You are on page 1of 50

INTRODUCTION TO POWER SYSTEM

STABILITY

Copyright © P. Kundur
This material should not be used without the author's consent
1539pk
Introduction to Power System Stability

Outline

1. Basic Concepts, Definitions and Classification of


Power System Stability

2. Conceptual Relationship between Power System


Stability, Security and Reliability

3. Challenges to Stable and Secure Operation of Power


Systems in the New Industry Environment

4. Comprehensive Study Procedures and Tools for


Stability Analysis

Appendix
Concepts of Active Power and Reactive Power

INT- 1
1539pk
Power System Stability: Basic Concepts
and Definition

 Power System Stability denotes the ability of an


electric power system, for a given initial operating
condition, to regain a state of operating equilibrium
after being subjected to a physical disturbance, with
all system variables bounded so that the system
integrity is preserved

 Integrity of the system is preserved when


practically the entire power system remains
intact with no tripping of generators or loads,
except for those disconnected by isolation of
the faulted elements or intentionally tripped to
preserve the continuity of operation of the rest
of the system

 Stability is a condition of equilibrium between


opposing forces:
 instability results when a disturbance leads to
a sustained imbalance between the opposing
forces
 instability is a run-away or run-down situation

INT- 2
1539pk
Basic Concepts (cont’d)

 The power system is a highly nonlinear system


which operates in a constantly changing
environment:
 loads, generator outputs, topology and key
operating parameters change continually

 When subjected to a disturbance, the system


stability depends on:
 the nature of the disturbance, as well as
 the initial operating condition

 The disturbances may be small or large:


 small disturbances in the form of load changes
occur continually
 large disturbances of a severe nature, such as
a short-circuit on a transmission line or loss of
a large generator

INT- 3
1539pk
Basic Concepts (cont’d)

 Following a transient disturbance, if the power


system is stable it will reach a new equilibrium state
with practically the entire system intact:
 faulted element and any connected load
disconnected
 actions of automatic controls and possibly
operator action will eventually restore system
to normal state

 On the other hand, if the system is unstable, it will


result in a run-away or run-down situation; for
example,
 a progressive increase in angular separation
of generator rotors, or
 a progressive decrease in bus voltages

 An unstable system condition could lead to


cascading outages, and a shut-down of a major
portion of the power system

INT- 4
1539pk
Need for Classification of Stability

 Power system dynamic performance is influenced


by a wide array of devices with different response
rates and characteristics
 Instability may be manifested in many different ways
depending on system configuration and operating
conditions
 mode of instability depends on which set of
balancing forces experience a sustained
imbalance

 Due to the high dimensionality and complexity of


the system, it is essential to make simplifying
assumptions and to analyze specific problems using
the right degree of detail

 Not very effective to study power system stability as


a single problem

INT- 5
1539pk
Classification of Power System Stability

 Classification of stability into various categories


greatly facilitates:
 analysis of stability problems
 identification of essential factors which
contribute to instability
 devising methods of improving stable
operation

 Classification is based on the following


considerations:
 physical nature of the resulting instability
 size of the disturbance considered
 devices, processes, and the time span
involved

 We should always keep in mind the overall stability


 solutions to problems of one category should
not be at the expense of another

INT- 6
1539pk
Classification of Power System Stability

Power System Stability

– ability to remain in operating equilibrium


– equilibrium between opposing forces
Consideration
for
Classification

Angle Frequency Voltage


Stability Stability Stability
Physical Nature/
Main System
Parameter
– ability to maintain frequency – ability to maintain steady
– ability to maintain synchronism voltages
– torque balance of synchronous within nominal range
– generation/load balance – reactive power balance
machines – equilibrium of voltage control

Small Transient Large Small


Signal Stability Disturbance Disturbance Size of
Stability Disturbance
Voltage Voltage
Stability Stability

Short Short Long Short Long


Term Term Term Time Span
Term Term

INT- 7
1539pk
Rotor Angle Stability

 Ability of interconnected synchronous machines to


remain in synchronism under normal conditions and
after being subjected to a disturbance

 Depends on the ability to maintain/restore


equilibrium between electromagnetic torque and
mechanical torque of each synchronous machine in
the system

 If the generators become unstable when perturbed,


it is as a result of
 a run-away situation due to torque imbalance

 A fundamental factor is the manner in which power


outputs of synchronous machines vary as their
rotor angles swing

 Instability that may result occurs in the form of


increasing angular swings of some generators
leading to loss of synchronism with other
generators

INT- 8
1539pk
Rotor Angle Stability (cont’d)

 Under steady-state conditions, there is equilibrium


between electromagnetic and mechanical torques

 If the system is perturbed, this equilibrium is upset,


causing acceleration or deceleration of the rotor
 synchronism is maintained through
development of restoring forces

 Change in electrical torque can be resolved into two


components:

Te  TS     TD  


 TS is the synchronizing torque coefficient
 TD is the damping torque coefficient

 Lack of synchronizing torque results in aperiodic


instability

 Lack of damping torque results in oscillatory


instability

INT- 9
1539pk
Transient Stability

 Term used traditionally to denote large-disturbance


angle stability

 Ability of a power system to maintain synchronism


when subjected to a severe transient disturbance:
 resulting system response involves large
excursions of generator rotor angles and is
influenced by the nonlinear power-angle
relationship
 stability depends on the initial operating
condition, severity of the disturbance, and
strength of post-fault transmission network
 A wide variety of disturbances can occur on the
system:
 varying degree of severity and probability of
occurrence
 the system is, however, designed and operated
so as to be stable for a selected set of
contingencies
usually, transmission faults: L-G, L-L-G,
three phase

INT- 10
1539pk
Small-Signal (Angle) Stability

 Small-Signal (or Small Disturbance) Stability is the


ability of a power system to maintain synchronism
under small disturbances:

 such disturbances occur continually on the


system due to small variations in loads and
generation
 disturbance considered sufficiently small if
linearization of system equations is
permissible for analysis
 instability that may result can be of two forms:
aperiodic increase in rotor angle due to
lack of sufficient synchronizing torque
rotor oscillations of increasing amplitude
due to lack of sufficient damping torque

 Corresponds to Liapunov’s first method of stability


analysis

INT- 11
1539pk
Voltage Stability

 Ability of power system to maintain steady voltages


at all buses in the system after being subjected to a
disturbance from a given initial operating condition

 A system experiences voltage instability when a


disturbance, increase in load demand, or change in
system condition causes:
 a progressive and uncontrollable fall or rise in
voltage of some buses

 Main factor causing voltage instability is the


inability of power system to maintain a proper
balance of reactive power and voltage control
actions

 The driving force for voltage instability is usually


the loads. Following a condition of reduced
transmission system voltages,
 power consumed by the loads tend to be
restored by the action if distribution voltage
regulators, tap changing transformers, and
thermostats

INT- 12
1539pk
Voltage Stability (cont’d)

 The possible outcome of voltage instability:


 loss of load in the area where voltages reach
unacceptably low levels, or
 loss of integrity of the power system

 Progressive but rapid drop in bus voltage can also


be associated with rotor angles going out of step:
 voltages at points close to the electrical center
reach very low values
 a much faster phenomenon
 not a voltage instability phenomenon

 In contrast, sustained fall of voltage related to


voltage instability occurs where rotor angle stability
is not an issue or the cause:
 usually a slower phenomenon

INT- 13
1539pk
Frequency Stability

 Ability to maintain steady frequency within a


nominal range following a disturbance resulting in a
significant imbalance between system generation
and load:
 instability that may result occurs in the form of
sustained frequency swings leading to tripping
of generating units and/or loads
 determined by the overall response of the
system as evidenced by its mean frequency
rather than relative motions of rotors of
generators

 In a small “island” system, frequency stability could


be of concern for any disturbance causing a
significant loss of load and/or generation

 In a large interconnected system, frequency stability


would be of concern only following a severe system
upset resulting in the system splitting into one or
more islands

 Generally, frequency stability problems are


associated with inadequacies in equipment
responses, poor coordination of control and
protection systems

INT- 14
1539pk
Relationship Between the Concepts of
Reliability, Security and Stability
of a Power System

 Stability: refers to the continuance of intact operation


following a disturbance
 depends on the operating condition and the
nature of the physical disturbance
 Security: the degree of risk in the ability to survive
imminent disturbances (contingencies) without
interruption of customer service.
 depends on the system operating condition as
well as the contingent probability of
disturbances.

 Reliability: probability of satisfactory operation over


the long run
 denotes the ability to supply adequate electric
service on a nearly continuous basis, with few
interruptions over an extended time period

INT- 15
1539pk
Essential Differences Among the Three
Aspects of Power System Performance

 Reliability is the overall objective in power system


design and operation

 To be reliable the power system must be


secure most of the time.

 To be secure the system must be stable but must


also be secure against other contingencies that
would not be classified as stability problems, e.g.
damage to equipment such as an explosive failure
of a cable, fall of transmission towers due to ice
loading or sabotage.

 As well, a system may be stable following a


contingency, yet insecure due to post-fault system
conditions resulting in equipment overloads or
voltage violations

INT- 16
1539pk
Essential Differences (cont'd)

 System security may be further distinguished from


stability in terms of the resulting consequences.
 For example, two systems may both be stable
with equal stability margins, but one may be
relatively more secure because the
consequences of instability are less severe

 Security and stability are time-varying attributes


which can be judged by studying the performance of
the power system under a particular set of
conditions.

 Reliability, on the other hand, is a function of the


time-average performance of the power system; it
can only be judged by consideration of the system's
behaviour over an appreciable period of time.

INT- 17
1539pk
Design and Operating Criteria for Power
System Security

 For reliable service, a power system must remain


intact and be capable of withstanding a wide variety of
disturbances
 Impractical to achieve stable operation for all possible
disturbances or contingencies
 The general practice is to design and operate the
power system so that the more probable
contingencies can be sustained without loss of
system integrity
 "Normal Design Contingencies"
 loss of any single element, either spontaneously
or proceeded by a fault
 This is referred to as the "N-1 criterion" because it
examines the behaviour of an N-component grid
following the loss of any one major components
 Events that exceed the severity of normal design
contingencies can in fact occur:
 "Extreme Contingencies"
 measures should be taken to minimize their
occurrence and impact

INT- 18
1539pk
Power System Stability: Historical
Perspective

 Recognized as an important problem for secure


system operation since the 1920s

 Major concern since the infamous November 9, 1965


blackout of Northeast U.S.A. and Ontario, Canada

 criteria and analytical tools used worldwide


until now largely based on the developments
that followed this blackout

 Presents many new challenges for today's power


systems

INT- 19
1539pk
Traditional Approach to Power System
Stability

 Focus on "transient (rotor angle) stability"


 System designed and operated to withstand
 loss of any single element preceded by single-,
double-, or three-phase fault
 referred to as "N-1" criterion
 Analysis by time-domain simulations of selected
operating conditions
 scenarios based on judgment/experience
 Operating limits based on off-line studies
 system operated conservatively within pre-
established limits

INT- 20
1539pk
Challenges to Secure Operation of
Today's Power Systems

 Power systems are more complex


 national/continental/regional grids
 many processes whose operations need to be
coordinated; thousands of devices requiring a
harmonious interplay
 complex modes of instability
 "Deregulated" market environment
 many entities with diverse business interests
 system expansion and operation driven by
economic drivers
 lack of coordinated planning!
 power systems pushed "harder"; more
frequent changes in power flow patterns

INT- 21
1539pk
Examples of Major System Disturbances

We had several wake up calls in recent years:

 July 1996 WSCC System Disturbance

 August 1996 WSCC System Disturbance

 March 1999 Brazil blackout

 July 1999 Taiwan blackout

 August 2003 NE U.S.A. and Ontario blackout

 September 2003 Italy blackout

 September 2003 South Sweden and Eastern


Denmark blackout

 Other blackouts in 2003/04: England, S.W. Australia,


Croatia, Greece, Brazil

INT- 22
1539pk
Comprehensive Study Procedures
and Tools

 All categories of system stability should be


considered

 Stability depends on the harmonious interplay of all


elements of the power system:
 knowledge of the characteristics of individual
elements is essential for the understanding
and study of power system stability
 proper selection and coordination of controls
and protective equipment are of paramount
importance

 Analytical tools and system models should be


validated against measured response

 Analytical tools should:


 not only determine if system stable or unstable
 but also provide insight into factors
influencing stability

INT- 23
1539pk
Concepts of Active Power
and Reactive Power

INT- 24
1539pk
Power in an A.C. Circuit

 Let us first look at simple dc circuits:

Energy is stored in inductance L and capacitance C

 With A.C., energy is stored and discharged twice every


cycle

 Instantaneous power, p = ei

INT- 25
1539pk
Concepts of Active and Reactive Powers

Consider the single phase circuit shown in Fig. A.1 with

e = Em Sin ωt
i = Im Sin (ωt - Φ) i
e

Instantaneous power:
Fig. A.1

INT- 26
1539pk
Figure A.2 shows plots of e, i, p, pp and pq.

 Active Power (pp) represents the component of p utilized for


permanent irreversible consumption. It has an average value of
P.

 Reactive Power (pq) is utilized in establishing either a magnetic


or electrostatic field; it is stored in inductance or capacitance
and then returned to the source. It has a zero average value.
 result of the associated component of current being in
quadrature with the voltage

INT- 27
1539pk
1 ACTIVE POWER pp = P (1 - cos 2 ω t)
2 REACTIVE POWER pq = -Q sin ω t

Fig. A.2 Plots of e, i, p, pp and pq

INT- 28
1539pk
3-Phase Power

Under balanced conditions, with

ea = Em sin ω t
ia = Im sin (ω t - Φ )
We have

p = ea ia + eb ib + ec ic
= 3 EI cos Φ
= 3 x average active power per phase
 Total instantaneous power is constant
 We are tempted to assume that reactive power is not
important in a 3-phase network:
 not appropriate to do so
 power in each phase is of significance
 We commonly refer to 3-phase reactive power as being
equal to 3 times single phase Q
 instantaneous values of Q in all three phases add
up to zero; similar to sum of the 3-phase currents
being equal to zero

INT- 29
1539pk
Reactive Power - Sign Conventions

 By convention, the Q associated with:


 inductive load is positive
 capacitive load is negative

An inductive load absorbs Q

A capacitive load supplies Q

 A synchronous machine:
 when overexcited, supplies reactive power
 when underexcited, absorbs reactive

INT- 30
1539pk
Complex Power

 Complex power, S, is defined as:

 The reason for using conjugate of I in the complex


multiplication is to arrive at the agreed upon convention
for reactive power
 Q is positive with I lagging E


S  E I  P2  Q 2
The magnitude of the complex power, S, is normally used
to specify the rating of equipment

INT- 31
1539pk
Special Comments on Reactive Power

 Although the Reactive Power associated with an element


has a zero average value, it represents real power required
to store and discharge magnetic energy in an inductance or
electrostatic energy in a capacitance, twice every cycle.

 In a network the interchange of energy takes place between


the source, inductive elements and capacitive elements.
The net energy associated with reactive power is the sum
of various inductive and capacitive stored energies.

 The oscillatory transfer of reactive power between points in


a power system results in voltage drops and losses in
generation and transmission equipment.

As efficiency and voltage regulation are very important, the


transfer of reactive power over the system is of prime
importance.

INT- 32
1539pk
General Observations on Active and
Reactive Power Flow

 In a practical transmission system, normally:


 the active power flow is determined primarily by
angular differences between bus voltages; and
 the reactive power flow by magnitude differences of
bus voltages
 Active Power is supplied only by generators:
 the desired flow of active power from a generator is
achieved by control of prime mover mechanical
torque.
 Increasing the mechanical torque advances the
generator rotor and hence, the "internal voltage"
with respect to other system voltages.
 Sources of Reactive Power:
 synchronous machines (over excited)
 static capacitors
 capacitance of transmission lines
 Consumers of Reactive Power:
 synchronous machines (under excited)
 induction motors
 inductive static loads
 inductance of transmission lines, transformers
 AC/DC and DC/AC converters

INT- 33
1539pk
 At any junction:

ΣP=0
ΣQ=0

They can be added arithmetically

 For a system:
 a balance sheet of active and reactive power can be
drawn;
 the total injected P and Q are equal to the total
extracted P and Q, plus any P and Q losses.

 Under steady-state conditions;


 P and Q flow over a network are fairly independent
of each other and are influenced by different control
actions.

INT- 34
1539pk
INT- 35
1539pk
INT- 36
1539pk
INT- 37
1539pk
INT- 38
1539pk
INT- 39
1539pk
INT- 40
1539pk
INT- 41
1539pk
INT- 42
1539pk
INT- 43
1539pk
INT- 44
1539pk
INT- 45
1539pk
INT- 46
1539pk
INT- 47
1539pk
INT- 48
1539pk
INT- 49
1539pk

You might also like