Table 1.

Demographics
Profile Frequency Percent Cumulative
Age
20 18 11.46 11.46
21 88 56.05 67.52
22 36 22.93 90.45
23 13 8.28 98.73
24 1 0.64 99.36
25 1 0.64 100.00
TOTAL
Gender
Male 48 30.57 30.57
Female 103 65.61 96.18
Prefer not to say 6 3.82 100.00
TOTAL
Program
Bachelor in Accountancy 15 9.55 9.55
Bachelor in Science in Entrepreneurship 39 24.84 34.39
Bachelor of Science in Business Administration – 74 47.13 81.53
Financial Management
Bachelor of Science in Office Administration 29 18.47 100.00
TOTAL

Table 2. Statements pertaining to perception on limited face-to-face classes

Variable Mean Media S.D Min Max
n
1. I believe limited face-to-face classes will pose 4.03 4.00 0.89 1.00 5.00
significant health risks.
2. I can concentrate better and devote myself in 4.11 4.00 0.87 1.00 5.00
learning through limited face-to-face classes
than online learning.
3. I am not convinced that the school will strictly 3.61 4.00 1.02 1.00 5.00
comply with the health and safety protocols.
4. I think I can do good in school and improve 3.99 4.00 0.92 1.00 5.00
my academic standing once limited face-to-face
class is implemented.
5. I believe that physical distancing will not be 3.94 4.00 1.00 1.00 5.00
observed once limited face-to-face class is
implemented.
6. Limited face-to-face classes is the best option 3.85 4.00 0.95 1.00 5.00
to learn more during this time of pandemic.
7. I am not totally convinced that I will get the 3.53 4.00 0.94 1.00 5.00
same value of education to limited face-to-face
classes.
8. I will be more eager to learn and accomplish 3.94 4.00 0.99 1.00 5.00
my tasks on a limited face-to-face scenario.
9. I believe that limited face-to-face classes is 3.65 4.00 1.01 1.00 5.00
more expensive in our parts as students
10. I believe that teachers will not give us 3.52 4.00 1.05 1.00 5.00
onerous tasks on a limited face-to-face class.

Scale Verbal Range-Value Interpretation

5 4.50 – 5.00 Strongly Agree
4 3.50 – 4.49 Agree
3 2.50 – 3.49 Neutral
2 1.50 – 2.49 Disagree
1 1.00 – 1.49 Strongly Disagree

According to the result, most of the students seemed to agree on statements regarding different
perceptions to limited face-to-face classes.

Perception regarding necessary health protocols, students agreed that limited face-to-face classes will
pose significant health risks that will defer them from learning properly. Items number 1,3, and 5 are
pessimistic statements related to health concerns, to which students responded “Agree”, which this
study finds that the students are not confident towards the capability of the school to maintain health
protocols

Perception regarding academic performance, students agreed that limited face-to-face classes will
improve their academic performance than online classes. Items number 2, 4, 6, 7, and 10 are optimistic
statements related to perceived effect of limited face-to-face classes, to which students responded
“Agree”, which this study finds that the students have progressive view upon the limited face -to-face.
Note that most of the students agreed to the statements as the same are compared to online classes.

Perception regarding financial capability, students agreed that limited face-to-face classes are more
expensive in the students’ disposition. The findings showed the students’ responded “Agree” to item
number 9 which is the statement pertaining to the financial capability of the student to participate in
limited face-to-face classes.

In summary, the findings showed students perceived limited face-to-face classes as better mode
of learning than online classes to improve their academic performance. In contrast, as it is beneficial in
academic aspect, health risks and economic status creates conflict of interest between themselves as
this pandemic affects every aspect of living including each livelihood of their families and the anxiety
posted by the COVID 19 disease.