Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Interaction Model takes into consideration the background and experience of students &
teachers.
The curriculum elements are seen as flexible, interactive and modifiable.
Taba's approach is based on the inductive approach to curriculum design.
Interaction Model takes into consideration the background and experience of students &
teachers.
The curriculum elements are seen as flexible, interactive and modifiable.
Taba's approach is based on the inductive approach to curriculum design.
Hilda Taba believed that there must be a process for evaluating student achievement of
content after the content standards have been established and implemented.
The main concept of this approach to curriculum development is that teachers must be
involved in the development of the curriculum.
She believed that the curriculum should be organized around generalized learning objectives
which enables students to discover principles that will enable them to be successfully.
There are seven major steps for developing a "grassroots approach to curriculum
development. These steps are:
6) learning activities are organized, remembering the students being taught; and
Taba stated that there are three groupings of objectives: knowledge- what children need to
understand; skills-children need to learn how to; and concepts-children need to be (Ornstein
& Hunkins, 2009).
She was an advocate for students using problem solving and inquiry discovery techniques.
The main idea to this approach is that the needs of the students are at the forefront to the
curriculum.
The use of Taba's ideals of charting students status in learning and placing students with
similar learning in diverse groupings, what is now called cooperative learning groups.
This is an idea that needs to be considered if using the basic ideas of this approach in
curriculum design.
Strengths
Weaknesses
It is a descriptive model.
The term “naturalistic” describes how the process of curriculum planning is done instead of
suggesting how it should be done.
It uses communicative approach to curriculum design.
The communicative approach starts with the more subjective perceptions and views of the
designers, the target group, and other stakeholders.
Walker suggests that better curriculum planning and development will result if persons
participate in the process and reach a consensus about the final product.
Walker’s model has three phases:
1. Platform – includes ideas, preferences, points of view, beliefs and values about the
curriculum.
3. Design – here, curriculum developers actually make decisions, which are based
on deliberations (above). These decisions affect curriculum documents and materials
production.
The platform guides the group in making decisions and determining actions.
The platform is the guiding force for the deliberative process, and all decisions made during
the process will be judged in terms of consistency to the platform.
Therefore, the platform should also include explicit models of the issues and the curriculum
problems that the group will be faced with.
After a platform has been established, the process of deliberation begins as the group
attempts to make specific decisions in regards to the curriculum.
Deliberation may take on many forms, but the most common forms are argumentation and
debate.
During deliberation, proposed decisions are formulated and alternatives to those proposed
decisions are suggested.
Arguments for and against the proposed decisions and their alternatives are then considered
by the group in an attempt to choose the most defensible alternative.
The result of deliberation is the curriculum design.
Walker suggests that the design is best represented as the series of decisions that were
made during the creation of the design.
These decisions make up two parts of the design: the explicit design and the implicit design.
The explicit design is composed of the decisions that were made during deliberation—after a
consideration of alternatives.
The implicit design consists of those decisions that were made automatically—without
considering alternatives.
In Walker’s naturalistic model, the important output that is generated by curriculum
development is a set of decisions.
As a result, evaluation is used only as a means of justifying or discrediting the decisions that
were made, rather than as a self-corrective process that directs practice to the attainment of
objectives.
Strengths
Walkers’ model consider the inputs of curriculum developers, target group, and other
parties/stakeholders in the development of the curriculum.
There is a broad social support because all parties involved are given opportunity to
contribute.
Weaknesses
Walker describes what happens in the process of curriculum design but does not describe
what actually happens in the classroom.
The processes for deliberation can be time consuming and resource intensive.
Consensus is often hard to achieve.
Tyler stated his curriculum rationale in terms of four questions that, he argued, must be
answered in developing any curriculum and plan of instruction:
(2) What educational experiences can be provided that are likely to attain these purposes?
(4) How can we determine whether these purposes are being attained?
Strengths:
Provides an easy to follow step- by-step guide to curriculum planning and development.
Begins with a set of clear objectives that teachers must plan tasks and work towards
achieving the specified outcomes.
Weaknesses
This cyclical model was developed by Daryl Kenneth Wheeler.
He modified Tyler’s straight line model into a cyclic or spherical model.
Reason: Tyler’s model did not provide for feedback or help students achieve the evaluative
outcomes or expected objectives (Urebvu, 1990).
This model which Wheeler called the circular model has five steps which are:
Step 5. Evaluating.