Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rubric Case Study #2 HCMG 730 (2020)

    Uploaded by

    Sarybell Del Valle
    9 views4 pages
    This document provides a grading rubric for a case study assignment with three questions worth a total of 170 points. It outlines the criteria for excellent, good, fair, and poor responses for each question relating to standard of care, withholding information, and altering medical records. An excellent response completely addresses the question, uses credible sources, shows depth of reasoning, and displays extensive knowledge conveyed fluently in writing. A good response adequately answers the question but may have superficial analysis. A fair response attempts to answer but lacks clarity, while a poor response does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    rubric case study #2 HCMG 730 (2020)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document provides a grading rubric for a case study assignment with three questions worth a total of 170 points. It outlines the criteria for excellent, good, fair, and poor responses for each question relating to standard of care, withholding information, and altering medical records. An excellent response completely addresses the question, uses credible sources, shows depth of reasoning, and displays extensive knowledge conveyed fluently in writing. A good response adequately answers the question but may have superficial analysis. A fair response attempts to answer but lacks clarity, while a poor response does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views4 pages

    Rubric Case Study #2 HCMG 730 (2020)

    Uploaded by

    Sarybell Del Valle
    This document provides a grading rubric for a case study assignment with three questions worth a total of 170 points. It outlines the criteria for excellent, good, fair, and poor responses for each question relating to standard of care, withholding information, and altering medical records. An excellent response completely addresses the question, uses credible sources, shows depth of reasoning, and displays extensive knowledge conveyed fluently in writing. A good response adequately answers the question but may have superficial analysis. A fair response attempts to answer but lacks clarity, while a poor response does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    Grading Rubric: HCMG 730 Case Study #2 (170 points)

    Content Excellent Good Fair Poor

    40-36 Points: Completely 35-31 Points: Adequately 30-25 Points: Fair attempt 24-0 Points: Poorly addressed
    addresses relevant aspects addresses the question. however it is unclear that the topic. There is no strength in
    of the question. Leads Reader is clear regarding question were answered. The the answers to the question. It
    Question #1: (40) readers into the discussion Writing is credible and reader is left to wonder what is difficult to assess what the
    fluently. cited properly most of the the writer is addressing writer meant.
    - Standard of care time. Depth of reasoning is specifically. Writing is credible
    Writing in the body of this is mainly sufficient. and cited properly, some of the Poorly analyzed. A few
    credible and cited properly. statements are made regarding
    time. Depth of reasoning
    Depth of reasoning is remains superficial. the topic but there is no depth
    evident. evident and citations are
    Student has an adequate The paper does not adequately improper most of the time.
    knowledge of the topic and focus on the major topic.
    is able to convey fluently in
    Student has a very good writing, most of the time. Student has a less than
    knowledge of the topic and adequate knowledge of the Novice thinking is evident and
    is able to convey fluently in student is unable to convey the
    topic and is not able to convey
    writing. this fluently in writing. major theory in writing.
    Student supports
    responses with some
    research, most is relevant
    Student supports responses Student does not use Student does not use any (or
    with relevant research poor) research to support their
    appropriate research to support
    their response response.

    Question 45-40 Points : Completely 39-35 Points: Adequately 34-30 Points: Fair attempt 29-0 Points: Poorly addressed
    #2Withholding addresses relevant aspects addresses the question. however it is unclear that the topic. There is no strength in
    information (45) of the question. Leads Reader is clear regarding question were answered. The the answers to the question. It
    readers into the discussion Writing is credible and reader is left to wonder what is difficult to assess what the
    fluently. cited properly most of the the writer is addressing writer meant.
    specifically. Writing is credible
    Provided at least two articles time. and cited properly, some of the Poorly analyzed. Either did not
    that were pertinent to the time. Provided two articles, but provide articles, or the articles
    discussion. One included Provided at least two one did not included statistics. were not pertinent to the
    articles that were pertinent
    statistics. Depth of reasoning remains subject. A few statements are
    to the discussion. One superficial. made regarding the topic but
    Writing in the body of this is included statistics. there is no depth evident and
    credible and cited properly. The paper does not adequately citations are improper most of
    Depth of reasoning is Depth of reasoning is focus on the major topic.
    mainly sufficient. the time.
    evident.
    Student has a less than
    adequate knowledge of the
    Student has an adequate topic and is not able to convey Novice thinking is evident and
    Student has a very good this fluently in writing. student is unable to convey the
    knowledge of the topic and knowledge of the topic and
    is able to convey fluently in major theory in writing.
    is able to convey fluently in
    writing. writing, most of the time.
    Student does not use
    appropriate research to support Student does not use any (or
    Student supports their response poor) research to support their
    Student supports responses
    responses with some response.
    with relevant research
    research, most is relevant

    Question #3: 40-36 Points: Completely 35-31 Points: Adequately 30-25 Points: Fair attempt 24-0 Points: Poorly addressed
    Altering Medical addresses relevant aspects addresses the question. however it is unclear that the topic. There is no strength in
    Records (40) of the question. Leads Reader is clear regarding question were answered. The the answers to the question. It
    readers into the discussion Writing is credible and reader is left to wonder what is difficult to assess what the
    fluently. cited properly most of the the writer is addressing writer meant.
    time. Depth of reasoning is specifically. Writing is credible
    Writing in the body of this is Poorly analyzed. A few
    mainly sufficient. and cited properly, some of the
    credible and cited properly. time. Depth of reasoning statements are made regarding
    Depth of reasoning is the topic but there is no depth
    remains superficial.
    evident. evident and citations are
    Student has an adequate The paper does not adequately improper most of the time.
    knowledge of the topic and
    is able to convey fluently in focus on the major topic.
    writing, most of the time.
    Student has a very good Student has a less than Novice thinking is evident and
    knowledge of the topic and adequate knowledge of the student is unable to convey the
    is able to convey fluently in topic and is not able to convey major theory in writing.
    writing. Student supports this fluently in writing.
    responses with some
    research, most is relevant
    Student does not use any (or
    Student supports responses Student does not use poor) research to support their
    with relevant research appropriate research to support response.
    their response

    Question #4: Jury 30-27 Points: Completely 26 – 24 Points: Adequately 23 -21 Points: Fair attempt 20 – 0 Points: Poorly
    Findings (30) addresses the question addresses the question. however it is unclear that the addressed topic. There is no
    Depth of reasoning is question was answered. The strength in the answer to the
    Depth of reasoning is mainly sufficient. reader is left to wonder what question. It is difficult to assess
    evident. the writer is addressing what the writer meant.
    specifically.
    Poorly analyzed. A few
    Student has an adequate
    Student has a very good statements are made regarding
    knowledge of the topic and the topic but there is no depth
    knowledge of the topic and is able to convey fluently in Depth of reasoning remains
    is able to convey fluently in evident and citations are
    writing, most of the time. superficial. improper most of the time.
    writing.
    Student has a less than
    adequate knowledge of the
    Student supports topic and is not able to convey Novice thinking is evident and
    Student supports responses responses with some
    with relevant research this fluently in writing. student is unable to convey the
    research, most is relevant major theory in writing.

    Student does not use


    appropriate research to support Student does not use any (or
    their response poor) research to support their
    response.

    10-9 Points:  Attention to 8-7 Points:  Some attention 6-5 Points:  Has 3-4 misspellings 4-0 Points:  
    detail is evident. No to detail is evident.  Has 1-2 and/or grammatical errors.  Has more than 4 misspellings
    misspellings or grammatical misspellings and/or and/or grammatical errors.  
    Few APA rules applied.  Student
    APA (10) errors.  grammatical errors. 
    effort reflects little
     Fair attempt to use APA understanding of the
    Student observed APA rules   Student observed some
    evident.  application of APA.   Few to no
    with no/very few errors APA rules however, few to
    references are cited both in
    evident.  All references cited moderate APA errors text and on the reference page
    in text are evident on evident.  Most references and vice versa. 
    reference page and vice cited in text are evident on Few references cited in text are
    versa. reference page and vice cited on reference page and vice
    versa. versa.  

    5 Points: References are of 4 Points: References are of 3-2Points: Fair use of 1-0 Points: Poor or no
    excellent quality. adequate quality. Some references. 1-2 adequate references noted.
    peer reviewed journals, references noted but nothing
    Peer reviewed journals, manuscripts, & scholarly beyond this.
    References (5) manuscripts, & other materials used.
    scholarly materials used.

    You might also like