Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Eric W. Lemmona…
Physical and Chemical Properties Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80303
Daniel G. Friend
Physical and Chemical Properties Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80303
A thermodynamic property formulation for standard dry air based upon available ex-
perimental p – – T, heat capacity, speed of sound, and vapor–liquid equilibrium data is
presented. This formulation is valid for liquid, vapor, and supercritical air at temperatures
from the solidification point on the bubble-point curve 共59.75 K兲 to 2000 K at pressures
up to 2000 MPa. In the absence of reliable experimental data for air above 873 K and 70
MPa, air properties were predicted from nitrogen data in this region. These values were
included in the determination of the formulation to extend the range of validity. Experi-
mental shock tube measurements on air give an indication of the extrapolation behavior
of the equation of state up to temperatures and pressures of 5000 K and 28 GPa. The
available measurements of thermodynamic properties of air are summarized and ana-
lyzed. Separate ancillary equations for the calculation of dew and bubble-point pressures
and densities of air are presented. In the range from the solidification point to 873 K at
pressures to 70 MPa, the estimated uncertainty of density values calculated with the
equation of state is 0.1%. The estimated uncertainty of calculated speed of sound values
is 0.2% and that for calculated heat capacities is 1%. At temperatures above 873 K and 70
MPa, the estimated uncertainty of calculated density values is 0.5% increasing to 1.0% at
2000 K and 2000 MPa. In addition to the equation of state for standard air, a mixture
model explicit in Helmholtz energy has been developed which is capable of calculating
the thermodynamic properties of mixtures containing nitrogen, argon, and oxygen. This
model is valid for temperatures from the solidification point on the bubble-point curve to
1000 K at pressures up to 100 MPa over all compositions. The Helmholtz energy of the
mixture is the sum of the ideal gas contribution, the real gas contribution, and the con-
tribution from mixing. The contribution from mixing is given by a single generalized
equation which is applied to all mixtures used in this work. The independent variables are
the reduced density and reduced temperature. The model may be used to calculate the
thermodynamic properties of mixtures at various compositions including dew and
bubble-point properties and critical points. It incorporates the most accurate published
equation of state for each pure fluid. The mixture model may be used to calculate the
properties of mixtures generally within the experimental accuracies of the available mea-
sured properties. The estimated uncertainty of calculated properties is 0.1% in density,
0.2% in the speed of sound, and 1% in heat capacities. Calculated dew and bubble-point
pressures are generally accurate to within 1%. © 2000 American Institute of Physics.
关S0047-2689共00兲00103-3兴
Key words: air, argon, density, equation of state, mixtures, nitrogen, oxygen, pressure, thermodynamic
properties, vapor–liquid equilibrium.
a兲
Electronic mail: ericl@boulder.nist.gov
©2000 by the U.S. Secretary of Commerce on behalf of the United States.
All rights reserved. This copyright is assigned to the American Institute
of Physics.
0047-2689Õ2000Õ29„3…Õ331Õ55Õ$37.00 331 J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2000
332 LEMMON ET AL.
experimental data for air.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356 21. Comparisons of bubble-point pressures calculated
16. Comparisons of critical region phase boundaries with the mixture model to experimental data for
calculated with the equation of state to predicted the nitrogen–oxygen binary mixture.. . . . . . . . . . . 358
data for air.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 356 22. Comparisons of bubble-point pressures calculated
17. Comparisons of densities calculated with the with the mixture model to experimental data for
equation of state to calculated p – – T data the argon–oxygen binary mixture.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 358
estimated from nitrogen data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 23. Comparisons of bubble-point pressures calculated
18. Comparisons of densities calculated with the with the mixture model to experimental data for
mixture model to experimental data for the the nitrogen–argon–oxygen ternary mixture. . . . . 359
nitrogen–argon binary mixture.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 24. Isochoric heat capacity versus temperature
19. Comparisons of densities calculated with the diagram for air. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359
mixture model to experimental data for the 25. Isobaric heat capacity versus temperature
nitrogen–oxygen and argon–oxygen binary diagram for air. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359
mixtures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 26. Speed of sound versus temperature diagram for
20. Comparisons of bubble-point pressures calculated air. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359
with the mixture model to experimental data for 27. Pressure versus density diagram for air.. . . . . . . . . 359
the nitrogen–argon binary mixture.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 358 28. Characteristic curves for air. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
List of Symbols
Symbol Physical quantity Unit
A Helmholtz energy J
a Molar Helmholtz energy J/mol
B Second virial coefficient dm3/mol
Bs Adiabatic bulk modulus MPa
C Third virial coefficient 共dm3/mol兲2
cp Isobaric heat capacity J/共mol•K兲
cv Isochoric heat capacity J/共mol•K兲
f Fugacity MPa
F Mixture coefficient
g Gibbs energy J/mol
h Enthalpy J/mol
k Isentropic expansion coefficient
KT Isothermal bulk modulus MPa
kT Isothermal expansion coefficient
M Molar mass g/mol
N Coefficients of equations
n Number of moles mol
p Presssure MPa
R Universal gas constant (8.314 510⫾0.000 070) J/共mol•K兲
s Entropy J/共mol•K兲
T Temperature K
u Internal energy J/mol
v Molar volume dm3/mol
V Total volume dm3
w Speed of sound m/s
X Mixture composition array
x Mole fraction 共liquid mole fraction for VLE
calculations兲
y Vapor mole fraction for VLE calculations
Z Compressibility factor
␣ Reduced Helmholtz energy
 Volume expansivity 1/K
s Adiabatic compressibility 1/MPa
␦ Reduced density, ␦ ⫽ / c or ␦ ⫽ / j
␥ Heat capacity ratio
TABLE 3. Composition of air using nitrogen, argon, and oxygen as TABLE 4. Summary of prior formulations for the thermodynamic properties
constituents of air
No. Pressure
of Temp. range
Author points range 共K兲 共MPa兲 AADa AADb
Bubble-point pressure
No. Density
of Temp. range
points range 共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 AADa AADc
Bubble-point density
FIG. 1. Low temperature p – – T data for air. Solid lines represent the dew
and bubble-point curves for air. FIG. 2. High temperature p – – T data for air.
p––T
FIG. 3. Isochoric and isobaric heat capacities and speed of sound data for air. FIG. 4. Derivation of second virial coefficient data from the p – – T data of
Solid lines represent the dew and bubble-point curves for air. Romberg 共1971兲.
virial coefficients since in many apparatus, such low density bolded entries in Table 8. Data of Crain and Sonntag 共1966兲,
data are subject to local adsorption by the walls of the appa- Palavra 共1979兲, and Kosov and Brovanov 共1979兲 were used
ratus or to higher uncertainties in the measurement of ex- for the nitrogen–argon mixture, and data of Pool et al.
tremely low pressures. No value of the second virial coeffi- 共1962兲 were used for the nitrogen–oxygen and argon–
cient was determined for the 84 K isotherm. The p – – T oxygen mixtures. In addition to the limited data for the
data used to generate the second virial coefficients are shown nitrogen–oxygen system, the following data sets for air were
in Fig. 4. The solid lines show isotherms calculated from the also used in the mixture modeling: Blanke 共1977兲, Howley
equation of state presented here and the solid curve repre- et al. 共1994兲, Michels et al. 共1954a兲, 共1954b兲, Romberg
sents the dew-point curve. The y intercept 共zero density兲 共1971兲, Magee 共1994兲, Ewing and Goodwin 共1993兲, and
represents the second virial coefficient at a given tempera- Younglove and Frederick 共1992兲. The largest impact from
ture, and the third virial coefficients can be taken from the the addition of these data sets was on the nitrogen–oxygen
slope of each line at zero density. The values of the second parameters, however, the argon–oxygen parameters were
virial coefficient calculated from the equation of state are in also influenced to some degree by the air data. These data
good agreement with those presented in Table 7 and shown had little impact on the nitrogen–argon parameters, as there
as circles in the figure. Values of the second virial coeffi- were sufficient binary data for this system to model the pa-
cients and p – – T data from Michels et al. are shown in a rameters well. The VLE data used in the model development
similar fashion in Fig. 5. The circles at zero density represent included the nitrogen–argon data of Hiza et al. 共1999兲, the
the second virial coefficients reported by Michels. nitrogen–oxygen data of Duncan and Staveley 共1966兲, and
Binary p – – T and vapor–liquid equilibrium data for the argon–oxygen data of Burn and Din 共1962兲 and of Wil-
mixtures containing nitrogen, argon, and oxygen are summa- son et al. 共1965兲. Comparisons with ternary VLE data indi-
rized in Table 8. The composition ranges listed in these
tables show the composition of the first component listed.
All available experimental data were considered in the pre-
liminary analysis, but the final regression of the coefficients
of the mixture model used the data sets indicated by the
88.27 ⫺0.219
94.06 ⫺0.194
97.56 ⫺0.179
103.24 ⫺0.160
109.10 ⫺0.143
113.05 ⫺0.134
117.12 ⫺0.125
122.22 ⫺0.115 FIG. 5. Second virial coefficient data and p – – T data of Michels et al.
共1954a兲, 共1954b兲.
TABLE 8. Summary and statistical analysis of data for mixtures of nitrogen, argon, and oxygen
N2 – Ar — p – – T
Crain and Sonntag „1966… 264 0.19–52.5 0.08–26.6 143–273 0.20–0.80 0.209
Holst and Hamburger 共1916兲 41 0.01–0.2 0.01–0.2 74–90 0.31–0.80 0.193
Kosov and Brovanov „1979… 201 5.93–58.8 2.46–18.8 293–353 0.16–0.81 0.363
Maslennikova et al. 共1979兲 88 100.–800. 17.5–41.1 298–423 0.26–0.75 0.320
Massengill and Miller 共1973兲 6 0.27–1.3 25.7–30.2 90–113 0.50 0.409
Palavra „1979… 203 0.95–24.9 25.8–32.9 94–106 0.32–0.70 0.021
Pool et al. 共1962兲 24 0.10–0.2 28.3–33.9 84 0.18–0.89 0.502
Ricardo et al. 共1992兲 21 7.41–145. 25.8–34.7 119 0.52 0.160
Townsend 共1956兲 144 0.18–13.9 0.07–5.7 298–323 0.16–0.84 0.054
Zandbergen and Beenakker 共1967兲 55 0.76–9.6 0.55–13.1 171–293 0.19–0.74 0.097
Overall 1047 0.01–800. 0.01–41.1 74–423 0.16–0.89 0.191
N2 – Ar — VLE
Elshayal and Lu 共1975兲 7 0.39–0.7 100 0.14–0.90 0.468
Fastovskii and Petrovskii 共1956兲 56 0.12–0.4 79–103 0.05–0.90 1.182
Hiza et al. „1999… 44 0.08–0.8 85–100 0.10–0.89 0.379
Jin et al. 共1993兲 13 1.48–2.8 123 0.05–0.97 0.555
Lewis and Staveley 共1975兲 8 0.07–0.2 85 0.23–0.81 0.840
Miller et al. 共1973兲 14 0.84–1.5 112 0.11–0.85 0.326
Narinskii 共1966兲 98 0.13–2.3 80–120 0.02–0.96 0.484
Pool et al. 共1962兲 12 0.07–0.2 84 0.06–0.88 0.420
Sprow and Prausnitz 共1966兲 17 0.08–0.2 84 0.06–0.91 0.460
Thorpe 共1968兲 68 0.13–1.1 81–115 0.10–0.91 0.830
Wilson et al. 共1965兲 176 0.10–2.6 72–134 0.05–1.00 0.805
Overall 513 0.07–2.8 72–134 0.02–1.00 0.708
N2 – O2 — p – – T
Blagoi and Rudenko 共1958兲 19 b
30.7–38.0 67–79 0.11–0.80 0.415
Knaap et al. 共1961兲 7 b
29.6–34.8 77 0.29–0.91 0.097
Kuenen et al. 共1922兲 153 2.93–6.0 1.22–19.4 135–293 0.25–0.50 0.877
Pool et al. „1962… 7 0.09–0.2 29.8–34.1 84 0.25–0.74 0.088
Overall 186 0.09–6.0 1.22–38.0 67–293 0.11–0.91 0.771
N2 – O2 — VLE
Armstrong et al. 共1955兲 70 0.003–0.1 65–78 0.03–0.94 0.870
Cockett 共1957兲 62 0.12–0.1 81–91 0.07–0.81 1.287
Din 共1960兲 108 0.11–1.0 79–116 0.10–0.89 0.788
Dodge and Dunbar 共1927兲 49 0.06–3.0 77–125 0.05–0.91 0.903
Duncan and Staveley „1966… 11 0.002–0.01 63 0.10–0.80 1.524
Hiza et al. 共1999兲 65 0.001–0.8 63–100 0.07–0.88 0.689
Pool et al. 共1962兲 11 0.05–0.2 84 0.10–0.90 0.310
Thorogood and Haselden 共1963兲 13 0.10 88–90 0.002–0.08 1.320
Wilson et al. 共1965兲 138 0.10–2.6 78–136 0.05–0.99 0.540
Yorizane et al. 共1978兲 20 0.05–0.1 80 0.11–0.85 2.489
Overall 547 0.001–3.0 63–136 0.002–0.99 0.865
Ar–O2 — p – – T
Blagoi and Rudenko 共1958兲 36 b
34.8–38.2 70–89 0.10–0.87 0.274
Knaap et al. 共1961兲 6 b
34.7–35.2 90 0.28–0.79 0.052
Pool et al. „1962… 15 0.05–0.1 34.7–36.3 84–90 0.17–0.86 0.025
Saji and Okuda 共1965兲 20 b
34.9–36.1 85–87 0.25–0.92 0.244
Overall 77 0.05–0.1 34.7–38.2 70–90 0.10–0.92 0.200
Ar–O2 — VLE
Bourbo and Ischkin 共1936兲 27 0.07–0.2 87–95 0.04–0.86 0.710
Burn and Din „1962… 140 0.06–1.0 85–118 0.10–0.91 0.232
Clark et al. 共1954兲 55 0.10–0.7 90–110 0.10–0.90 0.313
Fastovskii and Petrovskii 共1955兲 24 0.12–0.2 89–96 0.21–0.83 0.774
Hiza et al. 共1999兲 16 0.16–0.3 95–100 0.11–0.79 0.805
Narinskii 共1957兲 55 0.11–1.2 90–120 0.03–0.96 0.237
Parikh and Zollweg 共1997兲 24 0.12–0.9 92–115 0.01–0.92 1.149
Pool et al. 共1962兲 24 0.05–0.1 84–90 0.10–0.90 0.168
Wang 共1960兲 35 0.12–0.2 90–96 0.02–1.00 1.393
Wilson et al. „1965… 200 0.10–2.6 87–139 0.003–0.98 0.403
Yorizane et al. 共1978兲 58 0.10 89–92 ⬍0.76 0.857
Overall 568 0.05–2.6 84–139 ⬍1.00 0.493
N2 – Ar–O2 — VLE
Fastovskii and Petrovskii 共1957兲 14 0.1 81–88 0.13–0.68 0.555
Funada et al. 共1982兲 60 0.1 90 ⬍0.004 0.278
Narinskii 共1969兲 115 0.13–2.2 82–120 0.04–0.86 0.489
Weishaupt 共1948兲 41 0.1 81–92 0.01–0.89 1.613
Wilson et al. 共1965兲 1427 0.10–2.6 78–136 0.001–0.99 0.561
Overall 1657 0.10–2.6 78–136 ⬍0.99 0.572
a
AAD—Average absolute deviation in density for p – – T and average absolute deviation in bubble-point pressure for VLE.
b
No pressure reported, bubble-point pressure assumed.
J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2000
342 LEMMON ET AL.
TABLE 10. Coefficients for the dew and bubble-point pressure and density
equations for air
i Ni i Ni
cated that the binary mixture parameters were sufficient for The ancillary equations were developed using linear and
modeling the ternary mixture interactions. nonlinear regression algorithms with the experimental data-
base discussed in Sec. 2 and calculated data discussed in Sec.
3. Vapor–Liquid Equilibria for Air 6.1. The equation for the dew and bubble-point pressures is
冉 冊 冉 冊兺
8
p Tj
The maxcondentherm 共state point of maximum tempera- ln ⫽ N i i/2, 共1兲
pj T i⫽1
ture along the saturation line兲, maxcondenbar 共state point of
maximum pressure along the saturation line兲, and critical where the N i are the coefficients given in Table 10 for either
point for air used in this work were reported by Jacobsen the dew or bubble-point pressure equation and ⫽1
et al. 共1990b兲. These values were determined using a modi- ⫺T/T j . Values of N i are zero for the coefficients not listed
fied Leung–Griffiths model to represent the high-pressure in the table. Densities along the dew and bubble lines can be
VLE data for ternary systems of nitrogen, argon, and oxy- calculated from the Helmholtz energy formulation given in
gen. The values of the properties at the maxcondentherm Sec. 4 at any temperature and the corresponding pressure
(T j , p j , j 兲 were used as reducing parameters for the equa- calculated from Eq. 共1兲. Ancillary equations for the densities
Pressurea Density
共MPa兲 Temperaturea,c 共K兲 共mol/dm3兲
along the saturation lines are given here for convenience in TABLE 11. Averaged molar composition of standard air at specified tempera-
tures
certain calculations such as estimation routines. The equation
for the bubble-point density is Composition
T T共K兲 N2 Ar O2 NO
⫺1⫽N 1 0.65⫹N 2 0.85⫹N 3 0.95⫹N 4 1.1⫹N 5 ln ,
j Tj 1500 0.7804 0.0093 0.2089 0.0014
共2兲 1600 0.7802 0.0093 0.2083 0.0022
and the equation for the dew-point density is 1700 0.7797 0.0093 0.2078 0.0032
冉冊
1800 0.7790 0.0094 0.2071 0.0045
1900 0.7780 0.0094 0.2063 0.0063
ln ⫽N 1 0.41⫹N 2 1.0⫹N 3 2.8⫹N 4 6.5, 共3兲 2000 0.7768 0.0094 0.2056 0.0082
j
where the coefficients are also given in Table 10. In these
equations, T j , p j , and j are values at the maxcondentherm.
from this equation is 2.773 234. Although values of the
Comparisons of these equations to experimental data are
freezing liquid line for air could have been calculated from a
given in Sec. 6.1. These ancillary equations are valid for
generalization of Eq. 共7兲, Eq. 共4兲 was selected instead since
temperatures from the solidification point 共59.75 K兲 to the
its extrapolation behavior to very high temperatures was
maxcondentherm 共132.6312 K兲. Values for the dew-point
known. The resulting equation for the freezing liquid pres-
pressure and density between the critical point and the max-
sure of air is
condentherm, shown in Fig. 6, are calculated by the bubble-
point equations. p
ps
⫺1⫽35 493.5
T
Ts 冋冉 冊 1.789 63
⫺1 , 册 共8兲
3.2. Freezing Liquid Line derived using the melting pressure equation of nitrogen
关Span et al. 共2000兲兴.
A freezing liquid line for air was estimated using the melt-
ing curves for pure nitrogen, argon, and oxygen due to the
lack of experimental information for the mixture. The solidi- 4. Equation of State for Air
fication temperature T s of air along the bubble line given by 4.1. Effects of Dissociation
Blanke 共1973兲 is 59.75 K. The solidification pressure p s cor-
responding to this temperature was calculated from the The details included in this and the following section are
bubble-point pressure equation, Eq. 共1兲, as 0.005 265 MPa. taken from Panasiti 共1996兲 with some modifications. At high
The freezing liquid line for air was assumed to have the same temperatures, air and its constituents dissociate, and the com-
general pressure dependence as the freezing liquid line for position changes to include various atomic and ionic species
pure nitrogen. This can be expressed as and new compounds including oxides of nitrogen. Hilsenrath
and Klein 共1965兲 report the extent of dissociation in the tem-
p rf ⫽ p rf , 共4兲
Air N2 perature range from 1500 to 15000 K. They considered the
where the reduced freezing pressures are defined as equilibrium between atoms, molecules, and ions for the ele-
ments nitrogen, oxygen, argon, carbon, and neon. In all, 28
p f共Tr兲 species were considered by Hilsenrath and Klein. For the
p rf ⫽ ⫺1 共5兲
p tp temperature range of current interest, the amount of nitric
oxide 共NO兲 in equilibrium at 2000 K formed from the disso-
for nitrogen, argon, or oxygen, and
ciation of oxygen and nitrogen was large enough that it
p f共Tr兲 might be expected to cause a noticeable change in the ther-
p rf ⫽ ⫺1 共6兲 modynamic properties of the mixture. No other constituents
ps
were considered in the current study due to their small con-
for air. In these equations, p f (T r ) is the freezing liquid pres-
centrations. Table 11 lists averaged values of composition,
sure at the reduced temperature, T r is the reduced tempera-
derived from Hilsenrath and Klein, for a mixture of nitrogen,
ture 共T/T tp or T/T s 兲, and the subscript tp indicates the triple
argon, oxygen, and nitric oxide at various temperatures. Al-
point for nitrogen, argon, or oxygen. The value of was
though Hilsenrath and Klein consider a pressure dependence,
determined at a reduced temperature of 2 from
the effect on calculated properties is small, and the compo-
x N2 ln p rf 共 2 兲 ⫹x Ar ln p rf 共 2 兲 ⫹x O2 ln p rf 共 2 兲 sition of air is assumed to be constant over all pressures at a
N 2 Ar O
2
given temperature.
⫽ln p rf 共 2 兲 ⫽ln p rf 共 2 兲 , 共7兲 Several methods were considered to determine the effects
Air N 2
of dissociation on the thermodynamic properties of air.
where the mole fractions x are taken from the composition of These methods include calculations using cubic equations,
air used in this work, and the pure fluid melting pressures extended corresponding states predictions 关Clarke et al.
were taken from Span et al. 共2000兲, Tegeler et al. 共1999兲, 共1994兲; Lemmon 共1996兲兴, and mixture equations of state of
and Schmidt and Wagner 共1985兲. The value calculated the form developed by Bender 共1973兲. Use of extended cor-
responding states models with accurate pure fluid informa- for T in kelvin. The pressure was calculated from Eq. 共9兲 for
tion is one of the most accurate methods for obtaining mix- air using nitrogen data
ture properties. However, the equation of state for oxygen
T Air Air
关Schmidt and Wagner 共1985兲兴 has limited temperature and p Air⫽ p . 共12兲
pressure ranges 共less than 300 K and 82 MPa兲, and the ac- T N2 N2 N2
curacy of properties calculated beyond these limits is uncer- The numerical constants in Eqs. 共10兲 and 共11兲 were ob-
tain. In addition, there is no published equation of state for tained by fitting selected p – – T nitrogen data of Jaeschke
nitric oxide. Therefore, the Peng–Robinson 共1976兲 equation and Hinze 共1991兲, Klimeck et al. 共1998兲, Michels et al.
of state was used with standard mixing rules to determine the 共1936兲, and Nowak et al. 共1997兲 in the range from 200 to
effect of dissociation of air and its constituents. The acentric 520 K at pressures to 67 MPa to a preliminary version of the
factors required in the Peng–Robinson model and the criti- air equation of state. The data of Nowak et al. represent the
cal parameters for nitrogen, argon, and oxygen are listed in most reliable high temperature, high pressure data available
the fixed point tables. The critical temperature of nitric oxide for nitrogen. This fitting procedure minimized deviations be-
is 180.15 K, the critical pressure is 6.48 MPa, and the acen- tween air properties estimated from nitrogen data and values
tric factor is 0.6. The values of the critical parameters and the calculated from the preliminary equation of state for air. The
acentric factor for nitric oxide were taken from Prasad and average absolute deviations for values calculated from the
Viswanath 共1974兲. nitrogen equation of state of Span et al. 共2000兲 were 0.01%
Although cubic equations generally cannot be used to cal- for the data of Jaeschke and Hinze, 0.002% for the data of
culate values of density with high accuracy over a wide Klimeck et al., 0.02% for the data of Michels et al., and
range of temperature and pressure, the purpose here was to 0.001% for the data of Nowak et al. In comparison, the av-
compare the differences in density between two mixtures: erage absolute deviations for values calculated from the air
the three-component N2 –Ar–O2 model of fixed composition equation of state as compared with the transformed data were
for air used in this work, and a four-component 0.02% for the data of Jaeschke and Hinze and of Klimeck
N2 –Ar–O2 –NO model which accounted for dissociation by et al., 0.04% for the data of Michels et al., and 0.03% for the
the addition of the NO component. Errors associated with the data of Nowak et al. Using Eqs. 共10兲–共12兲, high temperature,
calculation of density differences should be much smaller high pressure p – – T nitrogen data of Robertson and Babb
than those calculated for the overall value of density. The 共1969兲 and Saurel 共1958兲 were transformed to predict state
highest deviation at 2000 K and 2000 MPa is approximately points for air and were used in subsequent fitting of the equa-
0.1%, which is less than the expected uncertainty of experi- tion of state for air. The data of Robertson and Babb were
mental measurements at these high temperatures and pres- used in the final regression of the coefficients. The estimated
sures. The differences in calculated heat capacities between uncertainty of calculated air properties is 1.0% in density at
the two mixtures is approximately 0.8%, also within the es- the highest temperatures and pressures of 2000 K and 2000
timated uncertainty. Based on this analysis, it was concluded MPa.
that dissociation effects are small enough at temperatures up
to 2000 K and pressures to 2000 MPa that they were not
explicitly considered in the development of the new equation 4.3. Fitting Procedures
of state for air. The equation of state was developed using selected experi-
mental pressure–density–temperature (p – – T) data, iso-
choric heat capacity data, speed of sound data, and second
4.2. Calculation of Air Properties from Experimental virial coefficients as indicated in Table 6 and discussed in
Data for Nitrogen Sec. 2. The units adopted for this work are megapascals for
pressure, moles per cubic decimeter for density, kelvins for
A modified extended corresponding states technique was temperature, and joules for energy. Units of the experimental
used to predict properties of air corresponding to states de- data were converted as necessary from those of the original
fined by measurements of nitrogen properties. Experimental publications to these units. All temperatures were converted
p – – T measurements for nitrogen extend to 1800 K and to the International Temperature Scale of 1990 共ITS-90兲
2220 MPa. Air properties were calculated from high-pressure based on temperature differences given by Preston-Thomas
and high-temperature nitrogen data using the assumption that 共1990兲.
the compressibility factors are equal The functional forms of preliminary equations for the re-
Z Air共 T Air , Air兲 ⫽Z N2共 T N2 , N2兲 共9兲 sidual part of the Helmholtz energy were optimized with the
algorithm developed by Wagner 共1974兲. The fitting process
at corresponding states defined by was used to select an optimal set of terms for representing
the selected data from a large bank of terms of the form
T Air⫽ 共 1.038 128⫹0.000 054 933T N2兲 T N2 共10兲
given in Eq. 共25兲 below. The exponents i k , j k , and l k were
and selected in this process. The exponents j k in Eq. 共25兲 are
generally considered to be greater than or equal to zero so
Air⫽1.043 492 N2 , 共11兲 that only ideal gas terms contribute as T goes to infinity, and
i k and l k are integers greater than zero. Each data point used TABLE 12. Coefficients for the ideal gas expressions
in the least-squares determination of the coefficients of the i Ni i Ni
equation of state was assigned a weighting factor. The
weights used in the fitting process were calculated using the c0p of nitrogen, c0pof oxygen,
Eq. „15… Eq. „17…
error propagation formula 共sometimes called the theorem of
1 3.5 1 3.500 42
propagation of variance兲. The functions for weighting were 2 0.306 646 9⫻10⫺5 2 0.166 961⫻10⫺7
calculated by making use of a preliminary equation of state 3 0.470 124 0⫻10⫺8 3 1.067 78
for the partial derivatives required for estimating variances 4 ⫺0.398 798 4⫻10⫺12 4 1.012 58
by the error propagation formula. In several instances, the 5 1.012 941 5 0.944 365
6 3364.011 6 2242.45
error propagation weights were modified by the assignment
7 11 580.4
of arbitrary multiplicative factors to increase or lessen the c0p of air, ␣0 of air,
effect of a particular data set on the overall representation of Eq. „18… Eq. „24…
the surface. 1 3.490 888 032 1 0.605 719 400⫻10⫺7
The isobaric heat capacity and speed of sound data are not 2 2.395 525 583⫻10⫺6 2 ⫺0.210 274 769⫻10⫺4
3 7.172 111 248⫻10⫺9 3 ⫺0.158 860 716⫻10⫺3
linearly related to the coefficients in the Helmholtz energy 4 ⫺3.115 413 101⫻10⫺13 4 ⫺13.841 928 076
formulation and must first be linearized before being used in 5 0.223 806 688 5 17.275 266 575
the fitting process. The isobaric heat capacity is linearized by 6 0.791 309 509 6 ⫺0.195 363 420⫻10⫺3
calculating the density at the experimental pressure and tem- 7 0.212 236 768 7 2.490 888 032
perature and reducing the isobaric heat capacities to an 8 0.197 938 904 8 0.791 309 509
9 3364.011 9 0.212 236 768
equivalent isochoric heat capacity using 10 2242.45 10 ⫺0.197 938 904
c v ⫽c p ⫺R
␣r
␦ 冉
⫺␦
2␣ r 2
1⫹ ␦
␦
.
冊 共13兲
11 11 580.4 11
12
13
25.363 65
16.907 41
87.312 79
␣ r
2␣ r
1⫹2 ␦ ⫹␦ 2
␦ ␦2
The speed of sound is linearized by calculating the density c 0p N3 N 4v 2e v 共 2/3兲 N 5 w 2 e ⫺w
⫽N 1 ⫹N 2 T ⫹ 1.5 ⫹ v 2
⫹ ,
and the ratio of the heat capacities ␥ from a preliminary R T 共 e ⫺1 兲 2 关共 2/3兲 e ⫺w ⫹1 兴 2
equation of state. To improve the representation of the speed 共17兲
of sound data and of the available shock tube data for air, the where v ⫽N 6 /T and w⫽N 7 /T. The coefficients for Eqs.
final functional form was developed using nonlinear regres- 共15兲 and 共17兲 are given in Table 12.
sion techniques. Using a combination of linear and nonlinear The ideal gas heat capacity c 0p for air, calculated by com-
techniques, a functional form was obtained which yielded the bining the ideal gas heat capacity equations for nitrogen,
best representation of the selected experimental data. Details argon, and oxygen, according to Eq. 共14兲, is given by the
of the nonlinear fitting procedures are given by Lemmon and following expression:
Jacobsen 共2000兲.
4
c 0p N N u 2e u N v 2e v
4.4. Ideal Gas Heat Capacity R
⫽ 兺
i⫽1 T
5
N i T i⫺1 ⫹ 1.5 ⫹ u
共 e
6
⫺1 兲 2⫹
共 e
7
v
⫺1 兲 2
The ideal gas heat capacity for air is given by the mole 共 2/3 兲 N 8 w 2 e ⫺w
⫹ , 共18兲
fraction average of the ideal gas heat capacities for nitrogen, 共共 2/3兲 e ⫺w ⫹1 兲 2
argon, and oxygen
冉 冊 冉 冊 冉 冊
where u⫽N 9 /T, v ⫽N 10 /T, and w⫽N 11 /T. The coeffi-
c 0p 共 T 兲 c 0p 共 T 兲 c 0p 共 T 兲 c 0p 共 T 兲 cients of this equation are given in Table 12; note that dif-
⫽x N2 ⫹x Ar ⫹x O2 .
R R N2
R Ar
R O2
ferent values for the coefficients N i are used in Eqs. 共15兲,
共14兲 共17兲, and 共18兲
The ideal gas heat capacity for nitrogen taken from Span
4.5. Ideal Gas Helmholtz Energy
et al. 共2000兲 is
c 0p
4 The ideal gas contribution to the Helmholtz energy of air
N 5u 2e u
R
⫽ 兺
i⫽1
N i T i⫺1 ⫹
共 e u ⫺1 兲 2
, 共15兲 is given by
3
where u⫽N 6 /T. The ideal gas heat capacity for argon is a 0 ⫽⫺RT⫹ 兺 x i共 h 0i ⫺Ts 0i ⫹RT ln x i 兲 ,
i⫽1
共19兲
c 0p
5
⫽ . 共16兲 where x i is the mole fraction of component i in air, and h 0i
R 2
and s 0i are the ideal gas enthalpy and entropy of component i
The ideal gas heat capacity for oxygen taken from Schmidt at the specified temperature. The ideal gas enthalpy is given
and Wagner 共1985兲 is by
h 0i ⫽h 0i
0
⫹ 冕 T
T0
c 0pi dT, 共20兲
TABLE 13. Coefficients and exponents for the equation of state for air
k Nk ik jk lk
0
where h 0i
is the enthalpy datum value at the reference tem- 1 0.118 160 747 229 1 0 0
perature (T 0 ) for component i, based upon a zero reference 2 0.713 116 392 079 1 0.33 0
point for the ideal crystal at absolute zero temperature. The 3 ⫺0.161 824 192 067⫻101 1 1.01 0
ideal gas entropy is given by 4 0.714 140 178 971⫻10⫺1 2 0 0
冕 冉 冊
5 ⫺0.865 421 396 646⫻10⫺1 3 0 0
T c0 p0
pi
s 0i ⫽s 0i
0
⫹ dT⫺R ln , 共21兲 6 0.134 211 176 704 3 0.15 0
T0 T p0 7 0.112 626 704 218⫻10⫺1 4 0 0
where 0
s 0i
is the entropy datum value at the reference tem- 8 ⫺0.420 533 228 842⫻10⫺1 4 0.2 0
perature and pressure 共T 0 and p 0 兲 for component i, also 9 0.349 008 431 982⫻10⫺1 4 0.35 0
based upon a zero reference point of the ideal crystal at ab- 10 0.164 957 183 186⫻10⫺3 6 1.35 0
solute zero temperature. The variable p 0 is the ideal gas pres- 11 ⫺0.101 365 037 912 1 1.6 1
sure at the fluid density and temperature. Combining Eqs. 12 ⫺0.173 813 690 970 3 0.8 1
共19兲–共21兲 results in the following expression for the ideal 13 ⫺0.472 103 183 731⫻10⫺1 5 0.95 1
gas Helmholtz energy 14 ⫺0.122 523 554 253⫻10⫺1 6 1.25 1
冉
15 ⫺0.146 629 609 713 1 3.6 2
3
T ⫺0.316 055 879 821⫻10⫺1
兺 xi
16 3 6 2
a ⫽⫺RT⫹
0
RT ln ⫹h 0i
0
⫺Ts 0i
0
i⫽1 0T 0 17 0.233 594 806 142⫻10⫺3 11 3.25 2
0.148 287 891 978⫻10⫺1
冊
18 1 3.5 3
⫹ 冕 T
T0
c 0pi dT⫺T 冕 T0
T c 0pi
T
dT⫹RT ln x i , 共22兲
19 ⫺0.938 782 884 667⫻10⫺2 3 15 3
冉 冕
3
a0 ␦ 0 h 0i
0
s 0i
0
c 0pi Eqs. 共1兲, 共2兲, and 共3兲 were used to define the vapor–liquid
␣ 0⫽
RT
⫽⫺1⫹
i⫽1
x i ln 兺
⫹ ⫺
␦ 0 RT c R R
⫺
0 2
d
equilibrium boundaries. To expand the range of the equation
冊
beyond 2000 K and 2000 MPa, data published by Nellis
⫹
1
R
冕0
c 0pi
d ⫹ ln x i , 共23兲
et al. 共1991兲, determined using a shock tube apparatus, were
included in the fitting process as discussed in Sec. 4.8 below.
The equation of state for air used in this work is explicit in
where 0 ⫽T ci /T 0 , ␦ 0 ⫽ 0 / ci is the reduced ideal gas den- the nondimensional Helmholtz energy
sity at p 0 and T 0 , T 0 is the reference temperature 共298.15
K兲, and p 0 is the reference pressure 共0.101 325 MPa兲. T ci
and ci are the critical parameters of the pure fluids. Values a 共 ,T 兲
␣共 ␦, 兲⫽ ⫽ ␣ 0共 ␦ , 兲 ⫹ ␣ r共 ␦ , 兲 , 共25兲
0
of h 0i 0
and s 0i for nitrogen, argon, and oxygen are taken from RT
Cox et al. 共1989兲 and are given in the fixed point tables.
where ␣ 0 is the ideal-gas contribution to the Helmholtz en-
The following expression for ␣ 0 is obtained by combining
ergy given in the previous section, ␣ r is the residual contri-
Eqs. 共18兲 and 共23兲:
bution to the Helmholtz energy, ␦ ⫽ / j is the reduced den-
5
sity, ⫽T j /T is the reciprocal reduced temperature, j is the
␣ 0 ⫽ln ␦ ⫹ 兺 N i i⫺4 ⫹N 6 1.5⫹N 7 ln density at the maxcondentherm, and T j is the temperature at
i⫽1
the maxcondentherm.
⫹N 8 ln关 1⫺exp共 ⫺N 11 兲兴 ⫹N 9 ln关 1⫺exp共 ⫺N 12 兲兴 The residual Helmholtz energy contribution to the equa-
tion of state is given by
⫹N 10 ln关 2/3⫹exp共 N 13 兲兴 , 共24兲
10 19
where ␦ ⫽ / j and ⫽T j /T, as given by Eq. 共25兲 in the Sec.
4.6, and T j and j are parameters at the maxcondentherm of ␣ 共 ␦ , 兲⫽ 兺 N k␦ ⫹
r ik jk
兺 N k ␦ i k j k exp共 ⫺ ␦ l k 兲 .
k⫽1 k⫽11
air. The coefficients of this equation are given in Table 12. 共26兲
4.6. Equation of State for Air The coefficients N k of the equation of state are given in
Table 13. The values of i k , j k , and l k were determined from
The equation of state for air was developed using experi- the fitting procedures described in Sec. 4.3. For the nonex-
mental data for pressure–density–temperature (p – – T), ponential terms in Eq. 共26兲, i k ranges from 1 to 6 and j k
isochoric heat capacity, speed of sound, and second virial ranges from 0 to 1.35. The thermodynamic properties can be
冉 冊 冋 冉 冊 冉 冊册
for the dew and bubble-point states are determined by the
simultaneous solution of the dew or bubble-point pressure p ␣r 2␣ r
⫽RT 1⫹2 ␦ ⫹␦2 共37兲
equation 共1兲 and the equation of state for a given tempera- T
␦ ␦2
ture. The derived properties for saturation states are calcu-
冉 冊 冋 冉 冊 冉 冊 冉 冊册
lated as functions of temperature and density using the stan-
dard thermodynamic relations given in Eqs. 共27兲–共34兲. 2p RT ␣r 2␣ r 3␣ r
⫽ 2␦ ⫹4 ␦ 2 ⫹␦3
2 ␦ ␦ 2
␦3
冉 冊
T
p ␣r 共38兲
Z⫽ ⫽1⫹ ␦ 共27兲
RT ␦
冉 冊 冋 冉 冊 冉 冊册
p ␣r 2␣ r
u
RT
⫽冋冉 冊 冉 冊 册
␣
0
␦
⫹
␣
r
␦
共28兲
T
⫽R 1⫹ ␦
␦
⫺␦
␦
共39兲
h
RT
⫽ 冋冉 冊 冉 冊 册 冉 冊
␣0
⫹
␣r
⫹␦
␣r
␦
⫹1 共29兲
J⫽ 冉 冊
T
p h
⫽
T  ⫺1
cp
共40兲
␦ ␦
s
R
⫽ 冋冉 冊 冉 冊 册
␣0
⫹
␣r
⫺ ␣ 0⫺ ␣ r 共30兲
k⫽⫺ 冉 冊
v p
p v s
⫽
w 2 M
p
共41兲
␦ ␦
g
RT
⫽1⫹ ␣ 0 ⫹ ␣ r ⫹ ␦
␣r
␦ 冉 冊
共31兲 k T ⫽⫺ 冉 冊 冉 冊
v p
p v T
⫽
p
p T
共42兲
cv
R 冋冉 冊 冉 冊 册
⫽⫺ 2
2␣ 0
2 ␦
⫹
2␣ r
2 ␦
共32兲 ⫽ 冉 冊 冉 冊冉 冊
1 v
v T p
⫽
1 p
T
p T
共43兲
cp cv
冋 冉 冊 冉 冊册
1⫹ ␦
␣r
␦
⫺␦
2␣ r
␦
2
 s⫽
1
kp
⫽⫺
1 v
v p
冉 冊 共44兲
冋 冉 冊 冉 冊册
s
⫽ ⫹ 共33兲
␣r 2␣ r
冉 冊
R R
1⫹2 ␦ ⫹␦ 2
p
␦ ␦2 B s ⫽kp⫽⫺ v 共45兲
v s
w2M c p
RT
⫽
cv 冋 冉 冊 冉 冊册
1⫹2 ␦
␣r
␦
⫹␦2
2␣ r
␦2
共34兲 ⫽
1
kTp
⫽⫺
1 v
v p
冉 冊 T
共46兲
冉 冊
Equations for the second and third virial coefficients are
given in Eqs. 共35兲–共36兲. p
K T ⫽k T p⫽⫺ v 共47兲
v
冉 冏冊
T
1 ␣r
B共 T 兲⫽ 共35兲 The derivatives of the ideal gas Helmholtz energy, Eq.
j ␦ ␦ ⫽0 共24兲, are given in Eqs. 共48兲–共49兲.
冏
5
␣0 N 8 N 11
⫽
␦ i⫽1 兺
共 i⫺4 兲 N i i⫺5 ⫹1.5N 6 0.5⫹N 7 / ⫹ N 11
e ⫺1
N 9 N 12 N 10N 13
⫹ N 12 ⫹ 共48兲
e ⫺1 共 2/3兲e⫺N13 ⫹1
冏
5
2␣ 0
⫽
2 ␦ i⫽1 兺
共 i⫺4 兲共 i⫺5 兲 N i i⫺6 ⫹0.75N 6 ⫺0.5⫺N 7 / 2
2 N 11 2 N 12
N 8 N 11 e N 9 N 12 e
⫺ 2⫺
共 e N 11 ⫺1 兲 共 e N 12 ⫺1 兲 2
2 ⫺N13
共 2/3兲 N 10N 13 e
⫹ 共49兲
关共 2/3兲 e ⫺N 13 ⫹1 兴 2
The derivatives of the residual Helmholtz energy, Eq. 共26兲,
are given in Eqs. 共50兲–共55兲. FIG. 7. Calculated Hugoniot curve for air.
冏
10 19
␣r
⫽
␦ k⫽1 k k 兺
i N ␦ i k ⫺1 j k ⫹
k⫽11
N k ␦ i k ⫺1 j k 兺 extrapolation behavior of an equation of state is the exami-
nation of the Hugoniot curve. The conservation relations for
⫻exp共 ⫺ ␦ l k 兲共 i k ⫺l k ␦ l k 兲 共50兲 fluid properties before and after the shock wave taken from
冏
10 19
Nellis et al. and the equation of state presented here were
2␣ r
⫽
␦ 2 k⫽1 k k 兺
i 共 i ⫺1 兲 N k ␦ i k ⫺2 j k ⫹
k⫽11
N k ␦ i k ⫺2 j k 兺 used to generate the Hugoniot curve for air. The Hugoniot
curve is the locus of states accessible to a fluid after a shock
wave which occur at a specified initial state. The equations
⫻exp共 ⫺ ␦ l k 兲关共 i k ⫺l k ␦ l k 兲共 i k ⫺1⫺l k ␦ l k 兲 ⫺l 2k ␦ l k 兴 for the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy across
共51兲 the shock wave are
冏
10 p⫺p 0 ⫽ 0 共 w s ⫺w 0 兲共 w p ⫺w 0 兲 , 共56兲
3␣ r
兺
⫽ i 共 i ⫺1 兲共 i k ⫺2 兲 N k ␦ i k ⫺3 j k
␦ 3 k⫽1 k k
19
冋
v ⫽ v 0 1⫺
共 w p ⫺w 0 兲
共 w s ⫺w 0 兲
, 册 共57兲
⫹ 兺
k⫽11
N k ␦ i k ⫺3 j k exp共 ⫺ ␦ l k 兲 兵 i k 共 i k ⫺1 兲共 i k ⫺2 兲 and
u⫺u 0 ⫽0.5共 p⫹ p 0 兲共 v 0 ⫺ v 兲 , 共58兲
⫹ ␦ l k 关 ⫺2l k ⫹6i k l k ⫺3i 2k l k ⫺3i k l 2k ⫹3l 2k ⫺l 3k 兴
where p 0 is the initial pressure, 0 is the initial mass density,
⫹共 ␦ 兲 lk 2
关 3i k l 2k ⫺3l 2k ⫹3l 3k 兴 ⫺l 3k 共 ␦ l k 兲 3 其 共52兲 u 0 is the initial molar internal energy, v 0 is the initial molar
volume, w 0 is the initial velocity of the material ahead of the
冏
10 19
␣r shock front, p is the final shock pressure, v is the final molar
⫽
␦ k⫽1 k k 兺
j N ␦ i k j k ⫺1 ⫹
k⫽11
兺
j k N k ␦ i k j k ⫺1 exp共 ⫺ ␦ l k 兲 volume, and u is the final molar internal energy. The velocity
共53兲 of the shock wave is w s and the velocity of the material
downstream from the shock front is w p . Combining Eqs.
冏
10 19
2␣ r 共56兲 and 共57兲 results in
⫽ 兺
j 共 j ⫺1 兲 N k ␦ i k j k ⫺2 ⫹ j k 共 j k ⫺1 兲 兺
2 ␦ k⫽1 k k
⫻N k ␦
k⫽11
i k j k ⫺2
exp共 ⫺ ␦ 兲 lk
共54兲
冉
v ⫽ v 0 1⫺
p⫺ p 0
0 w s2 冊 . 共59兲
TABLE 14. Pure fluid equations of state used in the mixture model density and temperature, properties are calculated here at the
density and temperature of the mixture. Since this model
Temperature Maximum
Fluid Author range 共K兲 pressure 共MPa兲 deals with the entire fluid surface, reduced values of density
and temperature are used rather than the physical values to
Nitrogen Span et al. 共2000兲 63.151–1000 2200
ensure that properties of the constituents are calculated for
Argon Tegeler et al. 共1999兲 83.806–700 1000
Oxygen Schmidt and Wagner 共1985兲 54.361–300 82 the same phase as the mixture. While this approach is arbi-
trary and different from the usual excess property format, it
results in an accurate representation of the phase boundaries
for pure fluids and their mixtures.
Hugoniot curve for air calculated using this process for an The formulation for nitrogen–argon–oxygen mixtures
initial state on the bubble line at 77.1 K as specified by Nellis given here is a modification of the generalized model devel-
et al. The data point on the plot is the lowest measured shock oped by Lemmon 共1996兲 for a wide range of fluids including
tube point from Nellis et al. The reported shock tube points hydrocarbons and cryogens. It preserves the general nature
above 30 GPa were not included because, according to Nellis of the previous work, but is more accurate at low tempera-
et al., nitrogen spontaneously dissociates above 30 GPa. tures for the calculation of nitrogen–argon–oxygen mixture
As shown in Fig. 7, the Hugoniot curve approaches the properties than the prior formulation. By restricting the ap-
shock tube point of Nellis et al. 共1991兲 indicating that the plication to a particular class of fluids, the model was de-
extrapolation behavior of the equation of state presented here signed to represent the unique characteristics of this system.
is reasonable. However, the extrapolation behavior of the The model represents available measured data in all parts of
formulation should not be based solely on Fig. 7. To further the thermodynamic surface within their estimated experi-
assess the extrapolation behavior of the formulation, other mental accuracy.
techniques, such as determining the isothermal behavior at An advantage of the approach used here is that the behav-
extreme pressures and densities, were used. These techniques ior of the Helmholtz energy contribution from mixing is the
are described in Sec. 7.1. same for the nitrogen–oxygen, nitrogen–argon, and argon–
oxygen binary systems. Relatively simple scaling factors are
5. Mixture Model for the used to determine its magnitude for each pair. This generali-
Nitrogen–Argon–Oxygen System zation makes it possible to extend the limits of the model for
the argon–oxygen mixture, for which there are few experi-
5.1. Mixture Model mental single-phase data. In addition, all vapor and liquid
The model used in this work to calculate the thermody- thermodynamic properties, including energy, entropy, heat
namic properties of nitrogen–argon–oxygen mixtures is capacity, sound speed, and the mixture critical temperature,
based on the Helmholtz energy of the mixture using a corre- pressure, and density, can be calculated using this approach.
sponding states theory that was originally developed by Preliminary equations for the mixture model based on the
Lemmon 共1996兲 and Lemmon and Jacobsen 共1998兲, 共1999兲. Helmholtz energy have incorporated equations with 7–10
The Helmholtz energy of the mixture is calculated as the terms in the excess contribution 关Lemmon and Jacobsen,
sum of an ideal gas contribution, a real gas contribution, and 共1998兲, 共1999兲兴. Many of these terms were included to ac-
a contribution from mixing. The Helmholtz energy for an count for deficiencies in the pure fluid equations, especially
ideal solution 共the first two contributions兲 is determined at in the extrapolation behavior to high temperatures and pres-
the reduced density and temperature of the mixture using sures, and at temperatures below the triple points of the pure
accurate pure fluid equations of state for the mixture compo- fluids. The equation presented here uses only two terms and
nents. The contribution from mixing, a modified excess func- is more predictive in nature, and results calculated for the
tion, is given by a single generalized empirical equation argon–oxygen system should generally be more accurate
which is applied to all mixtures considered. Reducing param- than the preliminary models.
eters, which are dependent on the mole fraction, are used to The Helmholtz energy for mixtures of nitrogen, argon, and
modify values of density and temperature. The model may oxygen can be calculated using
be used to calculate thermodynamic properties of mixtures at a⫽a idmix⫹a E . 共61兲
various compositions, including dew and bubble-point prop-
erties and critical points. It incorporates the most accurate The Helmholtz energy for the ideal mixture is
published equation of state for each pure fluid as given in
3
Table 14. Additional information concerning the model is
given by Lemmon and Tillner-Roth 共1999兲. a idmix⫽ 兺 x i 关 a 0i 共 ,T 兲 ⫹a ri 共 ␦ , 兲 ⫹RT ln x i 兴 ,
i⫽1
共62兲
An excess property of a mixture is defined as the actual
mixture property at a given condition minus the value for an In these equations, and T are the mixture density and tem-
ideal solution at the same condition. In most other work deal- perature, a 0i is the ideal gas Helmholtz energy for component
ing with excess properties, the mixing condition is defined at i, and a ri (⫽ ␣ ri RT) is the pure-fluid residual Helmholtz en-
constant pressure and temperature. Because the independent ergy of component i evaluated at a reduced density and tem-
variables for the pure fluid Helmholtz energy equations are perature defined below. Equations for the ideal gas Helm-
TABLE 15. Parameters of the mixture model rameters of the mixture model. The generalized factors and
mixture parameters F i j , i j and i j are given in Table 15.
Fij i j 共K兲 i j 共dm3/mol兲
If equations for the ideal gas Helmholtz energy in the non-
Nitrogen–Argon 1.121 527 ⫺1.237 713 ⫺0.000 760 31 dimensional form ␣ 0i ( ␦ , ), similar to Eq. 共24兲, are used
Nitrogen–Oxygen 1. ⫺0.856 350 ⫺0.000 418 47
rather than equations in the dimensional form a 0i ( ,T) as
Argon–Oxygen 0.597 203 ⫺2.115 126 0.000 412 32
indicated by Eq. 共64兲, the reducing variables for ␦ and in
the ideal gas equation are
␦ ⫽ / ci 共70兲
holtz energy and residual Helmholtz energy for the pure
and
fluids are given in the references shown in Table 14.
The excess contribution to the Helmholtz energy from ⫽T c i /T, 共71兲
mixing used in this work is
rather than the reducing values defined by Eqs. 共66兲 and 共67兲.
aE This only applies to the ideal gas part of the equation, not to
⫽ ␣ E 共 ␦ , ,x兲
RT the residual Helmholtz energy. The residual and excess terms
再兺 冎
2 3 ␣ ri ( ␦ , ) and ␣ E ( ␦ , ,x) in Eq. 共65兲 must be evaluated at the
reduced state point of the mixture defined by Eqs. 共66兲 and
⫽
i⫽1 j⫽i⫹1
兺 x i x j F i j 关 ⫺0.001 952 45␦ 2 ⫺1.4
共67兲. This complication is avoided though the use of dimen-
sional equations of the form given in Eq. 共22兲 or dimension-
⫹0.008 713 34␦ 2 1.5兴 , 共63兲 less equations of the form given in Eq. 共23兲 where the critical
where the coefficients and exponents were obtained from properties cancel out of the equation. Equations of the form
nonlinear regression of experimental mixture data. Values of given in Eq. 共24兲 are derived from dimensional equations,
F i j are given in Table 15. All single phase thermodynamic and the critical parameters of the pure fluids are built into the
properties can be calculated from the Helmholtz energy as coefficients of the equations.
described in Sec. 4.7 using the relations
冋 册
3
a 0i 共 ,T 兲 5.2. Vapor–Liquid Equilibrium „VLE… Properties
␣ ⫽ 兺 xi
0
⫹ln x i 共64兲
i⫽1 RT
In a two-phase nonreacting mixture, the thermodynamic
and constraints for vapor–liquid equilibrium 共VLE兲 are
3
T ⬘ ⫽T ⬙ ⫽T, 共72兲
␣ ⫽ 兺 x i ␣ ri 共 ␦ , 兲 ⫹ ␣ E 共 ␦ , ,x兲 ,
r
共65兲
i⫽1
p ⬘ ⫽ p ⬙ ⫽ p, 共73兲
where the derivatives are taken at constant composition. Cal-
culations of two-phase properties are described in Sec. 5.2. and
The reduced values of density and temperature for the mix-
i⬘ ⫽ i⬙ , i⫽1,2,...,q, 共74兲
ture used in Eqs. 共63兲 and 共65兲 are
where the superscripts ⬘ and ⬙ refer to the liquid and vapor
␦ ⫽ / red 共66兲
phases, respectively, and q is the number of components in
and the mixture. Equation 共74兲 is identical to equating the fugaci-
ties of the liquid and vapor phases for each component in the
⫽T red /T, 共67兲
mixture
where and T are the mixture density and temperature, and
f i⬘ ⫽ f i⬙ . 共75兲
red and T red are the reducing values
冉兺 冊
3 2 3 ⫺1 The chemical potential of component i in a mixture is
冉 冊
xi
red⫽
i⫽1
⫹
c i i⫽1 兺 j⫽i⫹1
兺 x ix j i j 共68兲
i 共 ,T 兲 ⫽
A
⫽ ci 共 T 兲 ⫹RTln共 f i 兲 , 共76兲
ni T,V,n j
and
3 2 3 where ci (T) is a function of temperature only and the nota-
T red⫽
i⫽1
兺 x i T c ⫹ i⫽1
兺 j⫽i⫹1
i 兺 x ix j i j . 共69兲 tion n j indicates that all mole numbers are held constant
except n i . The chemical potential in an ideal gas mixture is
The parameters i j and i j are used to define the shapes of
the reducing temperature lines and reducing density lines. 0i ⫽ 冉 冊
A0
ni T,V,n j
⫽ ci 共 T 兲 ⫹RT ln共 f 0i 兲 , 共77兲
These reducing parameters are not the same as the critical
parameters of the mixture and are determined simultaneously where f 0i is the ideal gas partial pressure of constituent i,
in the nonlinear fit of experimental data with the other pa- x i p 0 ⫽x i RT. Subtracting these equations results in
f i ⫽x i RT exp 冉 共 n␣r兲
ni 冊 T,V,n j
, 共78兲
冉 冊 冉 冊
numerical differences
冉 冊 冉 冊 冉 冊
2g 2g
2g 2g 2g ⫺ ⫺ ⌬T
⌬ ⬇ ⌬T⫹ ⌬p x2 T x2
x2 T x2 p x2
冉 冊
p,T p,T
p,T p,T p,T ⌬p⬇ , 共83兲
共80兲 2g
p x2
and p,T
⌬ 冉 冊
g
3
x3 p,T
⬇
g
T x3 冉 冊
3
p,T
⌬T⫹
g
p x3 冉 冊3
p,T
⌬p,
from which an estimate of the location of the critical point
can be obtained. The reducing parameters can be used as
initial estimates for the critical pressure and temperature and
共81兲 the values of T and p are repeatedly incremented according
where ⌬T and ⌬p are the differences from the critical point to Eqs. 共82兲 and 共83兲 until the second and third derivatives of
temperature and pressure in an iterative algorithm for finding the Gibbs energy are both simultaneously near zero.
the critical point, and the left sides of these equations repre- The critical lines for the nitrogen–argon, nitrogen–
sent the deviations from the zero value at the critical point oxygen, and argon–oxygen binary mixtures are shown in
indicated in Eq. 共79兲. Solving these equations for ⌬T and ⌬p Fig. 8 along with experimental values of the critical tempera-
results in ture from Jones and Rowlinson 共1963兲. The value of T c for
FIG. 10. Comparisons of densities calculated with the equation of state to experimental data for air.
FIG. 12. Comparisons of isochoric heat capacities calculated with the equa-
tion of state to experimental data for air.
FIG. 16. Comparisons of critical region phase boundaries calculated with the
equation of state to predicted data for air.
FIG. 15. Comparisons of second virial coefficients calculated with the equa- Comparisons of bubble-point pressures calculated with the
tion of state to experimental data for air. mixture model to experimental data are shown in Fig. 20 for
冉 冊
Z
v T
⫽0, 共87兲
冉 冊
Z
T p
⫽0, 共88兲
or
冉 冊
T
p h
⫽0, 共89兲
冉 冊
Z
T v
⫽0. 共90兲 FIG. 22. Comparisons of bubble-point pressures calculated with the mixture
model to experimental data for the argon-oxygen binary mixture.
FIG. 25. Isobaric heat capacity versus temperature diagram for air.
The uncertainties of the models presented here have been FIG. 26. Speed of sound versus temperature diagram for air.
estimated by comparing calculated results with experimental
data, as summarized in Sec. 6, and assessing the data them-
FIG. 24. Isochoric heat capacity versus temperature diagram for air. FIG. 27. Pressure versus density diagram for air.
Colwell, R. C., A. W. Friend, and D. A. McGraw, J. Franklin Inst. 225, 579 Kuenen, J. P., T. Verschoyle, and A. T. Van Urk, Proc. R. Acad. Amsterdam
共1938兲. 26, 49 共1922兲.
Cox, J. D., D. D. Wagman, and V. A. Medvedev, CODATA Key Values for Lemmon, E. W., ‘‘A generalized model for the prediction of the thermody-
Thermodynamics 共Hemisphere, New York, 1989兲. namic properties of mixtures including vapor-liquid equilibrium,’’ Ph.D.
Crain, R. W., Jr. and R. Sonntag, Adv. Cryo. Eng. 11, 379 共1966兲. dissertation, University of Idaho, Moscow, 1996.
Deiters, U. K. and K. M. de Reuck, Pure Appl. Chem. 69共6兲, 1237 共1997兲. Lemmon, E. W., NIST Standard Reference Database 72: NIST Thermo-
Din, F., Trans. Faraday Soc. 56, 668 共1960兲. physical Properties of Air and Air Component Mixtures, Version 1.0
Din, F., Thermodynamic Functions of Gases, Volume 1: Ammonia, Carbon 共National Institute of Standards and Technology, Standard Reference
Dioxide, and Carbon Monoxide; Volume 2: Air, Acetylene, Ethylene, Data Program, Gaithersburg, 1998兲.
Propane and Argon, Volume 3. Ethane, Methane, and Nitrogen 共Butter- Lemmon, E. W. and R. T Jacobsen, Adv. Cryo. Eng. 43, 1281 共1998兲.
worths, London, 1962兲. Lemmon, E. W. and R. T Jacobsen, Int. J. Thermophys. 20, 825 共1999兲.
Dodge, B. F. and A. K. Dunbar, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 49, 591 共1927兲. Lemmon, E. W. and R. T Jacobsen, An International Standard Formulation
Duncan, A. G. and L. A. K. Staveley, Trans. Faraday Soc. 62, 548 共1966兲. for the Thermodynamic Properties of 1,1,1-Tr; Triflluoroethane (HFC-
Elshayal, I. M. and B. C.-Y. Lu, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 53, 83 共1975兲. 143a) for Temperatures from 161 to 450 K and Pressures to 50 MPa, J.
Eucken, A., Phys. Z. 14, 324 共1913兲. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 共in press, 2000兲.
Eucken, A. and F. Hauck, Z. Phys. Chem. 134, 161 共1928兲. Lemmon, E. W. and R. Tillner-Roth, Fluid Phase Equilib. 165, 1 共1999兲.
Ewing, M. B. and A. R. H. Goodwin, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 25, 423 共1993兲. Lemmon, E. W., R. T Jacobsen, and S. W. Beyerlein, Adv. Cryo. Eng. 37,
Fastovskii, V. G. and Yu. V. Petrovskii, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 29, 1311 1107 共1992兲.
共1955兲. Levelt Sengers, J. M. H., M. Klein, and J. S. Gallagher, Pressure-Volume-
Fastovskii, V. G. and Yu. V. Petrovskii, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 30, 76 共1956兲. Temperature Relationships of Gases. Virial Coefficients, American In-
Fastovskii, V. G. and Yu. V. Petrovskii, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 31, 836 stitute of Physics Handbook, 3rd ed. 共McGraw Hill, New York, 1972兲.
共1957兲. Lewis, K. L. and L. A. K. Staveley, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 7共9兲, 855 共1975兲.
Friedman, A. S., J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 58共2兲, 93 共1957兲. Magee, J. W., Int. J. Thermophys. 15共5兲, 849 共1994兲.
Friend, D. G., NIST Standard Reference Database 12, NIST Thermophysi- Maslennikova, V. Ya., A. N. Egorov, and D. S. Tsiklis, Russ. J. Phys.
cal Properties of Pure Fluids, Version 3.0 共National Institute of Stan- Chem. 53共6兲, 919 共1979兲.
dards and Technology, Standard Reference Data Program, Gaithersburg, Massengill, D. R. and R. C. Miller, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 5, 207 共1973兲.
1992兲. Michels, A., T. Wassenaar, and G. J. Wolkers, Appl. Sci. Res. 5, 121
Funada, I., S. Yoshimura, H. Masuoka, and M. Yorizane, Adv. Cryo. Eng. 共1955兲.
27, 893 共1982兲.
Michels, A., T. Wassenaar, and W. van Seventer, Appl. Sci. Res. 4, 52
Giacomo, P., Metrologia 18, 33 共1982兲.
共1954a兲.
Hardy, H. C., D. Telfair, and W. H. Peilemeier, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 13, 226
Michels, A., T. Wassenaar, J. M. H. Levelt, and W. de Graaf, Appl. Sci.
共1942兲.
Res. 4, 381 共1954b兲.
Haynes, W. M., E. W. Lemmon, R. T Jacobsen, and D. G. Friend, Rev. High
Michels, A., H. Wouters, and J. DeBoer, Physica 3共7兲, 585 共1936兲.
Pressure Sci. Technol. 7, 1171 共1998兲.
Miller, R. C., A. J. Kidnay, and M. J. Hiza, AIChE J. 19共1兲, 145 共1973兲.
Henry, P. S. H., Proc. R. Soc. London A133, 492 共1931兲.
Narinskii, G. B., Kislorod 10共3兲, 9 共1957兲.
Hilsenrath, J., Tables of Thermal Properties of Gases; Chapter 2: The Ther-
Narinskii, G. B., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 40共9兲, 1093 共1966兲.
modynamic Properties of Air; Chapter 7: The Thermodynamic Proper-
ties of Nitrogen, NBS Circular 564 共1955兲. Narinskii, G. B., Zh. Fiz. Khim. 43共2兲, 408 共1969兲.
Hilsenrath, J. and M. Klein, Tables of Thermodynamic Properties of Air in Nellis, W. J., A. C. Mitchell, F. H. Ree, M. Ross, N. C. Holmes, R. J.
Chemical Equilibrium Including Second Virial Corrections from Trainor, and D. J. Erskine, J. Chem. Phys. 95共7兲, 5268 共1991兲.
1500 °K to 15000 °K 共National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Nesselmann, K., Z. Tech. Phys. 6共4兲, 151 共1925兲.
1965兲, AEDC-TR-65-58. Nowak, P., R. Kleinrahm, and W. Wagner, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 29, 1137
Hiza, M. J., A. J. Kidnay, and W. M. Haynes, Int. J. Thermophys. 共submit- 共1997兲.
ted 1999兲. Olien, N. A., National Bureau of Standards, Boulder 共private communica-
Holborn, L. and M. Jakob, J. Soc. German Eng. 61, 146 共1917兲. tion to R. T Jacobsen, 1987兲.
Holborn, L. and H. Schultze, Ann. Phys. 47, 1089 共1915兲. Palavra, A. M., Effect of pressure and temperature on excess properties in
Holst, G. and L. Hamburger, Z. Phys. Chem. 91, 513 共1916兲. the system argon-nitrogen, M. S. thesis, Instituto Superior Tecnico Uni-
Howley, J. B., J. W. Magee, and W. M. Haynes, Int. J. Thermophys. 15共5兲, versidade Tecnica De Lisboa, 1979.
801 共1994兲. Panasiti, M. D., ‘‘Thermophysical properties of air from 60 to 2000 K at
Jacobsen, R. T, W. P. Clarke, S. G. Penoncello, and R. D. McCarty, Int. J. pressures up to 2000 MPa,’’ M. S. thesis, University of Idaho, Moscow,
Thermophys. 11共1兲, 169 共1990a兲. 1996.
Jacobsen, R. T, W. P. Clarke, S. W. Beyerlein, M. F. Rousseau, L. J. Van Panasiti, M. D., E. W. Lemmon, S. G. Penoncello, R. T Jacobsen, and D. G.
Poolen, and J. C. Rainwater, Int. J. Thermophys. 11共1兲, 179 共1990b兲. Friend, Int. J. Thermophys. 20共1兲, 217 共1999兲.
Jacobsen, R. T, S. G. Penoncello, S. W. Beyerlein, W. P. Clarke, and E. W. Parikh, N. C. and J. A. Zollweg, Energy Week Proceedings, Houston, 1997,
Lemmon, Fluid Phase Equilib. 79, 113 共1992兲. Vol. 7, p. 58.
Jaeschke, M. and H. M. Hinze, Fortschr.-Ber. VDI 3, 262 共1991兲. Peng, D. Y. and D. B. Robinson, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 15共1兲, 59
Jakob, M., Z. Tech. Phys. 4, 460 共1923兲. 共1976兲.
Jin, Z.-Li, K.-Y. Liu, and W.-W. Sheng, J. Chem. Eng. Data 38, 353 共1993兲. Penning, F. M., Communs. Phys. Lab. Univ. Leiden, Number 166 共1923兲.
Jones, F. E., J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 83共5兲, 419 共1978兲. Poferl, D. J., R. A. Svehla, and K. Lewandowski, ‘‘Thermodynamic and
Jones, I. W. and J. S. Rowlinson, Trans. Faraday Soc. 59共488兲, 1702 共1963兲. Transport Properties of Air and the Combustion Products of Natural Gas
King, F. E. and J. R. Partington, Philos. Mag. 9共60兲, 1020 共1930兲. and of ASTM-A-1 Fuel with Air,’’ NASA Tech. Note D-5452 共1959兲.
Klimeck, J., R. Kleinrahm, and W. Wagner, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 30, 1571 Pool, R. A. H., G. Saville, T. M. Herrington, B. D. C. Shields, and L. A. K.
共1998兲. Staveley, Trans. Faraday Soc. 58, 1692 共1962兲.
Knaap, H. F. P., M. Knoester, and J. J. M. Beenakker, Physica 27, 309 Prasad, D. H. L. and D. S. Viswanath, ‘‘Generalized thermodynamic prop-
共1961兲. erties of real fluids using molar polarization at the critical temperature as
Kozlov, A., ‘‘Experimental investigation of the specific volumes of air in the third parameter,’’ Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian In-
the 20– 600 °C temperature range and 20–700 bar pressure range,’’ Dis- stitute of Science, Bangalore, 1974.
sertation for Candidate of Technical Science, Moscow Power Engineer- Preston-Thomas, H., Metrologia 27, 3 共1990兲.
ing Institute, 1968. Quigley, T. H., Phys. Rev. 67, 298 共1945兲.
Kosov, N. D. and I. S. Brovanov, Inz.-Fiz. Zh. 36共4兲, 627 共1979兲. Ricardo, A. A., S. F. Barreiros, M. Nunes da Ponte, G. M. N. Albuquerque,
Kuenen, J. P. and A. L. Clark, Communs. Phys. Lab. Univ. Leiden 150, 55 and J. C. G. Calado, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 24, 1281 共1992兲.
共1917兲. Robertson, S. L. and S. E. Babb, J. Chem. Phys. 50共10兲, 4560 共1969兲.
Rogovaya, I. A. and M. G. Kaganer, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 34共9兲, 917 Vasserman, A. A., E. A. Golovskii, E. P. Mitsevich, and V. A. Tsymarnyi,
共1960兲. Measurement of the Density of Air at Temperatures of 78 to 190 K up to
Romberg, H., VDI-Forsch., Dusseldorf, VDI-Verlag, Number 543 共1971兲. Pressures of 600 Bars, VINITI Deposition No. 2953 共Odessa Institute of
Saji, Y. and T. Okuda, Adv. Cryo. Eng. 10, 209 共1965兲. Marine Engineering, Ukraine, 1976兲.
Saurel, J., J. Recherche CNRS 42, 22 共1958兲. Vasserman, A. A., Ya. Z. Kazavchinskii, and V. A. Rabinovich, 1971, Ther-
Schmidt, R. and W. Wagner, Fluid Phase Equilib. 19, 175 共1985兲. mophysical Properties of Air and Air Components 共Israel Program Sci-
Shilling, W. G. and J. R. Partington, Philos. Mag. 6共38兲, 920 共1928兲. ence Translations, Tech. 1971兲, Transl. TT70-50095, 397 pp.
Smith, J. M. and H. C. Van Ness, Introduction to Chemical Engineering Wagner, W., Fortschr.-Ber. VDI, Dusseldorf, VDI-Verlag 3共39兲 共1974兲.
Thermodynamics, 3rd ed. 共McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975兲. Wang, D. I. J., Adv. Cryo. Eng. 3, 294 共1960兲.
Span, R., Multiparameter Equations of State—An Accurate Source of Ther- Waxman, M. and H. Davis, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 83共5兲, 415 共1978兲.
modynamic Property Data 共Springer, Berlin, 2000兲. Weishaupt, J., Angew. Chem. B20共12兲, 321 共1948兲.
Span, R., E. W. Lemmon, R. T Jacobsen, and W. Wagner, 2000, A Refer- Wilson, G. M., P. M. Silverberg, and M.G. Zellner, Adv. Cryo. Eng. 10, 192
ence Equation of State for the Thermodynamic Properties of Nitrogen 共1965兲.
for Temperatures from 63.151 to 1000 K and Pressures to 2200 MPa 共in Yorizane, M., S. Yoshimura, H. Masuoka, A. Toyama, Y. Nakako, and I.
press, 2000兲, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data; Int. J. Thermophys. 14共4兲, 1121 Funada, Chem. Eng. Sci. 33, 641 共1978兲.
共1998兲. Younglove, B. A. and N. V. Frederick, Int. J. Thermophys. 13共6兲, 1033
Span, R. and W. Wagner, Int. J. Thermophys. 18共6兲, 1415 共1997兲. 共1992兲.
Sprow, F. B. and J. M. Prausnitz, AIChE J. 12共4兲, 780 共1966兲. Zandbergen, P. and J. J. M. Beenakker, Physica 33共2兲, 343 共1967兲.
Sychev, V. V., A. A. Vasserman, A. D. Kozlov, G. A. Spiridonov, and V. A.
Tsymarny, Thermodynamic Properties of Air 共Hemisphere, Washington,
1987兲, Volume 6.
Tegeler, C., R. Span, and W. Wagner, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 28共3兲, 779
共1999兲. 9. Appendix: Tables of Properties of Air
Thorogood, R. M. and G. G. Haselden, Br. Chem. Eng. 8共9兲, 623 共1963兲.
Thorpe, P. L., Trans. Faraday Soc. 64共549兲, 2273 共1968兲. 9.1. Representative Tables of Thermodynamic
Townsend, P. W., ‘‘Pressure-volume-temperature relationships of binary Properties of Air
gaseous mixtures,’’ Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Pure Science, Colum-
bia University, New York, 1956. Properties of air along the dew and bubble-point curves
Tucker, W. S., Philos. Mag. 34, 217 共1943兲. were calculated using pressures from the appropriate ancil-
U.S. Standard Atmosphere 共U.S. Government Printing, Washington, D.C.,
1976兲.
lary equation at the specified temperature. The density was
Van Itterbeek, A. and W. de Rop, Appl. Sci. Res., Sec. A 6, 21 共1955兲. calculated using the air equation of state for the input tem-
Van Ness, H. C. and M. M. Abbott, Classical Thermodynamics of Nonelec- perature and pressure. Dew and bubble-point entries for the
trolyte Solutions with Applications to Phase Equilibria 共McGraw-Hill, isobar tables were calculated using pressure as the input to
New York, 1982兲.
Eq. 共1兲 to determine the corresponding temperatures. The
Vasserman, A. A. and V. A. Rabinovich, Thermophysical Properties of
Liquid Air and its Components, Series of Monographs No. 3 共Israel densities for these entries were calculated using the tempera-
Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1970兲. ture and pressure as input variables in the equation of state.
TABLE A1. Thermodynamic properties of air on the dew and bubble lines
Speed
Temperature Pressure Density Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共MPa兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
TABLE A1. Thermodynamic properties of air on the dew and bubble lines—Continued
Speed
Temperature Pressure Density Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共MPa兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
TABLE A1. Thermodynamic properties of air on the dew and bubble lines—Continued
Speed
Temperature Pressure Density Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共MPa兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲
Internal Speed
Temperature Density energy Enthalpy Entropy cv cp of sound
共K兲 共mol/dm3兲 共J/mol兲 共J/mol兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 J/共mol-K兲 共m/s兲