Running Head: HYPOTHESIS TESTING 1

Hypothesis Testing

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Date
HYPOTHESIS TESTING 2

Hypothesis Testing

In statistical analysis, among major methodologies in the process of verifying the results is to

ascertain the assumptions (Pata, 2018). Find whether the given assumption makes statistical

sense or not, and this can only be accomplished by use of the hypothesis testing.as such this

essay will be outlining all the hypothesis from the dataset of the part 1 of the statistical project

for both the happiness and the engagement.

Null Hypothesis:

 In both cases the rating for the median as well as the mode is same in other terms

the happiness tends to compliment the workplace engagement.

 There is not any particular correlation between the standard error in the both

cases.

 There is a slight variation between the standard deviation deviation for the

happiness as well as the engagement and hence small difference the mean.

Alternative Hypothesis:

 Kurtois and Skewness seems to be associated in the happiness while indirectly

proportional in the engagement.

 The standard deviation is lower than that in the engagement similarly to the error

which is quite high in happiness at 0.2.

 The maximum ratings in both cases varies while the minimum rating is the same.

 the sum in engagements is higher than the sum in the happiness

with the independent sample t test on the dataset, we’ll be aiming to find the comparison

between the means of the happiness dataset and the engagement dataset, in the process of
HYPOTHESIS TESTING 3

proving the level of significant of the data (Elahi, Abid, Arya, & Farooqi, 2020).in this case we

can have our null hypothesis (H0) as well as the alternative hypothesis (H1) written as;

H0: U1 = U2 (where means are equal)

H1: U1 = U2 (means not equal)

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal

Variances

  Variable 1 Variable 2
35.6962964 36.8095147
Mean 6 7
10262.2031
Variance 3 10929.4754
Observations 13 13
10595.8392
Pooled Variance 6
Hypothesized Mean Difference 0
df 24
-
0.02757206
t Stat 8
0.48911572
P(T<=t) one-tail 5
t Critical one-tail 1.71088208
0.97823145
P(T<=t) two-tail 1
2.06389856
t Critical two-tail 2  
HYPOTHESIS TESTING 4

Reference
Pata, U. K. (2018). Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development,

income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: testing EKC hypothesis with structural

breaks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770-779.

Elahi, N. S., Abid, G., Arya, B., & Farooqi, S. (2020). Workplace behavioral antecedents of job

performance: Mediating role of thriving. The Service Industries Journal, 40(11-12), 755-

776.