Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.nl/locate/aqua-online
Abstract
A simple process for nitrate removal is proposed for its application in aquaculture.
Biodegradable polymer pellets are acting as solid substrate and biofilm carrier for denitrifica-
tion. Laboratory experiments with conventional aquaria and fish were used to examine the
feasibility and a first evaluation of the process performance in a recirculated aquaculture
system. All over the test-period the fish were in a good condition. Nitrate concentrations in
the aquaria with treatment were low compared to the untreated reference system. A further
advantage was the stability of the pH in the units with denitrification whereas pH of the
untreated water decreased due to nitrification. © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights
reserved.
1. Introduction
In aquaculture systems nitrate removal is a problem which has not always found
satisfactory solutions in practice. Modern technology of water treatment in recircu-
lating systems consists of solid waste removal, carbon-removal and nitrification, pH
and CO2 control (Fig. 1). Consumption of energy and water in those systems can
be lowered if the nitrate produced in the aerobic biofilter unit is reduced by a
denitrification step. This diminishes the fresh water addition and the amount and
impact of the wastewater.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +49-711-6855441; fax: +49-711-6853729.
E-mail address: angela.boley@iswa.uni-stuttgart.de (A. Boley)
0144-8609/00/$ - see front matter © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 1 4 4 - 8 6 0 9 ( 0 0 ) 0 0 0 3 3 - 9
76 A. Boley et al. / Aquacultural Engineering 22 (2000) 75–85
polymers does not require an external dosing of soluble organic substrate as the
polymer itself acts as biofilm carrier and organic carbon source.
Heterotrophic denitrification positively influences the pH of the water. If proteins
are metabolized by fish, the end-products of respiration after hydrolysis to amino
acids (e.g. glycine) are NH+ −
4 and HCO3 , which are excreted via gills (Eq. (1);
Forster and Goldstein, 1969):
NH2CH2COOH + 1.5 O2 NH+ −
4 + HCO3 + CO2 (1)
The nitrification equation with biomass formation (Wheaton et al., 1994, Eq. (2))
indicates the production of protons (catalyzed by enzymes of, e.g. Nitrosomonas
and Nitrobacter species):
1.021 NH+ −
4 +1.895 O2 +1.021 HCO3
Fig. 3. Aquarium system for testing denitrification. Period 1: Carbon removal + nitrification only; period
2: Carbon removal +nitrification + denitrification.
Table 1
Material characterization
Before starting the experiments the biofilters for carbon removal and nitrification
were subjected to a conditioning phase with a medium containing ammonia to
secure a good nitrification performance.
The first period of the experiments was confined to nitrification via biofilter. In
period 2 the denitrification units were connected. They consisted of small fixed bed
reactors (‘denireactors’) with a volume of 0.375 l. As subsequent aerobic treatment,
small aerated fixed bed units (volume 420 ml), with SIPORAX-packing, were
installed for polishing to avoid possibly occurring byproducts (e.g. NO−2 ). Different
biodegradable polymers pellets (Table 1) were used as packing for the denireactors
and, as reference, one was operated with glass beads. The polymers to be tested
were filled into the closed denireactors without pretreatment and enclosed in the
system by a plastic foam bottom and a cover above.
Water was recirculated from the aquarium to the denireactor and — via the
polishing unit — back to the aquarium with flowrates of QD = 0.3–0.5 l/h. This
low throughput was selected to achieve suitable conditions for denitrification, which
depends among others upon sufficiently low oxygen concentrations. With an ample
residence time, the high oxygen content in the aquarium effluent cA (range 6.8–7.8
mg/l O2) is consumed in the inlet zone of the denireactor by aerobic biodegradation
of the polymers. This ensures anoxic conditions in the remaining part of the unit.
A. Boley et al. / Aquacultural Engineering 22 (2000) 75–85 79
3. Results
Solid substrate Specific surface Temp. (°C) Flowrate (l/h) Concentration range 5–40 mg/l N-NO−
3
(m2/l)
As Fig. 4 shows the theoretical concentration limits (about 5 mg/l, Eq. (6)) have
approximately been achieved with PCL and Bionolle at the end of test. Nitrate
concentrations in the effluent of these denireactors were below the detection limit
(0.23 mg/l N-NO− 3 ). This confirmed our assumptions.
In contrast to these results the aquarium with the PHB denireactor reached the
equilibrium already at a concentration of 18 mg/l N-NO− 3 . This decrease of
performance (= decrease of denitrification velocity) can probably be explained by
clogging and short-circuiting of the denireactor due to excess biomass production,
which has been observed after the end of period 2.
As the acid neutralizing capacity of the tap-water was low (ANC= 1 mmol/l),
pH values decreased with time, due to nitrification (Fig. 5). To prevent extensive
decrease of pH, it was adjusted twice with NaHCO3, which was added to the
reference aquarium (packing with glass beads) at days 71 and 100. For the
aquarium with the PHB denireactor NaHCO3 addition was not necessary because
at day 71 denitrification had already started. The start of denitrification immedi-
Fig. 5. pH in testsystems. Temperature 25–26°C. Arrows indicate pH adjustment with NaHCO3. (After
71 days: Reference, PCL, Bionolle; after 100 days: only Reference).
82
Table 3
Denitrification velocities in fixed bed reactors with different substrates
Carrier-material Spec. surface Substrate Temp. (°C) Volumetric rate (mg Surface related rate (mg N- Type of water and in-
a
Hawkins et al., 1978.
b
Partos and Richard, 1984.
c
Jestin et al., 1986.
d
Wurmthaler, 1995.
e
Schick, 1998.
f
Arbiv and Rijn, 1995.
g
Sautier et al., 1998.
A. Boley et al. / Aquacultural Engineering 22 (2000) 75–85 83
Table 4
Estimated costs of substrates for nitrate removal
ately may lead to an increase of pH. For the PCL and Bionolle denireactor
NaHCO3 was also added at day 71, because denitrification had not yet started.
Later pH increased too, therefore an adjustment was no more required. These
results are compatible with Eq. (4).
After both test-periods the fish were in a good condition and no fish died. They
almost doubled their initial body weight all together up to 145 g (9 5%) per
aquarium.
4. Discussion
Denitrification systems are not yet common practice in aquaculture and until
now they were mostly installed for research purposes. The reason is that toxicity of
nitrate is low, compared with nitrite and ammonia.
A comparison of the polymer based denitrification presented here with conven-
tional denitrification processes is shown in Table 3. The volumetric and surface
related denitrification rates with PHB and PCL as substrates are lower than the
respective rates with methanol and ethanol. However the same order of magnitude
as with acetic acid as substrate could be observed.
The costs of the denitrification process depend upon the price of substrates,
technical devices and labor costs for operation. The costs of different substrates in
relation to their denitrification capacity are given in Table 4. Although ethanol and
methanol have the best cost-benefit ratio, their use in aquaculture would require
additional treatment units to prevent any spill into the recirculated water. Denitrifi-
cation with soluble carbon sources demands a sophisticated process control and
continuous monitoring. A system based on insoluble solid substrates as carbon
source however is an easy to handle process.
84 A. Boley et al. / Aquacultural Engineering 22 (2000) 75–85
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References
Arbiv, R., Rijn, J., 1995. Performance of a treatment system for inorganic nitrogen removal in intensive
aquaculture systems. Aquacult. Eng. 14, 189 – 204.
Forster, R.P., Goldstein, L., 1969. Formation of excretory products. In: Hoar, W.S., Randall, D.J.
(Eds.), Fish Physiology, vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 313 – 345.
Frick, B.R., Richard, Y., 1985. Ergebnisse und erfahrungen mit der biologischen denitrifikation in einem
wasserwerk (Experience with biological denitrification in a full scale drinking water treatment plant).
Vom Wass. 64, 145–154.
Hawkins, J.E., Cooper, P.F., Seaman, M.R., 1978. Denitrification of sewage effluent by attached growth
technique. In: Mattock, G. (Ed.), New Processes of Wastewater Treatment and Recovery. Ellis
Harwood, Chichester, pp. 107–124.
Heinemann, A., 1995. Denitrifikation mit Co-Immobilisaten aus Bakterien und Poly-b-Hydroxybutyrat
(Co-Immobilization of bacteria and Poly-b-Hydroxybutyrate in biopolymer-matrices for denitrifica-
tion) Stuttg. Ber. Siedl. Wass. Wrtsch., Bd. 135, R. Oldenbourg, München.
Jestin, J.-M., Philipot, J.-M., Berdou, C., Moulinot, J.-P., 1986. Maitrise d’un processus biologique: la
dénitrification à Eragny. T.S.M.-L’Eau, pp. 359 – 362.
Müller, W.-R., Wurmthaler, J., Heinemann, A., 1992. Biologische nitratelimination in kleinen wasserw-
erken (Biological nitrate elimination in small drinking water treatment plants). WAP 5, 231 – 235.
Partos, J., Richard, Y., 1984. Dénitrification d’eau potable par cultures fixées mise en route de la station
de Chateau Landon. In: Use of Fixed Biomass for Water and Wastewater Treatment, Proceed. 37th
Internat. Conf. CEBEDEAU, 23–25 May 1984, Liège, Belgium, pp. 163 – 186.
Sautier, N., Grasmick, A., Blancheton, J.P., 1998. Biological denitrification applied to a marine closed
aquaculture system. Water Res. 32, 1932–1938.
Schick, V., 1998. Denitrifikation von Trinkwasser mit biologisch abbaubaren Polymeren im kontinuier-
lichen Festbettverfahren. (Denitrification of drinking water in a fixed bed reactor with biodegradable
polymers) Diploma Thesis, Lehrstuhl für Wasserchemie, Universität Karlsruhe, Germany.
A. Boley et al. / Aquacultural Engineering 22 (2000) 75–85 85
Stöver, T., Roennefahrt, K.W., 1990. Biologische denitrifikation in der trinkwasseraufbereitung. (Biolog-
ical denitrification in drinking water treatment). Vom Wass. 75, 287 – 305.
Wheaton, F.W., Hochheimer, J.N., Kaiser, G.E., Krones, M.J., Libey, G.S., Easter, C.C., 1994.
Nitrification filter principles. In: Timmons, M.B., Losordo, T.M. (Eds.), Aquaculture Water Reuse
Systems: Engineering Design and Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 101 – 124.
Wurmthaler, J., 1995. Biologische Nitratelimination mit einem Festsubstrat bei der Trinkwasseraufbere-
itung. (Biological nitrate elimination in drinking water treatment with a solid substrate). Stuttg. Ber.
Siedl. Wass. Wrtsch. Bd. 132, R. Oldenbourg, München.
.
.