Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PREPARED FOR:
EN. PUAT BIN HAJI SULAIMAN
PROFESOR MADYA DR. JUAZER RIZAL BIN ABDUL HAMID
PREPARED BY:
SUBMISSION DATE:
30th APRIL 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Abstract 1
2.0 Introduction 2
3.0 Objectives and Instrument Used 3-4
4.0 Location and Duration of the Practical 5
5.0 Methodology 6
5.1 Open Traverse 6-7
5.2 Deformation Survey 7-10
5.3 Levelling 11
5.4 Processing Data 12-17
6.0 Data 18
6.1 Traverse Data 18
6.2 Levelling Data 19
6.3 Detail Survey Data 20
6.4 Deformation Survey Data 21-26
7.0 Result and Analysis 27
7.1 Network Adjustment 27
7.2 Listing of Starnet 28-35
7.3 Coordinate Result from Starnet 36
7.4 Network Plotting from Starnet 36-38
7.5 Analysis 39
8.0 Conclusion 40
9.0 Comment 41-44
Appendix A - Traverse Data (Booking Form) 45
Appendix B - Levelling Data (Booking Form) 46
Appendix C (i) – Deformation Data for At CP1 to CP2 47
Appendix C (ii) – Deformation Data for At CP2 to CP1 48
Appendix C (iii) – Deformation Data for At CP2 to CP3 49
Appendix C (iv) – Deformation Data for At CP3 to CP2 50
Appendix D – Detail Plan 51
1.0 Abstract
The systematic measurement and tracking of the change in the shape or
dimensions of an object as a result of pressure caused by applied loads is known as a
deformation survey. The area of this study is takes place near to Menara Sultan Abdul
Aziz Shah, UiTM Shah Alam and the target are located on SAAS which consist of four
points that required an observation. The importance of this study comes from the need
to inspect whether the existing building’s behavior and its environment follow the
expected pattern, with the aim that any unpredicted deformations can be identified at
an early stage. Changes in the bedrock, increased or decreased weight, changes in
structural properties, and external factors are all reasons for a deformation survey and
a proper instrumentation and monitoring of three-dimensional locations of the point are
precisely defined according to the structure type, scale, and site conditions to facilitate
the monitoring of engineering structures. These measurements were carried out within
six weeks and high precision instrument were used. StarNet, a locally built computer
programmed, was used to calculate the observation and perform the deformation
analysis. The result passed for this deformation analysis was upper bound because of
some mistakes during the observation and calculation of an error.
1
2.0 Acknowledgement
The success and outcome of this report required tons of guidance and assistance
from many of us and we were extremely privileged to possess got this right along the
completion of our report. All that we even have done is merely thanks to such
supervision and assistance and that we wouldn't forget to thank them.
First, we would like to express the deepest gratitude to Allah S.W.T for all the
smooth journey along the fieldwork. Alhamdulillah, praise to Allah S.W.T, our creator.
We were so blessed that we even have managed to place an end to our fieldwork
successfully with Allah's blessings. We would like to thank Him for giving us an
opportunity to have a hand on and ability to go through our fieldwork peacefully and
well as His plan is always more than our desire.
We would like to express our deepest appreciation to all those who provided us
the possibility to complete this fieldwork in code GLS 558 especially to our parents for
giving encouragement, enthusiasm and invaluable assistance for and allowing us to
come back in university and finish the fieldwork. Without all of this, we might not be
able to complete this journey properly.
I respect and thanked to Mr. Puat Bin Sulaiman as he is our lecturer for
providing us an opportunity to do the fieldwork during this pandemic and giving us all
support and guidance, which made us complete this report duly. We were extremely
thankful to him for providing such a nice support and guidance.
We heartily thanked to our group members who have made valuable comments,
suggestions and guidance along this fieldwork and report which gave each of us an
inspiration to improve the quality of the skills in field and also during this report work
and took keen interest along this fieldwork and guided each other all along till the
completion of our fieldwork by providing all the necessary information for developing
a good teamwork especially when we are in completing a task given by the lecturer.
2
3.0 Objectives and Instrument
Equipment Description
1) Total station • It is used for measuring
horizontal angle, vertical angle
and distance.
• To analysing the slope and a
specific points.
3
4) Staff levelling • To determine the difference in
height between points or
heights of point above vertical
datum
4
4.0 Location and Duration of The Pracitcal
The study area in this practical is located near to Menara Sultan Abdul Aziz
Shah, UiTM Shah Alam and the target are located on SAAS which consist of four points
that required an observation. The duration to finish this fieldwork is within six weeks
include from briefing introduction on deformation survey until the submission of report.
But we need to finish this survey until week 5 and the report need to be submitted on
that week. The practical start on 30th March 2021 and end on 30th April 2021.
Study area
5
5.0 Methodology
1. The total station at CP 3 is being setup and the prism is placed at B1 as a back
sight.
2. The bearing will be set in the total station for back bearing and the target of CP
2 will be observed. The observe bearing and distance is being recorded in the
field book.
3. Then proceed with the face right and record the reading.
4. After that, transferred the total station to the next point which is in CP 2 and
set the prism at CP 3 as a back sight. Then the bearing and distance will be
observe for both face left and face right of CP 1.
5. All the bearing and distance will be recorded in the field book.
6
Figure 5.1.2 Step 4 until Step 5
7
8. Repeat step 4 until 7 for bearing 180°00’00” and 270°00’00”
9. Each CP must have 4 set of observation.
10. Move the total station to CP 2 and set the RO at CP 1. Then continue with step
4 until 7.
11. Still on the same CP 2 and set the RO at CP 3. Repeat step 4 until 7.
12. Then, the total station will be moved to CP 3 and set the RO at CP 2. Using the
same steps from step 4 until 7 and record all the bearing and distance.
13. One of the CP already given the coordinate which is 1000 N, 1500 E at CP 3.
Then find another coordinate for CP 2 and CP 1.
14. Ensure that the instrument height is measured at every CP.
8
Figure 5.2.2 Deformation survey at CP2 with RO at CP1
9
Figure 5.2.4 Deformation survey at CP3 with RO at CP2
10
5.3 Levelling
11
5.4 Processing Data
2. Then, open the MicroSurvey StarNet software for data processing. Choose
‘New Project’ or press Ctrl+N to create new project. Create the project name
and then save it inside the folder.
12
Figure 5.4.2 Create New Project
3. Click ‘Add File’ at Data Input File pop-up and then choose the previous notepad
that contains deformation survey data. Then, the data from the notepad will
appear in the Starnet interface.
13
Figure 5.4.4 Deformation data will appered
14
5. At the ‘Adjustment’ tab, set the Adjustment type into 3D and the unit is in
meters.
6. At the ‘Instrument’ tab, change the angle and azimuth to 20”. While, zenith need
to be changed to 60”. The centering errors for Horizontal Instrument, Horizontal
Target and Vertical need to be change to 0.004 meters. Then, press ‘OK”.
15
Figure 5.4.7 Instrument tab
7. Click ‘Run Adjustment’ and the result will be shown at the Processing Summary
and the Network Plot.
16
Figure 5.4.9 The result of deformation will appeared
17
6.0 Data
From the traverse booking, the value of the final bearing and distance from CP3 to CP2
and CP2 to CP1 is used to calculate to find the coordinate of CP2 and CP1 from existing
coordinate CP3.
18
6.2 Data Levelling
𝑉 = 𝐿 sin (θ)
=-0.00684559 m
𝑅𝐿 𝐶𝑃1 = 𝑅𝐿 𝐶𝑃2 + 𝐻𝑖 + 𝑉 − 𝐻𝑖
= 49.806 m
19
6.3 Detail Survey data
20
6.4 Deformation Survey Data
Refer to the deformation survey booking (Appendixes C), the mean angle on every 4
targets on four setting which are 00˚, 90˚, 180˚ and 270˚ for each stations is found
and the mean angle is key in into StarNet software to be analyzed.
#CP1 HORIZONTAL
# AT-FROM-TO DD-MM-SS
A CP1-CP2-1 206-16-42
A CP1-CP2-2 206-18-21
A CP1-CP2-3 210-23-18
A CP1-CP2-4 210-22-50
A CP1-CP2-1 206-17-31
A CP1-CP2-2 206-18-22
A CP1-CP2-3 210-23-25
A CP1-CP2-4 210-23-03
A CP1-CP2-1 206-18-10
A CP1-CP2-2 206-18-21
A CP1-CP2-3 210-23-28
A CP1-CP2-4 210-23-14
A CP1-CP2-1 206-17-40
A CP1-CP2-2 206-18-17
21
A CP1-CP2-3 210-23-20
A CP1-CP2-4 210-23-03
#CP1 VERTICAL
# FROM-TO DD-MM-DD HI/HT
V CP1-1 62-53-41 1.424/0
V CP1-2 65-13-54 1.424/0
V CP1-3 63-09-02 1.424/0
V CP1-4 66-24-26 1.424/0
V CP1-1 61-52-47 1.424/0
V CP1-2 65-14-42 1.424/0
V CP1-3 63-09-06 1.424/0
V CP1-4 66-24-03 1.424/0
V CP1-1 61-52-05 1.424/0
V CP1-2 65-14-07 1.424/0
V CP1-3 63-08-49 1.424/0
V CP1-4 66-23-54 1.424/0
V CP1-1 62-52-40 1.424/0
V CP1-2 65-14-01 1.424/0
V CP1-3 63-09-12 1.424/0
V CP1-4 66-24-33 1.424/0
#CP2 HORIZONTAL
# AT-FROM-TO DD-MM-SS
A CP2-CP1-1 22-32-29
A CP2-CP1-2 22-32-25
A CP2-CP1-3 26-16-05
A CP2-CP1-4 26-16-04
A CP2-CP1-1 22-32-09
A CP2-CP1-2 22-32-10
A CP2-CP1-3 26-16-11
A CP2-CP1-4 26-15-46
22
A CP2-CP1-1 22-32-34
A CP2-CP1-2 22-32-34
A CP2-CP1-3 26-16-23
A CP2-CP1-4 26-15-53
A CP2-CP1-1 22-32-10
A CP2-CP1-2 22-32-29
A CP2-CP1-3 26-16-23
A CP2-CP1-4 26-16-04
#CP2 VERTICAL
# FROM-TO DD-MM-DD HI/HT
V CP2-1 65-11-56 1.630/0
V CP2-2 68-15-36 1.630/0
V CP2-3 66-06-50 1.630/0
V CP2-4 69-04-48 1.630/0
V CP2-1 65-11-46 1.630/0
V CP2-2 68-15-44 1.630/0
V CP2-3 66-07-28 1.630/0
V CP2-4 69-05-26 1.630/0
V CP2-1 65-11-43 1.630/0
V CP2-2 68-15-34 1.630/0
V CP2-3 66-07-30 1.630/0
V CP2-4 69-05-27 1.630/0
V CP2-1 65-12-31 1.630/0
V CP2-2 68-15-47 1.630/0
V CP2-3 66-07-24 1.630/0
V CP2-4 69-05-24 1.630/0
#CP2 HORIZONTAL
# AT-FROM-TO DD-MM-SS
A CP2-CP3-1 301-42-06
A CP2-CP3-2 301-42-33
23
A CP2-CP3-3 305-25-50
A CP2-CP3-4 305-25-43
A CP2-CP3-1 301-42-35
A CP2-CP3-2 301-42-21
A CP2-CP3-3 305-26-00
A CP2-CP3-4 305-26-00
A CP2-CP3-1 301-41-37
A CP2-CP3-2 301-42-30
A CP2-CP3-3 305-26-03
A CP2-CP3-4 305-25-35
A CP2-CP3-1 301-42-33
A CP2-CP3-2 301-42-34
A CP2-CP3-3 305-26-16
A CP2-CP3-4 305-25-55
#CP2 VERTICAL
# FROM-TO DD-MM-SS HI/HT
V CP2-1 65-13-36 1.620/0
V CP2-2 68-16-10 1.620/0
V CP2-3 66-08-05 1.620/0
V CP2-4 69-06-08 1.620/0
V CP2-1 65-12-35 1.620/0
V CP2-2 68-16-25 1.620/0
V CP2-3 66-08-06 1.620/0
V CP2-4 69-05-11 1.620/0
V CP2-1 65-13-38 1.620/0
V CP2-2 68-16-23 1.620/0
V CP2-3 66-08-30 1.620/0
V CP2-4 69-06-21 1.620/0
V CP2-1 65-13-30 1.620/0
V CP2-2 68-16-01 1.620/0
V CP2-3 66-08-06 1.620/0
24
V CP2-4 69-06-03 1.620/0
#CP3 HORIZONTAL
# AT-FROM-TO DD-MM-SS
A CP3-CP2-1 97-41-46
A CP3-CP2-2 97-41-53
A CP3-CP2-3 102-54-47
A CP3-CP2-4 102-54-26
A CP3-CP2-1 97-41-55
A CP3-CP2-2 97-41-52
A CP3-CP2-3 102-54-38
A CP3-CP2-4 102-54-25
A CP3-CP2-1 97-42-02
A CP3-CP2-2 97-42-02
A CP3-CP2-3 102-54-55
A CP3-CP2-4 102-54-17
A CP3-CP2-1 97-42-12
A CP3-CP2-2 97-42-12
A CP3-CP2-3 102-54-34
A CP3-CP2-4 102-54-06
#CP3 VERTICAL
# FROM-TO DD-MM-SS HI/HT
V CP3-1 61-44-35 1.772/0
V CP3-2 65-06-31 1.772/0
V CP3-3 62-06-31 1.772/0
V CP3-4 65-27-40 1.772/0
V CP3-1 62-45-04 1.772/0
V CP3-2 65-06-53 1.772/0
V CP3-3 62-06-53 1.772/0
V CP3-4 65-27-55 1.772/0
V CP3-1 62-45-20 1.772/0
25
V CP3-2 65-06-24 1.772/0
V CP3-3 62-07-18 1.772/0
V CP3-4 65-27-43 1.772/0
V CP3-1 62-44-27 1.772/0
V CP3-2 65-06-22 1.772/0
V CP3-3 62-07-05 1.772/0
V CP3-4 65-27-42 1.772/0
26
7.0 Result and Analysis
27
7.2 Listing of the StarNet
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
7.3 Coordinates Result from StarNet
36
Figure 7.4.2 Coordinate Target 1
37
Figure 7.4.4 Coordinate Target 3
38
7.5 Analysis
Based on the result that have been processed using the StarNet software, after
three iteration, the statistical summary tells that the error factor for the angle is 0.981
and for the the zenith is 14.748. The result of chi-square test shows that it have failed
and also exceed the upper bound (0.871/1.128). The chi square test is failed maybe
because there are some mistake during data collection at the site such as blunders during
observation, error for recording the data properly inside the fieldbook. Other than that,
we carry out open traverse which may have error because it is hard to detect the error
for open traverse. Finally, we manage to obtain the coordinate and elevation of the
target that has been transfer from our control point to the targets.
39
8.0 Conclusion
In conclusion, ours group manage to carry out the deformation survey. The
deofrmation survey is to determine whether the building experienced any movement or
not. The results are directly relevant to the safety of human life. From what we have
experienced in this practical field is that we need to choose and create control points on
the rooftop at the old engineering building. Then, we monitor to the four selected target
point on the wall structure. The data will be booked on the fieldbook and then four
setting which is 00˚, 90˚, 180˚ and 270˚ for each control points will be applied.
After finish perform data collecting, we need to move to the next process which
is data processing. Since in the deformation survey is quite difficult to calculated
manually, the data need to key in and calculated by using Star*Net software to obtain
the coordinates on the wall of the building, height of the control points and analysis will
be provided automatically. The least square adjustment will be use to calculate the error.
40
9.0 Comments
First of all, I want to thanks to all my teammates because of their harworking to carry
out this practical survey. From this task I am able to understand the purpose of carry
out deformation survey and the importance of it. Although, there are many obstacles
and challenges during performing the survey but finally we manaage to face it until the
last process which is preparing the report. I hope in the future, I can carry out this
deformation survey job to improve my skill.
41
NAMA: MOHAMED RIDZUAN BIN JALAL
First of all, I would like to thanks my hardworking and persevering groupmate, because
without them, this practical would not finish. I am very grateful to be part of this group
because their high perseverance and keen to perform this practical. Moreover, I would
like to give appreciation to our lecturer, Sir Puat for his guidance and his knowledge to
guide my team in order to perform this practical accordingly.
The deformation survey had taught me about the important to survey the SAAS
Tower, to detect any movement of the tower. The survey is very significant to ensure
the safety of any tall and immense building and structure. This is a new knowledge in
survey field for me and my team as what we have learned in the cadastral survey and
engineering survey. Furthermore, I have learned to process data in StarNet software
until finish. Alhamdulillah for this opportunity to learn and perform in this subject.
42
NAMA: YASMIN ATHIRAH BINTI AZIZAN
MATRIX CARD: 2020869596
A lot of things I have learned from this practical field work. It would be difficult
to complete this practical without the help of my teammate. Getting up early in the
morning to catch the bus, then arriving early in the morning in front of the equipment
store to get the right and best equipment for our practical work. We cannot accomplish
the fieldwork without the cooperation of all my team members. The only thing that
offended me was that another class had used our station point as their point, causing us
to be late and not complete our tasks in the time we were supposed to. Other than that,
everyone knew what they were supposed to do and did not complain about it. I would
like to thank everyone for their support.
43
NAMA: SITI NATASHA NABILA BINTI ABDUL KHA’AR
MATRIX CARD: 2020810322
Alhamdulillah, the deepest gratitude to Allah S.W.T for all the smooth journey along
the deformation survey and I would also heartily thank to each member in the group
that had shown unending commitment from the beginning until the end of the survey
in depth of accomplish this task. Even though we were facing few problems in the
execution of this survey, but we managed to solve all the problems together. All in all,
we had put a lot of commitment to finish the task.
44
Appendix A
TRAVERSE DATA (BOOKING FORM)
BEARING
STATION MEAN ANGLE FM ST FINAL BEARING TO STN VERTICAL ANGLE DISTANCE FINAL DISTANCE
FACE LEFT FACE RIGHT
45
Appendix B
BELAKANG DEPAN HADAPAN NAIK TURUN TINGGI ARAS LRS JARAK CATATAN
1.446 50.000
1.496 1.493 0.047 49.953
1.446 1.474 0.022 49.975
1.413 1.447 0.001 49.974
1.404 1.404 0.009 49.983
1.432 1.413 0.009 49.974
1.440 1.406 0.026 50.000
1.455 1.462 0.022 49.978
1.415 0.040 50.018
11.532 11.514 0.097 0.079 50.018
11.514 0.079 50.000
0.018 0.018 0.018
12
12 = 33.941
= 1
=
46
Appendix C (i)
At CP1 to CP2
HORIZONTAL
STATION BEARING MEAN VERTICAL BEARING MEAN
FL FR FL FR
179 59 59 270 08 35
00 00 00 89 51 46
TPA 206 16 41 26 16 43 206 16 42 61 53 41 298 06 37 61 53 32
270 00 00 270 08 41
90 00 00 89 51 53
TPA 296 17 34 116 17 28 296 17 31 61 52 47 298 06 58 61 52 55
2 89 59 52 270 00 00 89 51 49 270 08 27
00 00 00 270 08 48
180 00 00 89 51 47
TPA 26 18 11 206 18 09 26 18 10 61 52 05 298 07 48 61 52 09
2 180 00 00 00 00 00 89 51 38 270 08 46
90 00 00 270 08 41
270 00 00 89 51 49
TPA 116 17 41 296 17 38 116 17 40 61 52 40 298 08 07 61 52 17
2 270 00 00 90 00 00 89 51 41 270 08 52
47
Appendix C (ii)
At CP2 to CP1
HORIZONTAL
STATION BEARING MEAN VERTICAL BEARING MEAN
FL FR FL FR
180 00 00 270 22 53
1 00 00 00 89 37 24
TPA 22 32 29 202 32 29 22 32 29 294 48 11 65 11 53
65 11 56
TPB 22 32 26 202 32 24 22 32 25 68 15 36 291 44 49 68 15 24
1 00 00 00 180 00 00 89 37 18 270 22 52
270 00 00 270 22 15
1 90 00 00 89 37 28
TPA 112 32 09 292 32 09 112 32 09 65 11 46 294 48 25 65 11 41
1 90 00 00 270 00 00 89 37 41 270 22 21
00 00 00 270 22 46
1 180 00 00 89 37 47
TPA 202 32 27 22 32 40 202 32 34 65 11 43 294 48 46 65 11 29
1 180 00 00 00 00 00 89 37 42 270 22 56
90 00 00 89 37 19 270 23 03
1 270 00 00
TPA 292 32 01 112 32 19 292 32 10 294 48 36 65 11 58
65 12 31
TPB 292 32 34 112 32 24 292 32 29 68 15 47 291 45 01 68 15 23
1 270 00 02 90 00 00 89 37 26 270 22 52
48
Appendix C (iii)
At CP2 to CP3
HORIZONTAL
STATION BEARING MEAN VERTICAL BEARING MEAN
FL FR FL FR
180 00 00 270 09 28
3 00 00 00 89 50 58
TPA 301 42 03 121 42 08 301 42 06 294 46 19 65 13 39
65 13 36
TPB 301 42 34 121 42 32 301 42 33 68 16 10 291 43 31 68 16 20
3 00 00 02 180 00 00 89 51 16 270 09 22
270 00 00 270 09 18
3 90 00 00 89 51 01
TPA 31 42 44 211 42 25 31 42 35 65 12 35 294 47 03 65 12 46
3 90 00 00 270 00 00 89 50 57 270 09 18
00 00 00 270 09 20
3 180 00 00 89 50 50
TPA 121 41 36 301 41 38 121 41 37 65 13 38 294 46 06 65 13 46
3 180 00 01 00 00 00 89 51 07 270 09 32
90 00 00 270 09 20
3 270 00 00 89 51 02
TPA 211 42 31 31 42 35 211 42 33 65 13 30 294 47 25 65 13 03
3 270 00 00 90 00 00 89 51 02 270 09 29
49
Appendix C (iv)
At CP3 to CP2
HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
STATION BEARING MEAN BEARING MEAN
FL FR FL FR
180 00 00 270 03 31
3 00 00 00 89 56 40
TPA 97 41 44 277 41 47 97 41 46 61 44 35 298 16 16 88 26 35
2 00 00 01 179 59 54 89 56 50 270 03 49
270 00 00 270 03 55
2 90 00 00 89 56 38
TPA 187 41 50 07 42 00 187 41 55 61 45 04 298 14 47 61 45 09
2 89 59 59 269 59 53 89 56 33 270 03 49
00 00 00 270 03 56
2 180 00 00 89 56 37
TPA 277 42 03 97 42 01 277 42 02 61 45 20 298 14 19 61 45 31
2 180 00 07 00 00 05 89 56 30 270 03 55
90 00 04 270 04 41
2 270 00 00 89 56 22
TPA 07 42 11 187 42 12 07 42 12 61 44 27 298 15 38 61 44 25
2 269 59 55 89 59 55 89 56 21 270 03 56
50
Appendix D
DETAIL PLAN
51