Practical Research 1

Quarter 3 – Module 2:
Characteristics, Processes and
Ethics of Research
Practical Research 1 – Grade 11
Alternative Delivery Mode
Quarter 3 – Module 2: Characteristics, Processes and Ethics of Research
First Edition, 2020

Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: No copyright shall subsist in any work of
the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency or office
wherein the work is created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit. Such
agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the payment of royalties.

Borrowed materials (i.e., songs, stories, poems, pictures, photos, brand names,
trademarks, etc.) included in this module are owned by their respective copyright holders.
Every effort has been exerted to locate and seek permission to use these materials from their
respective copyright owners. The publisher and authors do not represent nor claim ownership
over them.

Published by the Department of Education

Secretary: Leonor Magtolis Briones
Undersecretary: Diosdado M. San Antonio

SENIOR HS MODULE DEVELOPMENT TEAM

Author
Co-Author – Language Editor
Co-Author – Content Evaluator
Co-Author – Illustrator
Co-Author – Layout Artist
: Debbie S. Labrador
: Niljoy G. Senina
: Roanne S.J. Tolentino
: Joshua D. Hernandez
: Jexter D. Demerin

Team Leaders:
School Head : Marijoy B. Mendoza, EdD
LRMDS Coordinator : Karl Angelo R. Tabernero

SDO-BATAAN MANAGEMENT TEAM:

Schools Division Superintendent : Romeo M. Alip, PhD, CESO V
OIC- Asst. Schools Division Superintendent : William Roderick R. Fallorin, CESE
Chief Education Supervisor, CID : Milagros M. Peñaflor, PhD
Education Program Supervisor, LRMDS : Edgar E. Garcia, MITE
Education Program Supervisor, AP/ADM : Romeo M. Layug
Education Program Supervisor, Senior HS : Danilo S. Caysido
Project Development Officer II, LRMDS : Joan T. Briz
Division Librarian II, LRMDS : Rosita P. Serrano

REGIONAL OFFICE 3 MANAGEMENT TEAM:

Regional Director : May B. Eclar, PhD, CESO III
Chief Education Supervisor, CLMD : Librada M. Rubio, PhD
Education Program Supervisor, LRMS : Ma. Editha R. Caparas, EdD
Education Program Supervisor, ADM : Nestor P. Nuesca, EdD

Printed in the Philippines by the Department of Education –

Schools Division of Bataan
Office Address: Provincial Capitol Compound, Balanga City, Bataan
Telefax: (047) 237-2102
E-mail Address: bataan@deped.gov.ph
 Practical Research 1
Quarter 3 – Module 2:
Characteristics, Processes and
Ethics of Research
Introductory Message
This Self-Learning Module (SLM) is prepared so that you, our dear learners,
can continue your studies and learn while at home. Activities, questions, directions,
exercises, and discussions are carefully stated for you to understand each lesson.

Each SLM is composed of different parts. Each part shall guide you step-by-
step as you discover and understand the lesson prepared for you.

Pre-tests are provided to measure your prior knowledge on lessons in each

SLM. This will tell you if you need to proceed on completing this module or if you
need to ask your facilitator or your teacher’s assistance for better understanding of
the lesson. At the end of each module, you need to answer the post-test to self-check
your learning. Answer keys are provided for each activity and test. We trust that you
will be honest in using these.

In addition to the material in the main text, Notes to the Teacher are also
provided to our facilitators and parents for strategies and reminders on how they can
best help you on your home-based learning.

Please use this module with care. Do not put unnecessary marks on any part
of this SLM. Use a separate sheet of paper in answering the exercises and tests. And
read the instructions carefully before performing each task.

If you have any questions in using this SLM or any difficulty in answering the
tasks in this module, do not hesitate to consult your teacher or facilitator.

Thank you.
 What I Need to Know

This module is designed to let you understand the characteristics, processes,

and ethics of research. As a senior high school student, you need to know
these basic considerations in writing a research paper because they will also
serve as your foundation in doing the same in your future career.

At the end of this module, you are expected to learn the following
competencies:
1. describe the characteristics of research;
2. illustrate the processes of research; and
3. define ethics in research.

1
 What I Know

Read and analyze the following statements carefully. Write FACT if you think
the statement is correct, and BLUFF if incorrect. Write your answers on your
notebook.

__________ 1. Research should be empirical.

__________ 2. Research should be subjective.

__________ 3. Research follows a system in formulating its components.

__________ 4. Any unusual phenomenon may happen and can turn into a
potential problem.

__________ 5. The first step in writing a research is identifying any problem.

__________ 6. Research can be done in just one sitting.

__________ 7. The research process entails a careful investigation leading to

the discovery of new ideas, methods, or improvements.

__________ 8. Conducting a research may be done individually or

collaboratively.

__________ 9. A researcher must always adhere to the ethical codes and

policies of research.

__________ 10. Proper acknowledgment should only be given to chosen

authors cited and sources used in research.

2
 Lesson

1 Characteristics of Research

In the previous lessons, you were oriented with the definition of research along
with its importance in daily life. Aside from them, you also need to know the
characteristics of research because they will guide you in crafting your own.

Let me remind you that characteristics are features or qualities that

distinguish a person, place, or thing.

What’s In

Arrange the following jumbled letters to form the different characteristics of

research. Place the correct letter in each box. Write your answers on your
notebook.

1. E S M T S A C T Y I

2. E O C V J T E B I

3. S F A E I L E B

4. C E P A I R L I M

5. A R C E L

3
 Notes to the Teacher
This module prepares the learners to be acquainted with the
different characteristics, processes and ethics of research that will
guide them in writing their own research in the future.

What’s New

As a senior high school student, you are required to study a few research
subjects and conduct a research either individually or collaboratively. But, do
you know how to make a good one? Well, this module will surely help you to
achieve your goal.

In this lesson, you will be oriented about the five basic characteristics of
research (Cristobal & Cristobal 2017). There may be a lot of characteristics
stated by other authors in other references but let us only focus on the
following characteristics rooted from the given definitions of research in the
previous module.

What is It

Characteristics of Research (Cristobal & Cristobal, 2017)

1. Research should be systematic.
- The researcher needs to carry out a series of interrelated steps in
conducting the study. Such procedure must follow a well-planned,
sequential and organized structure from beginning to end.

- The research paper is divided into macrosystem and microsystem.

The former refers to different chapters labeled with main headings,

4
 while the latter consists of various elements detailing the contents
of each part.

2. Research should be objective.

- The researcher needs to present information that are purely based
on truths. It should always be anchored on the factual basis in which
the research work is founded, thus being free from any bias or
personal opinion.

3. Research should be feasible.

- The researcher needs to consider the possibility and practicality of
conducting the proposed study. All significant factors like time,
budget and access to resources must be analyzed to determine if the
research can actually be done.

4. Research should be empirical.

- The researcher needs to employ appropriate methods, either
quantitatively or qualitatively, to produce evidence-based
information. They can be drawn from concrete experimentation,
direct or indirect observation, and verifiable experience.

5. Research should be clear.

- The researcher needs to use comprehensible language to present
information and convey explanation throughout the research
process. The factors to be manipulated, measured or described in
the study, also known as variables, must be clarified using literature
from published and unpublished materials. They should be
explained well from the introductory part of the research paper to
ensure a deeper understanding of the study to be conducted.

What’s More

Think of any symbol that

represents each characteristic of
research. Draw them inside the
circles of the given concept map. Research

Write your answers on your

notebook.

5
 What I Have Learned

What are the five basic characteristics of research? Write your answers on
your notebook.
1. ____________________
2. ____________________
3. ____________________
4. ____________________
5. ____________________

What I Can Do

Examine the following research scenarios and identify what characteristic of

research is disregarded. Then, suggest how can the researcher improve
his/her work. Write your answers on your notebook.

1. The researcher lacks explanation on the identified variables being studied.

Characteristic disregarded: ____________________________________________
Suggestion: ___________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________

2. The researcher does not follow the standard format in writing the research
paper.
Characteristic disregarded: ____________________________________________
Suggestion: ___________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________

3. The researcher relies on the opinion of other researchers.

Characteristic disregarded: ____________________________________________
Suggestion: ___________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________

6
4. The researcher thinks of an implausible problem to solve.
Characteristic disregarded: ____________________________________________
Suggestion: ___________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________

5. The researcher uses information from a fabricated experimentation.

Characteristic disregarded: ____________________________________________
Suggestion: ___________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________

Assessment

Identify whether the following scenarios show different characteristics of a

good research. Write ACCEPT if it does, and REJECT if it does not. Write your
answers on your notebook.

__________ 1. Organizing the study in a logical manner

__________ 2. Disregarding the basis on which the work is founded

__________ 3. Validating the results of the study

__________ 4. Basing on biases

__________ 5. Analyzing phenomena of importance

__________ 6. Providing fabricated information

__________ 7. Presenting opinions

__________ 8. Considering the extraordinary nature of things

__________ 9. Evaluating sources of information

__________ 10. Counterchecking different evidence

7
 Additional Activities

Choose one among the five characteristics of research and explain how you
can apply it in writing your own research. Express your answer in at least five
sentences. Write your brief explanation on your notebook.

systematic objective feasible

empirical clear

___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________

8
 Lesson

2 The Research Process

In the previous lesson, you were oriented with the basic characteristics of
research. At this time, you also need to know the process of research because
it will help you in properly conducting your own study.

Let me remind you that process refers to a series of steps or actions taken to
achieve a particular end or goal.

What’s In

Can you help the researcher get out of the maze to achieve his goal?

Great! What you have just done can be compared to the process of research.
It takes you to the correct direction to finish your study and achieve your goal
despite the different challenges along the way.
9
 What’s New

As a senior high school student, you are required to accomplish a research

output at the end of the semester. But, do you know the steps to take in
making a research? Well, this module will surely help you to meet your goal.

In this lesson, you will be oriented about the research process. It can be
broken down into five phases, making it more manageable and easier to
understand. This module will give you an idea of what is involved at each
phase in order to give you a better overall picture of where you are in your
research, where you will be going, and what to expect at each step.

What is It

The Research Process

Research process is a systematic manner in which the researcher approaches

his/her area of study to produce knowledge that the community will consider
to be worthwhile within the field (Rao, 2017). Understanding such process is
an important step towards executing any study. The following table shows the
five phases of the research process along with their definition (Whittemore &
Melkus, 2008).
Research Phase Definition
Conceptual Phase Identifying the problem, reviewing the literature,
formulating the hypothesis, developing the research
framework, and determining the research purpose and
objective
Design and Selecting a research design, developing study procedures,
Planning Phase and determining the sampling and data collection plan
Empirical Phase Collecting data, and preparing data for analysis
Analytic Phase Analyzing data, interpreting the results, and making
conclusions
Dissemination Communicating results to appropriate audience, and
Phase utilizing the findings

Now, here’s the simplified flow of the significant steps you need to take in
conducting a study as presented by Rao (2017):

10
1. Define the research problem.
To begin your research, you must look at a significant real-life problem.
Factors like area of interest, availability of fund, socio-economic significance
of the study, and the safety measures to be undertaken should be considered
in finding and defining the research problem.
The researcher identifies English language proficiency as a problem of
aspiring maritime students in qualifying for admission to prestigious maritime
institutions.
2. Review the literature.
Read various publications or surf the internet to become aware of the
previous works already done about the chosen topic. You may utilize different
resources like science books, magazines, journals, newspapers, or even in the
internet.
The researcher reviews previous studies conducted about English
language proficiency and the experienced difficulties of aspiring maritime
students.
3. Formulate hypothesis.
A hypothesis is a theoretical statement in solving a logical relationship
between variables. It should be based on the problem being solved.
The researcher hypothesizes that the implementation of English-Only
Policy (EOP) in the classroom can improve the English language proficiency of
Pre-Baccalaureate Maritime students.
4. Prepare the research design.
Identify what is the best means to collect and analyze data in the study
to clarify and improve the research problem, purpose, and questions.
The researcher uses an experimental design on exploring the experiences
of the students in implementing EOP.
5. Collect data.
Use an appropriate data collection method to elicit the needed
information.
The researcher collects data through interview and focus group
discussion.
6. Analyze data.
Utilize strategies and methods that make sense of the data to answer
the research problem.
The researcher analyzes the data by drawing patterns and themes from
the generated data.
7. Interpret and report the findings.
Put the information in perspective and present the solution to the
proposed problem based on the findings of the investigation.
The researcher interprets and reports the findings based on the collected
and analyzed data to solve the research problem .

11
For a clearer understanding of the process, study the following schematic
diagram:

Prepare Interpret
Define the
Review the Formulate the Collect Analyze and report
research
literature hypothesis research data data the
problem
design findings

What’s More

Arrange the following steps to illustrate the research process. Use one to seven
(1-7) to indicate the correct chronological order. Write your answers on your
notebook.

1. Prepare the research design 4. Analyze data

2. Interpret and report the 5. Review the literature
findings 6. Collect data
3. Define the research 7. Formulate hypothesis
problem

What I Have Learned

What are the five phases of the research process?

___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________

Will you enumerate the seven significant steps in conducting a study?

___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________

12
 What I Can Do

Think of a topic that you’d like to research about. Then, compose a short
narrative essay describing the chronological steps you will take in conducting
your study. Be guided with the given rubric below. Write your essay on your
notebook.
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________

Rubric for Assessing an Essay

VGE GE SE LE N
CRITERIA
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
1. The essay demonstrates an understanding
of the research process.
2. The essay descriptively narrates the
chronological steps in conducting a study
based on the chosen topic.
3. The essay follows the correct format.
4. The essay is written coherently and
cohesively.
5. The word choice is appropriate.
6. The essay is free from grammatical errors.
TOTAL
OVERALL SCORE /30
Legend:
VGE – To a very great extent
GE – To a great extent
SE – To some extent
LE – To a little extent
N – Not at all

2
 Assessment

Categorize the following steps in which phase of the research process they
belong to. Use the legend below, and write your answers on your notebook.
A – Conceptual Phase D – Analytic Phase
B – Design and Planning Phase E – Dissemination Phase
C – Empirical Phase

__________ 1. Making conclusions

__________ 2. Developing study procedures
__________ 3. Identifying the problem
__________ 4. Selecting a research design
__________ 5. Developing the research framework
__________ 6. Collecting data
__________ 7. Interpreting results
__________ 8. Analyzing data
__________ 9. Reviewing the literature
__________ 10. Determining the sampling and data collection plan

Additional Activities

Which do you think among the five phases of the research process can be
done easily? Choose one from the box and justify your answer in at least five
sentences. Write it on your notebook.

Conceptualizing Phase Design and Planning Phase

Empirical Phase Analytic Phase Dissemination Phase

__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________

3
 Lesson

3 Ethics in Research

In the previous lessons, you were oriented with the characteristics of research
and the research process. Aside from them, you also need to know the
importance of ethics because it will guide you in considering the ethical codes
and policies you have to follow in writing and conducting a research.

Let me remind you that ethics is a branch of knowledge that deals with moral
principles on governing a person’s behavior in the conduct of any activity.

What’s In

Search for the terms in the word puzzle below by using the given clues. Write
the ten words you have found on your notebook.

1. Adhering to the facts 6. Expressing high regard

2. Being free from biases 7. Keeping privacy
3. Exhibiting morality 8. Taking accountability
4. Showing concern 9. Having adequate capabilities
5. Accepting differences 10. Observing lawfulness

14
 What’s New

Read and analyze the following article comprehensively. This will serve as an eye-
opener for you to realize the importance of ethics in research.

Thousands of Indians Die in Unethical Clinical Trials

(Subramanian, 2018)

Thousands of Indians have died in unethical clinical trials over the past decade, even
as a lawsuit to improve regulation of these trials has dragged unresolved through the
Supreme Court for six years.

Between January 2005 and November 2017, 4,967 people died during the course of
drug trials and research, according to government data obtained by a non-profit
called Swasthya Adhikar Manch (SAM). Another 20,000 odd people have suffered
adverse reactions in such trials.

Pharmaceutical companies have offered compensation to the families of the deceased

only in 187 of these cases, said Amulya Nidhi, who founded SAM. At least 475 drugs
have been tested in trials during this time, according to Sanjay Parikh, the lawyer
representing SAM in the lawsuit it filed against the government in 2012.

The trials take advantage of loopholes in rules, loose oversight, and India’s large
population of poor people who are often unaware of their rights as trial subjects, Mr.
Nidhi said. “We need a strong regulatory system, and we need action on violators.”

The number of clinical trials in India rose after 2005, when India relaxed its testing
laws. Drug companies began to recruit clinical research outsourcing firms to conduct
trials in India, where costs are drastically lower.

The annual revenue of these outsourcing firms has grown from $485 million in 2010-
11 to over $1 billion today, according to research from Frost & Sullivan, a market
consultancy.

India’s regulators have been unable to keep up with this explosion of testing. For
instance, Mr. Nidhi said, an ethics committee is supposed to oversee every trial. “At
one point, in Chandigarh, there were 257 trials going on, but only one ethics
committee overseeing them,” he said. “How is that even possible?”

Trials take place under the radar as well, Mr. Parikh said, sometimes by simply
paying poor subjects around 500 rupees a day and enlisting them. The details of the
trials and the data harvested remain with the companies. “There’s no way to find this
stuff out.”

15
In 2013, following an interim order from the Supreme Court, the government made
it mandatory for companies to seek written informed consent from each subject
before a trial, and for the process of seeking this consent to be recorded on video.

In reality, however, this rarely happens. What is more commonplace, Mr. Nidhi said,
is the kind of experience Pradeep Gehlot had. His story, as narrated to SAM, forms
part of the non-profit’s case in court.

Mr. Gehlot drives an auto rickshaw in the city of Indore, and when his father
Srikrishna, a tailor, fell ill with breathlessness and chest pain, he admitted him to a
government hospital.

In the hospital, Mr. Gehlot was given a sheaf of papers to sign. They were in English,
which he couldn’t read very well, but the doctors told him that his father would be
treated, free of charge, with imported drugs, so Mr. Gehlot went ahead and signed.

“Without his consent, Srikrishna was in a clinical trial for nearly two years,” Mr.
Nidhi said. “His health started deteriorating, and he died in 2012.”

When SAM heard about the case and sent a team to talk to Mr. Gehlot, they
confirmed from the documents that a trial had been conducted.

After Mr. Gehlot complained, the doctor’s medical license was suspended for three
months. SAM uncovered other cases of ethical violations in a different Indore hospital
and filed further complaints.

The state government, after investigating the hospital, found that 81 “serious adverse
events”—including 32 deaths—occurred during clinical trials on more than 3,000
people. These adverse events had not previously been reported to regulators. A third
Indore hospital enlisted 1,833 children and 233 mentally ill individuals in trials
without their consent, the investigators’ report found.

The report also suggested that doctors and clinicians running these trials had
frequently been sent on trips overseas, or had been paid out of process, by
pharmaceutical companies.

Punitive measures are weak, however. After its inquiry, the government imposed fines
of $100 apiece on 12 doctors for not cooperating with its investigations. Two doctors
were barred from conducting further trials for a period of six months.

But Chirag Trivedi, the president of the Indian Society for Clinical Research, a
professional body representing pharmaceutical researchers, argued that the
country’s rules are actually over-stringent, and that they have shrunk the number of
ongoing trials.

One regulation, for example, calls for companies to also pay for management of all
medical problems during trials, which is unfair, he said.

16
“There was a cardiovascular drug trial, which is for a heart ailment, where the
company had to pay for tuberculosis treatment for nine months,” Mr. Trivedi said.
“We all know that tuberculosis is caused by bacteria, not by any drug, and not by a
clinical trial for a heart ailment.”

In every case that has warranted compensation, companies have paid out, he said.
Mr. Trivedi admitted that, “as in any industry,” there were companies that indulged
in unethical trials as well. “We cannot condone any irregularities,” he said. “Whatever
protects the rights and safety of individuals, we will support such that. Every life is
precious. We can’t treat Indians as guinea pigs.”

He also pointed out that clinical trials are vital to drug development. “The medicines
that help you and me—they wouldn’t be available without trials.”

The next hearing of SAM’s lawsuit in the Supreme Court has been scheduled for
December 4, but all parties to the suit have been asked to file their suggestions for
an amended law next month, Mr. Nidhi said.

But the regulations before 2005 were both sufficient and comprehensive, Mr. Nidhi
said. “Bring back the law that existed before 2005. That is what we are asking.”

What is It

Importance of Ethics in Research

Resnik (2015), in his article, “What is Ethics in Research & Why is it

important?”, as cited by Cristobal & Cristobal (2017), enumerates the
following reasons why it is important to follow ethical principles in writing and
conducting a research:

1. It promotes the aims of research.

Ethics guides the researchers in obtaining knowledge, truth, and
avoidance of error by prohibiting fabrication, falsification and
misrepresentation of research data.

2. It upholds values that are essential to collaborative work.

Many researchers who are working in different disciplines and
institutions cooperate and coordinate to accomplish a particular research.
With ethics in mind, they also maintain trust, accountability, mutual
respect, and fairness.

17
3. It ensures that researchers can be held accountable to the public.
Ethical norms guarantee the public that researchers are deemed
responsible for committing any form of research misconduct.

4. It builds public support for research.

People express and lend their support by all means if they can trust the
quality and integrity of research.

5. It promotes a variety of moral and social values.

Ethical principles help the researcher avoid practices that can adversely
harm the research subjects and the community. Thus, it encourages social
responsibility, human rights, animal welfare, compliance with the law, and
public health and safety.

Ethical Codes and Policies for Research

Cristobal & Cristobal (2017), in their book, “Practical Research 1 for

Senior High School”, lists the following ethical codes and policies that the
researcher needs to consider in conducting a study:

1. Honesty
The researcher should strive to truthfully report data in whatever
form of communication all throughout the study.

2. Objectivity
The researcher should avoid being biased. The study should not be
influenced by his/her personal motives, beliefs and opinions.

3. Integrity
The researcher should establish credibility through the consistency
of his/her thought and action. He/she should act with sincerity especially
on keeping agreements.

4. Care
The researcher should never neglect even the smallest detail of the
study. All information should be critically examined. Records of research
activities should be properly and securely kept.

5. Openness
The researcher should be willing to accept criticisms and new ideas
for the betterment of the study. Research results and findings should be
shared to the public.

18
6. Respect for intellectual property
The researcher should not plagiarize. Credit should be given to who
or where it is due. All authors cited and sources used in the study should
be properly acknowledged.
- Plagiarism refers to the act of illegally using another person’s ideas,
works, processes, and results. Thus, it constitutes claiming an
intellectual property as one’s own that can be penalized through
Republic Act 8293 known as the Intellectual Property Code of the
Philippines.

7. Confidentiality
The researcher should take steps to protect all confidential
communications or documents from being discovered by others.

8. Responsible publication
The researcher should ensure that his/her work is clear, honest,
complete, accurate, and balanced, thus avoiding wasteful and duplicate
publication. It should likewise refrain from selective, misleading, or
ambiguous reporting.

9. Responsible mentoring
The researcher should teach responsible conduct of research and
share professional knowledge and skills especially to new or less-
experienced researchers.

10. Respect for colleagues

The researcher should show courtesy to his/her colleagues by
treating them equally and fairly.

11. Social responsibility

The researcher should promote social good by working for the best
interests and benefits of the environment and society as a whole.

12. Non-discrimination
The researcher should not discriminate based on sex, race, ethnicity,
or any factor relating to scientific competence and integrity. Thus,
research should be open to all people or entities who will participate in
research.

13. Competence
The researcher should possess necessary knowledge and skills in
conducting a study. He/she should be equipped with a sense of
professionalism and expertise to ensure competent results.

19
14. Legality
The researcher should know and abide by relevant laws, institutional
and government policies concerning the legal conduct of research.

15. Human Subject Protection

The researcher should protect human lives by preventing and
minimizing harms and risks. He/she should always uphold the human
dignity, privacy, and autonomy of human subjects to be used in the study.

Rights of Research Participants

In every aspect of life, rights and responsibilities are inseparably linked to one
another. This means that both the researcher and the participant have
necessary obligations to perform as a prerequisite of their privileges in
conducting research. According to Trochim (2006), Smith (2003) and Polit
(2006), the following are some of the rights of research participants, as cited
by Cristobal & Cristobal (2017):

1. Voluntary participation
The research participants must be given the privilege to exercise their
free will whether to participate or not. They have the right to refuse
involvement in the study. Thus, any person should not be forced to take
part in any research undertaking.

2. Informed consent
The research participants must be provided with sufficient information
about the procedures and risks involved in the research. It serves as an
initial guide on why and how the study will be conducted. Hence, the
researcher must ensure that they fully understood and agreed upon the
study.

3. Risk of harm
The research participants must be protected from any type of harm
whether it may be physical, psychological, social, or economic. The
researcher must avoid, prevent, or minimize threats especially when they
are exposed and engaged in invasive and risky procedures.

4. Confidentiality
The research participants must be assured of their privacy particularly
on personal information. The researcher must secure that all information
disclosed by them will not be used without authorized access.

20
5. Anonymity
The research participants must remain anonymous or unidentified
throughout the study even to the researchers themselves. They have the
right to keep their identities secret as they participate especially in case-
sensitive studies.

What’s More

Suggest appropriate ethical actions that must be undertaken in order to

correct the unethical practices presented below. Consider the ethical
principles that must be followed in conducting a research. Copy the table and
answer it on your notebook.

Unethical Practices Ethical Actions

1. Bella, a graduating student, claimed
the research work of her classmate.
She erased the name of the original
researcher and placed her own.
2. Joseph, the class president, forced
his classmates to participate in his
study.
3. A group of research students secretly
chose their adviser as the subject of
their research.
4. Sheila, an honor student, ranked last
in the honor roll because of non-
participation in extra-curricular
activities. A qualitative research
about her is conducted without
informing her.
5. Delbert, a senior high school student,
is planning to carry out his first
research on the misbehavior of fellow
students during examinations.
However, he has no idea on the
ethical guidelines in conducting such
research.

21
 What I Have Learned

At this point, you already learned a lot about ethics in research. Now, can you
recall the importance of ethical codes and policies?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________

What should you consider most among the different ethical codes and policies
when conducting a study? Why do you think so?
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________

What I Can Do

Complete the following phrases by referring to the ethical principles for

research. Write your answers on your notebook.

1. When I conduct research, I will _________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

2. The participants of my study will be ____________________________________

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

3. To finally arrive at the best findings, I will _______________________________

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________

22
 Assessment

Identify whether the following actions follow the ethical codes and policies for
research. Write GO if you think it is ethical, and STOP if it is unethical. Write
your answers on your notebook.

__________ 1. Securing the safety of research participants

__________ 2. Rejecting criticisms from others
__________ 3. Exposing personal identity of respondents
__________ 4. Carrying out inconsistent actions
__________ 5. Treating all peers equally
__________ 6. Duplicating other publications
__________ 7. Obeying relevant laws
__________ 8. Keeping agreements
__________ 9. Searching from credible online sources of information
__________ 10. Falsifying reported data and results

Additional Activities

Pick one from the rights of research participants inside the box. Then, explain
how you can personally apply it in conducting your own research in the
future. Express your ideas in at least five sentences. Write your explanation
on your notebook.

Voluntary Participation Confidentiality Anonymity

Informed Consent Risk of Harm

__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________

23