the two authors are very different. I believe that
    Schweikar put more personal feeling in his interpretation. On the other hand Zinn
    wrote more based on fact and experience.

    I believe there to bias more so in Schwikar’s writing. I appreciate that Zinn can take
    into account citizens and their feelings.

    You might also like