Professional Documents
Culture Documents
N.A. BERNSTEIN
To cite this article: N.A. BERNSTEIN (2006) New Lines of Development in Contemporary
Physiology, Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 44:2, 60-67
N.A. BERNSTEIN
in Contemporary Physiology
English translation © 2006 M.E. Sharpe, Inc., from the Russian text © 2004 Smysl.
“Novye linii razvitiia v sovremennoi fiziologii,” in Nikolai Bernshtein: ot refleksa k
modeli budushchego, ed. I.M. Feigenberg (Moscow: Smysl, 2004), pp. 200–232.
Translated by Stephen D. Shenfield.
60
physiology is undergoing now, before our eyes. Starting with the “lead-
ing variable,” the newly emerging problematic, we shall then make a
very cursory examination of the group of new methods that are striving
to respond to this problematic.
In the applied sphere, our attention is drawn to the cooling of interest
in questions of the physiology of physical labor, which a few decades
ago occupied the predominant place in the form of the ergonomics of
labor, biomechanics, medical monitoring, and so on. In a natural man-
ner, in connection with the progressive shift in the center of gravity of
occupational employment toward more refined and intellectual forms
Downloaded by [Gazi University] at 05:04 30 March 2016
fundamental reappraisals.
At the present moment it seems possible to identify two lines of theo-
retical development that are indisputably new but have already succeeded
to some degree in formulating their right to exist and initial tasks.
The first line is the group of questions of physiological regulation
that are connected in the closest fashion with the theory of automatic
regulation. The first steps here, following the formulation of basic prin-
ciple, were investigations into the stabilizing regulatory systems of the
organism: the systems of thermal regulation, regulation of the blood,
control of circulatory processes, and so on. In recent years there have
also begun to appear investigations of monitoring-regulatory systems,
the most advanced of which so far are investigations of ring-wise con-
trol of the pupil reaction and of eye movements. At the same time, there
is an expanding range of investigations into muscle tonus and muscular
automatisms: the rhythm of wing and sound-emitting mechanisms in
the insect, physiological clonuses and tremors in man and the higher
animals, the statics of standing, vestibular-otolitic regulation of tonus,
and other topics. The crucial leading principle of any and all regulatory
processes of this kind—the principle of cyclical control by feedback—
was formulated in our literature definitely earlier than in the West: as
applied to control of the motor apparatus, by P.K. Anokhin in 1934, and
also in a report presented in 1929. After many prolonged scientific battles,
the leading and universal significance of this principle is now recognized
by all.
It needs to be emphasized that recognition of this principle of ring-
wise interdependence has cast a new and more profound light on the
fact of the indissoluble wholeness of the organism in all its functions.
Physiologists who stood on the positions of the open-ended reflex arc
also understood the necessity of the coordinated participation of the sen-
sory, efferent, and central systems in each act of the organism. But
these positions necessarily led to the treatment of each nonmomentary
process as a mosaic of successive reflexes, broken off each time at the
end of the arc. Only the replacement of these arcs by the principle of the
reflex ring has placed on a real foundation our understanding of the inte-
gral, uninterrupted interconnection of the three named systems both in
coexistence and in time.
The second line of the theoretical renewal of physiology is the field
of the physiology of activeness, which is being born before our eyes.
There is an increasingly urgent need to broaden the range of functions
Downloaded by [Gazi University] at 05:04 30 March 2016
them all. It is very likely that in the nearest future we shall see among
them such areas as, for instance, the theory of configurations, the need
for which is already clearly felt in efforts to comprehend mechanisms of
regeneration and morphogenesis, the principles of hereditary transmis-
sion, and also the still enigmatic field of the recognition of geometrical
figures. The currently most abstract branches of general set theory, the
theory of groups, and so on will add their contribution. It would be useless
even to try to forecast which of these areas will fall by the wayside,
which will expand, and which will be born anew. One thing alone is
clear: that the biological group of sciences has now reached some kind of
important watershed or mountain pass, beyond which, as also occurs on
journeys, there opens up to the gaze a broad panorama of unexplored
lands. It is there that we now, in a planned fashion, have to make our way.
To order reprints, call 1-800-352-2210; outside the United States, call 717-632-3535.