Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by
Theodore Vo Galambos
and
\
Robert Lo Ketter
..
This work has been carried out as a part of an
investigati.on sponsored jointly by the Welding
Research Council and the Navy Department with funds
furnished by the following:
June, 1957
Ii
TABLE oF CONTENTS
I. Introduction • • • .....
·..·.• • • o • • • • 1
2. ) Tests of Massortnet • 0 • • • o • • • • o • • • • 0
23
3.) Tests in the Lehigh Series ~ ...·... · . • • 26
4.) .. . . . . . .
Tests in the Wisconsin Series. • • • : 27
v. Summary and Conclusions ·..... ... 0.. • 0 • .0 29
'.
• • · .. .. • • ..
'
..
20SA.19 -2-
(Ref. 9).
test results.
loading that have been considered are "c" and "dll (see Fig. 1).
/.
~05A.19 -3-
in Fig. 2).
The interaction curves for each of these cases are shown in Figs. 4,
5, 6 and 7, 8 and 9.
(Ref. 8).
•
20SA.19
-4-
other two types that are considered are for the maximum carrying
and since the star.ting point for these calculations is the elastic
P LSin kL LJ P L ~
For the case where Ma :: Mb Cl Mo and P = Po, ~quation (a) reduces to
follows:
cos ~ • • • • • • • fI! • • 0 • • •
(c)
2
rMo
M =..(1- Po)
P
cos T
kL r·
I • • • • • .• • • • • • • • • • • •
(1)
7 . Y
1ff.
·2
a !!~
2
!£
EI
f2 ~ EAr
I: Po2 = 1 L ~!2
2 r AE
. - 1
2
or
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. .(e)
Fct:k' ~l'lI. E value ef' 30 j COiJ 5 0CO psi and oy ef 33,000 psi, this reduces
Me',
-- =
~
~ ,.~
. . Pe «. L
.1- -- cos Oco05491)-
• ~, r
m) Po
--
~
.0. o 0 (],a)
"-
M,·,. My, ' [ 1
He
Y
y - Po P
y
-
Si.ll kL .
0
ll Sll! kx + sin k(L-x) - sin kLJ
Py ....,
vlhich gives
y -G) ~ r~~: ~ Mo
-1+ dos lqt - cot kL Sll! kx
J • • .'g)
-7-
kL00010982 1
_
lIlI
r-
~~
P -
(
y
J
kx will simiJArly'be
(h)
~.E2Py
o • • • • • • • • • • •
kx = 0 ..010982 2£
r
0 •
SubstituM.ng these expressions and the S/A value for the 8 WF 31 if:
y = 0.010)
that equation (3) assumes that the maximum moment occurs away
from the end ef the member. When this is net the case and the
applied end moment is the maximum moment aleng the member the
• • • • • • • • • • • • .(j)
vdJ.l be presented there has also been given a scale (acro~s the
t0P ,~nd down the right hand side) for ec/r2 • That is, a line
dr~>1m from the origin through the ec/r 2 Value in question will
po/pyo This fellows from the fact that had the member been
eccentrically loaded,
P e = Me
-9-
205A.19
or non-dimensionalizing
Pe-·- _ Mo
Sdf - M;
If the left hand side of this equation is multiplied by PyiPy
or
the curves shGWn for case "d". A similar method was used in the
which defines the relationship between. the applied end moment and resulting
-10-
curve; that is, the point at which the derivation of the end
in Figo 3.
not c0nSidered.)
Y = (3.010) 0020
0080
sin
sin.
x;
sin ,1.188. l' x (r!)
Y = (0.7525) '0.9276 - L • • • • . . . • • • • • ;;
the moments due to Mo , are listed .for each pClint. The assumed
o.f the previeus cycle are usee; until cenvergenee is reached. '!n
1.8 given
line "e" the moment Poy is shOwnJin l:trie "d':t\~hesuin of the moments in
lines'tla" and "Cfl'~ This total moment is then transfOrmed 'into non-
angle changes are listed. These were obtained from an enlarged version
of 'the Mft1y versus ¢/¢y curves of Fig. 3. The p/Py'= Q~8 curve
Lines II gll and IIhll shO'I1 the perfClrmance of the usual numerical
factor shown in the right hand columr (i.e. ,."'¢;;) will give the
are computed in l:ine II ill • The sum of lines f1hlr and lIi ll give
in :inches.
As would be expected, the final deflectiens do not correspond
to the assumed ones shown :in line lib". Therefore other cycles of
obtained fer the given rati0 ef Po/Py and L/r and fClI' the
assumed Mo/My • The next step in the procedure is to compute the
4 be -8 c
~A = 2 A
Which, as shown :in Appendix E, assumes that the deflection curve
follOtvs that
shape factor, f, of the sectien was 1.09 (Ref. 4), this critical
the fully plastic moment by dividing by the shape factor. That is,
205A,19 -14-
The curves sh6WR in Figs. :;, 6, 8 and 9 were all comp~ted, point
larger; and since the shape factor used in the calculations was
1.09 (the lCJWest value fOr rolled WF and I shapes); use of these
dictiens.
slenderness value.
with0Ut residual stress are very similar with the values beirlg
lewer for the case with residual stress. The actual :ma.@itude
diagrams.
In. APPROXIMATE DESIGN EQUATIONS
about its streng axis; the material is A-7 mild structural steel
and twist has not been considered. While mest laberatory columns
In. Fig 0 11 is shown the colunm curve fer pure axial thrust which
the axial thrust ratio (Po /py ) and slendernesf ratio, (L/r),
see AppendiX F:
Po
-=
Py
1 _ _1
3,500,000 (1)3
r
+ 1
32,000
(1'2
r)
_ (1\
r)~
.... (7)
1
curve below the Euler curve (i.e. L/r ~ 112), then the simpler
expression
Po
p; , 1
= 1 - 111,000 (;L)2. - b'451 (L)"
r (7a)
may be used.
Assuming as in the case of pure axial thrust that L/r will mlt
exceed 120 and further that Po/py ~ 0.6 an equation of the type
Mo
-=
Mp
1 - OC Po
p; _ ~(~) 2 • • • • . . . .••••• • (8)
0<..: and (3 are assumed ~,c vary with the slenderness according to the
general equations
20SA.19 -18-
Mo
-=
Mp _oZ·. .!:£
Py + /wl
().., . . . • • • • • • . • . • . • . . . • (9)
,
Here, as before at... and (3 are assumed to vary with slenderness, and
c?\ :. -1.110 -
(1L/) {LLfsl§·9a -
9r . + ri '5
(J:,!p) 3
b u,D 72O~OOO
","4
and • • • • • 0 • • • .(9a)
s
205A..19 -19-'
of 0.12 Py will ret reduce the moment capacity below this fully
a. Axial ~ only:
Pe
py = 1.0
1
- 3,500,000 ( ~r\3,) + ~l~
32,000
Values of Po/Py far 0 t... L/r (120 are tabulated in Table I"
c. Case ~ Loading
~ =. ~ - P/Py
Mp ~- 0.12
,
could be used for this loading cond~tion, It ~ould be
equation.
20SA.19 -21-
in Ref. 8.
~~ial thrust; however, the column tests under pure axial load
conditions were such that they failed by column buckling abeut tre
weak axis. The tests which can be cempared with the derived curves
value Po/py , all 'ilalues shown in this table have been reproduced
ZOSA.19
fr0Ill Table NlD. V (p.20) of Ref. 8. The test numbers refer to the
a steel with a yield strength of 42.4 ksi, whereas lot 2 is for one
having a value 40.8. . . The yield strength of lot 3 was 39.8 ksi.
' ..
and }i'1gs. 16 and 17 shO'W the compa.risen af the test results with
passing the yield point in the case of the sherter celumns, and
(see Figs. 16 and 17) failed below the predicted values. Fer
20 Tests ~ liaS80nnet
.
the test results fElT' the PN 22 sectien are net directly applicable •
(The shape factor fer the PN 22 sectieR; i.e., the ratie of the
were pinned at the ends in beth directions since they were previded
type of loadiI:J.g.
205A.1.9 -24-
type ef loadingo
axial thru.st in the plane ef the web (ioeo streng axis bending).
c emdder enJ.y the behav-ltJr €If' the member ilIl. the platle of the
re~;pect
•
tel thE!J weak direetil!Jno T'nis WEluld cerresp0Ild to an
DIE-IO sections (nominal L/r y I!I 130 and 175, tl€lminal L/rx • 82 and
; 110~) These were the lighter seeti0ns and had a neminal area
in general,
205A.19 -25-
e being -t.he end ec,ijenhricdt,y ()f le>ad applicat,il.'iln andpx the c<!Y.r'e
I'adius 0 Since the Ci.'tr'e rad:LiJ.8 can be expressed in terms of' the
I!'t 1:,a":.-,lei8 6 and ? t')f Appendix G,9 the test results are tabulated.
·~entimeter O. metric ten e 1000 kg) f'er t/he DIE 10 ~ection, and by
24.oS6 ter:;.f:~ per square cerLt.imet.er fer the DIE 20 section. These
alue:s
iT 0f the yield 01:;1'1388 are ave.-rage Wilues, determiJ::J.ed by
l'r-tbles 6 and. 7,\l a~nd these 'tfer-s then re:,luced as in the other cases
205A.19 -26-
( b.)
r adj.
~r VGl
~.
e:
where
In Fig. 18, these test results are compared to each Clf the
results lie closer to the predicted cases than did those for
this figure, there has also been shovm the Euler column curve in
resu~ts listed were taken from Ref. 6; however, there have been
most of these test results have not been shown on graphs. \<!hile
comparison over too wide a range of variables. For the pure axial
rates over estimate the true static yield stress level of the
The correlation between the test resUrlts for the axially load members,
4. ~ -
Test in ..,;,;,;;
the ......Wisconsin ;;.;;.;;.,;;;,;;,;;;.
Series
..;,,;;;;;.;;;.;,;;,;;.~
built-up and tied. columns were tested, and in Table 9 are listed
those tests which can be compared "lith the loading condition tlctl
constant value of ec/r 2 = 1.0 was used in each of the tests. End
conditions were such that the member was essentially pinned in tlE
These results are shown on Fig. 21. Tests H-l, H-2, and H-3
confirm the theoretical curve, whereas the tests with high LJr
values fall below the predicted strengths. While the exact manner
torsional buckling.
. '.J,
~05A.19 ~29-
SUMMARY
-
AND CONCLUSIONS
:b..as one of the lowest shape factEXl:'S of any of the sections rolled,
currently underway.
205A.19 -31-
no ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Bureau of Ships
.t>.
.;"
20SA.19 -32-
YILREFERENCES
11. Ketter, R.L", "Stability of Beam Colunms Above the EJAstic L:iIiJ:it"
ASCE Sep .. 692, Vel o 81, May 1955.
APPENDIX
205A.1S
NomenclatU1"8
M Moment. (inch=kips)
1'1y "" ayS Moment corresponding to initial yield under pure moment (inch-kips)
d Depth of member
e Eccentricity (inches)
t ThiclaJ.ess of flan.ge
Deflection (inches)
LIT' Slenderness=ratio
Nomenclature (cont,;,Ud)
Non=dimensional c:or,ztants
r 2 2
2 = ll~ .... 3.010 in
cx ~
Mo = 0.20 .~ = (0.20) (904.2) = 180.84nK
The end shear (i.e. the horizo Reaction is ~ = i~~:~4 = 1.303K .
Then the moment at each position is the following:
Position 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
II Xli 0 ;1.7.35 34.7 52005 69.4 86.75 104.1 121..45 138.8
Mo - :Mo x 181 - 158 136 113 90 68 45 22 0
r
-:~.::'. . - . . _. - .. - ---- ~-- ." .. ......
~" '--'---~-._--~.p.
20SA.19 -38-
Appendix D
L/ra 40
,ipiJhy, CI OoB
Me;11y a OG2
l- t .. 13BoB" I
(!'Me
IBlK a l
.i."\)~
',.'. \~
- ____+--
--tT p.
Pe, .a240·~8K
'tl!-,I-- A.17.~J.t1l ~
L
CI L303 K
t
(j) (b ( D QD cD cD .(D QD ( D MF Netatien
(1st Trial)
~6' .,
y=A:x.2 +Bx+C
@ x =).. y .<S~
@ x =2~ y ='¢c..
1.) 0 III C
y= f 2~&fer +(!WJ ~ 2
.(<-) x
The slope at x 0
-w7
I:
From Figs. 6 and 9 (Rc ... O.::ay) the following values of ~ are obtained
Py
when lli? &8 o.
My
Po
p;: 1.00 0.96 0.92 0.88 0.83 0.7, 0.62
PoL 3 L :3 L
-lOla
p
y . -r +b r+ _ c -r +d
~ =80 -- E2 = 0.83
r Py
Substituting I Solving:
c • -3,8
-1
205A.19 -41-
(_r~)3 I ~\ 2
Po
p; 1
= .00 -
. . 1
3,500,000 j
+ 1
32,000 \ r; -ill \ rJl
1 (L
o • • • • • • • • .II
to the one furnished by the AISC handbook for allowable column stresses.
Matching only that part of the curve below thE! Euler value (i.e.
will be obtained
@ 1r = 50, t2.
ry
1:1 0.900
(1'\2 (1)
Po .li.L- ~
pY = 1- 111,000 - 645 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • IIa
..
~
205A.19 -42-
TABLE 1
Values of Allowable Axial Thr'ust (determined from Equation U)
L/r Po/Py L/r po/py L/r po/py
0 1.000 52 0.899 86 0.809
5 0.987 54 0.895 88 0.801
10 0.975 56 0.891 90 0.793
15 0.964 58 0.887 92 0.785
20 0.954 50 0.883 94 0.776
25 0.945 62 0.877 96 0.767
30 0.937 64 0.874 98 00757
32 00933 66 0.869 100 0.747
34 0.930 68 0.865 102 0.736
36 0.927 70 0.860 104 0.726
38 0.923 72 0.854 106 0.714
40 0.920 74 0.849 108 0.702
42 0.917 76 0.843 110 0.690
44 0.913 78 0.837 112 0.677
46 0.910 80 0.830 114 0.664
48 0.906 82 0.823 116 0.650
50 0.903 84 0.816 118 0.635
120 0.620
205A.19 -43-
TABLE la
- ~ ( P;)
Po.V~
Mo
M; a 1.0 - 0< p;
Po
. • • • • • • • (a)
Note: for all the calculations for this case. ~ C!" 0.3 and
. ry
!:2. a 0.6 will be used. (The form of the equation insures Mo/Mp := 1
Py
when ~ = 0.)
Py
2.) g = 0.3
Mo
My = 0.278
from Equation a.
Mo
I E2.)= 1.00- Mp'
\ p Po
y Pi
then
1 .. ) 0< + 0.6 ~ = 1.000. - 0.008 0( + 0.6 (3 = 1.6,3
0.6
at !"
L • 0, ~ = 0.420 ••• a,= 0.420
at !:. = 120
r
at.L
-r = 80 0<. = 1.80
, L
at'·or = 40 c.~= 1.00
Solving:
205A.19
-46-
then cA
.
= 0.420 + i'ri
(L')
-
.( 1 )2.
r:
_ .......(~rL)3
_...;;....1. _
rp.,
III 0.770 + b2lr;
!) 2
I L\ 3 (
+ b 3 \.~ + b4
(Lr/\
L
at -r = 120
L
at -r a 80 ~ = -0.720
at ~ = 40 ,~ = +0.160
Solving:
." 1· 1-. 1
b 2 a_ 58.095' b3=~' bh=- 606,060
L fLj2 {1\3
(3 :;: 0.770 _ . ..L
58.1
+ m..
8700
- ..J.!L-.
606,000 •••••••••• • (c)
) . The values of!3 from Equation (c) are plotted on Fig. 12 in dotted
l:lne.
Contifluation Table 2
, L/r· b(
L L/r ()(.
~
~Q6 2.59 -1.73 114 2.90 -2.14
108 a.67 -1.83 ' 116 2.98 -2.26
110 2.74 -1.93 118 3.06 -2.37
112 2..82 ~2.03 120 3.16 -2.51
20SA.19 -49-
3. Development of an interaction equation for the condition "dtl
load:mg.
line:
~ .~(~) ~~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • (d)
Mo
My -0 Determined by drawing the best
straight line thr ough the c~ve
in question (by "eye fl)
Po - .. ."
P PcJ._~O •. ~O -,:r-
Mo IS
1• 0
Y Y
1.) 0 = 0.500<. + ~
2.) 1.oa 0.100( + ~
,0( = -2.500
i~ 1:1 +1.250
when!! ,
r
(3 IS 1.250
20SA.19
-50-
Therefore
C 1",""'_ ;
I
B" ...L..
185,000 3080
or
Fig. 13.
For ~ assume that
"
line :in Fig. 14. Good agreement is noted for both 0\ and 13
with the original curves.
Table 3, .
L/r K &
5 -1.134 1.135
10 -;L.153 1.137
15 -1.169 1.139
20 -1.182 1.142
25 -1.194 1.144
30 -1.205 1.148
35 -i.217 1.151
40 -1.231 1.155
45 -1.247 1.159
50 -1.267 ·1.163
55 -1.292 1.167
60 -1.323 1.172
65 -1.360 1.177
70 -1.406 1.182
75 -1.460·· 1.188
80 -1.524 1.194
85 -1.600 1.200
90 -1.688 1.206
95 -1"!788 1.213
100 -1.903 1.220
105 -2.033 1.227
110 -2.179 1.234
115 -2.343 1.242
120 -2.525 1.250
205A.19 -53-
Appendix G
Table 4
Eccentricity Pmax
Test No. Member Material "inches L/lX kips po/py
1.) Member I
Section: 3I5.7
Area: 1.64· in 2
Depth: 3.00 in
lxJc: 2.5 in 4
3
Sxx:: 1.7 in
rxx:: 1.23 fu
Plastic Modulus (f) : 1.1JJ
Yield strength: Lot 1. cry III 42.2 ksi; Mp :: 81.9 uK
Lot 2. cry 40.8 ksi;
III Mp r:: 79.3"K
20) Member II
Section: 6 WF 20
Area: 5.90 in2
Depth: 6.20 in
, Ixx:: 41. 7 in4
Sxx:: 13.4' in3
r:x:x:: 2.66 in
Plastic modulus (f): 1.12
Yield strength: Lot 3. ~ ::: 39.8 ksi; ~ III 596 uK
20SA.19
-56- '
Table 5
f05A.19 -57-
Table 6
ec P max Corrected
Test No. Section ;:r (tons) p;y(tms) I/Tx L/rx Po/py
,Table 7
Massonnet's Test Results, Loading Case "d"
ec Pmax P
Test No. Section ;a (tons) ({ons) L/rx L /rx(33) Po/Py
4 DIE 20 0.5 95.0 133 23.6 23.2 0.715
5 " 1.0 78.8 133 23.6 23.2 0.593
11 " 0.5 93.8 134 35.6 35.0 0.700
12 II 1.0 74.8 133 35.3 34.7 0.562
13 II
3.0 40.3 133 35.2 34.6 0.303
19 II
0.5 90.8 133 47.4 46.5 0.683
20 " 1.0 70.0 133 47.7 46.8 0.526
21 II
3.0 39.0 134 47.7 46.8 0.291
27 II
0.5 82.0 133 59.0 58.0 0.616
28 " 1.0 67.0 135 59.6 58.6 0.496
29 II
3.0 38.1 135 59.2 58.2 0.282
36 DIE"lO 0.5 25.0 56.4 81.9 76.0 0.444
37 II
1.0 24.4 56.4 82.7 76.9 0.433
38 " 3.0 15.05 57.0 82.7 76.9 0.264
45 II
0.5 11.8 57.7 109.1 101.5 0.204
47 II
3.0 10.8 57.7 109.1 101.5 0.187
205A.19
-59-
r x (DIE 20) =: 8.24 em (Handbook value)
rx (DIE 10) 0: 3.97 em (Handbook value)
I
cry
E
= 40ksi+
erimental
Adjusted
*
(fy#
I Theoretical
!------,----+------.----t , I !
Loading i I Adjusted I I
Test No~ Member Conditions Po/Py MO/P L/rx Po/Py Mo/Mp
i I
T-G awF31 c 0.62 ~ 0.68 52 0.76 0013\
T-16
T-18
8VVF31
0031
c
c
.Q.:]g 0.78
0.91 0
0.13 I, 0.8.5 '
0.99 o
39
2.5
I 0.13
: 0.96
i
i
0: 89
1
0~92 i
!
o
T-28 i.MF13 c 0080 Q 0.82 76 ./ 0.83
-o
T-32 4WF13 c ~ 0076 0.78 101 1 0.12 0.76
1-
"i,)'
Vult.
Test No. ec/r 2 L/rx L/rx (33) o-y (ksi) Po/Py
H-1 LOa 1L4 10.7 37 .)~ ksi 20.7 0.553'
H-2 LOO 29.0 2'7.2 37.4 19.95 0.533
H-3 1.00 49.5 46.5 37,,4 17,,95 00480
H-4 1.00 69,,6 65,,0 38.0 15.10 0.398
H-5 1.00 89,,7 35,,4 36,,4 12,,60 0.346
205A.19
FIGURES
i,. "
Z05A.19 -63-
rt:: M9 rR..
/ Me>
L
~
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
Mo
I
I
\L
~oMo
i
Case "a" Ca.se "e"
k
Case lid"
Figure 1
o-RC = O.3a-y
Figure 2
.---'
205A o 19 -64-
Fo,: 002
LO Py
- -- --
Po = 0.1+
~~
!1;'y
-- ---
-
t
Do.5
--- ---
~ _ . -
Rc 0
Rc = 0.3
o
o LO 2.0
figuJre 3
H(JiD1e:ut~T1:J\)rlli!8t-c-l>11"",·at'UJre.
R.ela,tim:11.shlps fo::r' an, 8WF 31
Sec.tion~ Jb:1'.cludLti'.g· the. bLfluen.c:e of :R.e.s:i..d~iB!.l St:ress
-6.5~
LO
1.0
ec.
pC!.
Py
O. 5 ;r
o L IL_..~ "
Q
Lo.adiJ".g
205A.19 -66-
ec
rz
0.5 1.0
1.0 /
tOMe
LI ( \1)Mo
or
1.5
T po
~---+-"---H.-~"------"o,rJ·------4~--~J~~
-1-"
1
ec
20 !
rz
Po-
Py
O. 5 I--......:~--
I
8~l~~ I
'
~""cl--------1OO-----r-- -------+
I ! I 3.0
120
. I
I
\ I
4.0
5.0
7.0
o
o 0.5 1.0
Mo
Mp
Figure 5
o
1.0
1.5
ec
2.0' ;Z
,
Po
Py
3.0
')
4.0
5.0
7.0
o
o 0.5 1.0
·.. Mo
Mp
Figure 6
-......... _-
205A.19 -68-
Mo
.Mp
Figure 7
ec
rz
o 0;5. 1.0
. 1 •.0
1.5
2.0
0~5·-·i---
o
o 1.0
Figure 8
/
205A.19 -70-
ec
rz
1.0'
1.5
¥b~·' -'-I~
ec
= ~
2.0
WF Section
L Str.ang. Axis Bending
Py 0.5
3.0
o
o
Mo
Mp
Note: (JY= Yield .Stress inksi
\,
Figure 9
0.25
~-------I
'My Me 1'-
max. 0.233
\
0.20
Po
-- L
0.10
.> .....
Po
0.05
!2.
Py
= 0.8
1 =40
r
o I
Figure 10
/
205A.19 -72-
1.0
Euler Curve
~
L2 ~
PO
Py
=1 r W
-111, 00 - 645 Po _
Py
o
o
-'
.Figure 11
./
20SA.19 -73-
3.~
~ ~ 0.5
~ (L \ IL\ 2 L!J3
~ '-
-:(3=
'
0.770 -
-
m.. + ~ - ~
__ .58..1-- __, _,. '_) _
2.5
o
2.0 ~°Mo
-0.5
c;.,
c;i...
~
LI ( (3
1.'5
~ to Mo
"
-1.0
LO
-1.5
L L L
20 AO 60 80 100 -- 120
. -2.5 -
L
r
Figure 12
Mo
Mp = 1.0 _(~)[d.. +
Py .
f.>
\
(Po\\
Py JJ. . . . . (8)
where
(1r);)
= 0.420 + (~)
L\"Io
( yl
l)( - + -
69 29,000 1,164,000
• • • • (8b)
(l.. = 0.770
,oJ
-GL (;y- -
58.1
I
8,700
(~)~
606,000'
Po
120 100 80 60 40 20 ~ Do not use above = 0.6
pS
Po
0.5
-J:-' ~MO
Po
,Py F(~ ~Po
o .,.
o .0.5 1.0
M
Mp
Figure 13
L (L\2 I I(1LY3,
~::-l.lOO _",r +~ ''!' ~
-....;:::::: - - ---189
- -8889- -, - - 720;000
~
.
Po
-1. 5000
t,
-2.000
r
(~)7-
~=
GL
1.133~3080 185,000
--------
;' ;'.:
1.120
-2.SQO
o 20 40 60 80 100 120
L
r
Figure 14
Mo
,Case"d"
0.5
Pe' Po
Py Py
o
o 0.5 1.0
Mo
Mp
Figure 15
\
0.7
--
Euler Curve in Weak Directior
0.6
ec -- 1 •0
-;:z
r
0.5
Po
Py
• 0.4
~ = 5.0
•
0.2
r
---
----
e
r===:~-~-:--::=~~~?==::=:-:::~
~
-------- -
----
~--..
- ...... c:>
--- ----
~ ~
__
-- .-.
~- -
O~l
o
o
Figure 16
0.5
Case "e"
3
O. r-;e~~:~-~"::_~0~,::::::::~:---_fL
Po-;r= 3.0' ---.;::: - .~ 0_·
• p-
,y
----
0.2
a
ee
-.". -
=_
7.0 -
_ ...... _ --
_.0 -'., - - - - -
r ~
, ~ - --.;.
0.1
•
o
o
Figure 17
= 0.5
•
0.5
Po
Py
ec -- 3 •·0
::z
r
";.
__
.. ~---..w.
r.'1
ec
" ;:z =0.5
r
ec .- -1. 0 D.IE20 +-..,....f-_. DIE 10
::'2'
r
o ec -- 3 • 0
;:z
O~ r
Rc = 0
.
---..
Rc =0.3
... - ~ - - . Elastic SOlUtiOIf'
o
.L=1
rx y.
7
,
'< •
Figure 18·
•
Comparison with Test Result:s of Mas sonnet
205A.19 -80-
Po
Euler Curve incWeak Axis \
--------,..-~
~ = 0.5
• - ..... - \ Case "d"
0.7 , \
- - - - - - - ---.,
0.6 ec -- 1 . 0
::z
r \
\
0.5 - -.. - - - - -
Po
. Py
0.4 .'
\
\
r--
I ~ ~ = 0.5
0.2 t- A
rz
ec
= 1.0
•EJ
•
---
.*= Rc=O
3.0
Rc-= 0.3
0.1 DIE 20 .....-+---1lP- DIE 10
Elastic Solution
o
o 50 100 .. ':,
Lf33
.r ~ er--;
Figure 19
Mo
,. MP I: 0 curve
/
T-18
T-ll
t T-15
Po
. pY
Ao Huber Test
o 50 100
Figure 20
Comparison with Test Results of the Lehigh Test Series
20SA.19 -82-
.....
-:I~ .
8H32.Sect:l..on:
. Strong Axis .Bending
.Po
.1. .00.(Rc
t Euler.Curve in Wea.k Axis
Po
Py
«,\
o
o
•
.Figure 21
..
d .,...
~ .
\.\.\-\\G" UNjV£RS~
DEC 9 1964
.",t.!SRA'R~
~.~~,~~