Scribd
Upload
2K views1 page

Procedure: Measurement System Analysis Execution

This document establishes guidelines for monitoring supplier performance and the process for determining the quality of procured raw materials and consumables. It involves rating existing suppliers based on quality and delivery over the last six months, with scores between 90-100% considered excellent and 65-79% requiring time-bound improvement plans. If a supplier scores below 65% their approval will be withdrawn, and scores between 65-70% will trigger an audit and corrective action plan submission. Records of data analysis and corrective actions taken are maintained.

Uploaded by

aslam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
2K views1 page

Procedure: Measurement System Analysis Execution

This document establishes guidelines for monitoring supplier performance and the process for determining the quality of procured raw materials and consumables. It involves rating existing suppliers based on quality and delivery over the last six months, with scores between 90-100% considered excellent and 65-79% requiring time-bound improvement plans. If a supplier scores below 65% their approval will be withdrawn, and scores between 65-70% will trigger an audit and corrective action plan submission. Records of data analysis and corrective actions taken are maintained.

Uploaded by

aslam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
  • Purpose: Establishes the process of monitoring supplier performance in manufacturing quality assessments.
  • Resources: Details the resources involved, including specific manuals and technical data.
  • Method: Describes the method of approval status with a detailed table of scoring criteria and statuses.
  • Scope: Defines the boundaries and applicability of the measurement system analysis execution.
  • Reference: Lists standards and manuals used as references in the execution of the procedure.
  • Responsibility: Outlines the responsibilities of procurement and quality assurance departments in the procedure execution.
  • Corrective Action: Specifies actions required in cases of non-compliance to the procedure standards.
  • Revision History: Documents the history of revisions made to the procedure, including specific dates and changes.

Sub - Section No 8

PROCEDURE Ref. IATF 16949 Clause 8.4.2.3/4


Doc No F/MGT/05/02
Revision No OE
Measurement System Analysis Execution Revision Date 10.09.20
Page No 1 OF 1

1.0 Purpose : It is to establish guidelines to determine the process of monitoring of performance of supplier
It applies to the determination of the quality of procured Raw material & consumables needed for
2.0 Scope : production casting impact on quality of finished product.

3.0 Reference : AS PER IATF 16949 STANDARD


4.0 Resources : IATF Manual
5.0 Responsibility : Procurement / QA / Technical Incharge
: Activity Description
The existing suppliers from whom the products are being purchased for the last six months are
: enlisted as approved suppliers based on their ability to meet Quality & Delivery requirements.

: The vendor performance is rated on basis of Quality and Delivery of the material sent by vendor.
: If the vendor performance rates below 70% but greater then 65% , material is hold and vendor-audited is initiated.
: If there is some OEM complaint reported then too vendor is audited followed by CAPA submission

6.0 Method APPROVAL STATUS


Rating SCORE
Regular supplier New Supplier

A 90 - 100 % Excellent .. Eligible for Self certification Un conditional approval

Good Conditional approval - Restricted quantities.


B 80 - 89 %
Needs improvement plan Required improvement plan

Requires major improvements Required major improvements / time bound

C 65 - 79 % Time bound improvement plan required improvement plan required Approval only after

Restricted procurement the re-audit and score improved to > 80 %.

D < 65 % Withdrawl of the approval Rejected

7.0 Corrective Action : The manufacturing process & system at vendor-end is validated and analysed to pin-point the root cause ;
followed by submission of CAPA by vendor

8.0 Records : Following records shall be maintained at specified location


1- Data analysis

2- List of Corrective actions taken

REVISION HISTORY
S.NO. REVISION NO REVISION DATE REVISION DETAILS PREPARED CHECKED BY APPROVED BY

1 OE 10.09.20 IATF Requirements

PROCEDURE Sub - Section No 8 Ref. IATF 16949 Clause 8.4.2.3/4 Measurement System Analysis Execution Doc No F/MGT/05/02 Revisi

You might also like