Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Happiness is something that everybody pursues. Accordingly, the importance of happiness
to be part of economic development measurement arises lately. This paper analyzes factors that
may determine the people’s happiness in Indonesia. Using Ordered Probit Regression model
towards Indonesia Family Life Survey-4 (IFLS-4) published by RAND, it is found that income
is not the only factor that correlated with happiness, but as well as several demographic
Introduction
Everybody wants to be happy and keep being happier all the time Indeed, to be happy,
everybody tries to hold the key of happiness. Happiness is also regarded as one factor in
pursuing the ultimate goal of life1. The importance of happiness measurement also arises lately.
In 2012, a high level meeting of United Nations was held to discuss about: “Happiness and
Well-Being: Defining a New Economic Paradigm” chaired by the Prime Minister of Bhutan,
which is the first country to use gross national happiness as their main development indicator
instead of gross domestic product. A year after, World Bank published annual world happiness
every human being, and can also be a measure of social progress. America’s
founding fathers declared the inalienable right to pursue happiness. Yet are
1
http://www.lifecoachexpert.co.uk/whyishappinesssoimportant.html
In the view of economics, happiness can be viewed as utility level. Theoretically, utility
level increases as individual consumes more goods and services. Hence, improvement of
income which expands the individual’s budget constraints increases the utility level of
On the other hand, measuring happiness is found not as compelling as other measurements in
economics (e. g. income, expenses, education). Until recently there are only few researches
cardinality in the measurement and comparing the level of utility among individuals.
Mullainathan (2001) finds this may happen because people may do something different from
what they say or even people may not understand what they are saying.
However, Konow and Earley (2008) find substantial measures of happiness hold objective
meanings by measuring the physical responses such as heart rate and blood pressure to
considerable intrapersonal stability and interpersonal comparability are relevant for most
The fact that happiness can be related with the income level through the utility level makes
development economists need to pay more attention to happiness. Ng (2003) stated that
disregarding the happiness would result in an overemphasis on preference that can be satisfied
2
World Happiness Report 2013
(Oswald, 1997) finds that income which slightly higher than minimum level generates little
additional happiness, thus extra income does really matter (Di Tella et al., 2003).
This paper tries to find factors that may determine the happiness in Indonesia. As one of
many developing countries, Indonesia is a country that becomes great interests by many
researchers around the world. Indonesia is a good example of economic development as its
economic growth is rapid and sustain. After facing the great depression, monetary crisis and
political chaos in 1998, Indonesia rose and kept its positive growth rate since 1999 until 2013.
Indonesia is also one of few countries that survived the global financial crisis in 2008.
-10
-13.13
-15
Although it is shown that Indonesia has positive economic growth. One question still
remains: given the positive trends, are Indonesians people happy? What factors determine the
happiness?
Literature Review
The importance of happiness starts arising with the demonstration by Easterlin (1995) which
shows increases in income over time are not followed by increasing of happiness. However,
(Oswald, 1997) finds that there is bit additional happiness generated by income that slightly
higher than minimum level. Before then, only few economics researches try to explain factors
that may determine the happiness of individual. One of the first empirical studies about
although there is a paradox found in Japan where drastic increasing of real income was not
followed by increasing of happiness, people tend to be happier when they think they have better
living than others. However, when people achieve higher status, they will adapt quickly and
set higher aim. Thus, he concludes that what matters to the happiness is relative income
As interest of happiness increases all the time, more variables are considered. Demographic
variables are such variables that considered to determine the level of happiness. Louis and Zhao
(2002), Clark and Oswald (1994), and Alesina et al. (2004) tries to measure the happiness
across gender. The latter finds that women tend to be happier than man while the other finds
there is no happiness difference for both gender. However, Clark (2003) finds the opposite
Several empirical findings suggest that married people are tend to be happier than those who
are never married (Helliwell, 2003; Blanchflower and Oswald, 2004a). However, there might
be causality where happier people are more likely to be married (Lucas, 2005). Unfortunately,
there is no data that record the decision of people to get married in Indonesia. Thus, without
losing the generality, this paper measures the level of happiness of married people and also
people who are divorced, separated, and widowed compared to the people who are never
married (single).
In several countries that have more than ethnicity, it is worth to compare the level of
happiness toward different ethnic. Thoits and Hewitt (2001) estimate that being whites in
United States are tend to be happier than blacks. Sohn (2013) finds that being majority in
Indonesia (Javanese) have no effect on happiness. In order to measure more particular results,
this paper accommodates more than one ethnicity to be compared with Javanese. However,
put each ethnicity in closest category. Hence, this measures the happiness of Sumatrans
(consists of Aceh, Batak, Minang, Palembang, etc), Borneo (consists of Banjar, Dayak, etc),
Sulawesi and Ambon (consists Toraja, Manado, Ambon, etc), Bali and Lombok (consists of
Bali, Sumbawa, Lombok, etc) and compared to Javanese (consists of Javanese, Sundanese,
Betawi, etc).
Blanchflower and Oswald (2004b) finds that there is positive relationship between
happiness and education level. They conclude that people with higher education level tends to
be happier. However, in Switzerland, middle level of education correlates with the highest level
of happiness (Stutzer, 2004). In developing countries which have low-income, it is found that
education and happiness have strong relationship (Ferrer-i-Carbonell, 2005). This paper also
background.
Easterlin (2001) suggests that relative income standing is related to the level of happiness.
Thus, this paper tries to measure the correlation of happiness with respondent’s income. In
addition, to accommodate the suggestion of Easterlin (2001), this paper also tries to measure
Model
This paper analyzes happiness of Indonesian people using Indonesia Family Life Survey-4
(IFLS-4)3 dataset published in 2007. In the survey, relating to the happiness, respondent was
asked: “Taken all things together how would you say things are these days - would you say
you were very happy, happy, unhappy or very unhappy?”. In this paper, very unhappy is
assigned −2, unhappy is assigned −1, happy is assigned 1, and very happy is assigned 2.
3
Can be accessed in https://www.rand.org/labor/FLS/IFLS/ifls4.html
response’s values is not necessarily the same. Regarding these characteristics, this paper uses
As y%∗ is unobservable, instead of measuring its value, this model observes a censored
outcome: 0 if y%∗ ≤ 0
1 if 0 < y%∗ ≤ 34
5. = 2 if 34 < y%∗ ≤ 36
⋮
J if 3894 ≤ y%∗
This model normalizes the mean and variance of : to zero and one by assuming that - is
normally distributed (-~< (0,1)). Hence, the probabilities of outcomes 0,1, . . . , J are:
Prob 5 = 0 @A = Φ (−( )* +)
Prob 5 = 1 @A = Φ 34 − ( )* + − Φ (−( )* +)
Prob 5 = 2 @A = Φ 36 − ( )* + − Φ 34 − ( )* +
⋮
Prob 5 = C @A = 1 − Φ 3894 − ( )* +
Thus, for all the probabilities to be positive, we need the thresholds 3 satisfy:
Source: Greene, W.H. (2012) Econometric Analysis. Pearson: Westford. Chapter 18.
The implications of the structure is as shown in Figure 2. The partial effects of the regressors
x on the probabilities are not equal to the coefficient. In this paper, we have 4 categories of
responses. The model thus has only one unknown threshold parameter. The four probabilities
are:
Prob 5 = 1 @ = Φ 36 − @* + − Φ 34 − @* + (4)
Prob 5 = 2 @ = 1 − Φ 3E − @* + (5)
For the four probabilities, the partial effects of changes in the regressors are:
FGHIJ 5 = −2 @
= −∅(@* L)L (6)
F@
FGHIJ 5 = −1 @
= ∅(−@* L − ∅ 34 − @* L L (7)
F@
FGHIJ 5 =1@
= ∅ 34 − @* L − ∅ 36 − @* L L (8)
F@
FGHIJ 5 =2@
= ∅ 3 − @* L L (9)
F@
happiness = age + dVWXYZW + dXYHH%W[ + \]^_`.a.^b + \_.c_]d^]efag^.h` + :ijklkmn + k:o inn:on + -. (10)
Results
Descriptive Statistics
As previously discussed, this paper uses IFLS-4 dataset collected from more than 29,000
Table 1, there are 29,055 individuals responded to the happiness question. The mean of the
happiness variable shows that more individuals stated they are happy rather than unhappy.
Furthermore, the variable of age shows that the average age of the respondents is approximately
36 years old, as the youngest respondent is 14 years old and the oldest is 100 years old.
Dummy variables show respondents’ demographic characteristic, hence the mean of each
dummy variable shows the tendency of characteristics. For instance, the mean of dummy
variables female shows that 52 percent of respondents are female while the other 48 percent
are male. Indeed, the sum of mean for each category is equal to 100 percent.
Interestingly, the descriptive statistics of monthly earnings show that in the time the data
was recorded, the average earnings of each individual is approximately £50.00 per month, as
the lowest earning is around 40 pence and the highest is paid for about £1,060.00 in a month.
Before starting with the parametric analysis using Ordered Probit Regression, it can be seen
that there is no variable that either perfectly positive or inverse correlated to other variables
This paper analyzes factors that determine the level of happiness in two level, namely
individual level and household level. In individual level, factors that measured by using
Ordered Probit Regressions are demographic variables and earnings of individuals. While total
net asset will be the only variable that is measured to the level of happiness. At the end of this
section, marginal effects are discussed to measure the probability of measurements fall in to
The happiness level of Indonesian people is determined by several factors. It can be seen
that increasing of age significantly bring less happiness to Indonesian people. It means that as
4
The sample size for individual level is 9,263 individuals while the sample size for the household level is 10,445.
Standard errors clustered at the county level are in parentheses. * denotes a p-value<0.10; ** p-value <0.05; ***
p-value <0.01.
calculation, as the age increases for one year, the people is significantly more probable to fall
in the unhappy threshold and has negative probability to fall in the very happy threshold (see
Women in Indonesia are also happier than their counterparts. It can be seen that female is
significantly happier compared to male. The probability of woman being unhappy and very
The probability of married respondents falls in to happy and very happy threshold also
significantly more likely than falls in to unhappy and very unhappy threshold. On the other
hand, divorced, separated and widowed respondent are significantly unhappier compared to the
single respondents. The marginal effect calculation of this variable also shows that this variable
has significant positive probability to fall in to unhappy and very unhappy threshold as it also
Compared to the Javanese, people who are Sumatrans and also Sulawesi and Ambonese
have different level of happiness. Sumatrans are unhappier than Javanese while on the other
hand Sulawesi and Ambonese are happier compared to Javanese. As the marginal effect
Educational background also matters for the happiness. Respondents that have higher
education than elementary school are significantly happier compared to those respondents who
only attended elementary school. This finding applies for respondents who attended Junior
High School, Senior High School, and College and University level.
consumption. Hence, it brings higher utility level that eventually increase happiness. This
significantly happier. Indeed, more income means more happiness for Indonesian people.
Likewise, more assets also means more happiness for Indonesians. In household level, those
who have higher value of assets are significantly happier. Hence, for Indonesians wealth does
Conclusions
There are many things that may determine the level of Indonesian people. Demographic
variables are found matter with the level of happiness in Indonesia. Although they show
different level of correlation, age, gender, marital status, and ethnicity are variables that
empirically affect the happiness of Indonesians. Likewise and not surprisingly, level of income
However, this level of happiness may change all the time. A time series analysis or panel
data analysis are highly recommended to measure the change of individual’s happiness in a
certain time period. From this further analysis we can see the changes of happiness given
Bertrand, M and S Mullainathan (2001). Do people mean what they say? Implications for
Subjective Survey Data. American Economic Review, 91(2), 67–72.
Blanchflower, DG and AJ Oswald (2004a). Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study.
Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(3), 393–415.
Blanchflower, DG and AJ Oswald (2004b). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA.
Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1359–1386.
Clark, A and AJ Oswald (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public
Economics, 61(3), 359–381.
Clark, A (2003). Unemployment as a social norm: Psychological evidence from panel data.
Journal of Labor Economics, 21(2), 323–351.
Easterlin, RA (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical
evidence, in Moses Abramovitz, David, PA and MW Reder (eds.) Nations and Households in
Economic Growth: Essays, Academic Press: New York, pp. 98–125.
Easterlin, RA (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of
Economic Behavior and Organization, 27(1), 35–47.
Easterlin, RA (2001). Income and happiness: Toward a unified theory. Economic Journal,
111(473), 465–484.
Helliwell, JF (2003). How’s life? Combining individual and national variables to explain
subjective well-being. Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.
Konow, J and J Earley (2008). The hedonistic paradox: Is Homo Economicus happier? Journal
of Public Economics, 92(1–2), 1–33.
Lucas, RE, AE Clark, Y Georgellis and E Diener (2004). Unemployment alters the set point
for life satisfaction. Psychological Science, 15(1), 8–13.
Louis, VV and S Zhao (2002). Effects of family structure, family SES, and adulthood
experiences on life satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 23(8), 986–1005.
Stutzer, A (2004). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic
Behavior and Organization, 54(1), 89–109.
Thoits, PA and LN Hewitt (2001). Volunteering work and well-being. Journal of Health and
Social Behavior, 42(2), 115–131.
Web sites:
http://www.lifecoachexpert.co.uk/whyishappinesssoimportant.html
data.worldbank.org
https://www.rand.org/labor/FLS/IFLS/ifls4.html
sum
histogram monthly_earnings
histogram ln_earnings
histogram net_asset
histogram ln_net_asset