Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Absorption 2
Types of Absorption 2
Types of Absorber 2
Comparison Between Packed and Plate Column 3
Designing Steps for Absorption Column 3
Packed Column Design 4
Packing Selection 4
Selection of Solvent 5
Design Calculation of Absorber 6
Calculation of column diameter: 6
Calculation of column diameter 7
Calculation of Height transfer Unit 7
Calculation of liquid film mass transfer coefficient 8
Calculation of gas film mass transfer coefficient 8
Gas Film Transfer Unit Height 9
Liquid Film Transfer Unit Height 10
Calculation of Height of Transfer Unit: 10
Calculation of Number of Transfer Units: 10
Calculation of height of tower 11
Calculation of operating velocity 11
Calculation of flooding velocity 12
Calculation of wetting rate 12
Calculation of Pressure Drop at Flooding 13
Calculation of Total Pressure Drop 13
Specification Sheet 14
Stripping 15
References: 27
Equipment Design Final Year Project
Absorption
The removal of one or more component from the mixture of gases by using a suitable solvent is
second major operation of Chemical Engineering that is based on mass transfer.
In gas absorption, soluble vapors are more or less absorbed in the solvent from its mixture with
inert gas. The purpose of such gas scrubbing operations may be any of the following;
Types of Absorption
Physical absorption,
Chemical Absorption.
Physical Absorption
In physical absorption mass transfer take place purely by diffusion and physical absorption is
governed by the physical equilibria.
In it mass transfer takes place purely by diffusion and is governed by the physical equilibria. The
forces that bring about physical absorption are predominantly the attractive “dispersion forces”
and short‐range repulsive forces. In addition, electrostatic forces are responsible for the
adsorption of polar molecules, or by surfaces with a permanent dipole.
Chemical Absorption
In this type of absorption as soon as a particular component comes in contact with the absorbing
liquid a chemical reaction take place. Then, by reducing the concentration of component in the
liquid phase, which enhances the rate of diffusion.
Types of Absorber
There are two major types of absorbers which are mainly used for absorption purposes:
Packed column
Plate column
2
Equipment Design Final Year Project
From the above consideration packed column is selected as the absorber, because in our case the
diameter of the column is less than 6 ft. As the solubility is infinity so the liquid will absorb as
much gases as it remains in contact with gases so packed tower provide more contact. It is easy
to operate.
3
Equipment Design Final Year Project
Berl Saddle.
Intalox Saddle.
Rasching rings.
Lessing rings.
Cross-partition rings.
4
Equipment Design Final Year Project
For the absorption packing selected in this case are Intalox saddles because of the following
features.
Selection of Solvent
Selexol solvent is a mixture of dimethyl ethers of polyethylene glycol, and has the formulation of
CH3 (CH2CH2O) nCH3, where n is between 3 and 9. Selexol solvents are true physical solvents
and do not react chemically with the absorbed gases. The ability of Selexol solvents to remain
chemically non-reactive with the gas is a necessary feature. The Selexol solvent has some other
encouraging advantages too.
A very low vapor pressure that limits its losses to the treated gas
Low viscosity to avoid large pressure drop
High chemical and thermal stability
Low heat requirements for regeneration because the solvent can be reproduced by a
simple
pressure letdown.
High solubility for nickel and iron carbonyls allows for their removal from synthesis gas.
High H2S absorption capacity.
5
Equipment Design Final Year Project
TG = Temperature of gases = 40 0C
L ʃG
F LV =
G √ ʃL
FLV = 0.03582
6
Equipment Design Final Year Project
K4
Percentage flooding =
√ K 4 at flooding
( )
¿
G ¿
µ L 0.1
13.1 F P
( )
µL
G*=35.696 Kg m2/sec
Thus
A= 1.236 m2
4
Diameter =
√ 3.14
Column arearequired
Diameter = 1.2549m
7
Equipment Design Final Year Project
g = 9.81 m/s2
aw
=1−exp ¿
a
aw/a = 0.096581116
aw = 0.096581116*a
aw = 0.096581116*194
aw = 8.923883283 m2/m3
aw = Effective interfacial area of packing per unit volume m2/m3 = 18.736 m2/m3
g = 9.81 m/s2
1/ 3
ρL Lw 2/ 3 μL −1 /3
KL ( )
μL
=0.0051(
awμL
) (
ρLDL
) (adp)0.4
KL = 0.00002736 m/s
8
Equipment Design Final Year Project
R = 0.08314 bar.m3/kmol. K
DG= µG/ʃG
DG = 8.440*10-05 m2/s
0.7
K G RT g Vw µ g 13
aD g
=K 5( )(
a µg )
ʃ g Dg
(adp)−2
KG = 0.001406591 kmol/m2.s.bar
aw = Effective interfacial area of packing per unit volume m2/m3 = 18.73 m2 /m3
Gm
HG=
KG aw P
HG= 0.701682385 m
9
Equipment Design Final Year Project
Ct = 1030/ 310
Ct = 3.322 kmol/m3
aw = Effective interfacial area of packing per unit volume m2/m3 =18.73 m2/m3
Lm
H L=
K L aw Ct
HL= 0.35083392 m
Colburn has suggested the economic value of mGm/Lm from 0.7 to 0.8
mGm
H OG=H G + HL
Lm
HOG=0.965544 m
Y1/Y2 = 205.8823529
mGm/Lm = 0.7
10
Equipment Design Final Year Project
NOG = 14
Z = 14 * 0.968
Z = 13.563 m
L ʃG
F LV =
G √ ʃL
FLV = 0.03582
11
Equipment Design Final Year Project
0.5
K 4 ʃ G ( ʃ L− ʃ G )
( )
¿
G ¿ 0.1
µL
13.1 F P
( )
µL
G = 35.696 kg/s
L ʃG
F LV =
G √ ʃL
FLV = 0.03258
¿
K 4 ʃ G ( ʃ L − ʃ G ) 0.5
G ¿( )
µ L 0.1
13.1 F P
µL ( )
G = 8.47558282 kg/s
12
Equipment Design Final Year Project
Volumetric liquid flow rate per unit cross sectional area = 0.000585287 m3/m2. S
GX ʃy
GY
=
√
ʃ x− ʃ y
=0.0110
gc = 32
13
Equipment Design Final Year Project
G 2 F p µ0.1
=0.0138
ʃ g ( ʃ l− ʃ g ) g c
Total ΔP = 7.4390*17.563
Specification Sheet
C-201
Identification
Item Absorber
Type Packed Column
Packing Ceramics Intalox Saddles
Function
To absorb H2S gas from Syngas
Operating Pressure 27.5 bar
Operating Temperature 40oC
Diameter 1.25 m
Area 1.236 m2
Height of transfer unit 0.968
Number of transfer unit 14
Column Height 17.563
Pressure Drop 0.01281 bar
14
Stripping
Stripping works on the basis of “mass transfer” that involves the transfer of a solute from the
liquid phase to the gas phase.
“Stripping is a separation process in which one or more components of a liquid stream are
eliminated by place in contact with a gas stream that is insoluble in the liquid stream.”
In industrial applications the liquid and vapor streams can have co-current or countercurrent
flows.
Stripping can be carried out in two types of columns, a packed type or a tray type column.
Packing Selection
It is the most important factor of the system. The packing provides adequate area for intimate
contact between phases. The efficiency of packing with respect to both HTU and flow capacity
determines to an important extent the overall size of the tower. The economics of the installation
are therefore tied up by the packing choice.
The packing is the heart of the performance of the stripper. Its proper selection involves an
understanding of packing operational features and the effects on performance of the points of
major physical difference between several types. The types and corresponding merits and
demerits are given below.
Rashing Rings
Berl Saddles
Intalox Saddles
Pall Rings Lessing rings.
Cross-partition rings
Single spiral rings
Double - Spiral rings etc.
For the stripping packing selected in this case are Intalox saddles because of the following
features.
16
Equipment Design Final Year Project
1. Selection of Column
2. Selection of packing and material
3. Selection of packing and material
4. Calculating the size of packing
5. Calculate Flow Factor
6. Calculate K4 & Mass Velocity
7. Calculate the Area of Column
8. Calculating the diameter of column
9. Determining the height of transfer unit (HOG)
10. Determining the number of transfer units (NOG)
11. Determining the height of the column
12. Calculating the operating velocity
13. Calculating the flooding velocity
14. Determining the pressure drop across the column
Calculations
17
Equipment Design Final Year Project
L ʃG
F LV =
G √ ʃ L
FLV = 0.106
0.5
K 4 ʃ G ( ʃ L− ʃ G )
( )
¿
G ¿ 0.1
µL
13.1 F P
( )
PL
G* = 1.25106 kg/m2. s
Diameter = 0.2022m
18
Equipment Design Final Year Project
Onda’s Method
g = 9.81 m/s2
aw
=1−exp ¿
a
aw = 44.21 m2/m3
aw = Effective interfacial area of packing per unit volume m2/m3 = 44.21 m2/m3
g = 9.81 m/s2
19
Equipment Design Final Year Project
1/ 3
ρL Lw 2/ 3 μL −1 /3
KL ( )
μL
=0.0051(
awμL
) (
ρLDL
) (adp)0.4
KL= 0.00010864m/s
R = 0.08314 bar.m3/kmol. K
DG= μG/ʃG
DG = 0.0000089041 m2/s
0.7
K G RT g Vw µ g 13
aD g
=K 5
a µg ( )( )
ʃ g Dg
(adp)−2
KG = 0.0003299 kmol/m2.s.bar
20
Equipment Design Final Year Project
aw = Effective interfacial area of packing per unit volume m2/m3 = 44.21 m2/m3
Gm
HG=
KG aw P
HG = 0.1445 m
Ct = 3.203 kmol/m3
aw = Effective interfacial area of packing per unit volume m2/m3 = 44.21 m2/m3
Lm
H L=
K L aw Ct
HL = 0.7385 m
Colburn has suggested the economic value of mGm/Lm from 0.7 to 0.8
mG m
H OG=H G + HL
Lm
HOG = 0.6245 m
21
Equipment Design Final Year Project
Y1/Y2 = 54.65
mGm/Lm = 0.7
NOG = 7
Z = 4.37 m
L ʃG
F LV =
G √ ʃL
22
Equipment Design Final Year Project
FLV = 0.106
0.5
¿
K 4 ʃ G ( ʃ L− ʃ G )
G ¿( 0.1
)
µL
13.1 F P
( )
µL
G*=1.251007323 kg/s
FLV = 0.106
23
Equipment Design Final Year Project
0.5
¿
K 4 ʃ G ( ʃ L− ʃ G )
G ¿( 0.1
)
µL
13.1 F P
( )
µL
G=2.194412009
Volumetric liquid flow rate per unit cross sectional area = 0.003547738 m3/m2. s
ΔPflooding = 0.115Fp0.7
24
Equipment Design Final Year Project
GX ʃy
GY
=
√
ʃ x− ʃ y
=0.108
gc = 32
G 2 F p µ0.1
=0.006045
ʃ g ( ʃ l− ʃ g ) g c
25
Equipment Design Final Year Project
SPECIFICATION SHEET
Identification
Item No C-202
Function
Diameter 0.213m
Area 0.04 m2
26
Equipment Design Final Year Project
References:
1. R. K. Sinnott, Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design, vol. 6, no. 4. 2005.
2. Dave, Ashok & Pathak, Bhumika & Dave, Medha & Kashyap, Poonam & Huang, Ye.
(2019). H2S Absorption from Syngas in Physical Solvent DMEPEG: Proceedings of
ICIIF 2018. 10.1007/978-981-13-1966-2_30.
3. Martelli, Emanuele & Gatti, Manuele & Maréchal, François & Consonni, Stefano.
(2015). Multi-objective Optimization of a Selexol® Process for the Selective Removal of
CO2 and H2S from Coal-derived Syngas.
4. Ahn, Hyungwoong & Kapetaki, Zoe & Brandani, Pietro & Brandani, Stefano. (2015).
Process simulation of a dual-stage Selexol process for 95% carbon capture efficiency at
an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant. International Journal of
Greenhouse Gas Control. 39. 17-26. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.04.015.
27