Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shear test
Procedure
The shear strength can be determined by testing small clear timber block as recommended by
testing standards. The shear block test method allows the shear strength values to be obtained
free from influence of timber defects. Shear strength will be calculated on the basis of the
maximum applied torque. The stiffness will be obtained by conducting linear regression analysis
of the applied torque and the relative twist per length within the elastic region.
Failure
In most cases, bending stress and deflection limits govern the design of the members. But for
short beams, tapered beams or special loading situations the shear stress can be more
important. In general for beams, the shear stress reaches the maximum value close to the
supports. Additionally, end-notched beams and beams with holes can lead to shear stress
concentrations. Failure due to shear stress is characterized by a sliding of the fibers and thus
cracking parallel to the grain and is considered as a brittle failure. The cracks are mainly closed
and therefore hard to detect if they are not at the end of the beam.
Literature review
To begin with, in 1944, a patent granted to Lundstrom (1944) indicated the possibility of surface
densification of wood, as opposed to bulk densification. While Lundstrom’s patent was focused
on specific furniture components, a patent granted to Elmendorf (1971) explored the possibility
16 of surface densification of wood in general. The list of patents mentioned here is far from
being complete, but it highlights that wood densification has been a subject of interest for
almost a full century.
In addition, Pizzi et al. (2005) chose an entirely different approach to achieve timber
densification. They placed two pieces of wood inside a wood friction welding machine,
separated by a layer of sunflower oil to avoid bonding of the surfaces by friction welding. When
the pieces were moved in relation to each other for 8 to 14 seconds under low pressure,
friction created heat and plasticised the wood surfaces. Once they were plasticised, the friction-
creating movement was stopped and an additional compressive force was applied to achieve
the actual densification. The pressure was maintained until the timber cooled to below 100°C.
The surface hardness was found to have doubled. Rautkari et al. (2009) continued with a similar
approach, using a single piece of wood fixed to a vibrating platen, while the other fixed steel-
platen was heated to a temperature of 100°C. The total process time was about 100 seconds,
and the surface hardness was doubled.
On the other side of the Atlantic, at Oregon State University (OSU), the group led by Frederick
Kamke became increasingly active, starting with the granting of a patent about viscoelastic
thermal compression (VTC) (Kamke & Sizemore 2004). VTC is similar to THM as it uses a
combination of heat, steam and pressure to densify wood. In a first step, the wood exceeds its
glass-transition temperature at elevated temperature and moisture conditions, after which the
wood is further plasticised by inducing rapid vapor decompression and removal of bound water
in the cell wall. The vapor decompression step is crucial for the successful plasticization of the
wood cells, and relies on the rapid movement of water out of the cell wall. To achieve the
optimal softening effect, the process and sequence of steps need to be well timed. The wood is
compressed in this softened state. This is followed by an annealing and cooling stage before the
pressing device is opened. A few years later, Andreja Kutnar and Milan Sernek from Slovenia
joined Kamke’s group and contributed substantially to the exploration of the VTC method
(Kutnar & Sernek 2007).
Furthermore, a similar approach was introduced by Lauri Rautkari at Aalto University. In one of
their studies (Rautkari et al. 2011), a density profile with a pronounced density peak close to
the surface was obtained with a press closing time of 30 seconds, after which the pressure 20
was held for 60 seconds before the wood was cooled. The hardness was approximately doubled
(Rautkari et al. 2013). In a similar study, with the same closing time paired with a holding time
of 10 minutes, an almost identical increase in hardness was obtained (Laine et al. 2013a).
Kristiina Laine’s doctoral thesis provides a good overview of the findings of the Aalto University
group (Laine 2014).
Moreover, the group led by Lauri Rautkari at Aalto University conducted several studies of the
density profile and morphology of densified timber. Laine et al. (2014) investigated the cell-wall
deformation due to densification in a heated press as a function of the pressing temperature
and the press closing time. They found that the deformation started in the early-wood regions
close to the abrupt border to the latewood, which are the weakest parts of the specimens
under radial densification. With increasing pressing temperature, the bulk of the deformation
moves closer to the heated surface. Cell wall fracture was not observed, indicating that the
surface density and thereby the hardness of the wood can be increased without damaging the
cell walls (fig 10).
In 2018, a group of researchers at FPL, the University of Maryland and the University of
California had an article published in the journal Nature, a feat that made a stir in the field of
wood modification. The authors had pre-treated bulk-densified wood of various softwood and
hardwood species with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide and sodium sulfite. This
treatment removed lignin and hemicellulose, and gave extreme levels of densification, resulting
in a more than tenfold increase in strength (Song et al. 2018).
Discussion
Swelling and shrinkage properties of densified timber
The dimensional changes that convoy the shrinking and swelling of wood are main sources of
both visual and structural problems in densified timber. Shrinking and swelling occur as the
wood changes moisture content in response to daily as well as seasonal changes in the relative
humidity of the atmosphere, i.e., when the air is humid, wood adsorbs moisture and swells;
when the air is dry, wood loses moisture and shrinks.
Four factors account for most of the shrinking and swelling problems seen in densified timber.
The timber was not dried to the proper uniform moisture content which subsequently
lead to excessive shrinkage,
The construction is such that the timber is mechanically restrained from shrinking and
swelling
Excessive drying takes place through the ends of the members.
A design was used that accents visual differences in shrinking and swelling in members
oriented perpendicular to one another rather than minimizing them
The timber swelling reduces its strength. To reduce problems related to the initial moisture
content of the timber, the timber should be dried to a moisture content level consistent with its
final service environment. It should then be stored and manufactured under atmospheric
conditions that will maintain this level. Then, even though the timber will continue to shrink
and swell in service as the seasons change, the effects will be minimized.
Conclusion
Due to the impact of different aspects like moisture changes, fungi and insect attacks, timber
beam elements can be damaged and resulting in lower capacity and larger deformations. High
stresses exceeding the strength limits can also lead to different types of failure cases, like
bending, compression, and tension or shear failure. Furthermore, changes in building use can
lead to a requirement for increased load bearing capacity in structural timber beam elements.
The analyses of several assessment reports showed, most damaged structural timber elements
present cracks in the grain direction due to any of the aforementioned cases.
During this project, several gaps in the field of wood densification have been identified, in
particular in terms of achieving the vision of mass produced densified wood products. The gaps
have been addressed with a fast continuous surface densification processes to greatly reduce
the set-recovery. These findings have set the stage for further research on the new band press,
facilitating a swift transfer of knowledge between small-scale research and continuous surface
densification with production-size wooden boards.
Reference
Morsing, N. (2000). Densification of wood – the influence of hygro- thermal treatment on
compression of beech perpendicular to the grain. Department of Structural Engineering and
Materials, Technical University of Denmark, BYG-Rapport,
Kutnar, A., Rautkari, L., Laine, K. & Hughes, M. (2012). Thermodynamic characteristics of surface
densified solid Scots pine wood. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products.
Laine, K., Belt, T., Rautkari, L., Ramsay, J., Hill, C. A. & Hughes, M. (2013). Measuring the
thickness swelling and set-recovery of densified and thermally modified Scots pine solid wood.
Laine, K., Rautkari, L., Hughes, M. & Kutnar, A. (2013). Reducing the set-recovery of surface
densified solid Scots pine wood by hydrothermal post-treatment.
Miyafuji, H. & Fujiwara, Y. (2013). Fire resistance of wood treated with various ionic liquids (ILs).
Navi, P. & Pizzi, A. (2014). Property changes in thermo-hydro-mechanical processing.
Holzforschung.
Laine, K. (2014). Improving the properties of wood by surface densification. Doctoral thesis.
Aalto University, Finland.
Bekhta, P., Sedliačik, J. & Jones, D. (2018). Effect of short-term thermo mechanical densification
of wood veneers on the properties of birch plywood. European Journal of Wood and Wood
Products.