Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FBMC Aaaaa
FBMC Aaaaa
CD Laboratory Workshop
Ronald Nissel
November 15, 2016
Motivation
p(t)
0.5
Frequency index, l
0
−2 −1 0 1 2
t
T0
0
P (f )
0
0 13
Time index, k
−50
−5 0 5
f
F0
= f T0
F
Frequency
Large area
Time (high efficiency if K >> L) T ∝ 1
F
Maximum
Independent
Spectral Time- Frequency- (Bi)-
Transmit
Efficiency Localization Localization Orthogonal
Symbols
TF = 1
Pure
yes yes no yes yes
OFDM
Windowed
/Filtered no yes yes yes yes
OFDM
real
FBMC-OQAM yes yes yes yes
only
yes,
Coded
yes yes yes after de- no
FBMC-OQAM
spreading
0
No OOB
reduction
Power Spectral Density (dB)
−40
21 sub-
Windowed carriers T F = 1.3
−60 OFDM
FBMC
−80 OQAM
Filtered
TF = 1
OFDM T F = 1.3
(complex)
−100
−50 −40 −30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30 40 50
Normalized Frequency, f/F
Transmitter:
TX antenna
RX
Receiver:
1
“On Pilot-Symbol Aided Channel Estimation in FBMC-OQAM”,R. Nissel,et.al.,2016
Dependable Wireless Connectivity for the Society in Motion Slide 12 / 27
Channel Estimation in FBMC
1.5
Channel
0.5
0
12
Sub 10 8 14
car 12
rier 6 10
- p 4 6
8 io n k
Fre
que
osi
tio 2 4 e- p osit
ncy nl 2 Tim
e, t
,f Tim
LS estimation,
Data symbols
Pilot symbols Interpolation
Time
Novel Contribution:
I We suggest the usage of two auxiliary symbols.
I We extended the coding approach to more than 8 symbols
I Downloadable MATLAB code: www.nt.tuwien.ac.at/downloads/
I Validated by real world measurements
30
Coding FBMC
Achievable Rate Improvement (%)
(high complexity)
25
2 Auxiliary symbols
(low complexity)
20
1 Auxiliary symbol
15 (low complexity) Improvement due to
better spectrum utilization
10
5 Improvement due to
OFDM no cyclic prefix no cyclic prefix
0
−10 −5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SNROF
D
DM
(dB)
30
Coding
(high complexity)
Throughput Improvement (%)
25
2 Auxiliary symbols
FBMC
(low complexity)
20
1 Auxiliary symbol
15 (low complexity)
10
95 % confidence
5 mean interval obtained
by bootstrapping
0
−10 −5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SNROF
D
DM
(dB)
2
“Enabling Low-Complexity MIMO in FBMC-OQAM”, R. Nissel and M. Rupp, 2016
Dependable Wireless Connectivity for the Society in Motion Slide 17 / 27
Enabling MIMO in FBMC By Hadamard Spreading (+1,-1)
Coded FBMC-OQAM:
Code
Time
Frequency
Novel Contribution:
I Matrix formulation: new analytical insights
I We investigate the block interference and the influence of time-varying channels
I Downloadable MATLAB code: www.nt.tuwien.ac.at/downloads/
I Validated by real world measurements
2×2 MIMO
−2 Maximum-Likelihood
10
16-QAM Detection (2×bit rate)
95 % confidence
interval for FBMC
10
−3 obtained by
bootstrapping 2×1 MIMO
Alamouti’s Space-Time
OFDM Block Code
FBMC
−4
10
−5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Estimated Signal-to-Noise Ratio for OFDM (dB)
3
“OFDM and FBMC-OQAM in Doubly-Selective Channels: Calculating the Bit Error
Probability”, R. Nissel and M. Rupp, 2016, submitted
Dependable Wireless Connectivity for the Society in Motion Slide 20 / 27
Closed-Form BEP Expression
0
10
Bit Error Probability, Bit Error Ratio
Vehicular A, 500km/h
−1
10 OFDM (noCP)
CP-OFDM
FBMC
CP OF
−2
10 Pedestrian A, 10km/h -O
F
DM
DM (no
C
64-QAM ≈
P)
FB
Theory M
C
Gauss approx.
Simulation
−3 Doubly- flat
10
−5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Sig na l-t o -No
Noiis e Ra t io [dB], s ee ( 1 8 )
Questions:
I Are one-tap equalizers good enough?
I How good is FBMC compared to OFDM?
I Which prototype filter
I Hermite
I PHYDYAS
Fair comparison:
Optimal Subcarrier Spacing
Signal-to-Interference Ratio
Limiting factor:
delay spread
(multipath delays)
Limiting factor:
Doppler spread
(time-variant channel)
Subcarrier Spacing
1.5 1.5
AMMSE
|Ĥ[l, m]|
1
ˆ |
1
LS
|h̄l,k
0.5 0.5
0 0
12 10 15 12 10
8 6 10 8 200
6 4 150
4 2 5 100
Subcarrier OFDM Symbol Subcarrier 2 50
time index
mmWave transmissions
I Testbed
I Jointly with Erich and Martin
KT KT KT
Time
Guard time-slot:
KT T KT T KT
Time
50
One guard slot per block
Signal-to-Interfernece Ratio (dB)
(reduced efficiency)
40
30
No guard symbols
(maximum spectral efficiency)
20
10
1 ms for 15 kHz subcarrier spacing, (125µs for 120 kHz)
0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Spreading Length (Symbols)
20
1ms for 15 kHz subcarrier spacing, (125µs for 120 kHz)
15
Efficiency Loss (%)
10
Spreading Length K = 8
30
20
Spreading Length K = 32
10
Theory
Simulation
0
0 10 20 30 40 50
Velocity (km/h) for F =15 kHz and fc =2.5 GHz
30 Hermite Phydyas
25
20 OFDM
15
10
15 kHz
5 (LTE) Theory
Simulation
0
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Subcarrier Spacing (kHz)
0
10 1.6
1Aux. 1Aux.
flipped
1.4
−1 1Aux.
10 1.2
OFDM 1Aux.
Pr (PAPR ≤ PAPR0 )
flipped
1
Signal Power
Cod.
−2
10 2Aux. 0.8 Cod.
2Aux.
0.6
−3
10 0.4
0.2
6T FBMC
−4
10 0
6 8 10 12 0 0.1 0.2
PAPR0 (dB) Time (ms)