You are on page 1of 26

11/16/2017

Contents
Addis Ababa University
Addis Ababa Institute of Technology • Wire antennas
– Dipole, Monopole, Helix
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering • Aperture antennas
• Microstrip antennas
Antennas and Radio Wave Propagation – ECEG-4304 • Reflector antennas
• Antennas for cellular communication
Common Antenna Types

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 2

Introduction Introduction
• Antenna parameters discussed in previous • The antenna engineer is expected to
chapter are diverse and some times conflicting. make a choice that satisfies a proper
• Antenna types differ from one another with balance of the requirements
respect to parameters of interest.
• There is no such thing at universally best • The objective of this chapter is to
antenna. examine and analyse some of the most
• Choice depends on specific application popular antennas using relevant
requirements antenna theories to see:
– High/Low directivity operation – why they have become popular, and
– Low side-lobes – Low cost – what their major features and properties
– Compact – Bandwidth (including advantages and disadvantages)
– Light weight – Impedance are.
– Low/High energy – ….

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 3 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 4

1
11/16/2017

Common antenna types Contents


• Wire antennas
– Dipole, Monopole, Helix
• Aperture antennas
• Microstrip antennas
• Reflector antennas
• Antennas for cellular communication

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 5 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 6

Wire antennas Dipole


• Dipole
• Monopole
• Loop
• Helical
• Yagi-Uda

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 7 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 8

2
11/16/2017

Dipole Dipole
• Electrical properties of a finite length dipole
Elevation plane
amplitude
patterns for a
thin dipole with
sinusoidal
current
distribution

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 9 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 10

Dipole Dipole
• l=1.25λ • Variation of Radiation resistance and
directivity of a dipole with respect to its length.

Increasing the length beyond l=1.00λ reduces


the beam-width, but it leads to side-lobes.
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 11 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 12

3
11/16/2017

Dipole Dipole
• Half wavelength dipole: l=0.5λ
• Some popular forms of dipole antennas

To reduce the imaginary part of the input impedance to zero, the


antenna is matched or reduced in length until the reactance
vanishes. Typical length is l=0.47λ to l=0.48λ
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 13 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 14

Monopole Monopole
• Half of a dipole antenna mounted above the earth or a
ground plane
• Normally one-quarter wavelength long almost the same • Analysis for a
feature as a dipole, except the 37Ωradiation
resistance, higher gain, a shorter length, and easier to vertical near
feed! infinite
• Based on the Image Theory l
electric plane
conductor,
using image
theory
Ground
l

l
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 15 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 16

4
11/16/2017

Monopole Monopole
• Quarter wavelength monopole: l=0.25λ

• An example:

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 17 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 18

Monopole Helical Antennas

• Some
popular
forms of
monopole
antennas
• It may be viewed as a derivative of the dipole or
monopole, but it can also be considered a
derivative of a loop.
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 19 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 20

5
11/16/2017

Helical Antennas Helical Antennas


• Normal mode Helix • Normal mode Helix
– It may be treated as the superposition of n – The axial ratio:
elements, each consisting of a small loop of
diameter D and a short dipole of length s, thus
the far fields are

where S is the area of the loop. – When the circumference is equal to


– They are orthogonal and 90 degrees out of
phase;
– The combination of them gives a circularly or the axial ratio becomes unity and the radiation
elliptically polarised wave. is circularly polarised.
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 21 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 22

Helical Antennas Helical Antennas


• Axial Mode Helix • Axial Mode Helix
– The axial (end-fire) mode occurs when the circumference Normalised radiation pattern:
of the helix is comparable with the wavelength (C = πD ≈ λ)
and the total length is much greater than the wavelength.
– This has made the helix an extremely popular circularly-
polarised broadband antenna at the VHF and UHF band
frequencies Half power beamwidth:
Directivity
– The recommended parameters for an optimum design to
achieve circular polarisation are:

Axial Ratio
First Null beamwidth:

Radiation resistance
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 23 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 24

6
11/16/2017

Yagi-Uda Antennas Yagi-Uda Antennas

• The driven element (feeder) • The reflector


– is the very heart of the antenna. It determines the – is longer than the feeder to force the radiated
polarisation and centre frequency. energy towards the front.
– For a dipole, the recommended length is about – The optimum spacing between the reflector and
0.47lλ to ensuring a good input impedance to a 50 Ω the feeder is between 0.15 to 0.25 wavelengths.
feed line.
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 25 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 26

Yagi-Uda Antennas Contents


• Wire antennas
– Dipole, Monopole, Helix
• Aperture antennas
• Microstrip antennas
• Reflector antennas
• The directors
– are usually 10 to 20% shorter than the feeder and appear • Antennas for cellular communication
to direct the radiation towards the front.
– The director to director spacing is typically 0.25 to 0.35
wavelengths,
– The number of directors determines the maximum
achievable directivity and gain.
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 27 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 28

7
11/16/2017

Aperture antennas Aperture antennas


• They are often used for higher frequency
• Rectangular and Circular Aperture
applications (>1GHz) than wire-type antennas.
– Common microwave antenna
– Simple in construction
• It is just an opening of a waveguide terminated on
(infinitely) wide conducting plane.

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 29 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 30

Aperture antennas Aperture antennas


• Rectangular and Circular Aperture • Horn Antennas
– The simplest and one of the most widely used
Circular Aperture Rectangular Aperture microwave antennas.
– The antenna is nicely integrated with the feed line
(waveguide).
Directivity
– The horn is nothing more than a hollow pipe of
different cross sections, which has been tapered
(flared) to a larger opening.
– The type, direction, and amount of taper (flare) can
have a profound effect on the overall performance of
TE11 TE10 the element as a radiator.
– They are mainly used for: standard antenna gain and
3D Pattern field measurements, feed element for reflector
antennas, and microwave communications.

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 31 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 32

8
11/16/2017

Aperture antennas Aperture antennas


• Horn Antennas • Horn Antennas
– Typical electromagnetic horn antenna – E-Plane sectoral horn: a1=a
configurations – H-Plane sectoral horn: b1=b

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 33 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 34

Aperture antennas Aperture antennas


• Horn Antennas • Horn Antennas
– E-Plane sectoral horn: a1=a – E-Plane sectoral horn
– Half-power beamwidth
as a function of
included angle and for
different lengths.

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 35 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 36

9
11/16/2017

Aperture antennas Aperture antennas


• Horn Antennas • Horn Antennas
– E-Plane sectoral
horn – H-Plane sectoral horn: b1=b
– Normalized directivity
as a function of
aperture size and for
different lengths.

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 37 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 38

Aperture antennas Aperture antennas


• Horn Antennas • Horn Antennas
– Pyramidal horn: Both E and – Pyramidal horn: Both E and H plane flare
H plane flare – Typical standard gain X-band (8.2–12.4 GHz)
pyramidal horn and its gain characteristics.

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 39 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 40

10
11/16/2017

Aperture antennas Aperture antennas


• Horn Antennas
– Conical horn: While the pyramidal, E-, and H- • Horn Antennas
plane sectoral horns are usually fed by a
rectangular waveguide, the feed of a conical – Directivity of a
horn is often a circular waveguide. conical horn as
a function of
aperture
diameter for
different axial
horn lengths

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 41 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 42

Aperture antennas Aperture antennas

• Horn Antennas • Horn Antennas


– Corrugated horn – Corrugated horn
– Leads to efficiencies of – Leads to efficiencies of
the order of 75–80% the order of 75–80%

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 43 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 44

11
11/16/2017

Contents Microstrip/Patch Antennas


• Wire antennas
– Dipole, Monopole, Helix
• Aperture antennas
• Microstrip antennas
• Reflector antennas
• Antennas for cellular communication

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 45 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 46

Microstrip/Patch Antennas Microstrip/Patch Antennas


• Advantages: • Dis-advantages:
Ease of construction Small bandwidth: BW ∝
and integration, d/λ
Relatively low cost,
Poor efficiency
Compact and low
profile (h << λ) Trade-off between scan
coverage and bandwidth
Light Weight
in large phased arrays
Good flexibility
(Conformal) Difficult to design -
require full wave
• Typical applications analysis
for 1 - 20 GHz

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 47 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 48

12
11/16/2017

Applications of Microstrip
Operational principles
Antennas
• Aerospace vehicles including • Resonant antenna
– high-performance aircraft, – L ~0.5λ
– spacecraft, • In this case, the antenna can be considered
– satellites and as a λ /2 transmission line resonant cavity
with two open ends.
– missiles
• The fringing fields from the patch to the
• Mobile radios, phones and pagers ground are exposed to the upper half space (z
• Base stations for personal > 0) and are responsible for the radiation.
communications • As a resonant cavity, there are many
• Large ground-based phased array possible modes (as waveguides), thus a
antennas patch antenna is multi-mode and may have
many resonant frequencies.

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 49 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 50

Geometry of Microstrip Antenna RF/Analog Substrate Requirements

• The basic antenna consists of a thin metallic patch separated from the • Low dielectric losses,
ground plane by a dielectric layer
• Usually used at microwave frequencies • Low leakage,
Radiating Patch
• Low and uniform dielectric constant
• Choice of a material based on its
Ground Plane
dielectric constant characteristics and
losses usually dominates over other
considerations.
Dielectric Substrate

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 52

13
11/16/2017

Well known Substrates for RF Well known Substrates for RF


applications applications

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 53 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 54

Substrates behaviour Microstrip Antenna Shapes

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 55 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD

14
11/16/2017

Rectangular Patch: Directivity Rectangular Patch: Bandwidth

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD

Rectangular Patch: Efficiency Rectangular Patch: Radiation Pattern

• E-plane pattern • H-plane pattern


AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD

15
11/16/2017

Rectangular Patch: Radiation Pattern Rectangular Patch: Impedance Level

• Three Dimensional pattern

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD
Typical values: 150-300Ω

Rectangular Patch: Input Impedance Feeding Methods


Feed Line
• Microstrip line feed
– Feed line with much smaller width
compared to the patch
– easy to fabricate
– easy to match by
controlling inset position
– “easy” to model (approximately)
– spurious feed-line radiation
and surface-wave excitation

– Limited bandwidth (2%-5%)


– produce cross-polarized radiation

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD

16
11/16/2017

Feeding Methods (Cont.) Feeding Methods (Cont.)


• Aperture-coupled feed
– On the bottom side of the lower substrate
• Probe feed there is a microstrip feed line
– inner conductor of the coax is – energy is coupled to the patch through a
attached to the radiation patch while slot on the ground plane separating the
the outer conductor is connected to two substrates
the ground plane – can give broader bandwidth
– easy to fabricate – more difficult to fabricate
– easy to match by – allows independent optimisation of feed
controlling position substrate
– requires via hole – separates antenna and feed-circuit
– adds probe inductance (matching is layers
difficult with thicker substrates) – Good pattern formation and polarization
– Feed point affects impedance purity
– narrow bandwidth – some spurious radiation due to slot
– produce cross-polarized radiation
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD

Feeding Methods (Cont.) Printed Antenna Efficiency

• Proximity-coupled feed
– Can give broader bandwidth
– low spurious radiation Feed type Feed Loss Efficiency
– more difficult to fabricate (dB)
Probe-fed 0.00 96±2%
MS-Line 0.02 91±2%
Aperture Coupled 0.26 85±2%

Note: Direct-contact feeding techniques are more efficient.

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD

17
11/16/2017

Designing a Rectangular Patch


Methods of Analysis Using the Transmission Line
• Transmission-line model
Model
– simplest
– good physical insight
– less accurate, valid only for rectangular patches
• Cavity model
– more complicated
– good physical insight, more accurate, more versatile
• Numerical Solvers
– complicated,
– less physical insight,
– very accurate & versatile
– can take into consideration surrounding environment

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 70
AAiT – Analysis and Design of Antennas,

Designing a Rectangular Patch Designing a Rectangular Patch


Using the Transmission Line Using the Transmission Line
Model Model
Relevant Formulas • Input data: εr , h, fr
1) Calculate W
2) Calculate ereff
ε reff =
ε r +1 ε r −1
+ 1 + 12
h 3) Calculate the extension ∆L
2 2 W 4) Calculate the actual (physical) length
of the patch using

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 71 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 72

18
11/16/2017

Example Example
• Design and verify with simulation a • Bluetooth operating frequency: 2.4-
rectangular microstrip patch antenna 2.485 GHz
that operates at Bluetooth using FR4
substrate. • FR4
– Thickness: 254µm
• Assuming the intrinsic impedance of
the feed system to be 50Ω, plot the S11 – Relative permittivity: 4.1
vs frequency near application
frequency.
• Now apply recess and re-plot the S11.

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 73 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 74

Contents Reflector antennas


• Wire antennas
– Dipole, Monopole, Helix
• Aperture antennas
• Microstrip antennas
• Reflector antennas
• Antennas for cellular communication

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 75 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 76

19
11/16/2017

Reflector Antennas Reflector Antennas


• Widely used to modify radiation • Advantages
pattern of radiation element. – High gain
• Result in high gain required for long- – High directivity
distance radio communications. – Narrow Beam width
– Can achieve gains above 30dB. • Drawbacks
• Two components – Requires reflector and drive element.
1. Reflecting surface – Cost
2. Feed antenna – Size

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 77 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 78

Applications Geometrical configurations


• Radio astronomy
• Microwave communication
• Satellite links Plane reflector

• Satellite TV
• Satellite tracking S-band antenna
on lunar surface
• High resolution RADAR
• Deep-space communication
– example on the surface of the moon
Curved reflector
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 79 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 80
Corner reflector

20
11/16/2017

Geometrical configurations Planar Reflector


• Example of non- • The simplest type.
conventional • Can be analyzed
using image theory.
reflector • Polarization of the
– CDMA and GSM feed and its position
cellular antenna. relative to the
– Wide 3-dB reflecting surface can
be used to control
beamwidth of more the radiating
than 90°. properties:
– Planar and corner – Pattern
reflectors employed. – Impedance
– directivity

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 81 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 82

Corner reflector Corner reflector


• Feed element is almost always a
• Two plane reflectors joined to dipole or an array of collinear
form a corner. dipoles placed parallel to the
• Simple in construction. vertex.
• Widely used as receiving • When the wavelength is large
elements for home television. compared to physical
dimensions, the surfaces can be
made of grid wires rather than
solid sheet metal
– spacing (g) between wires is made a
small fraction of a wavelength
(usually g ≤ λ/10)

• In most practical applications,


the included angle is 90◦

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 83 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 84

21
11/16/2017

Corner reflector 900 Corner reflector


• In practice, the aperture of the
corner reflector (Da) is usually
made between one and two • For small spacing the
wavelengths pattern consists of a
– (λ < Da < 2λ)
• The length of the sides of a 90◦
single major lobe.
corner reflector is most • Multiple lobes appear
commonly taken to be about
twice the distance from the vertex for the larger spacing
to the feed – (s > 0.7λ)
– (l≈2s)
• The height (h) of the reflector is • For s = λ the pattern
usually taken to be about 1.2 to exhibits two lobes
1.5 times greater than the total
length of the feed element separated by a null
along the φ = 00 axis.
Radiation
Amplitude Pattern
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 85 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 86

Parabolic Reflector Parabolic Reflector


• Parallel rays is incident upon
a parabolic reflector • Reflector
converge (focus) at a spot – Sheet metal, Metal Screen, or Wire grill (spacing <
– focal point. 0.1λ)

• Have some of the highest – Shape has to be accurate within a small


fraction of a wavelength.
gains
– Narrowest beam width angles • Feed
Collimated rays
• Reflector must have – Low gain antenna
dimension much larger than • λ/2 dipole
• Horn
the wavelength.
– Used in high frequency ranges:
UHF, SHF
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 87 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 88

22
11/16/2017

Parabolic Reflector Types Parabolic Reflector Types


• Based on shape of reflector • Based on shape of reflector

Paraboloid
• The most common Cylindrical
• Pencil-shaped beam • Curved only in one direction
Shrouded dish • Focus on a line
• Shields the antenna from side radiation • Feed is usually dipole or array
Orange peel
• Reduces side-lobes • Fan shaped beam.
• Radiates wide fan shaped beam.
• Internal part of the shroud is coated with absorbers. • Often used in RADAR antenna.
• Shroud can reduce back-lobe radiation by 10dB
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 89 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 90

Parabolic Reflector Types Parabolic Reflector Types


• Based on shape feed configuration • Based on shape feed configuration
Cassegrain feed

Feed on or behind the dish.


Axial or front feed • Primary feed illuminates a convex
• The most common. hyperboloidal secondary reflector.
• Feed at focus. Offset or Off-axis feed • Suitable for antennas with complicated Gregorian feed
• Feed and support block the beam. • Reflector is asymmetrical segment of paraboloid. or bulky feeds. • Similar to Cassegrain but the secondary reflector
• Limited aperture efficiency • Focus and feed are on the side. • Can achieve lower spillover and more is concave.
55% - 60% • Feed out of beam path. uniform illumination of the main reflector • Can reach aperture efficiencies beyond 70%.
• Commonly used in home satellite TV antennas • Better aperture efficiency
where size of feed is comparable to the dish. 65% - 80%
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 91 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 92

23
11/16/2017

Principles of Parabolic Principles of Parabolic


Reflectors Reflectors
• All rays leaving F after • Usually, the focus is
reflection on the at plane wave front.
surface emerge
parallel. D=4f
• They reach the plane
RR’ at the same time • Generally
– Equiphase wave front. – D/f
is an important
FP + PQ = const = 2 f
parameter and in
y 2 = 4 fx
FP = ( f − x )2 + y 2 practice varies
Equation of a
PQ = f − x parabola – 0.25 to 0.5

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 93 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 94

Principles of Parabolic
Gain of Parabolic Reflectors
Reflectors
2
 πD 
• When D/f is too low, • Gain G = 4πA e 2 A =  eA
λ  λ 
the reflector is not
properly illuminated.
– A geometrical area of the mouth of the
• When it is too large,
parabolic reflector.
radiation is lost over
the rim leading to – D diameter
spill-over. – λ is wavelength of the radio waves
– eA is the apperture efficiency with
common values between 0.55 and 0.70.

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 95 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 96

24
11/16/2017

Beam width of Parabolic


Gain of Parabolic Reflectors
Reflectors
• Factors affecting efficiency: • Half Power Beam width:
– Resistive or Ohmic losses λ
Θ=k
– Feed spillover D
– Feed illumination tapper
– Cross Polarization – k is a constant which depends on the
shape of the reflector and the feed.
– Aperture blockage
Usually taken to be k = 70.
– Non-Single Point Feed
– D diameter
– Shape/Surface finish errors
– And others … – λ is wavelength of2 the radio waves
 πk 
G =   eA
Θ
AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 97 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 98

Arecibo Radio Telescope FAST


• The world’s largest dish
antenna
• The world's most
sensitive radio telescope
• 305m diameter
• Spherical reflector
• Gregorian feed
• Operates between:
– 50MHz up to 10GHz
– (λ = 6 m) to (λ = 3 cm)
• At 2.4GHz: 900 ton
– HPBW=0.0280 Platform

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 99 AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 100

25
11/16/2017

End of slide

AAiT – ECEG – 3404 , Ephrem Teshale Bekele, PhD 101

26

You might also like