Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Author’s Name:
P.J.Cottam
P.Duffour
P.Lindstrand
P.Fromme
Objectives:
This article involves the study of:
Efficient, steady state analytical simulation of STC power plant.
Detailed collector model, taking into account varying heat transfer and fluid dynamics.
Collector outlet height shown to have large impact on power output.
Different collector canopy profiles studied, best configuration evaluated.
Simpler to construct, segmented or stepped canopy profile proposed.
About:
This research paper is about the study of Efficient and smooth analytical simulation along
with detailed collector model in order to notice varying heat transfer and fluid dynamics. Collector
height is also the point discussed in the research paper and the impact it produces over power
output is discussed. Different Canopy profiles are studied and their configurations are evaluated.
Results show that the height of the canopy has a significant effect on plant performance and that
the canopy must be sufficiently high at the junction with the chimney to ensure maximum kinetic
energy in the flow at the chimney inlet can be reached. Moreover, Simpler to construct segmented
or stepped canopy profiles are discussed.
air; a tall chimney through which the buoyant air rises; and a turbine and generator set which
extracts power from the pressure difference across it, generating electricity.
It was found that Pretorius and Kröger (2006) simulated both higher heat losses and heat
gains than Bernardes et al. (2003), leading to similar predicted power output. More recently, Zhou
et al. (2014) developed a steady state, compressible-flow model of the collector using a two-phase
working fluid (humid air) to predict the performance of STC power plants in which the collector
is affixed to a mountainside, reducing the required height of the chimney.
The role of collector canopy shape in reducing STC leveled electricity cost has received
limited attention. Pasumarthi and Sherif (1998) studied the performance of a small-scale physical
prototype STC with three different configurations of the collector, varying collector size and
materials used. They concluded that introducing an intermediate absorber in the collector has the
potential to boost mass flow rate. Koonsrisuk and Chitsomboon (2013) studied the impact of
canopy and chimney profile parameters by investigating flow area changes within the STC, with
a view to increasing power output. They derived a theoretical expression showing how a collector
canopy rising towards the chimney and a flaring chimney can boost power output by up to 400%,
validating their theoretical calculations with CFD analysis. Their model was limited to a constant
heat transfer flux to the air over the collector area, and the turbine was not modelled.
However, they provide compelling evidence that canopy designs other than the flat profile
can lead to significant power gains. Beyond this, the impact of changing canopy profile types or
parameters has not been studied in detail.
This contribution develops a theoretical STC model with a detailed thermodynamic analysis of the
air flow and temperature rise under the collector, incorporating collector heat loss and surface
shear stress. Different collector canopy profiles are systematically assessed, with a view to
maximizing power output whilst paying due consideration to engineering practicality.
Model Developed:
In order to assess the maximum power output across a wide range of plant design
parameters. Therefore, a steady-state formulation was chosen, as it is more efficient, with transient
simulations mostly required when start-up and nighttime operation need to be assessed. Therefore,
an analytical model of a solar thermal chimney power plant has been developed in order to compare
systematically different collector canopy profiles.
Details of Model:
The model presented here consists of a comprehensive thermo-fluids model for the
collector and chimney. All flow within the collector is assumed axisymmetric and radial, reducing
the collector to a one-dimensional flow problem with reducing circumferential area. The
simulation problem is treated as steady state and the flow is assumed incompressible, using the
Bossiness approximation to capture the effect of change in fluid density. Turbine efficiency and
the ratio of turbine pressure drop to chimney pressure drop are assumed to be fixed values and the
working fluid is dry air (a single-phase gas).
Functions of Model:
The model first simulates each STC component – the solar collector, the chimney and the
turbine – separately. These component models are then coupled together to simulate the entire
STC plant through an iterative process so that the input and output of each component converge
to stable values. The steady-state model presented here was implemented in Mat lab. It was
designed to run rapidly in order to investigate systematically the influence of a wide range of key
design parameters and environmental conditions. The reference parameters for the STC simulation
were used.
These reference values were chosen for ease of comparison with existing models published in the
literature. The parametric values along with range are given below:
Collector Economy:
Working Air:
Ground Surface:
Where,
Where hc (r) is the canopy height at point r on the collector radial path, (r decreases
from RC towards zero at the center of the collector); Hci is the canopy height at the collector inlet;
RC is the collector radius; and b is the canopy profile exponent, which defines the shape of the
canopy.
The radial path graphs for these canopy profiles discussed in research paper are:
Conclusions:
The research paper helped in figuring out the efficient and steady state of analytical
simulation of STC Power plant. Moreover, detailed collector model were taken into consideration
in order to check the varying heat transfer and fluid dynamics. In addition, the collector outlet
height was studied to check its impact on power output and different collector canopy profiles
were studied in order to evaluate the best configuration. We concluded that the stepped canopy
profile proposed is simpler to construct and managed.
We also studied that existing literature has focused mainly on canopy profiles, which are
either flat, sloped at a constant gradient, or exponential. Flat canopies are simple to design, but
cause pressure losses due to the restriction of the air flow cross section, especially close to the
chimney. A constant-gradient sloped canopy can improve power output. The exponential canopy
profile allows performance improvements, but construction and maintenance could be difficult and
costly due to access issues. For the best-performing design of each canopy profile, the
temperature rise and associated density drop under the collector were found to be quite similar.
The canopy outlet height was shown to be an important parameter as it defines the pressure drop
in the flow through the collector-to-chimney transition section. This highlighted the importance of
sufficiently increasing the cross-sectional flow area near the chimney to prevent pressure losses.
This study investigated whether improved canopy designs could reduce cost at little-to-no
loss in power generation. An efficient analytical, steady-state simulation model of the STC power
plant has been developed, with a detailed model of the collector including coupling of the heat
transfer and fluid dynamics along the collector radial path. The model was used to investigate the
peak power output for various system dimensions and collector canopy profiles. The results shown
indicate that the design of the canopy influences the plant power performance in a significant but
non-straightforward way.
Remarks:
Results indicate that the stepped, segmented canopy profile is likely to provide a good
compromise between power outputs to construction cost. The predicted power generation for
such a segmented canopy design was found to be highly robust for a wide range of
environmental conditions. Further work will be required to quantify the potential cost savings
and to investigate additional factors which influence the predicted power generation, such as
ambient wind, frictional and heat losses.
Author’s Name :
J. Spelling,
B. Laumert,
T. Fransson
Objectives :
The main objectives of this article are
To increase the economic viability of the technology.
To pinpoint the most promising configurations.
To identify Pareto-optimal designs and highlight the trade-offs between minimizing
investment costs and minimizing specific CO2 emissions.
22% reduction in costs and a 32% reduction in CO2 emissions are achieved relative to a
combination of parabolic trough and combined-cycle power plants.
Nomenclature used :
.Introduction:
Over 90% of the currently installed solar thermal power plant (STPP) capacity is based on
parabolic trough technology, which has been under development since the late 1980s. These power
plants employ Rankine-cycle power blocks with low temperature (below 400ºC [1]) steam-
turbines. the cost of electricity from these power plants remains high, typically above 210
USD/MWhe [2] More recent central receiver STPPs produce higher temperature
steam (~540°C [1]), increasing efficiency, but, in truth, a step change in technology is needed to
drive down electricity costs and thereby increase the economic viability of solar thermal power.
Hybrid operation :
It is a key feature of solar gas-turbine technology, facilitating control and ensuring the availability
of the power plant to meet demand whenever it occurs. Guaranteed electricity production (by
supplementing solar heat with combustion when the solar irradiation is insufficient) reduces the
economic risks associated with the construction of such plants, and makes hybrid solar gas-turbine
power plants ideally suited to forming the back-bone
of a future low-carbon electricity grid.
A serial hybridization scheme has been selected for the topping HSGT cycle, with the entire main
airflow of the gas-turbine passing through the solar receiver. As the Sun’s energy is to be harnessed
at high temperatures, high concentration ratios are required in order to maintain an acceptable
efficiency at the receiver [15]; this implies the use of a heliostat field solar collector. Given the
large size of the combined-cycle power plant, the power block will have to remain at the base of
the tower, and a concentric piping arrangement is assumed for ducting of the compressor air up
and down the tower. Within the pipes, the incoming air is slightly heated by the hotter air coming
down from the receiver through the inner pipe; the hot air is slightly cooled by the same effect.
The pre-heated air produced by the solar receiver is then sent to the gas-turbine combustion
chamber where fuel is injected in order to reach the desired combustor outlet temperature (COT).
Solar preheating of the compressor air allows fuel consumption to be dramatically reduced.
Additionally, fuel-flow to the combustion chamber can easily be adjusted to compensate for
fluctuations in the solar heat input, allowing a stable COT to be maintained. In order to increase
the fraction of solar heat supplied to the power cycle, a high-temperature TES has been integrated
into the topping-cycle, in parallel to the solar receiver. The addition of a TES unit to the HSGT
power plant allows excess solar energy to be stored during daytime and used at night or during the
passage of clouds. In this way, better use can be made of the investment in additional heliostats,
making larger heliostat fields more economically viable. At the same time, solar heat can be
introduced into the gas-turbine over a longer period and, as a result, the annual solar share of the
electricity produced rises.
The equipment sizes and nominal point data are also used to calculate the capital cost of the power
plant equipment. These cost values are then used together with the plant operating conditions to
calculate the annual maintenance and labor costs. The capital, maintenance and labor costs are
then combined with the performance data from the transient simulation (chiefly fuel and water
consumption) to get complete values for the total investment and operating costs. As output, the
analysis process produces a series of thermoeconomic performance indicators,
such as investment costs, levelized electricity costs, specific CO2 emissions, water consumption,
and many more.
We can check the multi objective optimization through the following processes
Three key design parameters are presented: the combustor outlet temperature, the nominal receiver
temperature and the compressor pressure ratio. The evolution of these parameters are shown in
Fig. 4 as a function of the annual solar share alongside the values for an optimized simple-cycle
HSGT without TES taken from a previous work [13].
It can be seen that, similarly to the optimised simple-cycle designs, the evolution of the
temperatures splits the designs for the optimal combined-cycle gas-turbine into three clear
domains, with transition points situated at 37% and 76% annual solar share. In Zone 1, the COT
is maintained high in order to ensure a high conversion efficiency for the gas-turbine, and the
nominal receiver temperature increases in order to increase the nominal solar share. In
Zone 2, the nominal receiver temperature has reached the maximum possible for contemporary
designs (in this case 950°C), and thus cannot increase further. In order to continue increasing the
nominal solar share, and thus integrate more heat into the gas-turbine cycle, it becomes necessary
to reduce the COT. While this reduces the overall conversion efficiency of the power plant, the
total fuel consumption is reduced due to the greater degree of solar heat integration. In Zone 3, the
COT has decreased to the level of the nominal receiver temperature. At this point, no
fuel is burnt in the combustion chamber when the receiver is operating at design conditions and
the nominal solar share is thus 100%. However, the annual solar share is not equal to 100% at this
point; the heliostat field and storage unit are not yet large enough to provide nominal power at all
times, giving an annualised solar share of only 76%. The annual solar share can be increased
further in Zone 3 by increasing the size of the heliostat field and the storage units, reaching a
maximum value of 98% solar share.
Conclusions
In order to overcome the limitations of the simple-cycle HSGT layouts studied in previous works,
two power plant improvements were combined to form an advanced HSGT power plant. High-
temperature TES units were integrated to extend the degree of solar operation, and a conventional
Rankine bottoming-cycle was added to reduce the cost of electricity. The advanced HSGT power
plant was analyzed using thermoeconomic tools in order to determine the performance, economic
viability and environmental impact. Multi-objective optimization was used to examine the trade-
offs between electricity costs and CO2 emissions and the results were compared against existing
power plant concepts. The advanced combined-cycle configuration can achieve annual solar shares
of over 90% while electricity costs range from a minimum of 81 USD/MWhe to a value of 105
USD/MWhe at an annual solar share of 37% and 157 USD/MWhe at an annual solar share of 76%.
With optimally designed gas-turbines for this application, the performance of these power plants
offer a significantly advantage over a simple combination of conventional power plant designs,
demonstrating both lower emissions and a lower cost of electricity than any combination of
conventional power plant designs For a given cost of electricity, the hybrid solar combined-cycle
power plant with storage offers a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions of up to 34%. Similarly,
for a given level of emissions, the levelised electricity cost can be reduced by up to 22%. Hybrid
solar gas-turbine power plants have been shown to be a promising alternative to conventional
steam-cycle solar thermal power plants. Low water consumption and competitive electricity costs
make hybrid solar gas-turbines an attractive choice for deployment in high-insolation desert areas.
By reducing water conflicts, new regions are opened up for the deployment of solar thermal power
technology, hopefully leading to increased capacity, lower
costs and a reduction in our dependence on fossil-fuels.
Remarks
Hybrid solar gas-turbine power plants have been shown to be a promising alternative to
conventional steam-cycle solar thermal power plants. Low water consumption and
competitive electricity costs make hybrid solar gas-turbines an attractive choice for
deployment in high-insolation desert areas. By reducing water conflicts, new regions are
opened up for the deployment of solar thermal power technology, hopefully leading to
increased capacity, lower costs and a reduction in our dependence on fossil-fuels.
Configuration of tower: They used the monopole tower instead of concrete and lattice. Because
monopole tower is the lowest cost configuration satisfying performance requirements and
available from many suppliers leveraging the wind industry’s well established supply chain
Configuration of Plant: The Plant Configuration Trade Study (based on Daggett-type weather
(~7.4 kWh/m²-day)) Examined the effects of SCS (Solar collector system)-to-SRS (Solar receiver
system) solar multiple, SRS-to-SGS (Steam generator system) solar multiple, thermal
Storage system size, and power block rating on performance, capital cost, and LCOE (Levelized
cost of electricity).
To assure optimal plant utilization on an annual basis, the SCS-to-SRS solar multiple should be
about 1.2 at our summer solstice design point.
Optimal SRS-to-SGS solar multiple and thermal storage size are interrelated and depend on desired
Capacity factor
Thermal storage system: The TSS (consisting of nitrate salt (60 wt % NaNO3, 40 wt % KNO3),
cold and hot storage tanks with passively cooled foundations, and salt melting and handling
equipment) stores thermal energy in molten salt so as to decouple solar energy collection from
electrical energy production. In this design, the molten nitrate salt thermal storage medium also
serves as the heat transfer fluid.
Working:
The two-tank heat storage system design is very similar to the Solar Two TSS. Cold nitrate
salt (nominally 288°C) is stored in an externally-insulated, cylindrical tank. During solar
collection, cold salt is pumped from the cold tank, though the SRS where heat is added, and flows
by gravity into the hot tank at a nominal temperature of 565°C. During energy dispatch, the hot
salt is pumped from the hot tank, through the SGS, and back to the cold tank.
Hot and cold molten salt tanks= conventional ground storage tanks= 79m in dia and17.5m tall
Both are sized to contain entire inventory of molten salt. There is also useable inventory tank that
have different dimensions.
Steam generator system (SGS):
The SGS (consisting of heat exchange vessels, hot salt pumps, feed water pumps, and
supporting systems) transfers thermal energy from hot molten salt to water to generate superheated
steam. Hot salt is pumped from the hot salt storage tank of the TSS to the SGS. The heat is extracted
in the SGS heat exchangers and the cooler molten salt is then returned to the TSS cold salt tank.
The steam drives a steam turbine generator within the Power Generation System (PGS) to produce
electricity. Molten salt is delivered to the SGS from the hot tank by the hot salt pumps, and first
split between the super heater and reheater. It then recombines and flows through the evaporator,
followed by the preheater, before returning to the cold tank. Water flows the opposite direction,
first entering the preheater where it is heated to near saturation temperatures. The water is then
converted to saturated steam in the evaporator and then enters the super heater which raises the
temperature to 540°C to meet the design steam temperature of the steam turbine.
Since the Power Generation System (PGS) is designed with a reheat cycle, steam exiting the high
pressure turbine is sent back to the SGS where it enters the reheater to be heated back to 538°C.
For a 100-MW plant, SGS thermal capacity is 275 MWt.
1Fig: Power block layout, including turbine/generator building (left), SGS structure (center),
and thermal storage tanks (right)
Power generating system: Thermal energy in steam is converted into the electrical energy to
electric grid. Its major components include a Rankine-cycle reheat steam turbine generator;
feedwater pumps; four feedwater heaters; air-cooled condensers; deaerator; transmission and
interconnection hardware; and auxiliary steam and other auxiliary equipment. The waste heat is
removed by the air cooled condenser, on the other hand condensers for cooling the lines are also
mounted in system.
Plant control system (PCS): The PCS consists of an integrated Distributed Control System (DCS)
located in the control room building. It is designed to facilitate a high degree of automation to
allow a single operator to control all the solar fields. Due to the distances between the control room
and major hardware nodes, multimode fiber optic cable is used to interconnect the remote IO
cabinets with the DCS processors located in the control room building. As a result of this
automation and the need for centralized control, redundancy in all major controls and interconnects
is required. Automated infrared cameras and other sensors tested at our Sierra plant are used to
monitor receiver conditions.
Balance of plant (BOP): The BOP contains all portions of the plant not specifically contained in
the other plant systems. The BOP contains electrical distribution, water treatment, compressed air,
buildings, site security, fencing, landscaping, roads, parking, lighting, fire suppression,
evaporation ponds, and hydrology. The requirements of the BOP are derivative of the systems
served.
Predicted design performance:
Remarks
Replicate the basic thermal module, without scaling or redesign, as many times as required (typically 2
to 14) to create plant sizes from 50 to 200 MW with capacity factors ranging from 20 to 75%.
WORKING:
A 1:100 scaled empirical model of a 4 storey apartment building was fabricated to analyze the
impact of the exterior and interior design of the tower on the indoor air movement. Wind tunnel
experiments in three separate configurations were conducted at Cermak Peterka Peterson (CPP)
laboratory in Sydney Australia to measure the surface pressures over the sealed model.
Boundary level wind tunnel:
It has dimensions of 20 m length, 3.0 m width, and 2.4 m height, with the testing section’s
roof designed to mitigate blockage effects. A variable frequency fan drives the wind tunnel.
Testing section for pressure and volume instrumentation.
Model design Fabrication:
Urban design, building form, dimension, and height all influence pressure distributions
over a building. The model is a four storey development consisting of two separate
apartments, each spanning two storeys. The living room, dining room, and kitchen areas
are co-located on the first of the two floors, while the bedrooms are on the second floor.
Empirical model setup:
A model of a four storey apartment building was fabricated with transparent acrylic
plastic (3 mm thickness) by printing in 3D stereo lithography at 1:100 scale. Ninety nine
pressure taps were installed over the five external façades of the scale model which was 19
cm in height, 17 cm in length, and 10 cm in width.
Pressure measurement:
Surface Pressure distribution over the openings of the wind tower on south side has been
calculated against the pressure coefficient over the windows of the building on north and south
facade.
Cpe = (pm-ps)/0.5pve(sq)
Where,
Cpe = mean surface pressure coefficient at building height
Pm = mean surface pressure (Pa)
Ps = mean static pressure at reference height (Pa)
The maximum rate of tower openings yields 1.12, which is around 1.5 times the maximum pressure
over the building windows at 0.77 at the north façade.
Pressure coefficient difference:
The pressure coefficient difference between the wind tower openings and the building windows
have been measured under sixteen azimuth angles of wind direction.
a) Between the south opening of the wind-tower and the windows of the building on the north
façade.
b) Cross ventilation between windows on the south and north façades
Results show that case (a) represents a considerable mean pressure coefficient differential of 0.85
with a maximum of 1.64 obtained during north - north east (NNE) winds, while the case (b)
generates average of 0.68 and maximum of 1.2 of pressure coefficient difference under the same
wind direction (NNE).
over the building, the higher the velocity indoors. The indoor air speed calculations have been
carried out based on the following constants:
� Room volume, L = 158 m3
� Surface roughness, k = 3.00E-04 m
� Kinematic viscosity, ν = 1.50E-05 m²/s
� Number of duct bends =1
� Wind tower opening area, Ao = 3 m2 (1.5m height * 2 m width)
� Cross-sectional area of duct, Ad = 3 m2
� Perimeter of duct, P = 7 m (1.5 m * 2 m)
� Building Windows area, Aw = 1 m2
A number of indoor air speed calculations have been conducted to optimise the wind tower design
in an extensive parametric study examining the height, area and the sides of the tower openings.
Conclusion:
As the experiment is performed to measure the surface pressure of a building. The use of equation
is developed to transform the exterior pressure to mean airspeed. Using the optimised design of
wind tower, the model was exposed to the subtropical Sydney contemporary climate (TMY 2013)
for the hourly indoor air speed calculations. In the next step, indoor thermal comfort analyses were
preformed to calculate SET* to represent the cooling potential of the wind tower in comparison
with the case of through-window cross ventilation.For wind-driven natural ventilation, the pressure
differential between air inlet and outlet (fenestrations) is the driving force. The external design of
the wind tower, building, and its neighbouring buildings all affect the wind generated surface
pressures. The height and the orientation of the inlet and outlet openings should be considered in
the application of wind towers. In Sydney’s TMY, the NNE wind direction produced the maximum
pressure coefficient between the wind tower openings in south, and windows in the building’s
north façade, and this was consistently higher than the case of window cross ventilation.
The internal configuration of the tower (length of duct and number of bends) affects the total
energy loss and consequently affects indoor air speeds. Air speed in the occupied zone was
discovered to be particularly sensitive to cross sectional area of the duct. During Sydney’s hottest
summer month January 2013, a wind tower with south facing opening and a cross sectional area
of just 3 m2 generated, on average, 0.2 m/s higher indoor air speeds compared with the through-
window cross ventilation default scenario. Thermal comfort analyses revealed that a wind tower
with south-facing opening in the conservative configuration for this research project could reduce
SET* by up to 6°C, and an average reduction of 1.1°C during the six warm/hot months of the year
2013, compared to the default scenario of through-window cross ventilation. Preliminary analysis
with numerical modelling of the thermal performance of this apartment building in Sydney’s
climate indicate that the SET* reduction (ΔSET*) resulting from installation of a wind tower
(termed the comfort cooling potential) is significantly greater than 1.1oC once the effects of
ventilation purging of heat stored in building thermal mass, leading to indoor mean radiant
temperature reductions, have been take into account.
Remarks:
Results indicate that, during Sydney's warm hours (≥23°C), elevated air speeds resulting from
the wind-tower improved in indoor comfort by 1725.8 degree hours (SET*) compared to the
default design relying on through-window cross ventilation under the same conditions.
TITLE:
A design study for regenerator-type heat storage in solar tower
plants – Results and conclusions of the HOTSPOT project
Author names:
S. Zunft a , M. Hanelb , M. Krugera , V. Dreibigacker
Regenerator heat storage is a cost-effective solution to provide solar tower power plant with operational
flexibility and load following capability a key factor for marketability. There has been only little research
activity in this field. In the early 1990s, a first conceptual investigation and a system test on such a plant
was the subject of the work of the PHOEBUS Technology Program Solar Air Receiver. A packed bed
storage based on ceramic spheres was part of the system, offering a thermal storage capacity of 1 MWh.
The overall objective of the project was to improve efficiency, reliability and investment costs of this
storage type for the pressure-less operation and thus provide the basis for subsequent implementation
in demonstration scale.
A set of TES design specifications has been derived. An unpressurized air receiver system driving a steam
cycle with a thermal capacity of 150 MWth was used as a reference application. Additionally, a pressurized
air receiver system operated at 5 bars with a thermal output of 11 MW has been considered.
For
each
of
the storage subcomponents and their setup several choices exist: The containment could be made from
welded steel, concrete or could be assembled on-site from prefabricated steel parts. The storage
inventory may consist of a stacked arrangement of regularly shaped refractory brickwork or a packed
bed. Usable inventory materials include oxide ceramics, such as alumina-silicate ceramics, some metals
or natural stone, opening a wide range of thermal and mechanical properties, possible shapes and also
costs.
From the selected storage variants, for a permissible discharge temperature drop of 60 K, the lowest
inventory mass of about 10 t/MWhth is obtained with ceramic saddles, multi-layer media and honeycomb
ceramics. This is due to large specific surfaces and the resulting high thermal utilisation of these materials.
Packed beds from ceramic media, or packed beds from broken basalt and stacked checker bricks still have
a favourable specific mass demand of about 20 to 30 t/MWhth, but, to comply with the thermal
specifications, should offer a specific surface of at least 75 m2 /m3 . With cast iron and sawn basalt, the
highest mass requirements are obtained.
All TES concepts exhibit relatively low absolute overall costs. Figure summarises the investment cost
estimates in a relative presentation. The most eye-catching feature in the cost breakdown is the clear
difference in inventory costs. For concept #3 (honeycomb-based TES) inventory is the determining cost
fraction. Though more costly, the use of honeycomb ceramics is well justified: its shape allows an excellent
thermal utilisation und this inventory type is a low-risk variant when applied to a modular containment
configuration with moderate height. TES concept #2 (packed bed with ceramic balls) can save part of the
inventory costs; this however at the expense ofadditional technical risks stemming from the thermo-
mechanical loads in the bed. These loads also add to the costs of the high-temperature insulation, which
must be protected with the help of additional functional layers. TES concept #1 (packed bed with broken
basalt) taps further cost reduction potential, but introduces further technical uncertainties with respect
to durability and erosion. These results suggest that all three TES concepts are well justifiable.
The elaborated design tools and TES concepts have also been experimentally validated in pilot scale. To
that end, a test bed for the investigation of high-temperature regenerator-type TES was designed, erected
and finally put into operation at DLR Stuttgart in early 2010. It has a wide operation range and allows to
investigate TES concepts with an inventory mass of up to 5 tons at charge temperatures of up to 830 °C
with repeatable test conditions, see Figure 3 (right). The experiments have provided valuable insight into
the relevant thermal effects and thus helped to achieve a reliable prediction of the TES operation.
Figures (left) shows the distribution of the mechanical stresses at a single particle-insulation contact point
before thermal-cyclic operation (symmetry exploited). As expected, the stress analysis reveals
compressive loads both at the contact point and at some distance from the contact point, see figure 5 left
top. Less expected, also tensile stresses occur in adjacent zones around the contact point, due to the
stretching of the near-surface insulation, see figure 5 left bottom in blue colors. The location of the
maximum tensile stress is in immediate vicinity of the contact point and quickly decreases to a flat curve
with increasing distance.
excellent prospects for the technology, but also point out solutions for a near-term demonstration in the
100 MWh scale.
TITLE:
Assessment of improved molten salt solar tower plants
AUTHORS:
Cs. Singer, S. Giuliano, R. Buck
The temperature level increase of molten salt solar tower plants is one important task on the development
schedule to increase the system’s overall efficiency. In the conventional power plant technology, modern
supercritical steam power plants work with life steam temperatures near 620°C. To apply these modern power
blocks in molten salt solar tower plants, salt temperatures near 650°C are required. Today’s molten salt tower plants
reach salt temperatures of 565°C. To follow the positive development tendencies of fossil power plants, in the
present work the combination of supercritical steam power plants with solar towers is analyzed.
The analyzed power level is 125 MW, while the steam process parameters are varied from low temperature level
(550°C) and subcritical steam to high temperature level (620°C) and supercritical steam.
In the past the fossil fired steam power plant park developed from low over marginal to high steam process
parameters. Modern steam turbine processes have today life steam parameters of around 300 bar / 620°C / 610°C,
as with higher temperatures and pressures higher efficiencies of the steam turbine process can be reached. That
leads to lower fuel consumption and lower levelized electricity costs (LEC) and also to lower greenhouse gas
emissions. These development tendencies could be pathbreaking also for today’s development and market
introduction of point focusing solar thermal tower plants (STTP) with central receiver system (CRS) technology.
The reference receiver concepts is the state of the art modular 360° cylindrical ETR. The model is then used
to gain the efficiency-load characteristics of the receiver, considering an appropriate irradiation profile provided by
the heliostat field layout tool after optimization.
The internal tubular receiver concept uses the assumption, that the absorber tubes, which are similarly
arranged in serpentine flow-through panels compared to the ETR, whereas the panels consists of parallel tubes. The
difference to the ETR is that these panels are located inside of a cylindrical cavity and at its internal lateral surface.
The irradiation of the absorber tubes falls into the cylinder through a circular downwards facing open aperture, while
the opposite side of the cavity is closed to reduce free convection losses.
Recently a new receiver concept with a directly irradiated liquid molten salt film as the coolant of inclined
absorber walls was introduced [5]. The developed IDAR-CFD-Model was used to analyze the open parameters
concerning the feasibility and functionality of the concept and considers the optics of the open free film surface and
of the inclined opaque absorber wall, as well as the
convective heat transfer between the absorber
surface and the liquid film. The model allows to carry
out the required detailed calculations at full size
receiver geometries.
As optimized STTP power plants are compared to each other and the annual yield of the STTP is mainly
defined by the power block (125 MWel) and a solar multiple (1.5-3.5), which by definition lead to the
receivers thermal power level at the DP. Because of this reason the resulting cost optimal field size
(number of heliostats) of the concepts variants is differing. It seems likely, that a concept with a higher
total net efficiency requires less heliostats to fulfill the same set demand at the DP. This again leads to
different annual yields of the concepts that are significant for the LEC calculation.
The sensitivity curves of the thermal storage system and the O&M cost assumptions run almost
parallel to the sensitivity curves of the receiver.
Related to the actual power block cost assumptions, the statement has to be made that neither
the temperature increase, nor the pressure increase and also both cannot lead to a cost reduction, as
these types of power blocks will be too expensive for the next generation STTP. Additional cost
assumptions from the turbine manufacturer state, that in case of a temperature increase of the Rankine
process, nickel based alloys could be necessary mainly because of corrosion reasons. If this is the case,
the power blocks with increased temperatures had instead of 18 % or 29 % higher costs than the reference
power block a significantly higher offset of 67 % and 78 %. With this the chances of supercritical STTP with
increased temperatures seem to shrink.
6. Conclusions:
After the discussion of the results of this study the following conclusions can be made:
1. With the made technical and economic assumptions, which comprise the same component
specific cost estimates and correlations expect of the power block variants, neither the
temperature increase, nor the pressure increase of the STTP’s Rankine cycle would lead to a
reduction of the LEC compared to the state of the art.
2. The only and not significant cost reduction potential of ~0.5 % can be observed, if ITR or IDAR type
receivers are used and the reference Rankine cycle is not changed.
3. If the cost estimations of SNL related to DAR with liquid film cooling apply, an IDAR could have
specific receiver costs, which are ~30 % lower than the reference ETR or the ITR. If this is the case,
a LEC reduction of up to 6 % could be reached by changing the receiver from ETR to IDAR, without
a temperature increase or the increase of the steam parameters.
4. The application of power blocks with increased steam parameters and thus increased thermal
efficiencies leads to increased total net efficiencies of the entire STTP. However, with the used
power block cost assumptions this effect doesn’t result in reduced LEC.
Bijan Samali,
Graeme Wood
05 S. Zunft a cast iron and sawn No concentration Improvement
M. Hanelb basalt is given data analysis
M. Krugera
V. Dreibigacker
06 Cs. Singer Solar Salt NaNo3 60 % Experimental
S. Giuliano NaNo3 , KNO3 KNO3 40% Graphical
R. Buck Analysis