Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Theoritcal AbstractAlgebra 4
Theoritcal AbstractAlgebra 4
ﻇﺰري
ﺗﻜﺎﻓﺆات اﻟﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ
4
5 أﺳﻤﻬﺎن ﺧﻀﻮر.د
EX: What are the contra positive, converse and inverse of the following
statement?
“the home team wins whenever it’s raining,
:𝑤𝑤 𝑞𝑞( ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺗﻜﺘﺐ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲℎ𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝑝𝑝) ﺇﻥ ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻻﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻋﻦ 𝑞𝑞 ⟶ 𝑝𝑝 ﻫﻮ
/ITE.RBCs
1
تﺿاﺸﺂات الﺼﺪاﻏا | د .أﺠمﻋان خﺪﻌر
𝑝𝑝“ DEF: let 𝑝𝑝, 𝑞𝑞 be proposition, the biconditional statement “𝑝𝑝 ⟷ 𝑞𝑞 ” is proposition
if and only if 𝑞𝑞” and this statement is true when both 𝑝𝑝 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑞𝑞 have the same truth
value ,and is false other wise.
ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﻀﻴﺔ 𝑞𝑞 ⟷ 𝑝𝑝
)𝑞𝑞 ⟶ 𝑞𝑞( ∧ )𝑞𝑞 ⟶ 𝑝𝑝( ≡ 𝑞𝑞 ⟷ 𝑝𝑝
𝒑𝒑 𝒒𝒒 𝒒𝒒 ⟷ 𝒑𝒑 ﺃﺣﺪ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﻟﻠﺘﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻋﻦ 𝑞𝑞 ⟶ 𝑝𝑝 ﻫﻮ:
T T T ”𝑞𝑞 “𝑝𝑝 is necessary and sufficient for
T F F "𝑞𝑞 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 𝑝𝑝"
F T F
F F T ﺑﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺃﺧﺮ:
)𝑝𝑝 → 𝑞𝑞( ∧ )𝑞𝑞 ⟶ 𝑝𝑝( ≡ 𝑞𝑞 ⟷ 𝑝𝑝
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ 𝑞𝑞 ⟷ 𝑝𝑝 ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺘﻴﻦ 𝑝𝑝 → 𝑞𝑞 𝑝𝑝 ⟶ 𝑞𝑞 ,ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺘﻴﻦ
ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻋﺪﺓ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ 𝑞𝑞 ⟷ 𝑝𝑝 :
”𝑞𝑞 “𝑝𝑝 is necessary and snffiient for
”𝑞𝑞 “𝑝𝑝 iff
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺔ:
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ 𝑞𝑞 ⟶ 𝑝𝑝 ﻭﻋﻜﺴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﻨﻔﻲ 𝑝𝑝¬ ⟶ 𝑞𝑞¬ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻓﺌﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺎﹰ.
تﺿاﺸﺂات الﺼﺪاﻏا:
ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻧﻤﻂ ﻫﺎﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺎﻟﻤﻨﺎﻗﺸﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﻝ ﺟﻤﻠﺔ ﺑﺠﻤﻠﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻭﻟﻬﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﺐ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻨﺘﺞ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺑﻨﻔﺲ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻛﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﻣﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﻣﻌﻄﺎﺓ ﺗﺴﺘﺨﺪﻡ ﺑﻔﻌﺎﻟﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺑﻨﺎء ﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﻗﺸﺎﺕ
ﺍﻟﺮﻳﺎﺿﻴﺔ
ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺔ:
ﻫﻲ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺓ ﻧﺤﺼﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﺑﺴﻴﻄﺔ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻄﺔ ﻣﻊ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺔ.
ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻠﻲ ﺳﻨﺒﺪﺃ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻨﺎ ﺑﺘﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﻃﺒﻘﺎ ﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻜﻨﺔ.
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ :ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﻣﺎﹰ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻬﻢ ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺑﺪﺍﺧﻠﻬﺎ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ )(a catalogy
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎﹰ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻬﻢ ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﻮﻧﺔ ﻟﻬﺎ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾ ) a
(contradiction
/ITE.RBCs
2
تﺿاﺸﺂات الﺼﺪاﻏا | د .أﺠمﻋان خﺪﻌر
الﺎﺿاﺸﺂات المﻈطﺼﻐﺋ:
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻟﻬﺎ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻜﻨﺔ ﺗﺴﻤﻰ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻓﺌﺔ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺎﹰ ,ﺃﻱ
ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺘﺎﻥ 𝑞𝑞 𝑝𝑝,ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻓﺌﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺎﹰ ,ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ 𝑞𝑞 ⟷ 𝑝𝑝 ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭﻧﻜﺘﺐ 𝑞𝑞 ≡ 𝑝𝑝.
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺰ ≡ ﻻ ﻳﻤﺜﻞ ﺭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ 𝑞𝑞 ≡ 𝑝𝑝 ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻗﻀﻴﺔ ﻣﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﺇﻧﻤﺎ ﺗﻌﻨﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ 𝑞𝑞 ⟷ 𝑝𝑝
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ.
ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻦ:
ﺑﻴﻦ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻵﺗﻴﺘﺎﻥ )𝑞𝑞 ∨ 𝑝𝑝(¬ ﻭ 𝑞𝑞¬ ∧ 𝑝𝑝¬ ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻓﺌﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻴﺎﹰ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺤﻞ:
ﻧﺸﻜﻞ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﻀﻴﺘﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺘﻴﻦ:
𝒑𝒑 𝒒𝒒 𝒒𝒒 ∨ 𝒑𝒑 )𝒒𝒒 ∨ 𝒑𝒑(¬ 𝒑𝒑¬ 𝒒𝒒¬ 𝒒𝒒¬ ∧ 𝒑𝒑¬
T T T F F F F
T F T F F T F
F T T F T F F
F F F T T T T
/ITE.RBCs
3
تﺿاﺸﺂات الﺼﺪاﻏا | د .أﺠمﻋان خﺪﻌر
ﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻗﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﻀﻴﺘﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺘﻴﻦ )𝑞𝑞 ∨ 𝑝𝑝(¬ ﻭ 𝑞𝑞¬ ∧ 𝑝𝑝¬ ﺗﺘﻔﻖ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻞ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺍﻛﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﻤﻤﻜﻨﺔ
ﻟﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻟﺤﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﻟـ𝑞𝑞 𝑝𝑝,ﻳﻨﺘﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ 𝑞𝑞¬ ∧ 𝑝𝑝¬ ⟷ )𝑞𝑞 ∨ 𝑝𝑝(¬ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ,ﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﻀﻴﺘﻴﻦ
ﻣﺘﻜﺎﻓﺌﺘﻴﻦ 𝑞𝑞¬ ∧ 𝑝𝑝¬ ≡ )𝑞𝑞 ∨ 𝑝𝑝(¬.
ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﺩ 6ﻳﺤﻮﻱ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﻓﺆﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻤﺔ ﻓﻔﻲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﻓﺆﺍﺕ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻣﺰ Tﻳﺸﻴﺮ ﻟﻠﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ
ﺩﻭﻣﺎﹰ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﻣﺰ Fﻳﺸﻴﺮ ﻟﻠﻘﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺮﻛﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻜﻮﻥ ﺧﺎﻃﺌﺔ ﺩﻭﻣﺎﹰ.
ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻮﺩ 7,8ﻳﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﺎﻓﺆﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﻤﻬﻤﺔ ﻟﻠﻘﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻧﺐ ﻭﺛﻨﺎﺋﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﺠﺎﻧﺐ.
خﻌاص الﺼﺪاﻏا
Equivalence Name
𝑝𝑝 ≡ 𝑇𝑇 ∧ 𝑝𝑝 Idenntity laws
𝑝𝑝 ≡ 𝐹𝐹 ∨ 𝑝𝑝
𝑇𝑇 ≡ 𝑇𝑇 ∨ 𝑝𝑝 Domination lows
𝐹𝐹 ≡ 𝐹𝐹 ∧ 𝑝𝑝
𝑝𝑝 ≡ 𝑝𝑝 ∨ 𝑝𝑝 Idempotrt law
𝑝𝑝 ≡ 𝑝𝑝 ∧ 𝑝𝑝
𝑝𝑝 ≡ )𝑝𝑝¬(¬ Double neyation law
𝑝𝑝 ∨ 𝑞𝑞 ≡ 𝑞𝑞 ∨ 𝑝𝑝 Commutative laws
𝑝𝑝 ∧ 𝑞𝑞 ≡ 𝑞𝑞 ∧ 𝑝𝑝
)𝑟𝑟 ∨ 𝑞𝑞( ∨ 𝑝𝑝 ≡ 𝑟𝑟 ∨ )𝑞𝑞 ∨ 𝑝𝑝( Associative laws
)𝑟𝑟 ∧ 𝑞𝑞( ∧ 𝑝𝑝 ≡ 𝑟𝑟 ∧ )𝑞𝑞 ∧ 𝑝𝑝(
)𝑟𝑟 ∨ 𝑝𝑝( ∧ )𝑞𝑞 ∨ 𝑝𝑝( ≡ )𝑟𝑟 ∧ 𝑞𝑞( ∨ 𝑝𝑝 Pistrbutive laws
)𝑟𝑟 ∧ 𝑝𝑝( ∨ )𝑞𝑞 ∧ 𝑝𝑝( ≡ )𝑟𝑟 ∨ 𝑞𝑞( ∧ 𝑝𝑝
𝑞𝑞¬ ∨ 𝑝𝑝¬ ≡ )𝑞𝑞 ∧ 𝑝𝑝(¬ Demorgan’s laws
𝑞𝑞¬ ∧ 𝑝𝑝¬ ≡ )𝑞𝑞 ∨ 𝑝𝑝(¬
𝑝𝑝 ≡ )𝑞𝑞 ∧ 𝑝𝑝( ∨ 𝑝𝑝 Absorption laws
𝑝𝑝 ≡ )𝑞𝑞 ∨ 𝑝𝑝( ∧ 𝑝𝑝
𝑝𝑝 ≡ 𝑝𝑝¬ ∨ 𝑝𝑝 Negation laws
𝐹𝐹 ≡ 𝑝𝑝¬ ∧ 𝑝𝑝
/ITE.RBCs
4
أﺠمﻋان خﺪﻌر.تﺿاﺸﺂات الﺼﺪاﻏا | د
😍😍 ......ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺖ ﺍﳴﺤﺎﺿﺮﺓ
/ITE.RBCs
5