Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 3: Paper
Charles Porter
I found a few things that stuck to me when thinking of being a project manager. The first
piece of information that was enlightening was on page 378 of our PDF file. The quote goes,
"Many companies start applying project management without understanding the fundamental
behavioral differences between the project manager and line managers." (Kerzner, pg.378). I
found this to very true within many companies I have worked for in the past. I have noticed that
many companies have a confusing line of leadership that need to be defined better.
There is a very distinct difference between the Line Manager and Project Manager. I have
witnessed first-hand project managers trying to take charge of personal on lines or on the floor.
This act causes an issue of who the workers turn to when they need help or questions. Line
managers oversee the personal and the product coming off the machines when a project manager
oversteps their boundaries and tries to implement their structure of discipline or authority to the
workers this action can be very confusing to the workers. Next line manager is the one in charge
of giving the team members feedback and reviews. Project manager oversees the design of the
project and not so much the people side of the project. When a Project manager tries to use their
own authority, it undermines the Line Managers' influence, and employees’ question who they
need to turn to. Project managers have little to no power when it comes to production. The line
Lastly, Ben Willmot spoke on his blog, "What are Self-Management Skills?", he pointed
out an essential leadership quality. "Taking responsibility for the outcomes of what you do when
a task hasn't gone as planned. Then learning from the problem, itself so it's not repeated in the
future." (Willmott, pg.2). When a leader stands up and admits wrong and takes the blame for a
failed project, those actions speak volumes to the team members. Also when a leader learns from
their mistake and fixes the situation it speaks volumes to the employees because they see their
Module 3: Paper |3
leader righting the wrong. When a leader does not place blame on their team, it shows excellent
leadership qualities because the leader is not trying to cover up and place blame somewhere else.
In our PDF, there was a story of a leader standing up and taking responsibility for a
failed issue. The union was so amazed by this; they worked extra hours without pay to dig
themselves out of the hole and get the project done because they respected their leader's ability
not to blame them but himself. All too often, fingers get pointed at others and team members
when issues arise. The leader needs to understand failure happens under their watch more so than
under the team they are leading. Your team is only as good as you lead them. People follow by
example, and if you show this kind of characteristic followers will be more willing to ride out a
I agree with what was discussed this week in our readings. I honestly feel that a leader
needs to be the one that takes the burden of blame when things do not go right on a project. It can
be disheartening when the fault is pushed upon the team members. They fell that the leader does
have their backs and will throw them under the bus to save their very own skin. Morale is vital to
a project. If there is poor morale, people do not work as hard and do not give their whole hearts
into the project. Mistakes happen more often, and people lose interest is they feel their leader
I also agree with the phrase "Demonstrates humility in leadership." (Kerzner, pg. 391). A
leader needs to show humility and vulnerability. When a leader is wrong, they need to admit to it
and move on. There is nothing wrong with admitting to being wrong and showing the
vulnerability behind that. Team members learn to respect a humble leader. A humble leader does
not mean a weak leader and leader that can be walked all over. A humble leader understands that
they were wrong, and they show the team how they are planning on fixing the situation. When a
Module 3: Paper |4
leader can show they are human and can fess up to a mistake the followers will go out of their
way to help their leader get out of hard times more than a leader who is cold and shows no
interest.
Another point that came from Kerzner was om the same page, "avoid arm-length
relationships." (Kerzner, pg. 391). A Leader should get to know their team members. Leaders do
not have to develop friendship but knowing how your members feel under certain situations.
How they react to stress and understanding who they are as a person is vital to have a team that
can sustain hardship and earns respect. To expand on that thought in the blog, Herding Cats,
their quote of the day on May 05 was, "If you wish to persuade me, you must think my thoughts,
feel my feelings, and speak my words." (Camenisch, 2020). I good leader will understand who
his workers are by their actions, words, and feelings. A leader will take the time to get to know
each member of their team and understand how to utilize them for the project. During the
simulation, I started to understand how my team would react to pressure. I learned after a few
attempts that I do not need more people; I need highly skilled people. Even though I was losing
team members, if I trained them right and gave them the tools for success, they could push
through the hardship. I needed to trust their ability and provide them with the space to work. I
felt that after a few attempts, I grew (figuratively speaking) a relationship with my workers. I
understood who they were and what they could accomplish. In the first few weeks, I developed a
relationship with them and figured out how to manage the crunch of losing people. They needed
more help, and I needed to be trust them that they could handle more work.
In the simulation, I also learned a lot about myself. I thought I had the answers to get the
team through the hardship and the problem of being behind schedule. I learned quickly that how
I handled situations was not the way my team needed me to handle the situation. After a few
Module 3: Paper |5
attempts, I took a step back and analyzed what I could do differently to increase morale and
production. I learned (as mentioned previously) that I have a highly/well-trained team, and they
need me to trust their abilities. I do not need to keep communicating and wasting their time with
meetings. They understood that we would eventually get team members back, and right now,
they need to work and focus. I learned less and is more in a situation like this one. I felt that I
frustrated them more with my presence because I was not trusting their abilities. They
appreciated when I outsourced more to take some the work off their plate, but they did not need
more meetings. My team was happy with having a project update meeting once a week, and they
Even after I was able to add more people to the team, the original members seemed to get
bored quickly. I had to change my outlook in that scenario as well. After week fifteen, I noticed I
needed to decrease the team again, and by week seventeen, I was down to one member. It was a
great feeling seeing that my team was trained enough to work with less personal and still
In my past, I was not the humblest of leaders. Nor was I a leader that trusted people.
Arrogance can take a toll on a team and destroy morale. I believe my failure from the past comes
from pride and not trusting. I may also come from that I never got to know my team. I knew their
names; I knew if they had kids or not. My interaction with them was surface at best. I know now
that I had the wrong people doing the wrong tasks, and my ego would not tell me otherwise.
With my failures, I have learned how to approach people. Now I get to know people
often. I go out of my way to greet new people, and the people on my team, I have a deep, lasting
relationship. I am not a leader by any means, but when I do become one, I have established a
rapport with my teammates, and it can (hopefully) sustain when I am leading them on a project.
Module 3: Paper |6
Nowadays, I like to look at the leadership I have at the plant. I notice the good and bad
attributes of my leaders. I see them because I have either I have been the one who has done those
types of failures. Or I watch to see how they can and will handle the situation. It is hard for me to
watch a leader tell someone to do something when they have not gained the respect of their
peers. Some of the new leaders that are in the plant do not understand the personal and just
assume that anyone can do any job. I have learned in this reading alone that it is not the truth.
People are wired differently and can accomplish tasks in different ways. However, some people
should not be asked to do the task because they do not know how to do it or because they are the
wrong person to do it. If the leader would take time to get to know their constituents, I think
Lastly, in the future, I hope I can apply some of the lessons learned from this module. It
is important to remember that as a leader, you are never as good as the people working for you.
If the opportunity ever arises again, I am hopeful that I have learned from my past mistakes and
have learned a great deal about being in college. I know next time I will trust those I have placed
on my team and encourage those who are struggling. Open communication is essential, but in
over-communication can feel like micro-managing. I need to make sure that I have relationships
that are lasting and friendly. I want to make sure that everyone understands their part, and they
References:
Camenisch, J. (2020, May 05). Quote of the Day. Retrieved June 06, 2020, from
https://herdingcats.typepad.com/my_weblog/
Willmott, B. (2020, May 19). What are Self-Management Skills? Retrieved June 02,