Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Conclusions
In a statically determinate beam, prestressing the system creates no external loads/reactions, and no net
moments or shears, etc. However, stresses in the material are induced by prestressing and deflections
can occur.
So far we have only looked at tendons anchored at the centroid of the section (at the center of gravity) at
the ends of the beams.
Tendons at the c.g. create only compression (F/A) in the material. But what if the tendon is not at the
c.g.?
Let’s separate the tendon from the material and first look at the tendon only.
A straight tendon applies no vertical equivalent loads in the span of the beam.
This can be thought of as an eccentrically loaded column sideways. The “P-Delta” moment is Fe at all
points in the section. In this particular case the moment is constant along the length of the beam since
“e” is constant. In this case, the “equivalent” loads, or “applied loads” to the “material only” which will
create the same moment and axial load are a moment at each end and an axial load at the c.g.
These are the only “applied” loads that will create a constant moment and constant compression. The
“material only” moment diagram, drawn to the tension side, looks like this:
Let’s look at the stresses in the material (compression is negative, and tension is positive). In this
example the beam is in tension at the top.
M F
f (anywhere) =
S A
M F
f (anywhere) =
S A
Always keep in mind what we are doing when we talk about equivalent loads. We are taking the tendon
out of the system and replacing it with “equivalent” applied loads which create the same moment, axial
load and stresses in the material. In a statically determinate member this equivalent moment anywhere in
the material will always be “F” (the force in the tendon group) multiplied by “e” (the distance between
the material centroid and the center of gravity of the tendon group).
Now let’s look at more complicated tendon arrangements.
Consider the following weightless beam:
The beam above has no tendon drape, “a”, but it does have eccentricity, “e” at every location in the
span. Therefore, there will be a primary moment at any location along the span, but no equivalent loads
within the span. In this case the equivalent loads that create the primary moments in span must be
concentrated moments at the ends, equal to Fe at each end.
34 Post-Tensioned Concrete - Principles and Practice
Let’s take the tendon out of the system and set it aside. Then we will concentrate on the “material only”
with the tendon replaced with the equivalent loads that it imparts on the material.
Where;
e
4Fa 4F 2 2Fe
P = = =
L L L
& M = Fe
Or, we can get the same answer for Pequiv by looking at the tendon components;
e 0 2Fe
P =F +F =
L L L
2 2
Remember, in a statically determinate system the “material only” moment diagram due to the equivalent
loads is equal at every point to Fe. Therefore we can find the equivalent moment diagram without doing
a static analysis as follows:
Now we will verify this by applying the equivalent loads individually, finding the individual static
moment diagrams and superimposing them.
K. Dirk Bondy & Bryan Allred 35
L
M =P
4
2Fe L
=
L 4
= Fe /2
Now apply Mequiv at the beam end and determine the moment diagram.
M = Fe
Now superimpose these individual moment diagrams determined from the equivalent loads to get the
same moment diagram determined by simply multiplying F times e.
We will finish this topic by looking at equivalent loads on cantilevers. Let’s start with a cantilevered
beam with a parabolic tendon profile. We’ve already established that a parabolic tendon profile results in
a uniform equivalent load.
36 Post-Tensioned Concrete - Principles and Practice
From before:
(2L)
Fa = w
8
4w L
=
8
w L
=
2
2Fa
w =
L
w L
M = (from statics)
2
w L
Fe =
2
2Fe
w = , and since e = a in this case
L
2Fa
w =
L
K. Dirk Bondy & Bryan Allred 37
Determine the equivalent loads acting on the concrete using the components of the tendon profile:
e
P = F( )
L
M =P L
Fe = P L
Fe
P =
L
38 Post-Tensioned Concrete - Principles and Practice
Find: Maximum stress at the top and bottom of the member using the “Material Only” (equivalent
load) method.
Solution:
Find the equivalent load that the tendons exert on the material.
Notice that this beam with a 15 kip point load at midspan and a 40 ft length is completely in
compression, top and bottom because of the prestressing.
The following is a free-body diagram cut through the previous example (without the 15 kip external load
for simplicity) to demonstrate that, of course, statics also applies to a post-tensioned concrete member.
40 Post-Tensioned Concrete - Principles and Practice
Concrete Only
F
= 0.250 ksi
A
M 1,320 in kips
= = 0.550 ksi
S 2400 in
Steel Only
Since there are no external loads, there are no net forces or moments.
K. Dirk Bondy & Bryan Allred 41
Beam Properties:
A = 1296 in2
Yt = 12.75 in
Yb = 29.25 in
St = 16,139 in3
Sb = 7,035 in3
Find: Maximum stress at the top and bottom of the beam using the:
Assume that the maximum top and bottom stress will occur in the first 40 feet of the beam measured
from the left support and cut a free-body diagram (FBD) in that zone. To satisfy statics, the centroid of
the compressive stresses must coincide with the centroid of the tension in the prestressing tendons.
Move the compression force, C, up to the center of gravity of the section and add a moment that
statically compensates for this shift (equal to the tendon force multiplied by the eccentricity) to maintain
equilibrium. This allows us to numerically separate the uniform axial load stresses from the bending
stresses so that we may independently analyze each.
Set up an equation for the flexural stress in the concrete at the bottom of the beam, f b. Units are in
inches and kips (but not shown). Compressive stresses are negative and tensile stresses are positive.
F M F e
f = +
A S S
450 M F e
= +
1296 7035 7035
M (F e)
= 0.347 +
7035
& (F*e) = 450e
The maximum bottom tensile stress occurs when the term (M TL – 450e) is maximized.
K. Dirk Bondy & Bryan Allred 43
The derivative of this equation set to zero will yield the point x where the original function is a
maximum (where the slope of the equation is zero).
d
(47.73x 0.0875x ) = 47.73 0.175x
dx
M = 71.4(272.7) 0.0875(272.7)
= 12,964 in kips
e = 0.0526(272.7 in)
= 14.34 in
M 450e
∴f = 0.347 ksi +
7,035 in
(12,964 in kips) 450 (14.34 in)
= 0.347 ksi +
7,035 in
= 0.347 ksi + 0.926 ksi
= .
And the stress in the concrete at the top of the beam is,
F M 450e
f =
A S
[(12,964 in kips) (450 kips)(14.34 in)]
= 0.347ksi
16,139 in
= 0.347 ksi 0.403 ksi
= .
44 Post-Tensioned Concrete - Principles and Practice
Though it is somewhat obvious in this particular case, we do not always know with certainty which
section of the beam will contain the maximum stresses. To be absolutely certain in this example we
would need to set up a second equation for the section between 40 ft and 68 ft and solve for the stresses
in the same way. We will not do that here, but it is important to understand that when the FBD method
is used it may be necessary to analyze multiple sections of the beam span.
Determine the equivalent point load acting on the “concrete only” beam.
25.25 in 25.25 in
P = (450 kips) + = 57.49 kips
480 in 336 in
Draw the loading on the “concrete only” beam. Only vertical equivalent loads within the span are
shown, though vertical equivalent loads at the supports and axial compression loads also exist on the
“concrete only” beam.
M F
f =
S A
(542.9 ft kips)(12 in/ft) 450 kips
=
7,035 in 1,296 in
= 0.926 ksi 0.347 ksi = .
M F
f =
S A
(542.9 ft kips)(12 in/ft) 450 kips
=
16,139 in 1,296 in
= 0.403 ksi 0.347 ksi = .
The results using the Equivalent Load Method are identical to those found using the Free-Body Diagram
Method.
Conclusions
Observe that not only does the Equivalent Load Method require less calculations, we do know with
certainty exactly where the maximum flexural stresses occur using one single analysis. For most
engineers this method is also much more intuitive and consistent with how we analyze flexural members
in general.
Finally, keep in mind that this was a relatively simple statically determinate beam. We will demonstrate
later in the book that the equivalent load method is just as easily applied to statically indeterminate
(multi-span) systems. However, one can only imagine how many equations would need to be
established and solved using the FBD method in multi-span systems.
In the previous example our task was to determine the maximum flexural stresses and their location in a
determinate system. In that example we demonstrated that the most straight-forward approach was to
use the Equivalent Load Method. However, when considering stresses in discrete locations the
Equivalent Load Method may be the more cumbersome approach, particularly with a more complex
tendon profile.
The following example will reinforce the fact that there are no support reactions generated due to
prestressing in determinate systems, and will also demonstrate that sometimes it is beneficial to calculate
flexural stresses using “MTL – Fe” as the moment creating stresses instead of combining the applied
loads with the equivalent loads and generating a complete moment diagram.
46 Post-Tensioned Concrete - Principles and Practice
Find:
1. Determine the reactions at Supports A & B using the applied loads only.
2. Determine the maximum flexural tensile stress in the concrete at Support B using the “MTL – Fe”
method.
3. Determine the maximum flexural tensile stress in the concrete at 31’-0” to the right of
Grid/Support A using the “MTL – Fe” method.
4. Determine all of the equivalent loads on the beam.
5. Create a net load “concrete only” diagram (applied loads and equivalent loads combined).
6. From the net load diagram found in 5), calculate the reactions and show that they are the same
as those found in 1).
7. Determine the maximum flexural tensile stress in the concrete at Support B using the net
“concrete only” diagram.
8. Determine the maximum flexural tensile stress in the concrete at 31’-0” to the right of
Grid/Support A using the net “concrete only” diagram.
K. Dirk Bondy & Bryan Allred 47
Solutions
2.0klf(18 ft)
M Fe = 0 = 324.0 ft kips
2
The maximum flexural tensile stress occurs at the top of the beam at Support B
(31 ft)
M = 96.26 kips(31 ft) 3.0klf(12 ft)(31 ft + 6 ft) 2.0klf = 691.1 ft kips
2
34 in - 9.5 in 12 in
M Fe = 691.1 k 350k = 326.5 ft kips
12
To determine the equivalent loads remove the tendon from the system and evaluate each tendon segment
individually. The equivalent loads on the concrete act in the opposite direction.
R = 99.74 kips
R = 0.772klf(12 ft) + 61.16 kips + 0.873klf(56 ft) + 28.69 kips + 2.0klf(24 ft) 99.74 kips
= 96.26 kips
These are the same reactions found in Part (1) as they must be, since applying prestressing to a statically
determinate beam/slab does not create any reactions. Therefore, the only reactions possible for the “Net
Concrete Only” loading are the reactions due to the applied loads. Another way to do this would have
been to do the equivalent load analysis separately from the applied load analysis and superimpose them.
In the equivalent load analysis there would be no reactions.
(18 ft)
M = 2.0klf = 324.0 ft kips
2
(324.0 ft kips)(12 in/ft) 350 kips
f = = 0.045 ksi
10,964 in 1132in
(31 ft)
M = (96.26 kips 61.14 kips)(31 ft) 0.772klf(12 ft)(31 ft + 6 ft) 0.874klf
2
= 326.0 ft kips
So far we’ve only looked at simply supported beams. However, the true power of post-tensioned
concrete is only realized fully by studying indeterminate, multi-span systems where the tendon drapes
can be maximized. This is the only way to truly appreciate and understand all aspects of post-tensioned
concrete. But before we dive into multi-span systems it’s very important that we have a solid
understanding of the analysis of indeterminate structures. For this book moment distribution by hand
will be the analysis technique of choice. It’s a terrific visual tool that unfortunately is not always taught
in schools anymore. The following text is intended to be a refresher for those who have, at one time,
been exposed to the analysis. Those who have never learned moment distribution would be advised to
consult a traditional structural analysis textbook first.
Moment Distribution
The following discussion applies only to prismatic members (constant E & I throughout the length of the
member). Later in the book we will discuss moment distribution with non-prismatic members.
51
52 Post-Tensioned Concrete - Principles and Practice
Fixed-End Moments
Again, the following applies to prismatic members only. Fixed-end moments can be derived for any
loading condition, but for purposes of this book we will restrict the loading to uniform line loads.
wL wL
12 12
Distribution Factors
The distribution factor to a member framing into a joint is the stiffness, K, of that member divided by
the sum of the stiffnesses of all the members framing into that joint (ΣKJoint).
/
DFBA = = = 0.4615
/ /
/
DFCB = = = 0.625
/ /
wL 3.0klf(28 ft)
= = 196 ft kips
12 12
Span B-C
wL 2.0klf(32 ft)
= = 170.67 ft kips
12 12
Span C-D
wL 1.0klf(40 ft)
= = 133.33 ft kips
12 12
54 Post-Tensioned Concrete - Principles and Practice
Now release both joints A & D, but keep B & C locked. Mathematically we are adding -196 ft-kips to
Joint A, and 133.33 ft-kips to Joint D.
The mathematical addition of the moments at Joints A & D to put them in equilibrium affect the far end
of the beams, and this is reflected by the carry-over moments to Joints B & C.
K. Dirk Bondy & Bryan Allred 55
Joints B & C are not in equilibrium since the moments on each side are not equal. Let’s focus on Joint B
first, which in its locked condition has 294 ft-kips trying to rotate it counter-clockwise, and 170.67 ft-
kips trying to rotate it clockwise. Intuition should tell you that when it’s released the joint will need to
rotate counter-clockwise to achieve equilibrium.
Let’s release Joint B. Mathematically the joint is out of balance by the difference between the two fixed
end moments, which is -123.33 ft-kips at this joint (-196 – 98 + 170.67 = -123 ft-kips). To bring the
joint to equilibrium we need to add 123.33 ft-kips, and distribute this to each side of the joint based upon
the relative stiffness of the beams framing into the joint. The left side of the joint will receive
0.4615(123.33 ft-kips) = 56.92 ft-kips and the right side will take the remaining 66.41 ft-kips.
Now that Joint B is in equilibrium we will re-lock it against further rotation and we will move over to
Joint C. Joint C is currently out of equilibrium by 62.54 ft-kips (-170.67 + 33.21 + 133.33 + 66.67 =
62.54 ft-kips). Now we will release Joint C (mathematically “adding” -62.54 ft-kips to it) to put it in
equilibrium. Based upon the relative beam stiffnesses, the left side receives -39.09 ft-kips and the right
side -23.45 ft-kips. However, remember that each time we put a joint in equilibrium by adding moment
to a beam end we affect the far end of the beam by the carry-over effect. Joint B is now affected by -
19.55 ft-kips.
56 Post-Tensioned Concrete - Principles and Practice
This process of moment distribution continues until the unbalanced moments become so small that they
are insignificant. The complete moment distribution for this example is as follows:
In the previous example we took advantage of the fact that the supports at Joints A & D were pinned,
and this resulted in a relatively quick convergence of the moment distribution. This makes for a good,
relatively quick example, but in most actual analyses there are no completely pinned supports in cast-in-
place concrete. The next example will be the same problem, but we will treat the end joints the same as
K. Dirk Bondy & Bryan Allred 57
the interior joints. This will get us closer to what we’ll be doing later in the book when we integrate
columns at all the joints, and it will also demonstrate that it is not necessary to use a rotational stiffness
of 3EI/L when the far end is pinned.
/
DFBA = = = 0.533
/ /
/
DFCB = = = 0.556
/ /
Carry-Over Factors
Since we are treating all the joints as a “far end fixed” system with prismatic beams, the carry-over
factor will be 0.50 for all cases. The next page shows the complete moment distribution for this analysis.
58 Post-Tensioned Concrete - Principles and Practice
This is the same answer as before. It just takes a few more iterations when we don’t take advantage of
the fact that the stiffness, K, to a pinned support is 3EI/L.
. ( )
Cantilever Moment = = = 50 ft-kips
Cantilevers are statically determinate and therefore their moments will not be affected by the moment
distribution. However, the cantilever moment does, of course, affect the moment distribution.
According to the right-hand rule, the moment is placed as a positive moment to the right of Support D.
We will use the distribution factors associated with the “far-end pinned” assumption as we did in the
first part of Example #1.
K. Dirk Bondy & Bryan Allred 59
The addition of the cantilever will decrease the positive moment in Span C-D, and also decreases the
negative moment at Support C. Cantilevers will often have a very beneficial effect on prestressed
concrete members and the benefit often comes at no added cost.