Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3. Explain why the voltage increases less rapidly as the DC current increases. (30
points)
As discussed in the lecture, it is known that alternators produce an AC voltage
whose frequency is determined by the rotational speed, DC field excitation, and
load power factor. It can be observed that if the DC field excitation is increased
assumed with a constant speed, the magnetic flux increases and the output
voltage rises in direct proportion to the current however there are a smaller
increased in flux for a given increase in DC field current. As a result, the voltage
increases less rapidly as the DC current increases.
2. Explain why synchronous generators would be advantageous to connect its stator
windings wye with regard to the voltage output. (20 points)
Since the output power increases, the phase voltage in a wye-connected stator
rises line-to-line, resulting in the highest (maximum) voltage achievable between
neutral or ground and the line voltage conductor.
3. An alternator is much less likely to burn out on a sustained short-circuit than a
separately excited DC shunt generator. Explain. (30 points)
The alternator is less likely to burn out because an alternator has not that much
eddy currents and losses. Furthermore, the majority of alternators have a large
impedance, which implies that when the load increase, the voltage drops
dramatically without the regulator correcting by increasing the field current. The
source voltage and field winding resistance limit how much the field current may
be raised.
ACTIVITY 2: Three Phase Alternator: Under Load
The armature reaction between the main rotor field and the
armature field is cross-magnetizing when a resistive load is
connected to the alternator. This implies that the primary
field set up in the air gap by the field excitation in the
rotor is distorted by the field developed by the current
flowing through the armature. The armature reaction caused by
the resistive load causes a drop in the alternator's
equivalent circuit. Drops in the total terminal voltage of an
alternator with a given connected load are also influenced by
armature resistance and synchronous reactance. As a result,
the line-to-line emf at full-load in three-phase is
substantially lower than the excitation emf at no-load. As a
result, the voltage regulation could provide a positive
percentage value.
2. Comment on the full-load rotor currents measured at inductive
loading compared to a resistive and capacitive loading. Comment
on the basis that at each loading type, a terminal voltage of
208 Volts is maintained. (30 points)
Since the rated voltage of 208V was established and
maintained at the alternator output terminals, the measured
current for each kind of balanced load showed no significant
change in magnitude. If phase is taken into account, however,
inductive load current will clearly lag full-load terminal
voltage since the alternator has a lagging power factor.
Meanwhile, the resistive load current will be in phase with
the rated full-load voltage, but the capacitive load current
will be leading ahead of it. The total output terminal
voltage under each type of loading is determined by the
effect of armature response caused by the alternator's load
current and field excitation, as well as internal drops.
WOUND ROTOR
INDUCTION
MOTOR
JUNE 16 2021
POWERED BY SUBMITTED BY
KENNETH KILAKIGA
LVSIM - EMS
SUBMITTED TO
IMAGE SOURCED FROM
ENGR. VLADIMIR LUCERO
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Group No.:
Section: TL31
Procedure 6:
(DC Motor is not turned on, hence rotor velocity = 0)
Slip in rpm = 1500 rpm – 0 rpm
Slip in rpm = 1500 rpm
Procedure 8:
Slip in rpm = 1500 rpm – 900 rpm
Slip in rpm = 600 rpm
Procedure 9:
Slip in rpm = 1500 rpm – 1800 rpm
Slip in rpm = -300 rpm
Procedure 10:
Slip in rpm = 1500 rpm - 900 rpm
Slip in rpm = 600 rpm
Procedure 11:
Slip in rpm = 1500 rpm – 1800 rpm
Slip in rpm = -300 rpm
Procedure 6
Procedure 8
Procedure 9
Procedure 10
Procedure 11
(𝑉𝐼)𝑐𝑜𝑠∅ = (173.02𝑊)(0.34678) = 60 𝑊
SYNCHRONOUS
MOTOR
JUNE 23 2021
SUBMITTED BY
POWERED BY KENNETH KILAKIGA
SUBMITTED TO
LVSIM - EMS ENGR. VLADIMIR LUCERO
ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Group No.:
Section: TL31