KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPI)

MUJ-TEC
(1st APRIL 2019 - 31st MARCH 2020)
Weight % of Target Performance
Sl. No. Parameter (16 KPIs)
(A) (B) (A x B) = C
I Faculty Engagement (10 KPIs) 0.7 92.5% 65%
II Resource Management (1 KPIs) 0.1 100.0% 10%
III Marketing & Branding (2 KPIs) 0.1 100.0% 10%
IV Policy and Process (3 KPIs) 0.1 67% 7%
Overall Performance = Average of all parameter’s performance in % 1 Sum of C in % 91.4%

Visual Comparision of Current year and Last year KPIs

20-21 19-20
100.0%
100%

100%
93%

62.2%
% of Achievement

67%
100%

50%
0.0%

0%
Faculty Engagement Resource Marketing & Policy and Process (3
(10 KPIs) Management (1 Branding (2 KPIs) KPIs)
KPIs)

Parameters
 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (KPI) KEY PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS (KPI)
MUJ-TEC 2021 *April-Dec,
(1st APRIL 2020 - 31st MARCH 2021) 2021)

Target Actuals % Target achieved Target

2020-21 2020-21 2020-21 2021
Sl. No Key Performance Indicators KPI No (April 01, 2020) (April 01, 2020) (April 01, 2020) (April 01, 2020)
to to to to
(March 31, 2021) (March 31, 2021) (March 31, 2021) (December 31, 2021)

I. Faculty Engagement [(0.7 Wt.) x (Percentage of Target achieved) = % Parameter Performance] 93%
1 Total number of faculty development programs organized KPI 1 10.00 15.00 100% 4
Overall percentage of teachers attending Faculty
2 KPI 2 60% 100% 100% 20%
Development Programs
Number of faculty development programs for pedagogy
3 KPI 3 2.00 3.00 100% 1
organized
Percentage of teachers attending Faculty Development
4 KPI 4 20% 100% 100% 17%
Programs for pedagogy
Number of faculty development programs for OBE
5 KPI 5 2.00 5.00 100% 1
organized
Percentage of teachers attending Faculty Development
6 KPI 6 10% 12% 100% 12%
Programs for OBE
Number of faculty development programs for personal
7 KPI 7 1.00 1.00 100% 1
effectiveness organized
Percentage of teachers attending Faculty Development
8 KPI 8 20% 13% 65% 17%
Programs for personal effectiveness
Number of faculty development programs for e-content
9 KPI 9 2.00 2.00 100% 1
development organized
Percentage of teachers attending Faculty Development
10 KPI 10 100% 60% 60% 20%
Programs for e-content development
II. Resource Management [(0.1 Wt.) x (Percentage of Target achieved) = % Parameter Performance] 100%
1 % of Opex utilized KPI 11 100% 100% 100% NA
III. Marketing & Branding [(0.1 Wt.) x (Percentage of Target achieved) = % Parameter Performance] 100%
Number of NIRF Ranking improvement initiatives
1 KPI 12 1.00 1.00 100% 1
implemented
2 Number of Accreditation activities completed on time KPI 13 100% 100% 100% ALL
IV. Policy and Process [(0.1 Wt.) x (Percentage of Target achieved) = % Parameter Performance] 67%
1 Have Defined Policies for conducting FDPs? (Yes or No) KPI-14 yes Yes 100% yes
Have Process map/Process for organising activities and
2 KPI-15 yes Yes 100% yes
shared with Dept. (Yes or No)
No of awareness program conducted for departments 1* [Process
3 KPI-16 2 0.00 0%
regarding processes. ownership]
ew Initiatives
New updates of MS
1 Faculty Development MS-0365 Tools.
team
2 Aligned to Vision & Mission of the University Yes Yes