You are on page 1of 8

Dr. Gloria D. Lacson Foundation Colleges, Inc.

Castellano, San Leonardo, Nueva Ecija


GRADUATE SCHOOL

Educ 202 . Advanced Statistics Output

I. Look/Search for 10 finished/approved Masterals Thesis and complete the table below.
Hypothesis
No. Thesis Title Statement of the Problem Research Design Statistical Tool Utilized Writer/s
(if there’s any)
1 Emotional Inclination and The researcher sought to evaluate The following null The Inputs, Process Statistical treatment of Julie Ann V.
Skills in Socialization of and assess the emotional hypotheses were tested Outputs (IPO model was data was confined to the Dominguez
Public Elementary Pupils: inclination and skills in at the .05 level: used to present the frequency count,
Bases for School Adjustment socialization of public elementary 1. Pupils across to research paradigm percentage distribution,
pupils and the various situations in gender, ordinal position wherein the profile weighted mean, Phi
school which aid in their and the educational variable includes gender, Kramer’s V and the
adjustments to come up with attainment of parents do ordinal position and the analysis of variance
efficacious behaviors. The study not differ in their educational attainment [ANOVA] employing
was formulated to arrive at manifestations of of parents is the Inputs. Duncan’s Multiple
valuable data and information to emotional inclination The descriptive method Range Test.
the following answers: and skills in was employed as
1. Pupils’ manifestations of socialization. Process where checklists
emotional inclination. 2. Pupils’ across were the main tool to
2. The indicators of pupils’ skills gender, grade level, and gather data. And for the
in socialization. parents’ educational Outputs, the findings
3. Circumstances and situations in attainment do not vary will serve as vital
school that contribute to the in their adjustment too information for teachers
adjustments of the pupils. school. in their duties to enhance
the cognitive
performance of the
pupils. Results will serve
as baseline information
for teachers and
guidance counselor of
what the school
activities and programs
to prioritize in the
Educ 202 . Advanced Statistics Output

school.
2 Pupils’ Expedient of The researcher study aimed to The significance of the The IPO model was used The weighted mean was Sarah May L.
Ingenuity and Teachers’ assess pupils’ expedient of following hypotheses to present the paradigm used to arrive at verbal Mallare
Responsiveness Amidst the ingenuity in Araling Panlipunan. were tested at .05: of the study. Wherein descriptions of item-
Pandemic: Relationship to The participants were 290 Grade 5 1. Pupils’ expedient of the inputs there is that statement. Phi Kramer’s
Academic Performance in and 6 pupils of Gapan South ingenuity in Araling Pupils’ expedient of V formula was applied
Araling Panlipunan Central School. Likewise, pupils’ Panlipunan is not ingenuity along Araling to test the hypothesis:
assessment on their teachers significantly related to panlipunan and the “Pupils’’ expedient of
responsiveness amidst the their appreciation of pupils’appreciation of ingenuity in Araling
pandemic and determine the their teachers’ teachers responsiveness Panlipunan is not
relationship to pupils’ academic responsiveness amidst amidst the pandemic and significantlyrelated to
performance in Araling the pandemic. academic performance their appreciation of
Panlipunan. Specifically, the 2. Pupils’ expedient of of pupils in Araling their teachers’
researcher ardently hoped to arrive ingenuity in Araling Panlipunan. The study responsiveness amidst
at answers to the following: Panlipunan and their employed the descriptive the pandemic.”
1. Pupils’ expedient of ingenuity in appreciation of method of research as Kendall’s tau-b formula
Araling Panlipunan terms of their teachers’ the process using a was utilized to test the
affective magnitude, passionate responsiveness amidst checklist to gather data. hypothesis: “Pupils’
synergist and certainly of leverage. the pandemic have no Interviews and expedient of ingenuity in
2. Pupils’ appreciation of their significant relationship observations were Araling Panlipunan and
teachers’ responsiveness amidst in their academic resorted to for validation their appreciation of
the pandemic. performance in purposes and data teachers’ responsiveness
Araling Panlipunan. underwent statistical amidst the pandemic.
treatment: weighted
mean, Kramer’s V and
Rendall’s tau-b.
Findings of the study
may bring light some
factors that have
significant relationship
to pupils’ academic
performance in Araling
Panlipunan.
3 Learners’ Fortitude to The researchers looked into The following This study employed the The descriptive method Nicomedes R. San
Transcendence and their learners’ fortitude to transcendence hypotheses were tested descriptive method of of research was Pedro
cognizance of Teachers’ and their cognizance of teachers’ at the .05 significance research. Checklist was employed with checklist
Instructional Competency: instructional competency in their level: the main tool to gather as the main tool to
Educ 202 . Advanced Statistics Output

Relationship to Level of subject in Science and correlate 1. Learners’ across age, data. Interviews and gather data. Statistical
Proficiency in science. them with selected profile gender and grade level observations were treatment of data will be
variables. The respondents of the do not differ in their employed to validate confined to the weighted
study were 157 grades 5 and 6 fortitude to findings. Descriptive mean, analysis of
pupils of San Nicolas Central transcendence and their research involves a variance, Kramer’s V
School, Division of Gapan City. cognizance of teachers’ collection of data in formula, Kendall’s tau-b
The study was formulated to come instructional order to test hypotheses formula and the Pearson
up with valuable data and competency along or to answer questions r.
information on the following: learning facilitation and concerning the current
1.Learners’ level of proficiency in intensifying potency. status of the subject of
Science 2.Learners’ fortitude to the study.
2. Fortitude to transcendence of the transcendence is not
learners. significantly related to
3. Learners cognizance of their cognizance of
teachers’ instructional competency teachers’ instructional
Science along: learning facilitation competency along
and intensifying potency. learning facilitation and
intensifying potency
3. Learners’ level of
proficiency in Science
is not significantly
related to their fortitude
to transcendence and
their cognizance of
teachers’ instructional
competency along
learning facilitation and
intensifying potency.
4 Highlighting Instructional The researcher explored students’ The following null He IPO model was used The statistical treatment Aila Mae B.
Schemes Via Students’ valuation of teachers’ pedagogical hypotheses were tested for the research of data was confined to Villanueva
Validation of Teachers approaches in the instruction of at the .05 level. paradigm wherein the the frequency count,
Pedagogical Approaches English and correlated them with 1. No interrelationships inputs are those students percentage distribution,
age and gender as profile variables. exist among the four valuation of teachers’ weighted mean, Pearson
The study was carried out to arrive facets of teachers’ pedagogical approaches r and the analysis of
at valuable information to the pedagogical along the following variance.
following: approaches. facets: subject matter
1.Students’ valuation of teachers 2. Students across age intensification,
Educ 202 . Advanced Statistics Output

pedagogical approaches along the and gender do not differ development of self-
following facets such as subject in their valuation of reliance, reinforcement
matter intensification, teachers’ instructional for achievement and
development of self-reliance, schemes. appreciating activities.
reinforcement for achievement and Students’ age and
appreciating activities. gender. Checklist was
2.The interrelationship of the four the main tool to gather
facets of teachers’ pedagogical data as the process. The
approaches techniques of
3.Variance in the students’ observation and
valuation of the teachers utilization interviews were likewise
of pedagogical approaches when employed to cross
grouped across age and gender validate findings drawn
4. Implications of findings to from the checklist. The
highlight pedagogical approaches statistical treatment of
in the instruction of English as a data was confined to the
subject. frequency count,
percentage distribution,
weighted mean, Pearson
r and the analysis of
variance.
The output there is
valuable information of
the relationship of
teachers’ pedagogical
approaches that may
highlight and intensify
delivery of instruction of
English.
Increased self-efficacy
of teachers’ instruction
that may elicit students’
enthusiasm and interest.
5 Work Philosophy as The researcher explored and The significance of the The descriptive method The mean weighted Vivian V. Ignacio
Moderator of Teachers’ determines the work philosophy following null of research was average was employed
Innovativeness and innovativeness of public hypotheses was tested employed. Checklist was to arrive at a verbal
elementary school teacher and at the .05 level: the main tool to gather description of each of
Educ 202 . Advanced Statistics Output

correlated them with selected 1. Teachers ‘across age, data. The techniques of the items in the Likert-
profile variables. Specifically, the gender, civil status, interviews and scaled checklists. The
researcher endeavored to come up educational attainment, observations were analysis of variance was
with valuable data and information and number of years employed for validation applied to test the
to the following: teaching do not vary in purposes. It is “fact- hypothesis: “Teachers’
1. Teachers’ work philosophy in their work philosophy finding” or “information across age, gender, civil
terms of their professional tenets, and innovativeness. gathering with analytical status, educational
work attitudes and quest for 2. The three construct interpretations. It is attainment, and number
renewal. of teachers’ work concerned with of years teaching in the
2. The innovativeness of the philosophy and conditions or service do not differ in
teachers. innovativeness are not relationships that exist, their work philosophy
3. Whether teachers across age, inter-correlated. practices that prevail; and innovativeness”.
gender, civil status, educational beliefs and processes Pearson r formula was
attainment and number of years that are going on; effects utilized to test the
teaching differ in their work that are being felt or hypothesis: “The three
philosophy and innovativeness. trends that are constructs of teachers’
4. Interrelationships of the three developing. work philosophy and
constructs of work philosophy and innovativeness are not
innovativeness. inter-correlated.

6 Assessment on the This study had been conducted to 1. There is no This study have utilized The process of data Jay Ar Leabres
Implementation of Special assess the implementation of significant correlation a Quantitative analysis constituted
program in sports and Special Program in Sports (SPS) between socio- Descriptive and descriptive statistics and
Student-Athletes’ Academic and its relation to student-athletes’ demographic correlation design to inferential statistics. The
Performance academic performance at Juan R. characteristics of the identify, analyze and analysis on socio-
Liwag Memorial High school in respondents and describe the extent of demographic profile
Gapan City. Specifically, the student-athlete’s implementation of comprised of descriptive
researcher sought to answer the academic performance. Special Program in statistics which involved
following: 2. There is no Sports (SPS) in relation frequencies, percentage,
1. How may the Socio- significant relationship to student-athletes’ means and standard
Demographic Characteristics of between the academic performance at deviations to present the
the respondents be described in implementation of Juan R. Liwag memorial description of teacher
terms of age, sex, educational special program in High School, the sole respondents regarding
attainment, position, years of sports and student- institution in the demographic variables,
teaching, sports being coached, athlete’s academic Division of Gapan that extent of
area of sport specialization, awards performance as caters such sports implementation of
received in sports and seminars perceived by the specialization for Special program in
Educ 202 . Advanced Statistics Output

attended? respondents. secondary school Sports as well as


2.How may the implementation of students. students’ performance
Special Program in Sports as through their outputs in
perceived by respondents be their academic
described in terms of planned performance.
Curriculum for individual and
team sports, Admission policy to
the SPS program; Retention policy
to SPS program; Student support;
Sports facilities; Manpower
resources; and instructional
resources?
3. How may the student-athletes
academic performance be
described in terms of General
Weighted Average (GWA)?
4. Is there a significant correlation
between socio-demographic
characteristics of the respondents
and student-athletes’ academic
performance?
5. Is there a significant relationship
between adequate implementation
of Special Program in Sports and
Student-athletes’ academic
performance as perceived by the
respondents.
6. What specific
recommendation/suggestion may
be drawn to improve the
implementation of Special
program in Sports?
7 Kindergarten Teachers’ The researcher investigated the The following null The IPO model was SPSS services were Esperanza R. Yuson
Commitment Responsiveness commitment responsiveness of hypotheses were tested utilized for the research availed of for the
and Effective Facility: kindergarten teachers and at the .05 level: paradigm. The statistical treatment of
Implication to Educational correlated them with their effective 1. Commitment descriptive method of data. Statistical tools
Management facility and other variables. responsiveness is not research was employed employed were the
Educ 202 . Advanced Statistics Output

Specifically, the study was significantly related to with checklist as the weighted mean,
designed to arrive valuable data effective facility. main tool to gather data. Kendall’s tau-b, Pearson
and information to the following: 2.Kindergarten teachers Interviews and r, and Kramer’s v.
1.Kindergrten teachers’ across age, number of observations were
commitment responsiveness years in teaching and utilized to validate
2. The effective facility of the occupational rank do findings. Descriptive
kindergarten teachers. not differ in research is “fact-finding”
3. The relationship between commitment or “information
kindergarten teachers’ responsiveness and gathering” with
commitment responsiveness and effective facility analytical
their effective facility. interpretations. It is
4. Variance in commitment concerned with
responsiveness and effective conditions or
facility of kindergarten teachers relationships that exist;
when group across age, practices that prevail;
occupational rank, and number of beliefs and processes
years in teaching. that are going on; effects
5. Implications of the findings to that are being felt or
educational management. trends that are
developing.
8
9
10

II. Reflect and answer the following questions:


1. Where did you find the researches you had enumerated above? What are the challenges you had encountered in looking/searching for these?
Seek assistance from a librarian, a professor and someone else in DepEd Gapan who finished their Masteral Degrees. It’s a big challenge for me especially in
approaching some of the researchers before I completed the enumerated above. First I got a rejection that nobody wanted to share their work. I need to persevere. I need
to make contacts to other researchers who will help you gain access that agreed to publish their work, so I used what are called snowball, sampling techniques-targeting a
particular group locating within social network and then asking them to recommend others who might be willing to share some data in their approved masteral thesis that
I need.

2. What did you notice between the research design and statistical tool utilized? How are they related?

I have two distinct research categories that I notice quantitative and qualitative methods of research. I found quantitative research that deals with numerical data which is
collected via assessment, analyzed using statistical method for comparison of experimental groups and inferences and qualitative research that takes the shape of observation and
Educ 202 . Advanced Statistics Output

interviews. These categories fall under descriptive research design aims to describe a phenomenon in terms of frequencies, categories and comparison. It relies on asking
participants questions pertaining to this research topic. Surveys or questionnaires (Likert frequency, pair comparison, and checklist). Observations in the collection of numerical
data (i.e. how many, what date, age gender, weight etc.)In analyzing statistical tool, descriptive statistics is used to confine to the frequency count, percentage distribution and
weighted mean. I also notice a comparison research design utilized in that research/s sometimes referred to as correlational research which aims to define the statistical
relationship between two or more constructs variables. The methods use in this research/s is same as the method use in descriptive but different in analyses used in statistical
tool. The correlation used there is calculating the relationship between variables. Phi Kramer’s V, Pearson r, Spearman‘s rank and Kendall’s tau rank is the most widely used in
this correlation and the analysis of variance [ANOVA] employing Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.

The overall study enumerated above is descriptive research appropriate to the descriptive tools used for the statistical treatment of data such as mean to describe score. It
explains as to what statistical test should be used depending upon type of independent and dependent variables. The researchers apply a descriptive analysis by presenting:
frequencies, mean and standard deviation of the question then the total mean of each theme.
3. Give at least three (3) importance of Statistics in research.
1. Statistics play a vital role in researches. For example statistics can used as in data collection, analysis, interpretation, explanation and presentation. Use of statistics
will guide researchers in research for proper characterization, summarization, presentation and interpretation of the result of research.
2. Statistics allows you to understand a subject much more deeply. It provides a platform for research as to; How to go about your research, either to consider a sample
or the whole population, the techniques to use in data collection and observation, how to go about the data description.
3. Statistical methods and analyses are often used to communicate research findings and to support hypotheses and give credibility to research methodology and
conclusions.
4. Statistics is very important when it comes to the conclusion of the research. In this aspect the major purposes of statistics are to help us understand and describe
phenomena in our world and to help us draw reliable conclusions about those phenomena.

Submitted by: __________________________________________________


Block : _______________________
Final Permit No. : ________________________

You might also like