Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BEED 2B
Lesson 3
Think about these questions:
1. What other government projects and programs are available for science
education in the Philippines?
There are various programs and projects offered in the Philippines to support
science education. These projects and programs are organized under the
Department of Science and Technology (DOST).
S&T Scholarship under R.A. 7687 or S&T. Scholarship Act of 1994 (S&T
Scholarship Program A)
DOST-SEI Merit Scholarship (Project 5801 or S&T Scholarship
Program B)
Junior Level Assistance Program (JLAP)
BS Scholarships in Science Education.
S&T Human Resource Development Planning
2. Are there private schools with outstanding education programs? Identify and
compare their science education programs with the public science schools.
It is a promise that the school will teach every child that passes through its
doors—poor children, affluent children, children with disabilities and children
who show great academic promise. The common public school is required to
teach the easy to teach and the difficult to teach.
Activity
The first paradigm shift relates to a shift in research approach from a single
commodity based and monodisciplinary to a farming system based and
multidisciplinary. The second shift demands a change from a top-down
(training and visit system) extension approach to a participatory (effective
research-extension-farmer-market interface) approach of technology
assessment, refinement and transfer. The third shift seeks the integration of
molecular biology, bio-technology and bio-information with conventional
technology for speedy and more precise gains. The fourth shift seeks greater
congruence between productivity and sustainability and creation of enabling
mechanisms for adoption of new technologies. Cost-effectiveness of
production, quality and safety in food and other products, and GMO biosafety
and biosecurity, will assume high significance in the globalized and liberalized
world.
Technologies while promoting growth must also have a human face. The
following features will humanize technologies for ensuring sustainable
livelihood: (1) Enhance capabilities for sustainable livelihood, and provide for
new livelihood opportunities for the poor, (2) Improve the productivity,
profitability and sustainability of communities' assets, and establish effective
linkages between community mobilization and the government and other
service providers, (3) Ensure the congruence and synergism among
environmental, economic and social (gender and other equities) securities,
and (4) Empower communities, especially the vulnerable ones, to harness
new and appropriate technologies and enable them to blend traditional local
technologies with modern technologies. If such technologies are developed in
close partnership with stakeholders, widespread adoption and further
improvement will be assured.
Expansions in science and technology have marked the onset of the Third
Millennium. If harnessed rationally and effectively, these could help eradicate
hunger, poverty, destitution and indignity. The progress in the fields of biotechnology,
information and communication technology, medicine, space science and
management science offers unprecedented opportunity for multifaceted
development. The industrialized countries and a few developing countries (in some
of the areas) are vigorously capturing these uncommon opportunities by innovating,
adapting and regulating these technologies. But the majority of the developing
countries are far behind and are further falling behind, thus widening the technology
divide. Based on indicators of technology creation, diffusion of recent innovations,
diffusion of old innovations and human skills, UNDP had the calculated technology
achievement index (TAI) of 72 countries. Although somewhat flawed as it generally
ignores the vast contributions of public sectors, which are mostly not under IPR, the
index shows that Finland with a TAI of 0.744 was first, closely followed by the USA
with a TAI of 0.733. Japan was fourth. Table 30 gives TAI of countries of the Asia-
Pacific region (for which data were available). It may be seen from the table that of
the 15 countries (including Hong Kong and Singapore), five were listed as "Leaders",
two as "Potential Leaders", six as "Dynamic Adopters" and two as "Marginalized". A
good number of the countries are in the "Marginalized" category. In order to bridge
the technology gap, effective policies and programmes are needed in the countries
with lower TAI.