Chapter 4

1.
Profile of the Respondents

The profile of the respondents which includes age, gender, year level, program and status as a student
are shown in tables 1-5. Table 1 presents the profile of the respondents in terms of age. It reveals that 62
which is majority of them are within the age bracket 20-24 years old followed by 20 below (28), 25-29 (5),
and 30 and above (5). However, it can be noted that ________.
Age Bracket Frequency Percent

Below 20 28 28
20-24 62 62
25-29 5 5
30 and above 5 5
Total 100 100
Gender Frequency Percent

Male 26 26
Female 74 74
Total 100 100
Year Level Frequency Percent

I 29 29
II 30 30
III 32 32
IV 9 9
Total 100 100
Program Frequency Percent

BSSE 42 42
BSEE 37 37
BEED 21 21
Total 100 100
Status Frequency Percent

Regular 88 88
Irregular 12 12
Total 100 100
Connectivity Frequency Percent

Internet 83 83
Data 17 17
Total 100 100
Gadget Frequency Percent

Laptop 47 47
Personal
8 8
Computer
Mobile Phone 42 42
Others 3 3
Table 8
Table 8 shows the Experiences of the students in Synchronous Mode of Learning in terms of instructor. It reveals
that 3.18 weighted Mean with the verball interpretation of “Agree” in item 2 “The instructor encourage them to
become actively involved in class discussion”, and the lowest rating is 3.03 weighted Mean with the verball interpretation
of “Agree” in item 4 “I am satisfied with the level of instructors’ performance”.
Experiences in Synchronous Mode of Learning in terms of instructor.
Weighted Verbal
Item
Mean Interpretation
1. I feel comfortable in course discussion with my instructors. 3.16 Agree
2. The instructor encourages me to become actively involved in class discussion. 3.18 Agree
3. I can easily approach my professor to ask questions and clarify some things I 3.14 Agree
did not understand during synchronous class.
4. I am satisfied with the level of instructors’ performance. 3.03 Agree
5. The instructor uses effective teaching methods for synchronous course delivery. 3.07 Agree
Instructor 3.12 Agree
Legend: 1.00- 1.75 - Strongly Disagree 1.76-2.50 – Disagree 2.56-3.25 – Agree 3.26-4.00 - Strongly Agree
Table 9
Table 9 represents the Experiences of the students in Synchronous Mode of Learning in terms of
interaction. It reveals that 3.21 weighted Mean with the verball interpretation of “Agree” in item 2 “I experience
minimal issues in communicating with my classmates and instructors in synchronous delivery of courses”, and
the lowest rating is 2.67 weighted Mean with the verball interpretation of “Agree” in item 5 “I sometimes feel
isolated in the class”.
Experiences in Synchronous Mode of Learning in terms of interaction.
Weighted Verbal
Item
Mean Interpretation
1. I am able to interact with my classmates and instructors during our 3.04 Agree
synchronous class.
2. I experience minimal issues in communicating with my classmates and 3.21 Agree
instructors in synchronous delivery of courses.
3. I am able to share my ideas, thoughts during the synchronous discussion 2.99 Agree
activities.
4. It is easily to understand the discussion activities when having a live 3.11 Agree
contact with fellow students.
5. I sometimes feel isolated in the class. 2.67 Agree
INTERACTION 3.00 Agree
Table 10
Table 10 represents the Experiences of the students in Synchronous Mode of Learning in terms of
learning platforms. It reveals that the highest rating is 3.05 weighted Mean with the verball interpretation of
“Agree” in item 4 “Learning platforms are easily accessible”, and the lowest rating is 2.05 weighted Mean with the
verball interpretation of “Disagree” in item 3 “Learning platforms help me to be equipped in my future profession”.
Experiences in Synchronous Mode of Learning in terms of learning platforms.
Weighted Verbal
Item Mean Interpretation
1. I easily understand the class content during our live synchronous class. 2.87 Agree
2. Learning platforms help me to be equipped in my future profession. 3.03 Agree
3. I prefer to take synchronous videoconferencing classes to traditional classes. 2.05 Disagree
4. Learning platforms are easily accessible. 3.05 Agree
5. Learning platforms make it simple for us to understand and remember what 2.89 Agree
we've learned.
Learning Platform 2.78 Agree
Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation

Interaction 3.00 Agree
Over All 2.97 Agree
Table 11
Experiences in Asynchronous Mode of Learning in terms of instructor.
1. I am able to ask questions and clarify some things to my professor during Weighted Verbal
asynchronous class. Mean Interpretation
2. The instructor encourages me to become actively involved in class discussion. 3.15 Agree
3.13 Agree
3. I can easily approach my professor to ask questions and clarify some things I did 2.95 Agree
not understand during asynchronous class.
4. I am satisfied with the level of interaction during the course. 2.95 Agree
5. The instructor uses effective teaching methods for asynchronous course delivery. 2.98 Agree
Table 12
Table 12 represents the Experiences of the students in Asynchronous Mode of Learning in terms of interaction. It
reveals that 3.07 weighted Mean with the verball interpretation of “Agree” in item 3 “Getting live interaction with fellow
students allows it easier to understand the discussion activities in an asynchronous class”, and the lowest rating is 2.71
weighted Mean with the verball interpretation of “Agree” in item 4 “I sometimes feel isolated in the class”.
Experiences in Asynchronous Mode of Learning in terms of interaction.
Weighted Verbal
1. I experience minimal issues in communicating with my classmates and 3.03 Agree
instructors in asynchronous delivery of courses.
2. I am able to share my ideas, thoughts during the asynchronous activities. 2.96 Agree
3. Getting live interaction with fellow students allows it easier to understand the 3.07 Agree
discussion activities in an asynchronous class.
4. I sometimes feel isolated in the class. 2.71 Agree
5. I am satisfied with the level of interaction during the course. 2.89 Agree
INTERACTION 2.93 Agree
Table 13
Table 12 represents the Experiences of the students in Asynchronous Mode of Learning in terms of learning platforms. It
reveals that 3.04 weighted Mean with the verball interpretation of “Agree” the result shows that majority of them agree
in item 3 “Learning platforms are easily accessible”, and the lowest rating is 2.19 weighted Mean with the verball
interpretation of “Disagree” in item 3 “I prefer to take asynchronous classes to traditional classes”.
Experiences in Synchronous Mode of Learning in terms of learning platforms.

Weighted Verbal
1. The available materials online facilitate effective learning during 3.01 Agree
asynchronous.
2. I feel that taking asynchronous class helped me to be equipped in the 2.73 Agree
profession I will be in the future.
3. I prefer to take asynchronous classes to traditional classes. 2.19 Disagree
4. Learning platforms are easily accessible. 3.04 Agree
5. Learning platforms make it simple for us to understand and remember what 2.93 Agree
we've learned.
Weighted Verbal Interpretation
Mean
Interaction 2.93 Agree
Learning Agree
Platform 2.78
Over All 2.91 Agree

Chapter 4

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 4

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1.

Profile of the Respondents

Age Bracket Frequency Percent

Gender Frequency Percent

Year Level Frequency Percent

Program Frequency Percent

Status Frequency Percent

Connectivity Frequency Percent

Gadget Frequency Percent

Weighted Mean Verbal Interpretation

Experiences in Synchronous Mode of Learning in terms of learning platforms.

You might also like