Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: No copyright shall subsist in any work of
the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency or office
wherein the work is created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit. Such
agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the payment of royalties.
Borrowed materials (i.e., songs, stories, poems, pictures, photos, brand names,
trademarks, etc.) included in this module are owned by their respective copyright holders.
Every effort has been exerted to locate and seek permission to use these materials from their
respective copyright owners. The publisher and authors do not represent nor claim ownership
over them.
Team Leaders:
School Head : Marijoy B. Mendoza, EdD
LRMDS Coordinator : Karl Angelo R. Tabernero
Each SLM is composed of different parts. Each part shall guide you step-by-
step as you discover and understand the lesson prepared for you.
In addition to the material in the main text, Notes to the Teacher are also
provided to our facilitators and parents for strategies and reminders on how they can
best help you on your home-based learning.
Please use this module with care. Do not put unnecessary marks on any part
of this SLM. Use a separate sheet of paper in answering the exercises and tests. And
read the instructions carefully before performing each task.
If you have any questions in using this SLM or any difficulty in answering the
tasks in this module, do not hesitate to consult your teacher or facilitator.
Thank you.
What I Need to Know
This module was designed and written with you in mind. It is here to help you master
elements and ethics of literature review. The scope of this module permits it to be
used in many different learning situations. The language used recognizes the diverse
vocabulary level of students. The lessons are arranged to follow the standard
sequence of the course. But the order in which you read them can be changed to
correspond with the textbook you are now using.
1
What I Know
Read each statement carefully. Write T if the statement is True, F if otherwise. Write
your answers on your notebook.
2
Lesson
Elements of Good Literature
1 Review
In the previous lesson, you were able to write your literature review. Good job!
However, there are still some reminders that you need to ponder as you hone your
skill in writing literature. These are just recommendations that you need to think
about as you polish what you have written. Do not worry, your literature is good
enough, but you still need to consider these pointers in achieving good literature
review.
What’s In
Read and answer the following questions. Write your answers on your notebook.
4. What do you call that summarizes the ideas presented in the body of your
literature?
5. What part of study that contains the discussion of the reviewed study?
3
What’s New
Your teacher is very proud of you because like Nonoy and Bok, you do not have
questions anymore. But wait a minute, are you not going to take your pen and begin
revising your literature review? Maybe you are just too tired to do it now. Anyway,
keep going, because you are almost done! With all the journal articles, books, online
sources, and theses and dissertations that you have read, you can establish now a
clear background of your research. After this, you will have a better literature review.
What is It
What makes a good literature review? There are many ways of coming up with a good
literature review. Hence, every writer has their own style on how they can create a
good literature review (Thomas et al., 2015). Here are some suggestions that you may
use in polishing your work. These are the five (5) elements of good literature review:
4
provides an explicit background of what you are writing. Thus, a good
literature review is concentrated, wherein all aspects of it are focused,
explored, and identified.
2. Literature review is concise. Literature review does not represent the entire
claim of the research being reviewed. It is just a part of your research that
provides information about the variables that you are exploring that were
already explored by other researchers on their studies. Therefore, a short
discussion of their processes, findings, and implication is more than enough
to establish the concepts being dealt on your research (Wee & Banister, 2015).
One reviewed literature has to be comprised of one (1) paragraph with six (6)
to ten (10) sentences. However, you can exceed depending on the information
and its relevance to your research.
3. Literature review is logical. Literature review has to be logical, analytical and
rational. It is accomplished through deductive or inductive presentation.
Deductive presentation may begin with most important to lesser important.
On the other hand, inductive presentation may begin with local going to
global. Nonetheless, each sentence has to be in harmony with each other.
4. Literature review is complete. Saturation of the studies related to you research
has to be practiced. It should not be based on the quota of literature you need
to cite but on the relationship of previous researches to your research. But of
course, it is impossible to exhaust all literature in the world related to your
work. It is up to you to decide whether the literature considered clarified all
the inquiries related to your research or not. Thus, all important parts are
present (Reijers et al., 2018).
5. Literature review is recent. The literature to be used have to be conducted
within ten (10) years for it to be called recent. However, there are institutions
that are requiring literature to be only within five (5) years. Though these time
frames differ from each other, their suggested time has to be recent. The more
recent it will be, the better. The wisdom behind this idea is that every day we
discover new things. There is a great possibility that the information on a
certain topic may possibly change.
5
What’s More
Read the statements carefully and determine what element of literature review is
described. Write “A” for intensiveness, “B” for conciseness, “C” for logical; “D” for
completeness, and “E” for recentness of the literature. Write your answers on your
notebook.
1. Peter connects in a systematic manner all the research studies from reputable
journal publications in his research.
2. Mike chooses studies highly related to his study.
3. Marta considers the findings and conclusions of the gathered research
articles.
4. Prince searches only for research articles that are recently published.
5. Sophie is careful in choosing research articles. She briefly discussed them in
her study.
6
What I Can Do
Read the statements carefully. Write T if the statement is true, F if otherwise. Write
your answers on your notebook.
Assessment
In four (4) to five (5) sentences, make a short literature review about students’
academic stress using the five (5) sources in the box. Write your composition on your
notebook.
7
Rubrics on how your composition will be graded
Criteria 5 4 3 2 1
The The
The The
composition composition
composition composition is
is highly is fairly The
is organized moderately
organized organized composition
Organization having 1 idea organized
wherein having 3 is not
that is not having 2 ideas
ideas are ideas not organized
related to the not related to
related to related to
topic. the topic.
the topic. the topic.
The The
The The The
composition composition
composition composition composition
does not has more
Grammar has 1 to 3 has 4 to 5 has 6 to 7
have any than 8
grammatical grammatical grammatical
grammatical grammatical
errors. errors. errors.
error. errors.
Committed 4
Citation Committed 1 Committed 3
Committed 2 or more
format is wrong wrong
Formatting wrong citation wrong
religiously citation citation
format. citation
followed. format. format.
format.
Additional Activities
Search for ten (10) words in the box that are related to the elements of good literature
review. Write your answers on your notebook.
I N T E N S I V E E R C C
I N F O R M A T I O N O O
L O G I C A L B R I E F N
C O M P L E T E R I T P C
R E C E N T R E V I E W I
V A R I A B L E S T A N S
L I T E R A T U R E E M E
U N D E R S T A N D I N G
1. ___________________________ 6. ___________________________
2. ___________________________ 7. ___________________________
3. ___________________________ 8. ___________________________
4. ___________________________ 9. ___________________________
5. ___________________________ 10. ___________________________
8
Lesson
You commonly hear ethics as an action that is prescribed by the society. If you think
that ethics is exclusively for action following norms, then, this is just a particle of the
huge concern of ethics. It is because even in literature review, there is an ethics that
you need to follow. Do not worry, you will not be imprisoned if you become
“unethical”, however, your integrity as a novice researcher is on wage. Better to follow
the standards procedures in conducting literature review because a research that is
ethically accomplished is a research that is dignified and with integrity.
What’s In
Arrange the jumbled words related to ethics in literature. Write your answers on your
notebook.
1. B R I E F R B E I F
2. F O C U S E D S U C O F E D
3. G O O D O G O D
4. R E V I E W S R W I E E V S
5. C O N C I S E S N O C I C E
9
What’s New
Bok and Nonoy mistakenly thought ethics as proper action or a physical expression.
Well, ethics in literature review is not exclusively an action of doing what is right and
moral. It is more on following the standards of writing literature review. At the end
of the day, after following the proper protocols and standards, your literature review
will be ethical. Let us be ethical writers!
What is It
Ethics etymologically came from the Greek word ethos which means right action. In
any society, standard action is ought to be followed. For example, if you go out, you
need to wear facemask. If you will buy goods, you need to fall in queue. Aside from
that, we respect elders, those in authority, and people around us. In literature review,
we also follow ethics. But this ethics is not expressed through concrete action like
bowing our heads, using “po” and “opo”, or being generous to others. This is
manifested to the way we write our literature review. Hence, these are five (5) ethical
ways on writing our literature review that we need to follow.
1. Observe proper citation. In writing academic text like research, you ought to
observe proper citation. This is from proper paraphrasing to correct citation
entry in different citations. Observance of this is one way of acknowledging
10
their contribution, as well as your professionalism. As a novice researcher,
you need to master different kinds of citation styles depending on what your
institution is requiring you.
2. Keep the original thoughts. There are many times that we lose the original
thoughts of the text that we are paraphrasing. It is unethical if we will just
cite writing wherein the original essence of the sentence is different from what
we have interpreted it or written down. We need to be abreast with proper
skills in paraphrasing and interpreting others’ work.
3. Avoid biases. As a novice researcher, it is important that you eliminate
personal interest or biases on your studies (Fleming & Zegwaard, 2018). You
should be fair, not one sided. This is not just demeaning your literature but
also destroying the integrity of research as vessel of new knowledge. Therefore,
any form of biases has to be eliminated.
4. Be scientific. Becoming scientific is to have strong basis on reviewing
literature. One has to state only what is written and provided evidence alone
not on personal and intuitive deductions of interpretation.
5. Embrace positivism. Research is always geared towards positivity. Thus, the
literature review has to be in line with positivism (Polonski, 2004). Though not
all reviewed literature is an affirmation of your research, negation of it on the
other hand provides clearer picture of implication.
What’s More
Read and answer the following questions. Write your answers on your notebook.
11
What I Have Learned
What I Can Do
Search for ten (10) words in the box that are related to the elements of good literature
review. Write your answers on your notebook.
C I T A T I O N T A R C C
S C I E N T I F I C N O O
B I A S E S S R E V I E W
O R I G I N A L R I T P C
D E D U C T I V E I E W I
L I T E R A T U R E A N S
E T H I C S U A C T I O N
U N D E P O S I T I V E G
1. ___________________________ 6. ___________________________
2. ___________________________ 7. ___________________________
3. ___________________________ 8. ___________________________
4. ___________________________ 9. ___________________________
12
Assessment
In four (4) to five (5) sentences, make a short literature review about students’
behavior inside the classroom using the five (5) sources in the box. Write your
composition on your notebook.
Criteria 5 4 3 2 1
The The The
The
composition composition composition
composition
is highly is moderately is fairly The
is organized
organized organized organized composition
Organization having 1 idea
wherein having 2 having 3 is not
that is not
ideas are ideas not ideas not organized
related to the
related to related to the related to
topic.
the topic. topic. the topic.
The The
The The The
composition composition
composition composition composition
does not has more
Grammar has 1 to 3 has 4 to 5 has 6 to 7
have any than 8
grammatical grammatical grammatical
grammatical grammatical
errors. errors. errors.
error. errors.
Committed
Citation Committed
Committed 1 Committed 2 4 or more
format is 3 wrong
Formatting wrong citation wrong citation wrong
religiously citation
format. format. citation
followed. format.
format.
13
Additional Activities
Search five (5) related studies that are relevant to your research. From those
literature, compose an eight (8) to ten (10) literature review. Write your composition
on your notebook.
Criteria 5 4 3 2 1
Searched
Searched for Searched for Searched for Searched for
Sources for 5
4 sources 3 sources 2 sources 1 source
sources
Presentatio Presentation
Presentation Presentation Presentation
n of ideas is of ideas is
Organization of ideas is of ideas is not of ideas is
very somehow
coherent. so coherent. not coherent.
coherent. coherent.
The essay The essay
The essay The essay The essay has
does not has more
has 1 to 3 has 4 to 5 6 to 7
Grammar have any than 8
grammatical grammatical grammatical
grammatical grammatical
errors. errors. errors.
error. errors.
14
15
Additional Activities What I Can Do What I Have Learned
1. intensive 1. T 1. C
2. information 2. F 2. A
3. brief 3. F 3. D
4. logical 4. F 4. E
5. complete 5. T 5. B
6. recent
7. review
8. variable
9. literature
10. understand
What’s More What’s In What I Know
1. T 1. proper citation 1. T
2. F 2. thesis statement 2. T
3. T 3. outline 3. T
4. T 4. conclusion 4. T
5. T 5. literature review 5. F
6. F
7. F
8. T
9. F
10. T
Lesson 1
Answer Key
16
What I Can Do
1. citation
2. scientific
3. bases
4. deductive
5. original
6. literature
7. ethics
8. review
9. action
10. positive
What I Have Learned What’s More What’s In
1. F 1. ethical 1. brief
2. F 2. bias 2. focused
3. F 3. proper citation 3. good
4. T 4. evidence 4. reviews
5. F 5. positivity 5. concise
Lesson 2
References
Antoniadou, V., & Dooly, M. (2017). Educational ethnography in blended learning
environments. In E. Moore & M. Dooly (Eds), Qualitative approaches to research
on plurilingual education (pp. 237-263). Research-publishing.net.
https://doi.org/10.14705/ rpnet.2017.emmd2016.630
Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2001). The practice of nursing research: conduct, critique
and utilization, (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders.
Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to write a literature review. Journal of
Criminal Justice Education, 24(2), 218–234.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2012.730617
Lee, Jungjoo, Thu G. Tran, and Kun Pyo Lee. 2007. Cultural Difference and Its Effects
on User Research Methodologies. Berlin: Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73287-7_16.
Minch, C. (2018). How to write a literature review. Center for Effective Services.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456
17
Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M., & Amin, A. (2014). Writing a literature review research
paper: A step-by-step approach. International Journal of Basic and Applied
Science, 3(01), 47–56.
Reijers, W., Wright, D., Brey, P., Weber, K., Rodrigues, R., O’Sullivan, D., & Gordijn,
B. (2018). Methods for practising ethics in research and innovation: A literature
review, critical analysis and recommendations. Science and Engineering Ethics,
24(5), 1437–1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9961-8
Timmins, F., & McCabe, C. (2005). How to conduct an effective literature search.
Nurs Standard 20, 41–47.
Thomas, B., Tachble, A., Peiris, D., Malhi, R., Godlovitch, G., & Lin, Y. (2015). Making
literature reviews more ethical: A researcher and health sciences librarian
collaborative process. Future Science OA, 1(4).
https://doi.org/10.4155/fso.15.78
Wee, B. Van, & Banister, D. (2015). How to Write a Literature Review Paper?
Routledge, 36(2), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456
18
19
For inquiries or feedback, please write or call: