Professional Documents
Culture Documents
21
with.at tours off error
Wit wit hf ft wi
w L
we assume that
IS I E S for all i
d w
l Uil
y Iti E
Lai a
El Hee L
D
Cti a
1 IS e
for all i o
N
E 1h1 Iz E
h
µ
hi JI14
If he find then
E Chico Echl is
decreasing
If h Ff E ht o
Echl is
increasing
Theorem
If Taylor's method of
order h
is used to approximate
the solution
is 01h
yr we can re
arrave
the Taylor expansion
Using
around
yit
Yin Yi hfyl.fi 1 hIf'cti.y
II f Ct yi if i Hi
for some
Ii C ti Titi
Based on we have
Fitial yiYI
h TYti.fi
ah f hi Mi D
for each i o d I
1
ti.fi fCfi
yi thf'cti
hn
f ft yi
since c c a S3
ye
yl f f it
yity
bounded on a S
TitichlE cha h
since I y ff Iffy
D8
Limitation of
Taylor
methods
21
Taylor expansion
fit y f fo
y
It.to E ly yoPE
It t.TII.tlt t.ny.yi.IE
HII It
it s
citation
reminder term
4,11 left tl
rely
It
yl I
f 7 2
fit Putt ll t Ralf
Recall
y ll
the Taylor
method of order 2
no
bigger
than 06h4
TYt.y flt.gl
t El t
Iff
Main idea
approximate
T'Ct yl using
f t 12 which
yep
will be expanded in
series
Taylor
fft.iq tpI
flt.y
t2IItpE kiEEIfI
igs3IIy
E III
n
to x
comparing
t2IftpIfy
fct.lt
fCt.ylth
fIItEyfI
Comparing coefficients
we have
t.kz
p HI
T ft y E
f t 1
ythflt.it
R
hIEftaIfIt.ylaEI
hfffit.yl 12,11
that the
Assuming partial
derivatives are bounded then
the error is 01h
The midpoint method
it swi hfftityh.withffti.IM
p p
This method resembles
the Euler however it is
different
ear
T It.ly flt.y1thfCt.y
th f t.tl
A
flt.y taufftta ytp.flf.yY
Therefore we have
fct.ylth FH.ly t
tho 3 17 f
tt
iEI
3ft
i
we need to find
an 7 ans
fx
oh
fct.yltaeffttdr.ytfhfft. i
a.ta
1flt.y
ta.de
ttaupefIT
a
take y
a
f If
pi
y
H
i
wait h't teach
Tunisian
have
We
flexibility
the
to choose parameters
a a I
4
2
12
Then we have the
method
following
E
The one Sified Eater method
12h4 The most common
12h method
K h.fcti.lv
kzihfftit.kz with
k hfftith
yh.it
Kui hff.IE ti Wit Ks
of Och
numerical
Comparing
methods there are
several consideration
accuracy
Amount of computation
effort
Should we use a
method with
simple a
Shaker site
step
or
complicated
a more
method h
with larger
Eater 1 evaluation per
step
cc cc cc
12h4 4
p p.li atioi
ig
t
i
Error control
12nF
01h nigh
run
We want to nah
sure that
ti
lyttit wit ee
we would like to
Given of
if
Imagine that at each
corter method
ycti.it yctilth4Hiyltil.h
Y0fhht
which probe
wit Witholfti Wish
Suppose that we use another
method with local truncation
error of hut
ylti.li ycfilthoTHi yltilih
tOChnt Weyfti1n
wiEwi
lti I Wit
T
In a similar way we
get wit
Ei.nu Yltiti
T T
corresponding
to 0T
1 we
Combining
obtain
C
itichl Eit.ch tFi itl
since the left hand side
is och we must
that w it Witi
is
a
Iit Ch is ochh
we are to use
going
the or for method
higher
to the error
approximate
in the last step of
our lower error methot
We define
12 th twit Witil
If change
the step
site to then
eh
E tilth 5k 41
The h Kh
e
Eckh I a R
R
To keep the local
truncation error bellow
E we regain
9 REE
T
ee E a
L
eecwf.tw
h 7 eh
At each step size
we calculate 12 and
is modified
I E i E
etually spaced
a'Tweeting
mm
TTY.in