Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Date: 27/11/20
Lab#: 3
1. 50cm3 burette
3. Distilled Water
Method
1. The burette was filled to the zero mark with distilled water.
2. 25 drops of water were transferred (dropwise) into the measuring cylinder. The new burette
reading was recorded to the nearest 0.05mL. The reading of the measuring cylinder was
recorded to the nearest 0.2mL.
3. This process was repeated in periods of 25 drops until 200 drops were delivered to the
measuring cylinder.
4. All appropriate results were tabulated.
5. A graph of the volume of burette against volume in the measuring cylinder was drawn.
6. A line of best fit was drawn.
7. The standard deviation between the volumes in the burette and the measuring cylinder was
calculated.
Diagram
Results
Treatment of Results
Burette Volume x−x́ ( x−x́ )2 Standard Deviation
(cm3) or x 2
1.25 0 0
1.25 0 0
Average 1.25
2
Volume ( x́ ) ∑ ( x− x́ ) =0.91 +0.3605
1.
a. By taking the average volume of water delivered from the Burette as the Experimental
Value, we calculate the absolute and relative error of the measurements made by the
Burette as follows:
0.25 cm3
(%Relative Error)Burette = |
1cm3 |
×100=25 %
a. The standard deviation of the volumes of water delivered from the burette is as follows:
( x− x́ )2
σ=
√
n−1
b. By taking the average volume of water delivered to the measuring cylinder as the
Experimental Value, we calculate the absolute and relative error of the measurements
made by the Measuring Cylinder (MC) as follows:
+ 0.225 cm3
(%Relative Error)MC = | 1 cm3 |×100=22.5 %
c. The standard deviation of the volumes of water delivered to the measuring cylinder is as
follows:
( x− x́ )2
σ=
√n−1
σ MC =± 0.2067 cm3
Graph
c. The gradient of Line A(Burette Readings) IN THE GRAPH- “GRAPH SHOWING VOLUME OF
WATER IN MEASURING INSTRUMENTS V.S DROPS OF WATER REDCORDED” is as follows:
Gradient=¿ ¿
(7.5−6.45)
Gradient= =0.042cm3 /drops
(150−125)
Gradient=¿ ¿
(5.2−4.00)
Gradient= =0.048 cm3 /drop s
(100−75)
Data Analysis
1. From the graph 4 cm3 of water delivered from the Burette corresponds to 78.75 drops.
3 cm 3 3
Vol of water ∈measuring cylinder cm =78 .7 5 drops × 0.048
( ) =3.7 8 cm
drops
Hence, when 4 cm3 of water is delivered from the Burette, 3.72 cm 3 of water is in the
measuring cylinder
2. From the graph, 8.2 cm3 of water delivered from the burette corresponds to 167.5 drops.
3 cm3 3
Vol of water ∈measuring cylinder cm =16 7.5 drops× 0.048
( ) =8.0 2 cm
drops
Therefore, when 8.2 cm3 of water is delivered from the burette, the measuring cylinder reads
8.02cm3.
3. From the analysis of the information gathered, we can conclude that the measuring cylinder
is the instrument which is considered to be more precise, rather than the burette.
4. Upon examination of the information gathered, we can determine that the measuring
cylinder is also accurate, over the burette.
5.
a. In question 3, the measuring cylinder was considered to be more precise. Precision can be
defined as a measure of the degree of variation between the measured values, where
high precision is indicated by little variation of such measured values. Hence, a low
standard deviation implies lower variation between the measured values, which
indicates high precision. The standard deviation of the volumes of water delivered from
the measuring cylinder was found to be ±0.2067cm3, which is lower than that of the
volume of water delivered to the burette, ±+0.3605cm3, therefore the measuring
cylinder was considered to be more precise.
b. For question 4 the burette was considered accurate over the measuring cylinder. Accuracy
can be defined as a measure of the proximity of the measured values from the
true/accepted value, where a high accuracy is determined by a closer proximity to the
true/accepted value. Hence, a low % relative error indicates a closer proximity of the
measured value from the true/accepted value which implies high accuracy. So therefore
since the % relative error of the volumes of water delivered from the measuring cylinder
was found to be 22.5%, which is lower than that of the burette which was 25%, the
measuring cylinder was considered more accurate.
SOURCES OF ERROR:
1. The burette may have been slightly bent and not straightened when taking measurements.
2. The volume of water in each drop of the burette may not have been consistent and may have
varied with each drop.
PRECAUTIONS:
1. Special care was taken when handling glass instruments to avoid damage.
2. The burette was secured in the retort stand for safe recording of measurements.
3. Special care was taken to ensure the measuring cylinder was positioned properly under the
Burette to avoid spillage.
CONCLUSION:
In conclusion, it was determined that the measuring cylinder was more sensitive than the burette as the
measuring cylinder’s graph had a gradient of 0.048 cm3/drops and the burette’s graph had a gradient of
0.042 cm3/drops.
REFERENCES:
Errors in Measurement: Gross Errors, Systematic Errors and Random Errors. (n.d.). Retrieved from
BYJU'S The Learning App: https://byjus.com/physics/accuracy-precision-error-
Accuracy, Precision, and Significant Figures. (n.d.). Retrieved from Physics Libre Texts:
https://phys.libretexts.org